Living On the Edge - Investment Portfolio 'Fails'
Without naming names, there have been some magnificent 'flame-outs' when it comes to portfolio managers that "didn't know what they didn't know" or in some cases, simply ignored investment discipline.
Over the last 40 years, we at AQS have witnessed:
Novices
A short-term portfolio invested in 10+ year callable agency securities betting that rates would remain low. They didn't. Prices dropped, losses accumulated. Personnel were 'reassigned'.
A long-term portfolio invested in 10+ year callable agency securities that backed life policies (long-term). Rates fell, bonds called, proceeds reinvested at lower (unprofitable) rates locking in losses for decades.
Overly conservative portfolios. High quality and short maturities seem a solid combination. Unless they are funding a specific liability. The hemorrhage is slow but the result is the same - failure. Risk should be managed, not avoided.
Smart Guys
Actually, really smart guys at Long Term Capital Management placed too much faith in the Black-Scholes pricing model which works great when volatility is limited. VOL kicked up, LTCM went down and almost took several primary dealers with them. The book, "When Genius Failed: The Rise and Fall of Long-Term Capital Management" chronicles this nicely.
The runup to the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) circa 2007-2009 produced a new asset class: the Residential Mortgage Backed Security (RMBS) and the Commercial Mortgage Backed Security (CMBS). So new was this asset class that regulators had not yet installed the guardrails that exist today. At the core of the entire structure was the assumption that the collateral supporting these deals would never default at a rate below 3%. But what if they did? "The Big Short" covers this top to bottom.
And Outright Fraud
We were contacted by a client a few years ago. A life and annuity company was dominating domestic annuity business with "above-market" rates. A cursory review of the portfolio showed a collection of securities (loans) to affiliate companies. Regulators saw this too. The indictment that followed read in part, "siphoning vast amounts of money from defendant's insurance companies for his personal use, then lying to regulators to hide their $2 billion scheme."
|