First, a bit of historical background: on December 16th, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved the Sonoma Developmental Center Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. The approved specific plan included 620 units of housing, with the expectation that density bonuses could see the total number of units end up slightly higher. Most recently, on February 16th, 2024, the developer submitted their proposal to Permit Sonoma, for a project including 920 units of housing, of which only 124 will be deed-restricted units. In a response letter sent on March 15th, 2024, Permit Sonoma, after reviewing the project proposal, deemed it incomplete. Their reasoning included disagreement as to how the number of affordable units is calculated as part of the density bonus, the placement of a hotel in the northwest corner of the campus along the wildlife corridor, the overreliance on single family detached dwellings, and underutilization of missing middle housing typologies.
As you might imagine, I have my own concerns, and I’m glad to see many of them reflected in the comments from Permit Sonoma. Given my own experience losing my home in the 2017 fires, and knowing that experience is shared amongst many Glen Ellen neighbors of the SDC, I remain very concerned about the plan’s lack of understanding of defensible space, as well as of how the increased number of units, beyond those approved in the approved SDC Specific Plan, will impact evacuation time in the case of future fires.
Now, the developer has time to respond. I remain hopeful that the developer will incorporate the comments shared by Permit Sonoma and keep the SDC Specific Plan, which our Board approved after receiving extensive community input over many years, front and center. On March 20th of this year, I cohosted a First District County Housing Update with Permit Sonoma, who provided an informational update on the county Housing Element, the General Plan, the Springs Specific Plan, and State Housing Law, and answered community questions. Among my takeaways from this meeting was the reminder of one final overarching concern I’ll share here which is that, because the SDC developer’s project preapplication was first submitted when the county did not have a certified Housing Element, they are only required to participate in five total public workshops or meetings as part of the project approval process. This includes meetings of the Board of Supervisors, the Planning Commission, and even First District advisory bodies, which would be meetings of the Sonoma Valley Community Advisory Council, the Springs Municipal Advisory Council, and the North Sonoma Valley Advisory Council. This was not the county’s decision, but rather a requirement under state law.
Five is not a large number of meeting opportunities to provide comment, and I want to make sure the public is aware and remains engaged throughout the approval process. I plan to keep you informed through my newsletter on upcoming meetings, when they are scheduled, and opportunities to provide comment. Please stay tuned.
|