|
Alabama
On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs challenging Alabama’s congressional redistricting map on the basis that it violated section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Arizona
There are several pending voting lawsuits in Arizona:
-
Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, and Arizona GOP sued Secretary of State Fontes for authorizing an illegal expansion of the database of signatures used to verify ballots, including the addition of potentially unreliable signatures. The state filed a motion to dismiss and intervenors filed motions to dismiss on May 22, 2023 with a consolidated response filed on June 16, and defendants' replies due on June 30.
-
Mi Familia Vota v. Hobbs (AKA Mi Familia Vota I):
- Filed in August 2021, challenging S.B. 1485, which removes voters from the permanent mail ballot list if a voter does not vote by mail in two straight election cycles; and S.B. 1003, which requires voters to “cure” signature-less ballots by 7PM on Election Day.
- The RNC and the NRSC are intervenor-defendants. The DCCC and DSCC also intervened as plaintiffs. DOJ filed a statement of interest in the case in November 2021.
- On June 24, 2022, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court (1) allowed plaintiffs to pursue their claim that S.B. 1485 was enacted with a discriminatory intent, and (2) dismissed the challenge to S.B. 1003 (curing) but granted plaintiffs’ leave to file an amended complaint which they ultimately opted not to do.
- The Court extended discovery through September 2023.
-
HB 2492 (Proof of Citizenship) Challenges:
- There are eight lawsuits challenging H.B. 2492 (and other legislation) that require proof of citizenship for registrants using the National Voter Registration Form:
- The eight lawsuits were consolidated. The RNC was granted intervention in consolidated the cases.
- The state’s motion to dismiss was denied on February 16, 2023.
-
The Arizona Speaker of the House of Representatives and Senate President motion to intervene as defendants was granted on April 26, 2023.
-
The RNC filed a motion for summary judgment on May 15, 2023, which was joined by the state legislator intervenors. Plaintiffs filed their responses and cross motions for summary judgment on June 5, 2023. Update: On July 5, the RNC filed a reply in support of partial summary judgment.
- S.B. 1260 Challenge (voter list and vote-by-mail list maintenance):
- Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans represented by Elias Group is challenging S.B. 1260, which requires a recorder to cancel a voter’s registration if they receive confirmation that the voter is registered in another county in the state, removes voters from the vote-by-mail list if they are registered in another county, and makes it a felony to forward a mail-in ballot to a voter registered out-of-state.
- The Yuma County Republican Party intervened in the litigation.
-
On September 26, 2022, the court entered a preliminary injunction on two provisions of the law which was quickly appealed to the 9th Circuit where it is currently being briefed.
- Attorney General Contest:
-
Attorney General candidate Abe Hamadeh and the RNC remain in a pending election contest. A motion for a new trial is pending. After the recount, Hamadeh’s deficit decreased to 280 votes. Top Republican legislators filed an amicus brief in support of Hamadeh. A hearing on the motion for new trial took place on May 16 and is pending a ruling.
Colorado
On December 5, 2022, a liberal group represented by Perkins Coie filed a lawsuit alleging signature matching disproportionately disenfranchises young people, people with disabilities, and people of color. On December 22, 2022 and February 6, 2023, plaintiffs filed a first and second amended complaint . On February 28, 2023, the Secretary of State filed a motion to dismiss which the court denied on April 17, 2023. On April 28, 2023, individuals supported by RITE, including RNC National Committeewoman Vera Ortegon, moved to intervene in the litigation. On May 31, 2023, the court granted the motion to intervene.
Florida
On April 27, 2023, the 11th Circuit ruled in favor of the state of Florida, RNC, and NRSC, in the challenge to SB90, Florida's 2021 election integrity legislation. The law was upheld in its entirety, except for one minor component of the line warming ban. The court also remanded back to the trial court the question of whether the drop-box and registration delivery provisions violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The district court had previously permanently enjoined multiple provisions of SB90 including the required registration disclaimers for third party voter registration organizations (§ 97.0575(3)(a)), registration delivery provisions for third party voter registration organizations (id.), drop box regulations (§§ 101.69(2)-(3)), and line warming provisions (§§ 102.031(4)(a)-(b)). On May 18, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing in front of the full 11th Circuit.
On March 16, the Elias Law Group filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging that Florida’s wet signature requirement for voter registration applications violates the materiality clause of the Civil Rights Act. On April 5, 2023, the RNC and Republican Party of Pasco County moved to intervene in the litigation. On May 26, 2023, the RNC's and Pasco GOP’s intervention was granted . On May 30, 2023, the State filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on June 12, adding Disability Rights Florida as a plaintiff. On June 26, 2023, the RNC and Republican Party of Pasco County filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint.
On April 26, 2023, the LWV and FL NAACP sued Florida's Secretary of State alleging that the state's voter registration application violates the NVRA, specifically by not specifying the eligibility requirements for voter registration. A hearing on the motion to dismiss was held last week.
Florida was hit with three separate suits following Gov. DeSantis signing SB 7050 into law:
-
Hispanic Federation v. Byrd and Florida NAACP v. Byrd have been consolidated.
- On May 25, 2023, the Hispanic Federation, Poder Latinx, and Florida residents sued Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and Secretary of State Cord Byrd over Senate Bill 7050 over its restrictions on third party registration organizations.
- On May 24, 2023, the League of Women Voters of Florida and League of Women Voters of Florida Education Fund sued Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and Secretary of State Cord Byrd over Senate Bill 7050 alleging the restrictions on third-party voter registration groups violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The law prohibits non-citizens and people with felony convictions from handling voter registration application, requires receipts to voters registering, and reduces the number of days for the third-parties to return the applications.
- On May 24, 2023, the Florida State Conference of Branches and Youth Units of the NAACP, Equal Ground Education Fund, Voters of Tomorrow, Disability Rights Florida, Alianza for Progress, Alianza Center, UnidosUS and Florida Alliance for Retired Americans sued Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and Secretary of State Cord Byrd over Senate Bill 7050. The plaintiffs challenge the imposition of fines, barring non-citizens and felons from registering voters, and retention of voter information for other activities.
- Emergency motions for preliminary injunction were filed on June 9, with the state's opposition coming on June 23, and plaintiffs' reply on June 26, 2023.
-
Update: On July 3, 2023, the district court (Judge Walker) entered a preliminary injunction on two parts of the law.
Georgia
In July 2021, the RNC, NRSC, NRCC, and GAGOP were granted intervention in 8 lawsuits, including the DOJ’s lawsuit against the state, challenging provisions of SB202. Six of the lawsuits were consolidated. Thanks to the RNC’s efforts, these safeguards were in place for the 2022 election and the state saw record turnout. The cases have mostly been consolidated and the various plaintiff groups are filing a series of preliminary injunction motions on different provisions of SB202:
-
The DOJ, joined by four other plaintiff groups, filed a preliminary injunction motion in the SB 202 cases. They move to enjoin Georgia from enforcing (1) the reduction in the number of dropboxes and limitations on the use of dropboxes outdoors and during non-early voting hours; (2) the line-warming prohibition; (3) the absentee ballot deadline; (4) the out-of-precinct provisional ballot deadline; and (5) the ID requirement for absentee ballot applications. They claim these provisions violate the Voting Rights Act and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Responses are due on July 27, 2023.
-
The AME plaintiffs moved to enjoin enforcement of (1) the felony provision for the handling of absentee ballots and (2) the requirements that dropboxes be located at an election office and accessible only during business hours. On June 29, the RNC filed a response to this preliminary injunction.
-
The NGP plaintiffs moved to enjoin enforcement of the line-warming restrictions. Responses from the state and RNC were filed on June 15, 2023. Plaintiffs’ reply was filed on June 29.
-
The CGG Plaintiffs moved to enjoin enforcement of the birthdate requirement for absentee ballots. Responses from the RNC and state were filed on June 22, 2023.
-
The State filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, requesting that the court dismiss DOJ’s complaint. The State argues that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in League of Women Voters clarified that proof of discriminatory impact is necessary to establish a VRA violation, which DOJ does not allege.
In CGG v. Raffensperger, one of the unconsolidated cases, plaintiffs filed a proposed amended complaint that drops the challenge to the voter ID law for absentee ballots and the narrowing of the absentee ballot deadline; it also added a claim banning the early release of absentee vote totals. Motions for summary judgment are due in July.
In Vote America v. Raffensperger, another unconsolidated SB202 suit, plaintiff Voter Participation Center and defendants Raffensperger and RNC have stipulated to a dismissal of their claim challenging the third-party absentee ballot application disclaimer in light of recent legislation changes. Earlier, Vote America, another plaintiff in the suit, who challenged SB202 provisions banning the pre-filling of absentee ballot applications and the disclosure requirement voluntarily dismissed its suit. After litigating the case for well over a year the plaintiff concluded its practices did not violate SB 202. There is a pending motion for summary judgment in the suit, which has been fully briefed since the end of February 2023.
On May 2, 2022, a group of liberal organizations sued Georgia’s Election Board challenging a state law that requires handwritten signatures on absentee ballot applications. The groups seek declaratory and injunctive relief, requesting the court find that the so-called Pen and Ink rule violates the Civil Rights Act and to enjoin its enforcement. The RNC and GAGOP have intervened in the litigation. On March 9, 2023, the court denied defendants' motion to dismiss.
Iowa
The RNC, Iowa GOP, NRCC, and NRSC were granted intervention to defend against a lawsuit challenging provisions of SF413 and SF568 . The trial set for March 21, 2022, was pushed back in light of discovery disputes between the Iowa legislature and plaintiffs. On March 16, 2022, the Iowa Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve these discovery disputes. After a hearing over the ongoing discovery disputes on July 15, 2022, the court issued an order compelling discovery on August 18, 2022.
Kansas
On March 17, 2023, the Kansas Court of Appeals ruled that challenges to voting laws under the state constitution be evaluated under strict scrutiny instead of the more flexible Anderson-Burdick standard utilized in federal claims and in many states. On April 5, 2023, the state filed its petition for review with the Kansas Supreme Court. The Kansas Supreme Court granted the cert petition on June 23, 2023.
On May 4, 2023, a Kansas federal district court ruled that the state’s restrictions on out-of-state organizations providing pre-filled absentee applications violated federal law. The state filed its notice of appeal on June 1, 2023.
Montana
RITE filed an amicus brief with the state Supreme Court in support of the state in Montana Democratic Party v. Jacobsen, involving challenges to several commonsense voting integrity reforms. Lawyers Democracy Fund also filed an amicus brief in the case. Update: Appellees filed their briefs on June 30, 2023.
Michigan
On September 30, 2022, the RNC and MI GOP sued Secretary of State Benson after she issued last-minute guidance on election challengers. Plaintiffs allege the guidance is inconsistent with state law and previous guidance and request the court to reinstate the 2020 challenger procedures. On November 3, 2022, the MI Supreme Court stayed the lower court’s decision. The case remains open at the MI Court of Appeals where the state has appealed the trial court’s preliminary injunction order. The state filed their opening brief on February 24, 2023. On May 26, 2023, the RNC and MIGOP filed their reply brief . On June 29, 2023, the RNC and MI GOP filed opposition to LWV’s motion for leave to file an amicus for going beyond the scope of the case and not addressing pertinent issues.
On March 13, 2023, the RNC and MIGOP filed their appellate brief in a suit challenging Flint’s refusal to hire an equal number of Republican and Democrat election inspectors. The lower court had ruled the parties did not have standing to bring the claim. The state filed its opening brief on May 15, 2023. The RNC filed a reply brief on June 19, 2023.
New Hampshire
In June 2022, Democrats filed two cases challenging SB 418 in NH which would require voters registering on Election Day who do not provide acceptable ID to vote an “affidavit ballot” and mail in proof of their identity within seven days if they did not have documentation at the polling place. On September 1, 2022, the NH Republican State Committee motioned to intervene which was denied on December 21, 2022 and the NHRSC appealed to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, which granted cert. Since then the parties have agreed to a stipulation to permit the NHRSC to intervene in the litigation. On June 26, 2023, the superior court issued an order seeking clarification from the parties on which classes of voters are subject to the new law.
New York
In January 2022, the RNC and NYGOP, leading a broad bipartisan coalition of officeholders and concerned citizens, including Congresswoman Malliotakis and naturalized citizen voters, sued Mayor Eric Adams, the New York City Council, and the New York City Board of Elections in state court over the “Non-Citizen Voting Law,” which illegally allows non-citizens to vote in city elections. On June 27, 2022, Judge Porzio struck down the Non-Citizen Voting Law, explaining in his opinion that it violates the New York Constitution, New York election law, and the Municipal Home Rule Law. Appellees filed their appellate brief on October 10, 2022. On December 11, 2022, RNC filed its opening brief. The city and intervenors filed reply briefs on January 9, 2023. Oral argument on the appeal took place on June 23, 2023.
North Carolina
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Moore v. Harper that the federal elections clause in Article I of the Constitution does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules for federal elections. The ruling did not disturb the North Carolina Supreme Court’s recent reconsideration of the legislature’s congressional districting plans for compliance with North Carolina law.
State sued in federal court by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice over NC’s felony disenfranchisement.
Ohio
On January 6th, 2023, Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, Ohio Federation of Teachers, Ohio Alliance for Retired Americans, and Union Veterans Council represented by Elias Group sued the Ohio Secretary of State challenging Ohio’s new election integrity bill H.B. 458. The lawsuit challenges the in-person voter ID requirements, deadlines for ballot curing, and provisions regarding applications for and returning mail ballots. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on January 27, 2023. Ohio Republican Party and two citizen poll workers supported by RITE moved to intervene in the litigation. On April 18, 2023, Ohio Republican Party and the two citizen poll workers were granted intervention.
In a 4-3 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that state lawmakers can proceed with an August election for voters to decide whether it should be harder to amend the constitution. The court also rejected a separate challenge. If approved, the measure would require 60 percent of voters to enact new constitutional amendments instead of a simple majority.
Pennsylvania
On June 20, 2023, the Delaware County Republican Party and its chairman, Frank Agovino, sued Delaware County and the County Council over a passed ordinance that would allow the Democrats to veto Republican nominees for minority member on the county board of elections. The RNC and NRSC are supporting the county party in the litigation. The county’s response is due August 16, 2023.
Following the RNC’s win in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that ballots must be signed and dated as required by state law, the NAACP and John Fetterman filed two separate lawsuits in federal court. The RNC, NRCC, and PAGOP were granted intervention in the case and filed a motion to dismiss both cases. The NAACP amended its complaint with an Equal Protection claim comparing the requirements under the state statute and federal UOCAVA requirements. On January 17, 2023, the RNC filed a motion to dismiss in NAACP. On February 17, 2023, the RNC filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in Eakin. On June 8, 2023, the court denied the motions to dismiss in both cases.
The RNC filed motions in support of summary judgment in both NAACP and Eakin . Both RITE and Lawyers Democracy Fund filed amicus briefs in support of summary judgment against the plaintiffs.
On March 28, 2023, two voters supported by Lawyers Democracy Fund brought a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania alleging a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendment right to vote and due process in Luzerne County. The claims arise from the 2022 midterm election when Luzerne County failed to supply enough ballot paper on Election Day.
The ACLU of PA sued Delaware County for rejecting provisional ballots for voters whose mail ballots were previously rejected under state law.
Texas
The DOJ sued the State of Texas and the Secretary of State, challenging provisions of SB1, Texas’ 2021 voting integrity legislation. The DOJ claims SB1 violates Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act and Section 101 of the Civil Rights Act. The RNC, NRCC, NRSC, and Dallas and Harris County Republican Parties initial moved to intervene in the suits was denied. The party committees appealed and the 5th Circuit reversed and ruled that the Republican committees were entitled to intervention as of right. On May 24, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. On May 31, 2022, the court granted the parties’ unopposed motion to stay pending appeal. On July 12, 2022, the court granted in part and denied in part defendant’s motion to dismiss, allowing only the claims brought by LULAC Texas, Voto Latino, the Texas Alliance for Retired Americans, and Texas AFT against the Secretary of State and Attorney General to proceed. On August 2, 2022, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, further limiting the claims allowed to proceed. Two interlocutory appeals as to the court’s August 2 judgment were filed in the 5th Circuit. The 5th Circuit has ordered the case bifurcated to separate out claims that involve the Legislature’s Intent with the trial set to begin on September 11, 2023. On May 26, 2023, summary judgment motions were filed including one from the RNC and other party committees.
Vermont
On March 9, 2023, the RNC, the Vermont Republican Party, and two concerned citizens supported by RITE brought a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief applying an earlier Vermont Supreme Court ruling to challenge Winooski’s charter that allows non-citizens to vote in school board elections and on school budget questions. Winooski filed a motion to dismiss. On June 2, 2023, the RNC and RITE plaintiffs filed a response to Winooski's motion to dismiss. Update: On July 5, 2023, Winooski filed its reply. Since the results of these elections have statewide budget and policy impacts outside of the municipality, the Vermont constitution limits voting on those issues to United States citizens. The RNC and VTGOP previously sued cities of Montpelier and Winooski over their town charters in a facial challenge. The VT Supreme Court ruled in favor of the cities but left the door open for this as-applied challenge.
Washington
On November 11, 2022, a liberal group filed a lawsuit alleging signature matching disproportionately disenfranchises young people, people with disabilities, and people of color. On December 16, 2022, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 12, 2023, the RNC and WA GOP filed a motion to intervene in the case. Plaintiffs oppose the intervention and the state has taken no position. On February 7, 2023, the court denied the motion to intervene filed by RNC and WA GOP. On March 20, 2023, the RNC and WAGOP appealed the denial with the Washington Court of Appeals and filed a reply brief on April 4, 2023. Update: The Washington Court of Appeals cancelled a June 30, 2023 oral argument and ruled on the appeal, denying discretionary review of the trial courts denial of intervention.
Wisconsin
Update: The RNC supported a lawsuit in Green Bay against the city clerk regarding restrictions on public observation of the in-person absentee voting process. The RNC won and Green Bay was going to appeal but ultimately agreed to a stipulated final order which was entered in the court on July 6, 2023.
On September 23, 2022, an individual voter supported by the RNC and RITE sued WEC over its guidance that allowed absentee voters to change their votes after they are cast. RISE and the DNC filed motions to intervene. On October 5, the court sided with the plaintiff and granted a temporary restraining order, giving WEC until 4pm, October 7 to withdraw the unlawful guidance. On October 7, the DNC petitioned the Court of Appeals for review of the temporary injunction order and requested a stay of a temporary injunction pending review. On October 10, the appeals court granted the temporary stay pending a decision and requested a briefing on whether to grant the petition for an interlocutory appeal. Also on October 10, plaintiffs requested their case be transferred to a different court of appeals pursuant to state law. On October 12, the WI Supreme Court upheld the temporary stay, ordered briefing on the petition to file an interlocutory appeal, and asked the WI Court of Appeals to step aside until the high court issued a ruling on the venue issue. On October 26, the Supreme Court granted plaintiffs motion to transfer the case to a different court of appeals. The next day, the Court of Appeals dissolved its stay and denied the DNC’s petition for review, leaving the RNC’s and RITE’s win in place for the November election. On June 2, 2023, the RNC and RITE plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment.
A left-wing group, Rise, represented by Marc Elias, sued WEC on September 27 in a collateral attack on the White ruling argues that election officials should be allowed to accept absentee ballots with partial witness addresses if the official can discern the correct information. On October 3, the Wisconsin state legislature and Michael and Eva White filed motions to intervene. On October 6, the court granted the Wisconsin state legislature’s motion to intervene and declined the Whites’ motion to intervene. At a hearing on October 7, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction, thus reinforcing that an address is complete if it contains “a street number, street name and name of municipality.” On December 22, 2022, the Whites filed an appeal of the ruling denying their intervention. On February 28, the Whites, as proposed-intervenors, filed their reply brief. Update: On July 7, 2023, the circuit court affirmed the denial of the Whites motion for intervention. There is also a pending League of Women Voters suit on the issue.
Other News
-
National: The self-inflicted machine misinformation crisis looming over 2024
-
National: Countering the weaponization of election administration mistakes
-
U.S. Election Assistance Commission: Election Administration and Voting Survey 2022 Comprehensive Report
-
AZ: County accepts Blair’s resignation, search for new county recorder to begin this year
-
GA: Republicans sue over rejection of voter challenger to Fulton election board
-
GA: Georgia ranked as a top state for early voting turnout
-
GA: Cobb political parties appoint new election board members
-
ID: Idaho’s open primary supporters cleared to gather signatures, but will weigh legal options
-
MA: As states hunt for new voters, Massachusetts adds thousands via Medicaid applications
-
NM: New Mexico Supreme Court says lower court can decide gerrymandering issue
-
NC: State BOE tweaks rules for voter ID law after public input
-
NV: NV RNC member files lawsuit challenging election worker protection bill
-
NY: Manhattan DA: Straw donors sought to illegally curry favor with NYC mayor during cam
-
OH: Ohio adopts landmark election integrity legislation
-
TX: Houston-area county sues Texas over law that eliminates its elections administrator position
Voting Litigation Overview
|
