MAKE $$$ WHILE YOU CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR PROFESSION

ICI provides world-class programs and its intellectual property to affiliates free of charge and shares all program revenue with them. If your organization is interested in partnering with ICI to earn revenue while you contribute to the development of the internal control profession worldwide don't hesitate to get in touch with Dr. Michael Pregmon, Jr., Chief Operations Officer, by email at:

mpregmon@internalcontrolinstitute.org or by phone at 727-538-4113 in the USA.

The ICI "Certification Series" has been completely updated and is available online to everyone around the world! Course content prepares individuals to design and/or assess internal control and to assist management in installing internal control processes. In addition, the series prepares candidates for the Certified Internal Control Specialist (CICS) Examination. To review the course catalog click

ICI Course Catalog

To register for one or all of the online training programs click here:

The Internal Control Institute Store

Online course pricing has been reduced by over 70%



In a significant development for state nonmember banks with assets of at least $10 billion (Covered Institutions), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has recently proposed comprehensive corporate governance and risk management guidelines (NPR) that would impose significant requirements on a broad set of institutions which have historically been below the thresholds from this type of prescribed regulation and oversight. In particular, the NPR establishes new enforceable requirements on the Board of Directors (Board) of each Covered Institution in an effort to enhance an institution’s safety and soundness. 

Read The Article

Charter Communications (CHTR.O) has agreed to pay $25 million to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charges related to stock buyback controls violations, the regulator said on Tuesday. From 2017 to 2021, Charter used a provision that changed the total dollar amounts available to buy back stock and the timings of the buybacks after the plans took effect, the SEC said in a statement. Those provisions, which the SEC found the company used in nine separate pre-approved trading programs over those four years, ran afoul of the agency's rules for such plans and did not comport with the board’s authorizations.

Read The Article

In this article, we will explore 15 biggest corporate frauds in US history. You can skip our comprehensive analysis and proceed directly to the 5 Biggest Corporate Frauds in US History. Corporate fraud is a long-standing issue in commerce, dating back to the 17th century when trade expansion and the rise of corporations provided opportunities for unethical practices. Early cases involved embezzlement, accounting fraud, and information exploitation. As commerce evolved, corporate governance also developed. The 19th and 20th centuries witnessed the rise of industry giants that played pivotal roles in shaping the American economy. Companies like Standard Oil, US Steel, and General Electric wielded immense power, driving industrialization and economic growth. They achieved this status through strategies such as vertical integration, aggressive expansion, and innovative technologies. History notes that in 1934, during the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to clean up the financial markets, protect investors, and enforce securities laws. It marked a significant step towards regulating the chaos and fraud that had plagued the market.

Read The Article

The Justice Department has had a slow year in FCPA enforcement (another profound grasp of the obvious). The reasons for this may be a question of timing elements in the pipeline of cases. What is clear is that pushing through an enforcement action and settlement requires increased coordination with a growing number of international partners. That may be part of the explanation.

In this environment, when DOJ’s FCPA enforcement record is relatively slow, there are other sources for monitoring DOJ’s approach to FCPA issues — individual enforcement actions, opinion releases and compliance enforcement programs. When considered in this light, DOJ has been busy setting forth a new enforcement program, emphasizing voluntary disclosure, adopting new requirements related to claw backs and disincentives, and ephemeral messaging communications. In other words, there is always work to do and issues to stay abreast of when it comes to FCPA enforcement and compliance.

Read The Article

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it filed 784 total enforcement actions in fiscal year 2023, a 3 percent increase over fiscal year 2022, including 501 original, or “stand-alone,” enforcement actions, an 8 percent increase over the prior fiscal year. The SEC also filed 162 "follow-on" administrative proceedings seeking to bar or suspend individuals from certain functions in the securities markets based on criminal convictions, civil injunctions, or other orders and 121 actions against issuers who were allegedly delinquent in making required filings with the SEC. The stand-alone enforcement actions spanned the securities industry, from billion-dollar frauds to emerging investor threats involving crypto asset securities and cybersecurity, and charged violations by diverse market participants, from public companies and investment firms to gatekeepers and social media influencers.

Read The Article

In the high-stakes practice of international regulatory compliance, perhaps no law looms as large as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This act is designed to ensure that companies — in their overseas dealings — don't establish contracts or advantages through bribery of any foreign official while also keeping accurate and transparent records. The law applies to all U.S. individuals and companies, as well as foreign nationals conducting business in the U.S., and prevents payments, offers, and promises of anything of value in exchange for corporate favors. While it's possible to mount an affirmative defense when accused of a violation, it requires clear documentation of mitigating factors such as proof that the alleged conduct was legal or reasonable in the country in question. As an international organization, your firm (or client) will need to comply with both sides of the FCPA — anti-corruption and accounting provisions alike. Your case may hinge on the strength of your internal controls, which prominently include the ability to accurately translate and retain essential foreign-language documents. There are now sophisticated multi-language search, analytics, and translation tools that can help reduce your FCPA compliance risks hidden in foreign-language files that go undetected.

Read The Article

Britain has ditched much of a planned new code of practice for companies drawn up after a string of high-profile business failures, amid concerns tougher rules might hit competitiveness. Three government-backed reviews recommended beefing up auditing and corporate governance standards after companies such as builder Carillion, retailer BHS and cafe chain Patisserie Valerie collapsed, leading to thousands of job losses. But the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) watchdog has faced a backlash in London's financial centre, where critics argue that toughening up its corporate governance code would knock the hub's post-Brexit competitiveness as it vies with New York for listings. "The main substantive change we will take forward concerns revisions to our original proposal on internal controls," the FRC said in a statement.

Read The Article

The lull in FCPA enforcement has greatly reduced the number of companies entering into pre-trial agreements, either deferred or non-prosecution agreements, plea agreements, or declinations with disgorgement. But there’s no detectable lull in federal criminal enforcement against companies for other offenses. Who are those companies, and what are their federal crimes? According to data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the number of companies sentenced for federal crimes has remained fairly constant for the past five years through FY2022. In FY2018, 99 companies were sentenced, 118 in FY2019, 94 in FY2020, 90 in FY2021, and 99 in FY2022. Again, these numbers (and the ones that follow) don’t include companies entering into pre-trial agreements. Most of the companies sentenced in FY2022 were located in the United States — 89.9 percent.

Read The Article

Contact: Mr.Nikolai Triffet 

Email: nikolai@icib.org

Contact: Mr Nereo Guzman Mendoza

Email: nguzman@businesssolutionvalley.com

Tel: +52 811 181 3514

Control Quote

Quality means doing it right when no one is looking

- Henry Ford.