Campaigning for Democracy And Socialism
April 12, 2024: The Week in Review
Time To Get Serious.
Our Fascist Adversaries Are Deadly So
Our Weekly Editorial
What's at stake in November? A lot, and we can't say we weren't warned.

It's one thing to seize upon outrageous snippets from Trump's stump speeches and media postings: getting rid of vermin who penetrated our borders, protecting our bloodline from criminal animals from shithole countries, calls for violence against his opposition, denying the legitimacy of votes in Black communities, and many more. We can correctly expose these as fascist rants Trump has plagiarized from the book of collected speeches by Adolf Hitler that his ex-wife tells us he keeps by his bedside. The only reason to doubt her is the likelihood that Trump rarely reads anything other than Twitter posts against him.

All that is fair game. Election campaigns always engage in a war of words that try to paint the opponent into an unsavory corner. And using Trump's words against him is more than justified. Even his assertion, as our cartoon above suggests, that he aims to be a dictator on 'Day One' and maybe more. One problem, however, is a good portion of the electorate doesn't take it all that seriously. Some simply dismiss it as amusing hyperbole, 'there he goes again,' and then balancing it off with a 'whataboutism' regarding Team Biden.

But we're getting closer to a day of reckoning. It's urgent that we set aside this level of discourse and get deadly serious. Our adversaries have, and they've had everything very clear for the past six months. We're referring to 'Project 25,' the 900-word governance plan released by the Heritage Foundation. Previously a conservative think tank behind Ronald Reagan's sunshine libertarian conservatism, the outfit has been reborn as a full-blown authoritarian and fascist enabler. Nor does it stand alone. It has organized some 100 far-right think tanks and base organizations to join 'Project 2025 and combine their efforts to implement it on all state and local levels, as well as at the federal level.

What's the substance of Project 2025? For starters, we can't say we haven't been warned. In chilling detail, it outlines measures to reverse everything from the Obama reforms to LBJ's Voting Act and Great Society, then FDR's New Deal, and even the Reconstruction Era's 14th Amendment. Then it goes beyond simple advocacy and begins the work of assembling and training at least 50,000 Neo-confederate and Christian nationalist cadres who will replace all the personnel to be removed in a great purge of the civil service. Project Director Paul Dans said, 'We want conservative warriors' in these positions, which are supposed to be apolitical by current statute.

Heritage's idea echoes Trump staffer Steve Bannon's desire for a dismantling of the 'Deep State.' It goes further, asserting that while nearly all military officers below the rank of general are 'patriots,' those above are not. The generals have been corrupted by 'woke' ideology, meaning they wince at the idea of automatically obeying presidential orders even when the order are patently unconstitutional or otherwise illegal. These generals, they claim, are also guilty of working to build a military that observes 'DEI,' meaning 'diversity, equity, and inclusion.' Heritage goes further. They aim to scrub out all references to DEI from all levels of government, from the Oval Office down to local school boards.

So far we haven't got past openers. Project 2025 plans to scrub the Department of Education, purging all those who they claim 'inject racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda into America’s classrooms.” If only this contained some truth, but we know what it means: reversing all the gains won in the 1960s opposing the Dunning Schools 'Lost Cause' ideology defending white supremacy and restoring 'Confederate Heritage.' It means getting rid of the exposure of anti-Chinese and anti-Chicano pogroms in the West. It means restoring women to the 'pedestal' and back under the thumbs of their local patriarchs.

Next we get an idea of why so many on this far right are Putin fans. They aim at reversing all legislation protecting the LGBTQ+ community, especially demonizing the transgender community, equating 'transgenderism' and 'transgender ideology' with 'pornography' and 'pedophilia.' To counter these evils, it insists on restoring the 'traditional family,' claiming that 'families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society.' Same-sex marriage is on the chopping bloc, along with anything else that's 'non-binary,' which they claim is 'ideology' and thus not natural.

There's not time or space in this editorial to go into the drastic changes, if not abolition, spelled out for the Justice Department, Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, and more. We've just highlighted a few critical talking points from a 900-page action plan. But believe us, it's draconian all along the line.

But here's something to consider: Why has Heritage openly announced all this? Such things are usually kept under wraps until it's too late to do anything about them. We think there are several answers. One is that Heritage has to gain wider legitimacy and more allies if it hopes to succeed. Electing Trump is just step one. If he's not to be thwarted by the 'Deep State' (You can read this as our 'bourgeois democracy,' such as it is), he has to hit the ground running, with a phalanx of fascist warriors ready for action on 'Day One' and beyond. The second step is legitimacy. Heritage wants to avoid any opposition claiming a 'secret takeover.' They are gambling on the prospect that few besides policy wonks will actually read the document.

But we should read it. And we should believe it as well. Take the advice of Sun Tzu in The Art of War: 'If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.'

We know this may be difficult for some. They may fear the upcoming reckoning: that to defeat Trump, they will have to set aside 'politics as self-expression' in favor of strategy and tactics and vote for Biden or, in case of unforeseen circumstances, whoever heads the Democratic ticket.

A few may even cling to a popular but foolish notion that 'we don't read books.' That idea can get you killed. For a revitalized and stronger left, we need a revolutionary instrument of all the organic intellectuals of the working class and all the oppressed. We need cadres who can be 'permanent persuaders' among all insurgent constituencies. Why? As Ho Chi Minh once observed, 'the harder the core, the broader the front.' We can't do this with a militant minority alone. At this conjuncture, there is an antifascist majority in our country, but currently, it is mainly a majority 'in itself,' but not yet entirely 'for itself.' Therein lies the task: 'What do we do next?' Don't waste any time. It's getting shorter by the day.
WE ARE INVITING FEEDBACK!

Please send us your letters, comments, queries, complaints, new ideas. Just keep them short and civil. Longer commentaries and be submitted as articles.

Click Here to send a letter

DIFFICULTY READING US?


We're going to try something new, and you are all invited.

Saturday Morning Coffee!



Started in August 2022, then going forward every week.

It will be more of a hangout than a formal setting. We can review the news in the previous days' LeftLinks or add a new topic. We can invite guests or carry on with those who show up. We'll try to have a progressive stack keeper should we need one.

Most of all, we will try to be interesting and a good sounding board. If you have a point you would like to make or a guest to invite, send an email to Carl Davidson, carld717@gmail.com

Continuing weekly, 10:30 to Noon, EDT.

The Zoom link will also be available on our Facebook Page.


Meeting ID: 868 9706 5843

Let's see what happens!
The Return of John Brown:

Abolitionist Comes Back
to Life in New Musical

The first show will debut on April 26 in Baltimore, followed by a show on April 27 in Washington, DC. The next weekend on May 4 and 5, the play will be featured at the Kennedy Farm, the Harpers Ferry location where John Brown staged his famous anti-slavery raid.

Director: Jayne LaMondue Price

Musical Director: Glenn Pearson

For more information email Returnofjohnbrown@gmail.com.
We’ve officially launched our NEW documentary, BEYOND BARS, and we’d like you and your community to host a screening for free! During an election year with over two million Americans currently incarcerated, BEYOND BARS exposes the continuing impact of white supremacy, all through the powerful story of former San Francisco DA Chesa Boudin and his family. Organize and mobilize with us!

ON THE IMMIGRATION 'PROBLEM'

The webinar features Anne Lewis and David Bacon

April 22, 2924,
9 pm Eastern, 6 pm Pacific

Presented by the CCDS
Socialist Education Project's
4th Monday Webinar

Woody Guthrie wrote his famous song "Deportees" in 1948, decrying that "All they will call you will be 'deportees.'" And "they chase us like outlaws, like rustlers, like thieves."

Woody wrote at a time when the US political economy depended upon temporary immigrant labor. Since the 1940s and the globalization of the economy, people faced increased violence and repression, largely involving United States interference

People also faced growing income and wealth inequality and poverty, climate catastrophes, and the rise of repressive regimes everywhere. Emigration has increased.

The United Nations has estimated that "the number of international migrants has been robust over the last two decades, reaching 281 million people living outside their country of origin in 2020, up from 173 million in 2000 and 221 million in 2010.
David Bacon, below
Currently, international migrants represent about 3.6 percent of the world's population." And today, they represent a large and growing percentage of the agricultural and manufacturing work force.
Now, 'the immigration problem' is the issue dominating campaign and election debate. Both parties conceive of immigration as a problem. Is it? What are its causes? What role have immigrants played in America's economy? How should the left respond to the vicious attack on immigrants and the draconian proposals made by political candidates to address "the problem."
Betty Brown,
1927-2024, Presente!

Elizabeth 'Betty' Brown, died peacefully in her home on Friday, January 12, 2024. She was 97 years old, and an active member of CCDS in the Bay Area. Betty was born on Jan.3, 1927, to her parents Kate and Henry Blake on the family homestead in Firesteel, South Dakota, land that Betty would later in life recognize as stolen from the Cheyenne River Sioux.

The family left South Dakota during the Dust Bowl era and relocated to Oregon, then moved to Richmond, California, to find work in the shipyards during World War II. Betty attended Richmond High School, where she began her lifelong activism for peace and social and environ-mental justice. Throughout her life, she carried on the humanist traditions of her parents, who were founding members of the Richmond NAACP.

Betty met her husband Wallace Donald Brown while attending Richmond High. They would marry upon his return from WWII. Betty graduated from the University of California, San Francisco with a nursing degree, followed by a year-long course of study in public health at the University of California, Berkeley.

Betty worked as a school nurse for the Richmond Unified School District (West Contra Costa County Unified School District) for 30 years, identifying children with special needs and referring them to specialists who could help them succeed as school students.

Wally and Betty had two children and enjoyed the out-of-doors in a variety of forms including building cabins, hiking, camping, and traveling throughout the western U.S.

Following the Wally’s death in 1972, Betty redoubled her devotion to a variety of progressive causes including peace through diplomacy and the intertwined causes of environmental and social justice.

She continued as the co-Chairperson of East Bay Peace Action through 2023, living out her desire to remain an activist all her life. She was also a passionate advocate for health care for all people.

A celebration of Betty’s life will be held later in the year. In lieu of flowers, those who would like to remember her may make contributions to Peace Action, Healthcare for All, or the Sierra Club or simply speak out for a more just and peaceful world.
A CONVERGENCE SYLLABUS

The strategy elaborated in this syllabus is aims to block MAGA’s bid for power and while doing so build enough independent progressive clout to start the country down the road to a robust multiracial, gender-inclusive democracy and an economy that works for all on an environmentally sustainable planet.

Convergence added a special session to this study to help participants grapple with the dramatic impact the Gaza crisis has had on US politics.


Bernie Sanders: I am excited to announce that, this week, I am launching a new podcast. In it, we discuss my recent book, It's Ok to Be Angry about Capitalism.

If you'd like a copy of the book, you can make a contribution today — of $12 any amount you can afford —at berniesanders.com/book and we'll send it to you in the mail.

This featured story are reflections by labor and community activist Jeff Crosby, son of Harry Crosby, a prominent character in the Apple TV series “Masters of the Air.” The series depicts the courage of young men who risked, and often sacrificed, their lives to defeat fascism during World War II. The non-profit group Greater Lynn Senior Services (GLSS) interviewed Jeff about his father and his experience with the making of the series.

Thanks for reading Liberation Road! Subscribe for free to receive new posts
Zen Peacemakers
Focus on Gaza

Monday, April 15th
12pm Eastern Time


Note about Way of Council: Council is one of our most important core Zen Peacemaker practices. We share Council during our Bearing Witness retreats most every day.

In Council, we come together in a small group in a profound way. We create a shared liminal space that is safe, confidential, and perhaps sacred. We each listen and speak from the heart, encountering and experiencing one another gently and with awareness. We are not solving problems or debating issues or making plans. We are making a healing space for each of us to hear and be heard, see and be seen.

Last Week's Saturday Morning Coffee
News of the Week, Plus More
Rising Threat: Unveiling American
Neo-Fascism's Agenda for 2025

Understanding How the Ruling Class Rules

By Jerry Harris
Liberation Road

Apri 09, 2024 - Antonio Gramsci explained that hegemonic blocs are established by leading elements of the capitalist class to create a ruling consensus. The bloc establishes commonly agreed-to forms of accumulation and political rule—as well as cultural and ideological domination, or ideas that become accepted as “common sense.” 

The main components are accepted by the major political parties, although there may be policy differences that exist within the scope of the general consensus. The bloc, essentially a coalition of ruling class factions, forms a mass base through both repressing the opposition and creating political support among other sections of the population. The bloc accomplishes this mainly through the tools of culture and ideology to support its political and economic project, but economic success and stability also play an important role. 

From about 1932 to today there have been two major hegemonic blocs in the U.S. The first was the Keynesian bloc developed during the Roosevelt administration and lasting to the late 1970s. It included social welfare, the acceptance of unions and civil rights reforms for women and minorities, raising living standards, an economically active state sector, nation-centric economics, repression of the left, building the military-industrial base, and imperialism abroad. It was replaced in the 1980s by neoliberalism, the globalization of production, vast cross-border financial flows, broad-scale attacks on unions, precarity, deindustrialization, undermining of the social contract, free market ideology, expansion of the military-industrial complex, and imperialism.

Ruling Class Splits

The deep economic crisis of 2008 began to unravel the neoliberal hegemonic bloc. A rapidly growing crisis of legitimacy disrupted politics, with social movements developing to the left and right. Significant sectors of the ruling class concluded that they needed to form a new consensus to stabilize capitalism and reestablish political support for the system. Two different power blocs have formed–the neo-fascist bloc and the neo-Keynsian bloc–although neither has achieved hegemony as of yet.

The neo-fascist bloc seeks stability through repression and creation of a mass base through religious fundamentalism, patriarchy, and white supremacy. The neo-Keynesian bloc seeks stability and renewed political legitimacy through neo-Keynesian reformism and economic expansion through the green modernization of the means of production. Both still pursue imperialism and continued military dominance.

This is a deep split within the ruling class over internal policies, different from the McCarthy era in which the ruling class and both political parties were united in purging the left and expanding the U.S. empire. The current splits may be beneficial to the left in forming a common project to defend and expand democracy, and protect civil society. That would entail aiming our main blow against the neo-fascists, building the socialist core, working closely with progressives, and pushing the center to the left.

There are numerous important issues that unite a broad array of political forces: defending abortion rights, defending the queer and trans community, expanding voting rights, teaching about institutional racism in our public schools, defending public libraries and access to books, promoting more environmental legislation and regulations, maintaining a pro-labor Labor Board, defending social security, and greater taxation on corporations. Actually, the list could go on. These issues encompass questions of race, class, and gender as well as democracy. Even within this common project socialists need to maintain independence and initiative, particularly in opposing U.S. imperialism.

The movement behind Trump is a coalition of reactionary and conservative forces. Its major organized elements are Christian Nationalists, reactionary Catholicism, laissez-faire capitalists like the Koch network, right-wing think tanks, and neo-fascist militias. It’s important to see beyond Trump, and understand the social/political movement that has gathered around him. This movement desires to coalesce as a long-term ruling hegemonic bloc, turning the U.S. into an authoritarian Christian country, ending bourgeois democracy, and severely curtailing civil society. 

Enter Project 2025

Project 2025 is a major policy and ideological projection by a large coalition of forces that comprise major sections of the neo-fascist movement. It is a fascist document that puts forward a strategic path to create an authoritarian Christian-dominated society through control of the state. There are other statements from within the authoritarian bloc with somewhat different formulations and viewpoints. But Project 2025 is the most developed, signed by over 100 groups and think tanks. It aims to be the ideological and policy brain behind Trump, who is useful as a mass fascist leader, but lacks the intellectual capacity to carry out a strategic project.

The Heritage Foundation was the initiator and publisher of Project 2025. Heritage has, for decades, been the most influential, most powerful of these right-wing think tanks – certainly the one closest to the power centers of the right and the Republican Party. It unites much of the conservative movement, think tanks, activists, and lobbying groups with the goal of installing a much more effective, more ruthless right-wing regime. It comes with tremendous funding and the backing of much of the political right, and believes there is a Communist plot in the highest echelons of American power. It sees a vast conspiracy with enemies everywhere, and that un-American forces have overtaken every last institution.

Project 2025 outlines what the right wants to do with the executive and the state immediately upon returning to power, department by department and agency by agency–including purging 50,000 federal employees. Following is an examination of the Project’s 900-page document, with much of the content based on quotes.

Executing a president’s agenda requires a well-conceived, coordinated, unified plan and a trained and committed cadre of personnel to implement it. “We need to assemble an army of aligned, vetted, trained and prepared conservatives to go to work on Day 1 to deconstruct the administrative state and to use the state as a tool for concentrating power and entrenching ideology.”

The president’s “needs,” “goals” and “desires” are always consistent with the law. And the president is the “personal embodiment of popular will.” Mussolini and Hitler would be particularly pleased with this section. 

The right has long studied Gramsci, using concepts of cultural hegemony to understand the left and craft their own strategy. The Project writes: “The long march of cultural Marxism through our institutions has come to pass. The federal government is a behemoth, weaponized against American citizens and conservative values, with freedom and liberty under siege as never before.” Anyone who adheres to leftist ideology is a member of this elite, dominating most major institutions of American life: the media, big tech, education—and “nothing less than a counter-revolution will save the nation.”

Donald Trump is not part of the “ruling class” (a term often used by the right to describe the elite).

China, globalists, political and academic elites, the left, socialists, communists—for Project 2025 it is all just one enemy. “Today, nearly every top-tier university president or Wall Street hedge fund manager has more in common with a socialist, European head of state than with the parents at a high school football game.” Moreover, America’s corporate and political elites, are fully in cahoots with the nation’s foreign enemies, and “real America made up of humble, patriotic working families.”

“Every hour the Left directs federal policy and elite institutions, our sovereignty, our Constitution, our families, and our freedom are a step closer to disappearing. Conservatives have just one shot to get this right. With enemies at home and abroad, there is no margin for error. Time is running short. If we fail, the fight for the very idea of America may be lost. This is the last opportunity to save our republic.” The solution to all the above problems is not to tinker with this or that government program, to replace this or that bureaucrat…“We solve them by ripping out the trees – root and branch.”

It's necessary to understand fascism as a dynamic and revolutionary movement. It is not a conservative political force safely embedded in U.S. institutional power. It has a radical vision of power and reconstruction that Project 2025 gives voice to. As Trump has stated, he plans to rid the country of “left vermin.”

Plans to Transform the State

Following are some of the Project’s specific plans and narratives with respect to the state apparatus.

  • Large sections of the State Department’s work force are left-wing and predisposed to disagree with a conservative president’s policy agenda and vision. And the Department of Justice (which oversees the FBI) “has been captured by an unaccountable bureaucratic managerial class and radical left ideologues who have embedded themselves throughout its offices and who are infatuated with the perpetuation of a radical liberal agenda.”

  • Women’s and gender rights are targets that generate a particular degree of fear and hatred. Project 2025 advocates the abolishment of the Gender Policy Council, and it wants to delete a host of terms such as sexual orientation, gender identity, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensitive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and diversity, equity, and inclusion from every federal rule, internal agency regulation, contract, grant, public regulation, and piece of legislation that exists. Every U.S. state should be required to report “exactly how many abortions take place, the gestational age of the child, for what reason, and the mother’s home residency.”

  • When it comes to environmental science and regulations, the Project takes the same extreme approach. It wants to abolish the Office of Domestic Climate Policy, the Office of Environmental Justice and Civil Rights, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which it says “constitutes one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.” It goes on to state that environmental extremism serves to undermine the strength of the U.S. “It is not a political cause, but a pseudo-religion meant to baptize liberals’ ruthless pursuit of absolute power in the holy water of environmental virtue.”

  • As for confronting racial inequality and discrimination, the Project wants every department, from the Department of Labor to the U.S. Agency for International Development, to be scrubbed clean of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (a policy adopted by many corporations and government agencies), and treat the “participation in any critical race theory or Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives as grounds for termination of employment” as they violate constitutional and moral principles.

  • The government should prohibit the collection of employment statistics based on race or ethnicity. Illegal immigration should be ended and the border sealed. Furthermore, bureaucrats at the Department of Education “inject racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda into classrooms.” And “critical race theory and gender ideology should be excluded from the curriculum in every public school in the country, because they poison our children.” This coincides with Trump calling immigrants “animals” that “poison the blood of our country.”

  • Lastly, pursuit of the good life is found primarily in family—marriage, children, and above all, in religious devotion and spirituality.

Conclusion

For those who say there is no difference between the Democrats and Republicans, that the U.S. is not a democracy, or that we are already living under an authoritarian government, please take Project 2025 seriously. We are facing a well-organized, very well-financed, highly motivated and ideologically rigorous enemy. As socialists we exist in civil society. We use the political tools of free speech, free press, free association, and the right to assemble and protest to organize for our ideas and our cause, and to create a working class mass base.

There are always tensions, limitations, and violence in bourgeois democracy. But what we have today is qualitatively a different society from the strategic plans of the neo-fascist movement. There is an anti-fascist majority in the U.S., but it is unorganized, and centrist Democrats are incapable of giving it full expression or leadership. I believe the role for socialists is to unite the many and aim our main blow against the most reactionary and dangerous enemy we currently face. We need to defeat MAGA as a national movement over a broad front of combat. It’s not just about a presidential election, but that is one aspect of the battle.

Jerry Harris is the national secretary of the Global Studies Association of North America, and on the international board of the Network for Critical Studies of Global Capitalism. His articles have often appeared in Race & Class (London), Science & Society (New York) and International Critical Thought (Beijing). His last book was Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Democracy. His work has been translated to Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Czech, and Slovak.

Thanks for reading Liberation Road! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Subscribe Here!
The Right Has a New Playbook to Crush
Unions and Enshrine Corporate Power

The American Legislative Exchange Council is pushing a spate of anti-worker bills in states across the country—the latest in the group’s onslaught on collective bargaining rights.

By Juliana Broad
In These Times


APRIL 3, 2024 - State lawmakers seeking to dismantle unions and implement anti-worker laws have just been handed a new state-by-state roadmap by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the corporate-funded bill mill popular with Republican legislators.

Although ALEC claims that its proffered labor reforms are designed to protect ?“worker freedom and flexibility,” its attacks on workers over the past 50 years have made it harder for them to organize, harder for local governments to support decent-paying jobs, and easier on big business.

Those attacks, bankrolled by Koch Industries and right-wing donors such as the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, are motivated as much by the desire to protect corporate bottom lines as by the determination to eviscerate a key supporter of the Democratic Party: labor unions.

ALEC has paid particular attention to public sector unions by peddling model bills that prohibit paycheck deductions for dues, mandate high membership thresholds, and introduce automatic decertification, among other anti-labor measures.

The first edition of ALEC’s labor policy handbook, which was published in 2019, came on the heels of the Supreme Court’s momentous 2018 Janus ruling, which radically upended the lives of American workers by maintaining that public sector employees do not have to pay union dues as a condition of employment.

The second edition, published this year, adds three model bills to expand the scope of ALEC’s key anti-labor policies. In addition to its evergreen model ?“right-to-work” and union-busting bills, the updated edition includes bills that target independent contractors and occupational licensing. Two of these address interstate occupation licenses, with one setting up a process for reviewing all current and proposed occupational licenses.

One of ALEC’s most recent anti-worker policies, which was introduced at last summer’s annual meeting, blacklists any company that voluntarily recognizes a union to keep it from qualifying for state economic development incentives. However, this policy is not included in the newly released handbook.

Since 2019, ALEC’s anti-labor priorities — including its state-level right-to-work and anti-union bills — have had a significant impact on workers and workplaces. With the imprimatur of Governor Ron DeSantis ®, the Florida legislature passed some of the most regressive labor legislation in recent history last year. The Florida bill — which is highlighted as ?“noteworthy legislation” in the new handbook — empowered the state to decertify public sector unions, prohibit automatic deductions for union dues, mandate universal language on union membership cards, and impose considerable annual reporting requirements, all key items on ALEC’s anti-worker wishlist. A recent investigation found that since the law passed, more than 42,000 public sector workers in Florida have lost their union representation.

A Louisiana bill outright banning collective bargaining for that state’s public sector workers is currently making its way through the state legislature. It comes amidst a flurry of other anti-union bills which feature some of the most regressive features of ALEC’s model bills: banning the automatic deduction of dues, requiring the regular recertification of existing bargaining units, and all but outlawing political lobbying.

Permanent precarity

The new model bills included in the second edition focus on promulgating precarious employment through independent contracting laws and occupational licensing reforms.

These have been introduced in at least seven states this legislative session: Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Oklahoma.

ALEC claims that its model bill addressing self-employment in the gig economy — known as the Uniform Worker Classification Act — ?“ensures that the 80% of workers who prefer their independent contractor status are able to keep it, rather than being forced into traditional employment models.”

Big business groups have long sought to maintain the status quo of workplace insecurity faced by the vast majority of gig workers.

“It is in the best interests of this State, workers, and businesses for there to be certainty regarding the legal status of workers and their applicable rights and obligations,” the model bill states.

ALEC’s advocacy arm, ALEC Action, worked to oppose the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act of 2021. ?“Increasing barriers to independent contractor status would deprive millions the flexibility and entrepreneurial opportunity available through innovations such as the ?‘gig’ economy,” an open letter organized by ALEC Action stated... ...Read More
BLOOD SPORT: Cage Fighting Is the Key to Trump’s Reelection Campaign

The former president has built an alliance with UFC head Dana White to woo young men.

By Sean Eagan
The New Republic

April 1, 2024 - Donald Trump watched the flyweight title fight between Brandon Royval and Alexandre Pantoja at UFC 296 in Las Vegas last December.

In mid-December, the Ultimate Fighting Championship—by its own description the world’s “leading mixed martial arts organization”—put on one of its biggest events of the year: a matchup between welterweight champion Leon Edwards and challenger Colby Covington in Las Vegas, the fight capital of the world. But the biggest stars that night weren’t in the UFC’s trademark caged ring.

As UFC president and CEO Dana White made his entrance, the crowd erupted, less for White than for his entourage: Kid Rock and Donald Trump. With “American Bad Ass” blaring in the background, UFC commentator Jon Anik crowed about Trump’s love of the UFC. The fight itself quickly became a miniature political rally. In a ringside interview after being overwhelmed in five rounds, Covington—who rarely appears in public without a MAGA hat—heaped praise on Trump.

It was, in many ways, business as usual for the UFC, which, as it has risen to prominence over the last decade, has aligned itself with the right. But Trump’s growing commitment to the sport—on March 9, he showed up at another title fight, this time in Miami—indicates a deepening alliance: The UFC is now a crucial campaign stop for the former president as he aspires to win over young men—and to win the 2024 election.

Where some mainstream sports organizations have mildly supported liberal politics, the UFC is unabashedly right-wing. White was one of the earliest supporters of Trump’s 2016 campaign and even spoke at that year’s Republican National Convention. “A company usually doesn’t want to get into politics and back one guy or another—I’m like, let me tell you what … no matter who likes it or doesn’t like it, I care,” White said when asked about his decision to speak at the convention.

In 2023 alone, the UFC hosted Trump at three separate events, and the former president also appeared on the organization’s official podcast, UFC Unfiltered. White has appeared on Tucker Carlson’s new streaming show, The Tucker Carlson Interview, and is a vocal critic of President Joe Biden. One of Trump’s top campaign aides, Steven Cheung, previously worked as a communications director with the UFC.

The UFC’s comfortable relationship with Trump goes back decades. In 2001, when the struggling organization was being lambasted by politicians like John McCain, who had once called it “human cockfighting,” Trump hosted two fights at his Atlantic City casino.

“Affiliation with Trump has a way of infiltrating or taking over every aspect of a person’s public life if they remain loyal to him,” said Brian Hughes, co-director of the Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, or PERIL, an American University think tank. “As we see the leadership of UFC [growing] much more comfortable expressing far-right politics, you’re going to see fighters who express even further-right politics.”

Conor McGregor, one of the UFC’s biggest stars, has been accused of helping incite anti-immigrant riots in Dublin, Ireland. In April 2023, veteran fighter Jorge Masvidal used part of his in-ring retirement speech to praise the former president. And in January, former middleweight champion Sean Strickland launched into an anti-LGBT tirade when a reporter asked him about previous comments on gay marriage.

The UFC has “become more openly conservative,” said Nate Quarry, a former UFC fighter. According to Quarry, the election of Trump was a turning point for the organization’s politics. “In the past, they were in the closet with their beliefs, and now Trump gives them the permission to be as rude and as big [of] assholes as they want.”

Trump has embraced the UFC not only for its mainstream appeal, but as an extension of his own brash and violent brand.

Presidents have long utilized sports to connect with their constituents and project working-class appeal. Richard Nixon emphasized his fandom of both football and baseball to seem like a regular guy. George W. Bush threw out the first pitch of the World Series after 9/11 to signify a return to normalcy.

Sports leagues, however, have typically gone out of their way to keep partisan politics at arm’s length so as to appeal to as many people as possible. That has shifted somewhat in recent years, as many athletes—most notably former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick—have embraced activism as a means of drawing attention to racism, mass shootings, and other issues, leading to tepid actions from the leagues themselves. This, in turn, has generated a furious backlash on the right, where gestures like the END RACISM message featured in the end zone of February’s Super Bowl are treated as evidence that the NFL has gone “woke.”

Enter the UFC, which is betting that it can leverage right-wing politics to become a massive sports organization. Trump, meanwhile, has embraced it as an extension of his own brash and violent brand—and as a means of reaching young men.

“What the UFC promises is an athletic outlet and a league that the far right can claim as its own,” said Hughes.

Mixed martial arts have recently become a keystone of far-right-wing culture in America and around the globe, particularly in Europe. Active Clubs, neo-Nazi social clubs built around a shared passion for fascism and combat sports, have taken root in as many as 17 states. A brutal, individual sport that emphasizes domination, MMA is vulnerable to co-option by demagogues and right-wing influencers.

In just three decades, the UFC has become a global juggernaut, selling out London’s O2 arena, Madison Square Garden, and the Sydney SuperDome. Last year, the company merged with World Wrestling Entertainment—itself long affiliated with Trump—to become TKO Group Holdings. ...Read More
On It has to be Game Changing

By Ike Gittlen
Ike’s Work in Progress

April 12, 2024 - Robert Kuttner, is a co-founder of the Economic Policy Institute and the editor of the American Prospect Magazine. He is both pro-union and pro-labor. One of his latest essays is titled “Liberals Need to Be Radicals.” It was a call for upping the game in a second Biden term. Yet his “radical” agenda struck me as both mild and missing the importance of a broad vision.

Kuttner proposed tuition-free college at public institutions, a single-payer universal health care system, creating a “second-tier” of Social Security that would provide a livable pension, government-subsidized affordable housing for first-time home buyers (assisted by student loan relief), and more investment in mass transit. While Kuttner is correct, that these issues all need attention, they strike me as nibbling around the edges of our core problems.

Our nation has built-in some structural problems within our political system that keep people like Robert Kuttner from dreaming bigger. Yet without those fundamental changes, nibbling is all that will get done.

MONEY IN POLITICS: The fact is that there’s too much money required to participate in our political leadership contests. Witness both political Presidential candidates competing for bragging rights on who held the biggest single fund-raiser (both allegedly hauled in tens of millions). Each of those big dollar donors know they purchased at least “influence” if not outright limitations on candidates. There are a few leaders who can successfully run for office on “small dollar donations” Most must beg for money on a daily basis. To be blunt, the average American won’t get dick-shit unless we vastly reduce the need for private money in our elections system.

REVERSE THE GOUGING OF AMERICA: Related to the corruption of our political system is the advantages that the wealthy have purchased from our government. The list of pro-wealth provisions of just about every function of government, has the people of our nation revisiting the income disparities of the Gilded Age. All the money is going to the top. Little is left for the common good. In fact, the average American is now subsidizing the ultra-wealthy with transfers of trillions of our tax money into their tax breaks (put on a credit card for future repayment). They have further tightened their grip on us through weakened labor rights and deregulation of financial rules. A “radical” agenda must include a reversal of these acts of greed. That requires a fight with greed, to return more of the wealth that is earned by America’s producers, back into our pockets.

RETURN POWER TO WORKERS: Overall, as a friend sums things up, we need to “Raise Wages”. Get more money into average and poor people’s pockets so they can afford a decent life and take advantage of opportunities to grow and prosper A huge part of raising the wage is the rebalancing of power between workers and the boss. That means powerful unions. Even relatively mild labor law reform has been unable to find the votes needed to pass them in Congress. We need the kind of laws that close off all the delays, intimidation, interference, and corporate support that come down on workers seeking to organize and bargain effectively. Enhancing worker power directly, is a “radical” move in today’s politics.

GUARANTEE INCOME IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSISTION: Climate change proposals leave people justifiably fearful. In particular, the things we need to change to sustain our environment are seen as devastating to workers whose jobs are fossil-fuel related. Talking about a “just transition” is an empty promise. A “radical” agenda would declare that no American will lose income as a result of environmental changes we need to make, to return our planet to health. A flat guarantee to our workers that they will not pay the price, while the top tier profits.

LIFETIME AFFORDABLE EDUCATION: Then there is the issue of opportunity. The old joke that “Some people are born on third base and go through life thinking they hit a triple”, points out the fact that people start out in life at different points on the life opportunity racetrack. If we want economic growth and social equity, we have to provide a hand-up to all Americans. This is good social policy. Just the other day a report came out that the Navy is having problems building our next generation of ships and submarines, for lack of skilled workers. Millions of jobs are open in this country for lack of qualified workers. We need a lifetime educational system for all Americans that will assure we use the talent we have, no matter what base they were born on. Again a “radical” idea that if you want to apply yourself, the tools will be there for you.

HONEST AND PROPERLY FUNDED EDUCATION FOR ALL: Among the very real challenges this nation faces is the quality of our educational systems. Kuttner points out the underfunding of our college and university systems and their failures as we have privatized them. But there is a deeper problem we are facing. The fundamental teaching of critical thinking skills and a broad understanding of history is under attack. Organized groups of “thought police” are successfully turning our schools into isolation chambers, where thinking is stifled, teachers are directed by non-educators and a false history is being promoted. This leads to misunderstandings of how and why things happen. That results in huge errors in both personal and social policies. Ignorance is not bliss. Since the rest of the world is not putting on rose-colored glasses, they have a distinct advantage over us in making good decisions and better dealing with change. Not only do we need to put a hell of a lot more money into our schools, but we have to make sure they are honest institutions.

Kuttner is right that we need to assure old-age security and affordable and accessible health care. Those are bedrock requirements of any leading nation. What he avoids is that to do this we need to take back the savings that the corporations and wealthy have stopped contributing to those basic needs. Our experiment in handing the money over to private interests and waiting for them to do the responsible thing, has failed (again!). These assurances are also solid public policy. Retirees and those not burdened by outrageous medical bills, spend their money back into the economy, making is stronger. Healthy people, particularly kids, are essential to control disease, learn well, and reduce the nation's healthcare bill to boot. But again, this is a “radical” fight with the financial sector, private pension, and healthcare industries that have bought out our political leadership.

I don’t fault Kuttner for the limits of his proposals. His purpose was to outline what he thinks is possible in the current political environment. Yet the appeal of the former President is the sense that he’s a wild card, willing to break out of the box and shake things up. People are tired of incrementalism and are looking for the mouse who will stick its middle finger up at the descending hawk. In this political environment, “radical” has to be truly game-changing. ...Read More
Video Above: Alan Minsky on Pushing Democrats Left

Alan talks about the necessity to work within the Democratic Party to effect the progressive changes we all desire.

By Sharon Kyle, Dick Price, and Alan Minsky
LA Progressive

APR 10, 2024—Alan Minsky is a lifelong activist who has worked as a progressive journalist for the past two decades. From 2009 to 2018, he coordinated Pacifica Radio’s national coverage of elections as program director at KPFK Los Angeles. Before that, Alan was one of the founders of LA Indymedia. He is the creator and producer of the political podcasts for The Nation and Jacobin Magazine and a contributor to Commondreams and Truthdig.

Economic Bill of Rights Needed to Save American Democracy

Alan’s activism began in college with union solidarity work and opposition to US involvement in Central America. In the 1990s and early 2000s, Alan was active in the counter-globalization and media democracy movements. In 2011, he began organizing for Occupy Wall Street in the months leading up to the occupation of Zuccotti Park.Alan is a committed anti-racist and feminist. He is also an advocate for economic policies that address social inequality, eradicate poverty, and prioritize the interests of working and middle-class households. Alan began working with PDA in 2014. ...Read More
Photo: German workers affiliated with the IG Metall union demonstrate in front of the Mercedes-Benz plant in Berlin... GERALD MATZKA/PICTURE-ALLIANCE/DPA/AP IMAGES

American Workers Get Some Help
From an Enlightened German Law

As the UAW seeks to unionize an Alabama Mercedes factory, a new German law requires the company not to go union-busting.

By Harold Meyerson
The American Propect

APRIL 8, 2024 - In Seattle, in 1999, Lefts Old and New converged to mount what is arguably the most far-reaching protest against the corporate domination of the planet. The protests extended well beyond the young enragés’ sit-down strike in the city’s streets, which made it impossible for the first (and still the only) global conference of the World Trade Organization held in the U.S. to convene. The events also included a remarkable rally of roughly 10,000 union members from all corners of the globe that the AFL-CIO sponsored.

There, I distinctly recall, one young man who worked at a Ford factory in South Africa told the crowd that it was past time for global corporations to be held to some uniform standards when it came to treating their workers.

It was indeed past time, but that didn’t mean anything like that happened.

Fast-forward 22 years. In 2021, the German Social Democrats, then the minority partner in government with the Christian Democrats, pushed a new law through the Bundestag. Germany was home to all manner of corporations—Siemens, Volkswagen, Daimler, Bayer—that had factories and contractors strewn across the planet, and German unions feared such companies could undercut their members by offshoring work to low-wage climes, even as environmental and human rights organizations feared the low standards that such offshoring could enable.

The new law, the Supply Chain Act, which took effect in 2023, was designed to allay such fears. It empowered a German federal agency (the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control, or BAFA) to monitor the foreign-located factories and supply chain operations of German businesses with at least 1,000 employees to see if those facilities were violating any of 11 stipulated human rights standards, including the use of child labor, the violation of worker health and safety standards, and the right to form trade unions.

Should a company fail to meet those standards, the agency can subject it to a fine of up to 2 percent of its yearly revenues, and withhold any government contracts with the company.

Fast-forward to last week. On the eve of filing for a unionization election at the Mercedes factory in Vance, Alabama, the UAW filed a complaint against Mercedes-Benz Group AG with BAFA, based on the company’s having fired workers active in its unionization campaign, on requiring workers to attend anti-union propaganda meetings, and other particulars of the anti-union playbook that managers in the U.S. (though not in Germany) routinely draw upon to squelch workers’ efforts to have a voice at work.

The UAW has lodged similar complaints with our own labor-law enforcer, the National Labor Relations Board. In both German and U.S. law, it’s a violation to fire workers for their pro-union activities. In the U.S., however, the only penalty employers face if they’re found in violation is to rehire such workers, give them the back pay they missed, and post a notice saying they’d done the rehiring and back-paying. That falls somewhat short of having to cough up 2 percent of annual revenues (roughly 3 billion euros in this case) and being blocked from government contracts.

That said, the German supply chain law is still largely untested. The UAW’s filing is the first from an American union, and BAFA is only now getting its feet wet when it comes to monitoring alleged violations. How long such a process would take is at this point anyone’s guess.

Given the timing of the UAW’s filing, it may be best understood as a way to add pressure to Mercedes not to wage the kind of all-out war that the Southern factories of foreign-owned automakers have up to now conducted when their workers have sought to go union. Even though every one of those automakers are unionized in their home countries of Germany, Japan, and South Korea (and even though every Mercedes factory on the planet is unionized save those in the American South), all of those companies have sunk to the South’s anti-worker norms when their employees have tried to organize.

The non-union South has long provided American corporations with their own domestic equivalent of low-wage offshoring.

Now, however, it looks like such scorched-earth campaigns may no longer prevail. Later this month, the workers at Volkswagen’s factory in Chattanooga will vote for the third time on establishing a local of the UAW, and this time, they’re widely expected to win. Under the timetable set by Joe Biden’s NLRB, which crimped employers’ capacity to indefinitely delay union elections, the workers at Mercedes will likely get to vote in May or early June. At both factories, supermajorities of the workers have already signed UAW affiliation cards.

A host of factors are contributing to what may become a sea change in the political economy of the South. The stunningly successful strike that the newly militant UAW waged against General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis yielded record, and very well publicized, gains for workers there—as workers in lower-wage Southern factories are well aware. UAW President Shawn Fain followed up that victory with a pledge to do what the union has been unable to do for the past half-century: unionize the foreign-owned factories that had sprung up in the South. The union announced it was appropriating $40 million to the effort.

More generally, this campaign comes at a time when the favorability rating that Americans give to unions is at its highest level in 60 years, and when worker militance—among baristas, teachers, bakers, docents, and doctors, to cite just some of the varied occupations that have been striking and going union—is also reaching new heights. It may be that German-owned factories are more susceptible to union efforts than Japanese- and Korean-owned ones, given the greater power that German law has long accorded to its employees (including holding half the seats on corporate boards). Still, that power wasn’t sufficient to enable Chattanooga’s VW workers to prevail in their previous efforts to go union. That’s one reason why German unions pushed for the supply chain law that the UAW is now wielding against Mercedes’ Alabama managers.

That said, the UAW knows this law is still largely untested, and the timing of its BAFA filing makes clear it’s chiefly meant to be one constraining factor in what Mercedes’ Alabama managers do over the next several weeks. I’d be surprised if the union thinks this filing will make a decisive difference, but just like the pro-union slate of board candidates that union advocates advanced in the run-up to Starbucks’s annual shareholder meeting—which was one factor in Starbucks’s surprise decision to negotiate a national contract with its baristas—every bit of pressure helps.

The non-union South has long provided American corporations with their own domestic equivalent of low-wage offshoring, and foreign automakers also began setting up shop there half a century ago. As I noted in a Prospect article nine years ago, “Between 1980 and 2013, The Wall Street Journal has reported, the number of auto industry jobs in the Midwest fell by 33 percent, while those in the South increased by 52 percent.” Not surprisingly, when manufacturing went south, so did the wages of manufacturing workers—including in the North, given the downward pressure that low-wage factories in the former Confederacy and the current developing world exerted on American industry. In 2021, the Journal reported that a factory job that paid 83 percent more than a hotel or restaurant job in 2010 paid just 56 percent more in 2020. It added that the pay advantage of manufacturing over retail had slumped from 40 percent to 27 percent. This was not because wages in hotels, restaurants, and stores were rising.

The economic impact of unionizing the South, in other words, could almost be placed in the same category as reshoring work that had gone to China. If the UAW can begin that transformation—with a little help from laws that enforce decent standards of work on global corporations—that will be no small thing. ...Read More
Photo: Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes speaks to reporters at the state Capitol in Phoenix on Tuesday, April 9, 2024.

Making Even Reactionaries Blush: Arizona
Reaches Back to 1864 to Make Women Suffer

Anti-Abortion Statute was written by one man, and before Arizona Was a State and Women Could Vote

By Heather Scott Richardson
Letters from an American

April 10, 2024 - Yesterday, former president Trump released a video celebrating state control over abortion; today, a judicial decision in Arizona illuminated just what such state control means. With the federal recognition of the constitutional right to abortion gone since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, old laws left on state books once again are becoming the law of the land.

In a 4–2 decision, the all-Republican Arizona Supreme Court today said it would not interfere with the authority of the state legislature to write abortion policy, letting the state revert to an 1864 law that bans abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger. “[P]hysicians are now on notice that all abortions, except those necessary to save a woman’s life, are illegal,” the decision read.

The court explained: “A policy matter of this gravity must ultimately be resolved by our citizens through the legislature or the initiative process…. We defer, as we are constitutionally obligated to do, to the legislature’s judgment, which is accountable to, and thus reflects, the mutable will of our citizens.”

The idea that abortion law must be controlled by state legislatures is in keeping with the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. But it’s an interesting spin to say that the new policy is protecting the will of the citizens.

The Arizona law that will begin to be enforced in 14 days was written by a single man in 1864.

In 1864, Arizona was not a state, women and minorities could not vote, and doctors were still sewing up wounds with horsehair and storing their unwashed medical instruments in velvet-lined cases.

And, of course, the United States was in the midst of the Civil War.

In fact, the 1864 law soon to be in force again in Arizona to control women’s reproductive rights in the twenty-first century does not appear particularly concerned with women handling their own reproductive care in the nineteenth—it actually seems to ignore that practice entirely. The laws for Arizona Territory, chaotic and still at war in 1864, appear to reflect the need to rein in a lawless population of men.

The 1864 Arizona criminal code talks about “miscarriage” in the context of other male misbehavior. It focuses at great length on dueling, for example—making illegal not only the act of dueling (punishable by three years in jail) but also having anything to do with a duel. And then, in the section that became the law now resurrected in Arizona, the law takes on the issue of poisoning.

In that context, the context of punishing those who secretly administer poison to kill someone, it says that anyone who uses poison or instruments “with the intention to procure the miscarriage of any woman then being with child” would face two to five years in jail, “Provided, that no physician shall be affected by the last clause of this section, who in the discharge of his professional duties deems it necessary to produce the miscarriage of any woman in order to save her life.”

The next section warns against cutting out tongues or eyes, slitting noses or lips, or “rendering…useless” someone’s arm or leg.

The law that Arizona will use to outlaw abortion care seemed designed to keep men in the chaos of the Civil War from inflicting damage on others—including pregnant women—rather than to police women’s reproductive care, which women largely handled on their own or through the help of doctors who used drugs and instruments to remove what they called dangerous blockages of women’s natural cycles in the four to five months before fetal movement became obvious.

Written to police the behavior of men, the code tells a larger story about power and control.

The Arizona Territorial Legislature in 1864 had 18 men in the lower House of Representatives and 9 men in the upper house, the Council, for a total of 27 men. They met on September 26, 1864, in Prescott. The session ended about six weeks later, on November 10.

The very first thing the legislators did was to authorize the governor to appoint a commissioner to prepare a code of laws for the territory. But William T. Howell, a judge who had arrived in the territory the previous December, had already written one, which the legislature promptly accepted as a blueprint.

Although they did discuss his laws, the members later thanked Judge Howell for “preparing his excellent and able Code of Laws” and, as a mark of their appreciation, provided that the laws would officially be called “The Howell Code.” (They also paid him a handsome $2,500, which was equivalent to at least three years’ salary for a workingman in that era.) Judge Howell wrote the territory’s criminal code essentially single-handedly.

The second thing the legislature did was to give a member of the House of Representatives a divorce from his wife.

Then they established a county road near Prescott.

Then they gave a local army surgeon a divorce from his wife.

In a total of 40 laws, the legislature incorporated a number of road companies, railway companies, ferry companies, and mining companies. They appropriated money for schools and incorporated the Arizona Historical Society.

These 27 men constructed a body of laws to bring order to the territory and to jump-start development. But their vision for the territory was a very particular one.

The legislature provided that “[n]o black or mulatto, or Indian, Mongolian, or Asiatic, shall be permitted to [testify in court] against any white person,” thus making it impossible for them to protect their property, their families, or themselves from their white neighbors. It declared that “all marriages between a white person and a [Black person], shall…be absolutely void.”

And it defined the age of consent for sexual intercourse to be just ten years old (even if a younger child had “consented”).

So, in 1864, a legislature of 27 white men created a body of laws that discriminated against Black people and people of color and considered girls as young as ten able to consent to sex, and they adopted a body of criminal laws written by one single man.

And in 2024, one of those laws is back in force in Arizona.

Now, though, women can vote.

Before the midterm elections, 61% of Arizona voters told AP VoteCast they believed abortion should be legal in most or all cases, while only 6% said it should be illegal in all cases. A campaign underway to place a constitutional amendment protecting abortion rights on November’s ballot needs to gather 383,923 verified signatures by July; a week ago the campaign announced it already had 500,000 signatures.

It seems likely that voters will turn out in November to elect lawmakers who will represent the actual will of the people in the twenty-first century.


Notes:

https://azmemory.azlibrary.gov/nodes/view/38227

John S. Goff, “William T. Howell and the Howell Code of Arizona,” American Journal of Legal History 11 (July 1967): 221–233.

Acts, Resolutions and Memorials, Adopted by the First Legislative Assembly of the Territory of Arizona (Prescott: Office of the Arizona Miner, 1865).

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/23/us/arizona-abortion-ban.html

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/09/arizona-court-upholds-states-1864-total-abortion-ban-00151287

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2024/04/09/arizona-abortion-law-state-supreme-court-upholds-near-total-ban/73251148007/

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/04/09/us/arizona-abortion-ruling.html

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-arizona-supreme-court-ruling-biden-democrats-361cff78974e6038e532e73e261ae8a4

Twitter (X):

ezralevin/status/1777760245730992276 ...Read More
Digging Deeper into the Current Conjuncture:
Meet Claudia Sheinbaum, Who May Be Mexico’s First Woman President

The former student activist and current mayor of Mexico City is poised to make history with an ambitious platform on education, clean energy, and combating violence against women.

By Arturo Cano
The Nation

In the center of a photograph is a young woman wearing a kerchief. Alongside a small group of protesters, she holds up a sign that reads, in English, “Fair Trade and Democracy Now.”

The protest—the only expression of dissent during Carlos Salinas de Gortari’s triumphal tour of California—took place in September 1991 at Stanford University, where the Mexican president was invited to give a speech.

Salinas was at the height of his power. Thirteen months later, he and his fellow North American leaders, US President George H.W. Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, would sign the North American Free Trade Agreement into law.

At that moment, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, the young woman in the photograph, was driving from her home in Palo Alto, California, to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, where she was doing research as part of her doctoral studies in energy engineering at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). When one of Sheinbaum’s old friends sent me the photo recently, I texted it to her. She wrote back, “Heh, heh. I have the original,” referring to the story published in The Stanford Daily.

Barring unforeseen disaster or a major electoral upset, Sheinbaum, who was born in Mexico City in 1962, will be elected the next president of Mexico on June 2.

In 2022 and 2023, I conducted several interviews with her—whenever her schedule as mayor of Mexico City, one of the largest cities in the world, would permit—for my book, Claudia Sheinbaum: Presidenta.

On March 1, she launched her presidential campaign and announced her basic platform. But knowing her history, her family, and the roots of her political positions is essential to understanding who she is and how she reached this point—and how she might use her power as president.

Sheinbaum’s principal opponent is Xóchitl Gálvez, who represents a coalition made up of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), the National Action Party (PAN), and the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD).

During one of our conversations, I asked Sheinbaum what her life had been like between 1991 and 1994, when she was a graduate student in the United States.

“It was a beautiful time,” she said. “We lived in Stanford student housing, in small houses that formed a circle where all the back doors opened onto a garden; our kids lived with children from all over the world. I had a scholarship, so I dedicated myself to doing my doctorate while working and living with the children.”

Sheinbaum and her family, which includes many academics, have a decades-long relationship with the United States. She lived with her then-partner, Carlos Ímaz, who was pursuing a PhD in education at Stanford, and their children, Rodrigo (from her husband’s previous marriage) and Mariana, who was 2 years old when they came to the US and who later returned to study and earn her doctorate in philosophy at the University of Santa Cruz in 2021.

Sheinbaum’s sister, Adriana, lives in Los Angeles. Her older brother, Julio, who influenced her decision to study physics, is a physics researcher in Ensenada, in the Mexican border state of Baja California. Sheinbaum recalls that in nearby Redwood City, “they ate the best carnitas,” joking that “all of Aguililla” lives there, referring to the town in Michoacán, a state with one of the highest migration rates in Mexico.

One of her best friends at the time was an economist from Michoacán, Alma González, who crossed the border because she had no job opportunities and “because of the violence,” Sheinbaum explained. Speaking of her friend, Sheinbaum evoked the struggles of many migrants: “She started cleaning houses, and now she works at Stanford Hospital.” ...Read More

Image by Vilius Kukanauskas from Pixabay

Will the Congressional Putin Caucus Give Ally Ukraine to a Bloodthirsty Dictator?

If we fail to aid Ukraine and Russia succeeds in overwhelming that country, expect Putin to head to Moldova and Poland or the Baltic states next: his generals and his #2, Dmitry Medvedev have said so…

By Thom Hartmann
The Hartmann Report

April 09, 2024 - Today, the House of Representatives is back from a 2-week vacation and news reports suggest that Speaker “Moscow Mike” Johnson may put legislation on the floor to provide aid to Ukraine.

Other news reports, however, say that his entire “I’ll consider Ukraine aid” is just BS: that he’s going to poison pill the legislation by attaching riders and amendments demanding things that Democrats won’t go along with.

Sunday, Johnson told Fox “News”:

“We’ve been talking to all the members, especially now over the district work period. When we return after this work period, we’ll be moving a product, but it’s going to, I think, have some important innovations.”

Innovations? You mean scams? Like calling the aid to Ukraine a “loan” or funding it with seized Russian assets, a process that could introduce more months of delay.

The Congressional Putin Caucus is outraged at even the possibility that we may help a fellow democracy fend off violent attacks and child kidnappings (over 100,000 so far) from the Russian dictator. As Marjorie Taylor Greene said in the context of her threat to push her discharge petition to remove Johnson from his Speaker’s seat:

“I’m going to tell you right now: funding Ukraine is probably one of the most egregious things that he can do.”

Putin, being a former intelligence officer, understands well the importance of propaganda as a weapon to destroy an enemy. And he’s been using that knowledge — and billions of rubles running social media troll operations — to influence both American public opinion and the opinions of Republicans in Congress.

His efforts have become so blatant that the chairmen of both the House Intelligence Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee are warning the public and their colleagues about Republicans who are openly taking Putin’s side in the conflict.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) was blunt, saying that Russian propaganda “has infected a good chunk of my party’s base.” He elaborated to Puck News:

“There are some more nighttime entertainment shows that seem to spin, like, I see the Russian propaganda in some of it — and it’s almost identical [to what they’re saying on Russian state television] — on our airwaves.”

McCaul added, “[T]hese people that read various conspiracy-theory outlets that are just not accurate, and they actually model Russian propaganda.”

Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio) was equally specific when asked if he agreed with McCaul’s statement:

“Oh, it is absolutely true. We see directly coming from Russia attempts to mask communications that are anti-Ukraine, and pro-Russia messages, some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor.”

Republicans are promoting pro-Putin propaganda because they know, with the leader of their party in thrall to the Russian dictator, that there will be no pushback or consequence; Trump actually rewards such behavior with special recognition, private phone calls, and visits to Mar-a-Lago. Just ask Marjorie Taylor Greene.

But it’s not just members of Congress. Elon Musk has promoted Russian propagandists on X and cut off access to Starlink when Ukraine was preparing an attack on the Russian navy at Crimea. And just this past weekend RFK Jr. also echoed Putin himself, saying:

“Putin said, ‘Look I don't want to go into Crimea. Let’s negotiate a peace.’ ...Read More
'Solutionaries:' Helping Young People to Combat Anxiety

Children and adolescents are anxious about their world and their futures. We need to give them the chance to make a positive difference collaboratively.

By Zoe Weil and Guest
LA Progressive

APR 6, 2024 - It’s been widely reported in the news that depression, anxiety, and suicidality among youth are on the rise. As a humane educator who teaches about the interconnected issues of human rights, environmental sustainability, and animal protection, I’ve personally seen anxiety deepen among youth during the almost 40 years that I’ve been teaching.

When I began my work as a humane educator, and during the ensuing 20-plus years, by and large young people were upset about the problems they learned about, but they almost all believed these problems could be solved.

In 2012, before the COVID pandemic, before wildfires were regularly destroying forests and communities across the globe, before hard-won rights were being rolled back, and before polarization had become so extreme it seemed we could barely come together to solve much of anything, I was invited to speak at a middle school in Connecticut. I asked the fifth- and sixth-graders to tell me what they thought were the biggest problems in the world, and I wrote down what they said on a whiteboard until the board was completely full.

Then, I asked the students to raise their hands if they thought we could solve the problems they listed. Of the 45 children, only five raised their hands.

This was the most sobering moment in my then almost 35-year career as an educator, and things have only gotten worse since then.

I knew I had to do something to restore their hope, so I asked the students to close their eyes and imagine themselves sitting on a park bench on a beautiful day at the end of a long and well-lived life. I painted a picture of the scene: The air and waterways around them were clean. The birds were singing. Species were recovering from the brink of extinction. There hadn’t been a war in more years than they could remember. No one went to bed hungry. We had learned to treat each other and other animals with compassion.

For the sake of our children and the world, we need to educate them to be 'solutionaries.'

Then, I asked them to imagine a child coming up to them and joining them on the park bench. I told them that the child had been studying history in school and had been learning about darker times, times they themselves had lived through. The child had all sorts of questions about how things had gotten so much better. Then I asked them to imagine the child asking this final question:

“What role did you play in helping to bring about this better world?”

I let them respond to the child in their mind before asking them—with their eyes still closed—to raise their hands if now they could imagine us solving the problems they listed on the whiteboard. This time, 40 hands went up in the air. Envisioning a peaceful, healthy world and knowing that they and the other children in the room would have a role in creating such a future was enough to restore their hope.

A few years later, I was in Guadalajara, Mexico, to speak at a conference. The day before the conference began, I visited the school hosting the event. When I arrived, I was invited to talk to some of the fifth-graders. Remembering the time I’d spoken to the fifth- and sixth-graders in Connecticut, I asked these children to raise their hands if they thought we could solve the problems in the world. This time, every hand flew up in the air.

What was different? Their teacher had been teaching them, in age-appropriate ways, about environmental problems, and they had been addressing them. They knew problems could be solved because they were solving them.

We need to act to move from despair to hope. Singer-songwriter Joan Baez said as much in her famous quote: “Action is the antidote to despair.”

Oberlin College and Conservatory Professor David Orr put it another way: “Hope is a verb with its sleeves rolled up.”

With that said, not all actions are equal, either in their effectiveness in solving problems or in their ability to transform anxiety into a sense of efficacy. Actions that foment division and rage tend not to be either strategic at solving problems or particularly hope-inducing. Solutionary actions, however, which require that we conduct careful research, connect with a range of stakeholders, and collaborate to find solutions that do the most good and least harm for everyone (people, animals, and the environment), are not only more likely to be adopted (which is hope-inducing in and of itself) but also to build community and camaraderie, which diminishes anxiety and despair.

Teachers who adopt this "solutionary" framework rave about it, as do their students. In one survey of teens who participated in solutionary projects in several countries, 96% of students said they developed more compassion and understanding of others’ lives and perspectives, and 93% reported feeling more confident that they can take action and make a positive difference. These results suggest that learning how to be "solutionaries" is a powerful way not only to provide meaningful educational experiences and prepare young people to contribute positively to their communities, nations, and world but also to stave off hopelessness and reduce anxiety.

There are many good ideas about what we should do in our homes and our schools to address anxiety among young people. These include banning phones in schools, delaying the age at which we allow our children to be on social media, and giving young people opportunities to be together in person rather than spend hours alone on devices. Let’s not stop there, however. Young people are anxious about their world and their futures. We need to give them the chance to make a positive difference collaboratively. For the sake of our children and the world, we need to educate them to be 'solutionaries.' ...Read More
‘No Losers in Peace’: Taiwan’s Ma Ying-jeou Sends Antiwar Message in Beijing

  • Island’s former president appeals to younger generations to learn the lessons of history

  • Speech at museum is part of an 11-day trip to the Chinese mainland that is expected to include a meeting with Xi Jinping


By Vanessa Cai in Shanghai
South China Morning Post

April 8 2024 - Former Taiwanese president Ma Ying-jeou called on younger generations to learn from the past to “resolve disputes peacefully” during a visit on Monday to a museum in Beijing commemorating the second Sino-Japanese war.

“People in both the mainland and Taiwan had been bullied by Japanese warlords, and suffered heavy casualties. Although we were lagging behind in terms of equipment and training in a disadvantaged situation, we were united in our determination,” he said in a speech at the Museum of the War of the Chinese People’s Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.

“I have always believed that there are no winners in war and no losers in peace. The mistakes of war may be forgiven, but the truth of history cannot be forgotten.

“We, the younger generation, must remember that historical mistakes must not be repeated … We must learn to resolve disputes peacefully.”

Former Taiwanese president Ma Ying-jeou calls for both sides of Taiwan Strait to ‘avoid war’

The museum is near Lugou Bridge, also known as Marco Polo Bridge, the site of a battle between the Japanese army and Chinese forces on July 7, 1937.

The incident is regarded as the starting point of Japan’s full-scale war into China’s heartland after its years of occupation of China’s northeast provinces.

Ma arrived in Beijing with a group of Taiwanese students on Sunday as part of an 11-day trip to the mainland that he is calling a “journey of peace.”

The visit comes amid soaring tensions across the Taiwan Strait as the island prepares for the inauguration on May 20 of William Lai Ching-te from the independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party.

Ma is expected to meet President Xi Jinping this week, but the meeting has yet to be confirmed officially. They last met in Singapore in 2015 when Ma was the self-ruled island’s president, the first such summit since the two sides split in 1949.

Asked about the possible meeting between Ma and Xi, Chiu Tai-san, head of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), said on Monday that “it is a good thing that both sides have communication and exchanges”, according to Taiwanese media reports.

Chiu added that the MAC would continue to monitor the situation, and “provide relevant information to government officials”.

The trip is Ma’s second to the mainland since stepping down as the island’s leader in 2016. He arrived on April 1 and has visited Guangdong and Shaanxi provinces.

Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou says massacre history holds lessons for both sides of strait.

Beijing sees Taiwan as part of its territory to be united with the mainland, by force if necessary.

Most countries, including the United States, do not recognize Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington opposes any attempt to take the island by force and remains committed to supplying it with weapons. ...Read More
New Journals and Books for Radical Education...

Use Changemaker for Your Holiday Gifts,
Thus Lending Us a Hand, Too!
From Upton
Sinclair's 'Goose Step' to the Neoliberal University

Essays on the Ongoing Transformation of Higher Education


Paperback USD 17.00
 
This is a unique collection of 15 essays by two Purdue University professors who use their institution as a case-in-point study of the changing nature of the American 'multiversity.' They take a book from an earlier time, Upton Sinclair's 'The Goose-Step A Study of American Education' from 1923, which exposed the capitalist corruption of the ivory tower back then and brought it up to date with more far-reaching changes today. time. They also include, as an appendix, a 1967 essay by SDS leader Carl Davidson, who broke some of the original ground on the subject.

The Man Who Changed Colors

By Bill Fletcher, Jr.

When a dockworker falls to his death under strange circumstances, investigative journalist David Gomes is on the case. His dogged pursuit of the truth puts his life in danger and upends the scrappy Cape Cod newspaper he works for.

Spend a season on the Cape with this gripping, provocative tale that delves into the
complicated relationships between Cape Verdean Americans and African Americans, Portuguese fascist gangs, and abusive shipyard working conditions. From the author of The Man Who Fell From The Sky.

“Bill Fletcher is a truth seeker and a truth teller – even when he’s writing fiction. Not unlike Bill, his character David Gomes is willing to put his life and career in peril to expose the truth. A thrilling read!” − Tavis Smiley, Broadcaster & NY TIMES Bestselling Author 


VVAW: 50 Years
of Struggle

By Alynne Romo

While most books about VVAW focus on the 1960s and 1970s, this photo-with-text book provides a look at many of actions of VVAW over five decades. Some of VVAW’s events and its stands on issues are highlighted here in stories. Others show up in the running timelines which also include relevant events around the nation or the world. Examples of events are the riots in America’s urban centers, the murders of civil rights leaders or the largely failed missions in Vietnam.

Paul Tabone: This is a must read for anyone who was in the war, who had a loved one in the war, who is interested in history in general or probably more importantly for anyone who wants to see how we repeat history over and over again given the incredible idiot and his minions that currently occupy the White House. To my fellow Viet Nam veterans I say "Welcome Home Brothers". A must read for everyone who considers them self an American. Bravo.

A China Reader


Edited by Duncan McFarland

A project of the CCDS Socialist Education Project & Online University of the Left


244 pages, $20 (discounts available for quantity orders from carld717@gmail.com), or order at :


The book is a selection of essays offering keen insight into the nature of China and its social system, its internal debates, and its history. It includes several articles on the US and China and the growing efforts of friendship between the Chinese and American peoples.
Taking Down
White Supremacy

Edited by the CCDS
Socialist Education Project


This collection of 20 essays brings together a variety of articles-theoretical, historical, and experiential-that address multi-racial, multi-national unity. The book provides examples theoretically and historically, of efforts to build multi-racial unity in the twentieth century.

166 pages, $12.50 (discounts available for quantity), order at :


  Click here for the Table of contents

A Revolution in Russia Is Possible

Mikhail Lobanov on the prospects
for political change in Putin’s Russia


Michael Lobanov is a left-wing politician and trade unionist, whose election campaign made him famous across Russia prior to the invasion of Ukraine. After a year of harassment, arrests, raids, police beatings, and dismissal from his university post, he was forced to leave the country in the summer of 2023.


By Michail Lobanov
Rosa Luxemburg Stifung

In mid-February, two very bad pieces of news arrived just three days apart that would have a serious impact on the Russian political landscape. First, an appeals court upped the sentence of the left-wing intellectual Boris Kagarlitsky — a 600,000-rouble fine (approximately 6,000 euro) suddenly became a five-year prison sentence, and the academic was sent straight from the courtroom to jail. On the following Friday, the world was shaken by the news of Alexei Navalny’s unexpected death in a penal colony in the Arctic Circle. Perhaps in the future, these two events will be understood as the beginning of yet another level and scale of the Kremlin’s repression of Russian society.

It is important to realize that both news events, and the possible reactions to them (or lack thereof) are closely linked to the prospects of ending the war in Ukraine. I will try to briefly explain and show why we need to carefully avoid reproducing the narratives that are manufactured and planted by the Kremlin in these cases.

The first thing we should understand and accept is that the war in Ukraine can only truly end once there has been profound political change in Russia. Making costly and unjust concessions to Putin at the expense of the interests of Ukraine and other countries cannot buy real peace from the Kremlin but only a brief pause before renewed military aggression.

The second thing to understand, without which the first only leads to undue despair, is that a revolution or profound political change is indeed possible in Russia in the medium term. There are three fundamental preconditions for this:

The dissatisfaction with the Kremlin’s domestic policies and with the vulnerable position of many people at all levels of Russian society, except a small percentage of the most affluent.

The presence of a sufficiently large number of people with experience in independent or even oppositional activities — these are the future activists of a broad popular movement who will change the country, removing the current leadership that has seized wealth and power. I would like to note that a lot of the people with experience in political participation are from younger generations, and in this demographic left-wing and democratic views are the most widespread.

A series of mistakes and crimes by the Russian authorities, the first of which was the invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, which make political crises in Russia almost inevitable. Prigozhin’s mutiny was the first instance.

There is nothing the regime or anyone else can do about the first preconditions, namely mass dissatisfaction with life in Russia and Putin’s domestic policies. Russia is dominated by one of the world’s most radical liberal-conservative regimes. Market ideology, blatant economic inequality, the precarious and vulnerable position of the majority, and the staggering luxury of the minority are the basis of this regime, and one which it will not abandon, even when standing on the edge of the abyss. They will not “share” with the people.

To avoid political crises, the Kremlin seeks allies, willing or unwilling, in Europe and the US.

The Kremlin can, however, work with the second and third preconditions. The active part of society, which has experience in collective cooperation, has to be intimidated and demoralized.

Fabricated criminal cases, such as the Kagarlitsky case and Navalny’s political assassination, serve this purpose. Sometimes European officials and politicians also unwittingly act as Putin’s allies in the demoralization of the active part of Russian society when they, for one reason or another, make life difficult for political activists who have fled repression or military mobilization by closing off escape routes for those who may be targeted in the future.

To avoid political crises, the Kremlin seeks allies, willing or unwilling, in Europe and the US. Whether misguided or outright corrupt, they are supposed to convince their citizens and the authorities to make unjust concessions to Putin that will allow him to get out of his otherwise hopeless situation, catch his breath, and continue his military aggression with renewed vigour.

How does Russia’s multi-layered propaganda deal with issues that are inconvenient for the Kremlin? Whether it is the passenger flight MH17 that was shot down over Ukraine in 2014, or Navalny’s assassination, or the criminal prosecution of the journalist Kagarlitsky or the mathematician Azat Miftakhov, it begins with several “alternative facts” being offered at once through a variety of channels (from the official state media to supposedly ‘independent’ writers). One alternative fact may be publicly debunked, but people will not want to deal with debunking a whole slew of artificially planted narratives. Ultimately, people are simply left with the feeling that there are many explanations and different opinions, and that “we will never know the real truth”.

Among the standard explanations used by the Kremlin to divert attention are narratives based on the principle of cui bono — looking for the guilty among those who benefit from the situation. The downing of MH17 by pro-Putin forces benefits the Ukrainian authorities, so the Kremlin plants the version that Kyiv did it.

Navalny’s assassination leads to a wave of criticism of Putin from the global community, it therefore benefits the governments of the US and Western Europe and NATO, which the Kremlin presents within Russia as its opponents. So, it was them who carried out the assassination through their secret agents. In other high-profile political cases, such as Kagarlitsky or Miftakhov, it is often suggested that the defendant is in fact guilty of other crimes, yet for some reason they are not being tried for them, but rather for the fabricated case.

Therefore, it is always important to monitor the Kremlin’s narratives that accompany its political repression and crimes. When these narratives are followed and unconsciously reproduced by political and social groups around the world, it contributes to the demoralization of Russian civil society and helps Putin avoid political crises. This means it works against the prospect of revolution or profound political change in Russia, which is the only way to peacefully, permanently, and justly end the conflict in Ukraine.

I urge everyone to consider their positions and actions regarding the events in Russia in relation to how they may impact Russian civil society and the Kremlin’s chances of avoiding future crises.
I wish to end by reiterating a few facts and simple truths.

The left-wing intellectual Boris Kagarlitsky is set to spend five years in jail for no reason. He was cautious and did nothing to threaten anyone. It is just that he is a well-known figure and publicly opposed to the war. The very fact that in a fabricated case of “justifying terrorism” in December 2023, a Russian court gave him a fine rather than sentencing him to several years in prison is, the best evidence of his innocence. Now the sentence has been reviewed and Boris has been sent to prison simply because he did not want to leave Russia, which he has every right not to do.

An attempted poisoning of Alexei Navalny was already carried out on Putin’s orders in August 2020. Over the past few years, the Kremlin and security forces have been doing everything possible to gradually isolate Alexei from his family, his lawyers, and the world. Now the Kremlin is covering up the traces of what happened and made the family wait nine days before they could receive his body.

If the Russian authorities had not wanted Navalny’s death and were not to blame, they would have acted differently. Alexei would have lived in excellent conditions all these years, trusted and independent doctors would have been allowed to see him, and an international team would have been working from the very beginning to determine the cause of death. We know that it was a political assassination of a key political opponent.

I urge everyone to consider their positions and actions regarding the events in Russia in relation to how they may impact Russian civil society and the Kremlin’s chances of avoiding future crises. I call for the widest possible solidarity campaigns with all anti-war and other political prisoners. The projects of Russian activists and the activists themselves should be supported. This is not very difficult, and it is far less costly in comparison to the amounts spent on “security” budgets.

There are no ethical dilemmas here. However, it will be an important contribution to the cause of revolution in Russia, and thus peace in Ukraine and Europe.

Translated by Charlotte Bull and Marty Hiatt for Gegensatz Translation Collective. ...Read More

CHANGEMAKER PUBLICATIONS: Recent works on new paths to socialism and the solidarity economy

Remember Us for Gift Giving and Study Groups

We are a small publisher of books with big ideas. We specialize in works that show us how a better world is possible and needed. Click HERE or Gramsci below for our list.

Interested in Studying Gramsci? In a Serious way? We have a group that meets Sundays via Zoom, 11am-12:30pm, facilitated by Piruz Alemi. We go paragraph by paragraph, even line by line, reading aloud, then discussing, through The Prison Notebooks, using an online PDF. If you are interested contact Carl Davidson at carld717@gmail.com

Treat someone to a wonderful book.
And treat yourself, too!


Powerful stories, wonderful gifts.

As they stand up, slow down, form unions, leave an abusive relationship or just stir up good trouble, the characters in this multi-generation novel entertain and enlighten, make us laugh and rage, and encourage us to love deeply, that we may continue the fight for justice.

"So much fiction is about escape and fantasy, but these powerful Tales of Struggle will enrich our real and daily lives."  ─ Gloria Steinem 

“What a wonderful story of class, class struggle and regular people. The story is about struggle and change, but also about joy and humor. Great work! ─ Bill Fletcher, Jr., author of Solidarity Divided 

Price: $15.00
Photo: Protesters at the nonviolent Navajo Indian Protests of 1973, in Gallup, New Mexico, organized by AIM, the American Indian Movement, protesting the mistreatment of Navajo people by federal government agencies and law enforcement agencies, 1973. Photo By Buddy Mays/Getty Images

History Lesson of the Week: 47 Years Later, Leonard Peltier Is Still Not Free

Despite being eligible for parole since 1992, Peltier remains in prison—a sign of how determined the federal government is to repress and criminalize the American Indian Movement.

BY MANSA MUSA
Real News Network

APRIL 8, 2024 - n 1977, American Indian Movement member Leonard Peltier was convicted of the murder of two FBI agents, and has remained a political prisoner of the US ever since. Peltier’s conviction has long been contested by activists and legal experts. Despite the recantation of three key witnesses, his case has never been brought back to trial. Peltier has been eligible for parole since 1992, and the federal government has ignored calls to free him for more than 30 years. Rachel Dionne Thunder joins Rattling the Bars to discuss Peltier’s case and the radical vision of the American Indian Movement which the federal government has sought to repress through Peltier’s incarceration.

So my name is Rachel Dionne Thunder. I currently live in Minneapolis, Minnesota. I come from an AIM family, that’s the American Indian Movement, which is a Civil Rights movement for American Indian people that started here in Minneapolis in 1968. I’m also one of the co-founders and board members of our organization here called the Indigenous Protector Movement.

And so, growing up as a girl, as a little girl in AIM, I always heard stories of Leonard Peltier and those founding members of the American Indian Movement, and the injustices that they fought during the Civil Rights era in the late ’60s and early ’70s. And so, our work today is carrying that on, but also not forgetting our now elder, Leonard Peltier, who is the longest-held indigenous political prisoner. He’s been held for nearly five decades at this point.

Mansa Musa: We’re talking about people whose nation, these are nations that’s asking for… The thing with Leonard Peltier is because of, like you said earlier, the Civil Rights. But it’s more about the human rights of a people who are claiming nationhood and the right to self-determination and the right to govern themselves. And it’s because of this that we find a situation with Lewis Peltier. But not only with him, but other indigenous people that have came and gone. And so, let’s talk about, as you spoke earlier, about AIM. Now, we recognize that, and it came out, I think the birth is in the Minneapolis, if I’m not mistaken.

Rachel Dionne Thunder: Yeah. In 1968.

Mansa Musa: 1968. We know that during that period, a series of events took place that led up to AIM being organized into an entity. We had all the tribes, various tribes come to Washington during the Nixon administration to try to get treaties that was signed, giving back properties, getting out the way of indigenous people from having their own nation. That they came to Washington with the sole and purpose of educating the populace about what was going on on the reservations, and then the different parts of the country where indigenous people was populated. ...Read More


Women in Politics: Rosario Ibarra
Mexico Solidarity Project News
from April 10, 2024
Boys and girls are socialized differently. Boys are taught to aim for the top of a pecking order, to win. Girls are taught to nurture; they are responsible for the well-being of the whole family. So, what do boys want to be when they grow up? They might well say, “President.” Girls? “Me and my friends are going to…”

Women often enter politics after personally experiencing a collective need. Look at Malala Yousafzai, who won the Nobel Prize at age 17 and influenced a generation of girls. She never intended to be a public figure; she just loved learning, which the Taliban denied her when they banned girls from going to school. “Me and other girls have a right to education!”

As Heather Dashner Monk tells us, so it was with Rosario Ibarra de Piedra. In 1982, she ran for president of Mexico, the first woman to ever do so. Her trajectory began simply as a mother searching for a lost child. She bonded with other mothers, and collectively they started a political movement against government impunity and political repression. From there, her many friends encouraged her to find a bigger platform — the biggest platform! Running for president would not have crossed her mind if someone had asked her as a child, “What do you want to do when you grow up?”

The mothers began with pleas, their pleas morphed into demands; soft women's voices morphed into loud ones — amplified by the thousands of voices of their friends.

As we look at the women running for president of Mexico today, let’s not forget Rosario Ibarra and her clarion call for justice. ...Read More
New Liberation Road
Booklets supporting the Mexico Solidarity Project

By Bill Gallegos

Liberation Road is the only major US revolutionary socialist organization that has a developed position on Chicano Liberation, and one of the few that understands and works to build solidarity with the socialist movements and revolutionaries of Mexico.  Now we have something that explains those positions - a series of Liberation Road pamphlets entitled Adelante! (Forward!). The pamphlets were developed collectively by several comrades, with support from comrades outside the organization.  

The articles are enhanced and enriched by the powerful art and culture that is a major component of the pamphlets.  While Adelante! was introduced at the recent Mexico Solidarity tour of the Mexico Solidarity Project they are meant as important resources for all comrades of Liberation Road — to better understand our strategic perspectives on Chicano Liberation and Mexico Solidarity (internationalism), and to help us promote those perspectives in all of our mass and red work.  

This has always been an important task for our organization, but now more than ever as the New Confederacy seems to have made immigration the center of their attack on democracy, equity, and social justice.  In order to support comrades in understanding and advancing our strategic perspectives we are going to be conducting at least one webinar to discuss our line and how to integrate Adelante! in your work.   Adelante! is a product of love comrades, an expression of the spirit element that Che Guevarra insisted is at the heart of every true revolutionary’s work. A link to download the booklets will be available by next week. Meanwhile, contact Bill Gallegos at billg4@gmail.com
Our Amazing Resource for Radical Education

CURRENT FEATURE: In the 'Study Guides' Section
From the settlers to the present, and how its consciousness is conflicted. Prepared by Carl Davidson and Rebecca Tarlau,
with some help from the DSA Rust Belt group.
There are hundreds of video courses here, along with study guides, downloadable books and links to hundreds of other resources for study groups or individuals.

Nearly 10,000 people have signed on to the OUL for daily updates, and more than 150,000 have visited us at least once.

Karl Marx's ideas are a common touchstone for many people working for change. His historical materialism, his many contributions to political economy and class analysis, all continue to serve his core values--the self-emancipation of the working class and a vision of a classless society. There are naturally many trends in Marxism that have developed over the years, and new ones are on the rise today. All of them and others who want to see this project succeed are welcome here.

Video for Learning: This Is Neoliberalism? Introducing the Invisible Ideology ...26 min
Harry Targ's 'Diary of a Heartland Radical'
This week's topic:

SOME ARTICLES ON NEW REALITIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

(Inspired by DISCUSSIONS IN CCDS)


Click the picture to access the blog.
Tune of the Week: Sour Widows - 'Cherish'...5:40 min
Book Review: 'We Want Better Education'

The following is a guest post from People’s History in Texas (PHIT). They’ve been bringing the stories of ordinary people and extraordinary movements to life since 1977. Subscribe to the the People’s History in Texas Substack for more like this. --Alice Embree

By People's History in Texas

Thanks for reading Alice’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

April 6, 2024 - In 1969, Edcouch-Elsa school district allocated $350 for books related to Mexican-American literature.

It wasn’t done happily and it wasn’t done voluntarily.

In the fall of 1968, Chicano students enrolled in high school in small Winter Valley community walked out of school repeatedly, faced incarceration, had their parents threatened with loss of their jobs, and some students were forced to move to another district. But it was important to these students that their heritage be respected and be included in the public school system.

The walkout ended when Chicano student protesters agreed to end their protest after the Edcouch-Elsa School District readmitted them to classes in January 1969 as part of a court settlement. This was the first major MALDEF Chicano civil rights victory in the courts. MALDEF is the Mexican American Legal Defense And Educational Fund.

This story is told by James B. Barrera in "We Want Better Education!” It was published last year and is an excellent history told at a crucial time in the current climate of Texas educational battles.

“We Want Better Education!” is an absorbing recounting of the actual history of the four 1968-69 student uprisings in Texas.  Lanier High School in San Antonio was the first Texas high school to demand better education by protesting and walking out, but Edcouch-Elsa was the first in the Winter Valley. It is an interesting historical note that one of the student leaders worked during the summer before the walk-out in a Detroit automobile factory. Labor unionists gave him valuable lessons organizing and political consciousness.

The most famous walkout was in Crystal City, which the author says led to the development of the La Raza Unida Party. Jose Angel Gutierrez was involved in the organization and support of the students. The protest started over a grievance about cheerleaders and the selection process. But that was just the opening clash. The more substantive demands were pretty reasonable. No punishment for speaking Spanish in class, access to better education, help in getting information about colleges, and courses dealing with Mexican-American culture and history.

The Texas Rangers were sent down to investigate because the state leaders thought that was a clearly communist thing to say.

Severita Lara was one of the leaders of the protest, and also one of the more fascinating stories. Severita Lara, like numerous other Mexican American students, migrated during the summer for work. In San Jose, California, Lara began planning a protest at her Crystal City school after learning about the East Los Angeles school walkouts that occurred in March 1968. According to one historian, the migrant labor network between Crystal City and the vegetable-growing region near San Jose provided her and other Crystal City migrant students exposure to the development of the Chicano Movement in California. Some might call this an example of the circulation of struggle.

The Crystal City walk-out garnered national attention and three students, Severita Lara, Diana Serna, and Mario Trevino, were chosen by their fellow students to go to Washington, DC, to meet with government officials.

They met with Senators Yarborough and Edward Kennedy, as well as Chris Roggerson, an official in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The student leaders urged the government to withhold federal aid from their school system. Roggerson promised an investigation into the school district’s possible violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which allowed HEW to cut funds from segregated school systems.

That must have caught the administrators’ eyes because the complaints were settled soon after.

That period of official respect for other cultures lasted 50 years but a pushback is now taking place on diversity in education.

And this book is a timely reminder of what is used to be like.

And PHIT applauds the book, because our mission is to remind folks of stories and history that has been forgotten and needs to be remembered.

So buy the book.

And, by the way, support People’s History in Texas with a pledge and a subscription to our Substack. ...Read More

TV Review: The Sympathizer, But
Which Side Is He On?

By Nandini Balial
Rogerebert.com
April 10, 2024 -The unnamed narrator (Hoa Xuande) of “The Sympathizer” flees the fall of Saigon as a refugee and lands up in sunny Los Angeles in the late ‘70s. Like many immigrants in America, he suffers racist insults, works jobs he doesn’t particularly enjoy or want to do, and struggles to feel at home in a strange new land.

But unlike many immigrants in America, he is hiding a bombshell secret, one that threatens his future and haunts every decision he makes. Based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel of the same name by Viet Thanh Nguyen, “The Sympathizer,” which begins airing on HBO this week, was created for television by Don McKellar (“The Red Violin,” “Blindness”) and Park Chan-wook (“Decision to Leave”). Just as in the book, the series’ lead, played with dynamic intensity by Australian-Vietnamese actor Xuande, is the son of a Vietnamese mother and French father, and identified only by various epithets lobbed at him by others like bastard, two-faced, half-breed.

The narrator is in a Vietnamese communist reeducation camp when the audience first meets him. His sole task is to prepare an account of his efforts to aid the revolution. Sweat pours off his neck, off his eyelids, staining his uniform, as he sits in a wooden solitary holding cell, writing about his work as a communist embedded inside the Vietnamese Secret Police, passing on valuable information about espionage to his comrades in the Viet Cong.

The narrator’s perpetually preoccupied, tinpot dictator of a boss, known only as the General (Toan Le, born for the part), does not suspect a thing, nor does Claude (Robert Downey Jr., unrecognizable in a curly ginger wig, complete with eyebrows, and wide blue-black contact lenses), the narrator’s CIA handler and recruiter.

The narrator has two best friends, with whom he forged a long-lasting bond at the age of 14: Bon (Fred Nguyen Khan) is an anti-communist army paratrooper, counting the days till he, his wife, and newborn child will be able to flee Vietnam for America. The other, Man (a stellar Duy Nguyen), is a dentist and the narrator’s VC handler. In addition to the bombs raining down around them, Man and the narrator are weighed down by the secret they conceal from their dearest friend.

The VC are due in Saigon any day now, as thunderclaps of artillery remind the residents of the city. While Claude does manage to help the narrator, the General, and many of their colleagues escape, their departure from Saigon is marred by bombs falling from the sky and unimaginable heartbreak. Once in LA, the sympathizer is still required to report on the General’s activities back to the VC, which sets off a cycle of death, destruction, and lies, equally calamitous as the war they left behind.

Park Chan-wook’s direction of the first three episodes is among his finest work. It isn’t just that his fluid direction makes the episodes feel like one long, gliding film rather than episodic television. It’s that he forges an extraordinary relationship with the material that creates a luminous visual texture; the viewer can practically feel the sweat of Saigon emanating from the screen, the viscosity of rich red blood blasting out of a skull, the lissome slipperiness of pho noodles slurping into happy mouths. As in “Oldboy” and “Decision to Leave,” Park expands shots using wide angles, displaying the effect of one character on others in the background, causing the stakes to change without everyone in the frame even realizing it. His camera glides with wit and insouciance, reflecting changes in fortune and mood. Speaking of which, entire dissertations could be penned on his predilection for reflective surfaces (like Wes Anderson, perhaps his closest stylistic contemporary, Park enjoys finding new ways to use the same bag of tricks): mirrors, glass coffee tables, double-sided glass in interrogation rooms. By finding multiple ways to convey the bounty of themes at work, Park creates a kinetic storytelling energy that is rarely found in American TV. Credit also belongs to his editors Vikash Patel (“Ozark”) and Jin Lee (“Ma”), who use dissolves and match cuts in ways that are both humorous and meditative. Their collaboration with Park is poetry in motion, each cut, each move of the camera adding greater dimension and speed to the story.

Robert Downey Jr., also an executive producer of the project, mirrors the many layers at work here by stepping into multiple characters. This project is his “Dr. Strangelove” with the aid of wigs, facial prosthetics, varied diction, and body language that leaps off the screen with supreme confidence; the actor achieves something most artists just dream about. This writer is not permitted to share every role he inhabits, but his work as Claude alone captivates—he is both brash and a cipher, a Philip Seymour Hoffman maneuver rarely managed by other actors, especially since both the actor and Park revealed in interviews that much of RDJ’s dialogue was improvised.

But even though Downey Jr. swings it out of the park, he makes ample room for Hoa Xuande, whose work here is that of a bona fide movie star. Best known for a supporting turn on Netflix’s remake of “Cowboy Bebop,” Xuande’s work as the sympathizer encompasses a rainbow of emotions: dread, anxiety, guilt, rage, frustration, joy, and hope. His wide cheekbones and blue-green eyes dance in gorgeous disharmony, conveying the vibrant discomfort of always being caught in the middle.

He is white but also Vietnamese; he is a cop but also a communist; he is charming but terrified; he exudes confidence, concealing an iceberg of terror underneath. (In an interview, Xuande’s recollection of his own biracial past as a first-generation Australian, the child of Vietnamese refugees, seems like it was more than adequate preparation for the part.) Perhaps that’s why being a spy comes fairly naturally to the sympathizer: he has never fit in, and straddling many worlds but never belonging to one, while painful and disorienting, is familiar.

What prevents this series from achieving perfection is that Park Chan-wook hands off directorial duties for the back half of the season (although it should be noted he does maintain writing credits after the initial trio). The first three episodes are likely locks for various Emmy nominations. However, as soon as Fernando Meirelles ("City of God") and Marc Munden ("The Secret Garden") take over directorial duties, “The Sympathizer” falters. What was once enthralling becomes merely competent; most of all, the latter two directors lack Park’s audacious levity.

Nonetheless, “The Sympathizer” is a riveting watch, not just because it features front and center the experiences of Vietnamese citizens—those who fled and those who stayed behind—but because it offers a vantage point into how the American immigrant experience thoroughly bamboozles the mind; how both loss and good fortune are slippery slopes into reactionary politics; and the gruesome, eternal ripple effects of war. Grainy red text, a quote from Nguyen’s novel, appears on the screen in the first episode: “All wars are fought twice. The first time on the battlefield, the second in memory.” The audience is fortunate enough to witness both.

All episodes screened for review. Premieres on April 14th. ...Read More
522 Valencia St.
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-6637
Is the content of this email relevant to you?
Yes
No