PUBLISHED BY TEANECK VOICES
Managing Editor
Bernard Rous


Editorial Board
Natalee Addison
Laraine Chaberski
Toniette H. Duncan
Charles W. Powers
Barbara Ley Toffler


Supporters
Denise Belcher
Juanita Brown
Margot Embree Fisher
Gail Gordon
Guy Thomas Lauture
Laverne Lightburn
Micki Shilan
Gloria Wilson
Contributors
Bettina Hempel
Henry Pruitt
Howard Rose



Advisors
Theodora Smiley Lacey
Loretta Weinberg

Contents
Government by Litigation
The Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP) - discussion only
Englewood City Council Keeps Alfred Avenue on its Agenda
Notable Women of Teaneck - in recognition of Veteran's Day
  • Pat Korczak
Announcements
Still Unanswered Questions
Upcoming Town Meetings
Events at the Library
Government by Litigation
“Sue me, sue me, what can you do me....so sings Nathan Detroit in the musical Guys and Dolls. And the audience laughs.
 
It is not so funny, however, when the Teaneck Town Attorney, John Shahdanian, tells the public that the only way to have its voice heard is to ……. SUE THE TOWN!
 
           You don’t like segregated housing for the new Palisade Avenue Townhouse Development? Sue the land use board and developer!
 
You don’t like way the Town determines whose signature is acceptable for ballot Referenda? Sue us!
 
This past year, Teaneck residents repeatedly have been told by Township Attorney Shahdanian to sue the Township in Superior Court to achieve the decent and democratic outcomes they expect and deserve – a townhouse development with integration of Affordable and Market-rate units; Municipal Ballot questions #1 and #2 to move municipal elections from May to November and bulk purchase renewable energy.
 
So, we residents sued - and we won.
 
But did we?
 
We won on democracy, integrity, truth, and decency. But financially, we the taxpayers of Teaneck lost. And we will continue to lose for as long as we allow Government by Litigation.
 
At this month’s departmental budget meetings Attorney Shahdanian proposed – and Manager Dean Kazinci agreed - that the legal expenses annual litigation and fees budget line should be raised from $695,000.00 to $795,000.00, anticipating that the Town will be involved in increasingly expensive (unspecified) lawsuits in 2022.
 
For example, a resident presently has a lawsuit against the Township regarding OPRA issues. As well, the Englewood City Council is discussing suing Teaneck over the “invasion” of Englewood by Teaneck Council’s Alfred Avenue apartment building and cannabis facilities.
Breaking News: Stop & Shop is suing the Town
 
·       The more the litigation brought against or initiated by the town, the more the Township Attorney law firm earns.
·       The Township Attorney’s earnings are paid for by the taxpayers.
·       Sometimes, courts order the Township or others to pay the Plaintiff’s (the residents) legal costs, but even then the money to pay our costs ultimately comes from ----US, THE TAXPAYERS
 
Right now, with our present Council and Township Attorney, litigation is essential. As we said, democracy, integrity, truth, and decency won in 2021! We, the people of Teaneck won!
 
In November 2022, we will have the opportunity to change our Township Council majority with four seats up for election. It is the opportunity, as well, to bring about the welcome change from Government by Litigation to Government by the People.
Moving Teaneck Backwards on Open Space Preservation
After two full years of delays, Teaneck’s Planning Board (PB) met November 10, 2021. Its only agenda item was discussion of the October 2019 OSRP draft and the prior 2007 OSRP. The 2019 draft has been in the works since early 2018.

The OSRP – A Brief Review of How we Got Here

·        Beginning in 2018, Barbara Davis of the Land Conservancy of New Jersey prepared a draft OSRP for $10,000. The OSRP must be updated every 10 years by State requirement.

·        Davis drew input from the township administration, the Municipal Open Space Trust Fund Advisory Committee, and organized input sessions for a large group of residents.

·        Davis presented her draft report to Council and the Planning Board in July 2019.

·        And there it sat.

·        In November 2020, the Township Council awarded a contract for up to $20,000 to the Nishuane Group “to review and consult with the Planning Board” on the OSRP. The contract was dropped after the revelation that the firm violated State's pay-to-play laws.

·        The review assignment was then passed on to two other planners.

OSRP Discussion at the November 10, 2021 Planning Board Meeting

·        For November 10, 2021, planner Elizabeth Leheny was asked to make a presentation explaining the role of an OSRP.

·        She emphasized that an approved OSRP makes the township eligible for the Green Acres Planning Incentive category, which awards 50% matching grants to local governments.

·        The OSRP must also include a Recreation and Open Space Inventory (ROSI), a separate listing of land preserved for open space and/or recreation. The ROSI is a contract signed by the Mayor and PB Chair that agrees that ROSI-listed properties cannot be used for other purposes without approval from the State.

·        After the presentation, the PB held a discussion which showed that many Board members had no interest in adopting the 2019 Davis OSRP.

·        The main objection was Davis’ inclusion of a list of properties to be included in the ROSI, including a dozen properties identified in 2011 by the Environmental Commission for preservation and the properties along the Route 4 Greenbelt to provide a buffer between the highway and adjoining residential properties.

o  Deputy Mayor Mark Schwartz said that he would not support protecting any properties unless forced to do so and that he didn’t want to vote for a document with anything that “certain people in the audience will claim that ‘you violated the OSRP’…we can close our eyes and hear them yelling now.”

o  Member Mark Zomick called the document a “paper tiger that doesn’t lock us into anything” but asked if the Board could simply take the 2007 OSRP, approve it again as the current version to submit to Green Acres.

o  Chair Bodner emphasized that “people get up to be experts during Good and Welfare” but it “doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re the actual facts”.

For unexplained reasons, the video of the entire Board meeting is not yet available on the Town website. Subscribers can however see a privately made video of the meeting zoom which provides the entire 25- minute Board discussion. – Click Here

Public Comments

·        Former PB member Howard Rose stated that he had seen the comprehensive, detailed and well-done presentations made by Barbara Davis in 2019 and regretted the efforts to remove items.

·        James Veach spoke to the detailed description in the 2019 OSRP of the efforts made to get public input and participation. “Believe it or not, there are people here who want to preserve open space.

·        Two other residents who are former Town elected officials – Marie Warnke & Alan Sohn – also spoke. Teaneck Voices has prepared two very short videos that record these two inputs. Both are available immediately below.

Next Steps
The Planning Board asked Ms. Leheny to develop a detailed list of which properties were added to the ROSI. It is clear is that this Planning Board has little interest in preserving open space and that it is going to willfully ignore the effort and recommendations made by so many Township residents and official bodies.
Marie Warnke addresses the OSRP in the Nov 10 Planning Board meeting
In G&W, Alan Sohn tries to address OSRP in the Nov 10 PB Meeting
Englewood City Council Keeps Alfred Avenue on its Agenda:
Shows Concern for its own and Teaneck Residents


On Tuesday, 11/9, for the third consecutive meeting, the Englewood City Council discussed Teaneck Township’s clumsy attempts to “redevelop” the Light Industrial Zone on Alfred Avenue. The redevelopment crafted by Teaneck’s Council and Planning Board includes a 255-unit six-story apartment complex and the Cannabis District that will operate next door, practically adjacent to Englewood’s Denning Park.
You can watch the Englewood Council’s discussions on video (Click Here and go to the start of hour 4) and see the Englewood Councilmembers’ concern for not only the Englewood residents who live opposite the proposed complex, but for Teaneck residents as well, residents and taxpayers whose lives will soon be turned upside down.

The Englewood Council meets much more frequently than Teaneck’s Council and includes Workshop Meetings. You will see in the video that the Englewood Council brings key City employees, like its CFO and Engineer, into their meetings to answer the public’s questions in public.

On November 9 ,the Council's Workshop Meeting began with a 6:30 pm special session, and then Council continued talking, debating, and listening to residents until after midnight. Because it had a lot on its plate – including efforts to dig out from Hurricane Ida flooding - the Englewood Council did not reach Alfred Avenue on its discussion agenda until 11:45 pm. However, the Council still devoted considerable time to Alfred Avenue, this time focusing on the apartment complex.

The discussion revealed that no one in Englewood government knows of any permits that have been sought by the Alfred Avenue developer. The developer will need an Englewood permit if it intends to tie into any part of Englewood’s sewers or drains or any other part of Englewood’s infrastructure, as we have been told Englewood experts believe it intends to do. The proposed 255-unit apartment complex would sit on the highest point on Alfred Avenue so any stormwater runoff and sewage generated by the complex will flow downhill to Englewood.

Englewood’s Council has already taken several steps to address the proposed changes for Alfred Avenue. The Council directed that signage be installed to prevent tractor trailers from exiting the light industrial zone via Tietjen Avenue. The Council also discussed whether residents-only parking could be implemented on Tietjen and LaFayette Avenues. The Council also directed that the City Engineer consult surveys and clearly mark the Teaneck-Englewood border and the boundaries around Alfred Avenue.

The discussion may have been cut short before the Council could turn to the Alfred Avenue cannabis district because the meeting at that point had run into the following day. But before the Council moved on, Councilperson Wayne Hamer, who represents the 4th Ward, which almost surrounds Alfred Avenue, urged that his fellow Englewood Council members should do “every single thing we can” to protect Englewood residents affected by the construction and the cannabis district, and that those efforts should extend to Teaneck residents. As Mr. Hamer put it: “We should not make this invasion an easy situation.”

Meanwhile, the Teaneck Council and Planning Board remain silent.
Notable Women of Teaneck
Patricia "Pat" Korczak
In recognition of Veteran's Day - November 11, 2021
It’s 1962. You are a senior at Teaneck High School. Your family does not have the resources to send you to college even if you are in the top 10% of your class. You are shy; you barely squeaked through the required “Oral Expression” course; you took typing but did not feel very successful at it.

What do you do?
If you are Pat Korczak, the answer is:   JOIN THE MARINES!

Why the Marines? The military had come to Teaneck High to introduce students to the idea of the military as a next career step. Pat thought the military might be a good next step for her. So, she headed to the wooden recruitment cabin in Hackensack. There was only one recruiter there that day – a Marine. So, Pat signed on to the Marines.

After taking the Marine oath and getting two armloads of shots, Pat and her new friend, Rosemary climbed aboard a train and headed to Parris Island, South Carolina for Boot Camp.

That train ride gave her the first life lesson of her new experience. Her fellow-recruit, Rosemary, was Black. As the train crossed the Mason-Dixon Line and headed into Virginia, Rosemary handed Pat the travel papers. “They won’t accept them from a Black person,” she said. “That life lesson never entered my head, living here in Teaneck” Pat says now.

Boot Camp for women Marines in 1962 was less rigorous than for men. But it brought structure, a sense of equality, and a sense of identity to Pat’s life. Though women recruits were not screamed at as we’ve seen in movies about the Marines. They had physical requirements (like sit-ups and pull-ups); they had Close-Order Drill, the traditional marching in formation. They learned about weapons, but women Marines were not allowed to handle rifles.

Pat loved to work on cars and hoped to be assigned to the Motor Pool. Unfortunately, women were not allowed to work there. So – the Marines made her a typist. Despite her trouble with typing in high school, the Marines made her a proficient typist. Pat became an Aviations Operation Clerk. It was her job to know where every plane and every pilot stationed at her base was at any time and make sure what was needed was where it should be at any moment.

As she says, “I had a full education in organizational skills,” which served her well throughout her professional life.

Despite the somewhat different training and some different treatment received by women and men, Pat says the Marines gave her the identity she needed. She was not Ethel’s daughter or Jim’s sister. She was Recruit, then Private, then Private-First Class Patricia O’Brien. For the first time in her life, she felt treated as an equal. “When you’re treated with confidence, you get your confidence.”

In 1965, with her honorable discharge, Pat moved back to Teaneck. Moving back to Teaneck meant moving back to the house her grandfather bought when it was just a hole in the ground in 1923. Pat’s mother graduated from Teaneck High school in 1934 – and Pat is the proud owner not only of her mother’s Hi-Way Yearbook, but also the yearbooks from three years earlier which includes the very first Hi-Way from 1931.

Moving back to Teaneck brought Pat many opportunities to use the extraordinary organizational skills she developed in the Marines. When her son and daughter were small, she organized the family home (something she has kept up to the present) so it is essentially a museum of Teaneck from the 1920’s forward.

Now, at Christmastime, her first floor is transformed into a true Christmas wonderland with miniature villages. It is truly a work of art, though Pat would probably tell you it is a work of organization.

Pat worked for many years in advertising in the city and a marketing firm on Cedar Lane. But her great loves that make her sparkling eyes shine even brighter are her membership in the Gooney Birds (Marine Corps League Detachment 434) and the last job she held before retirement.

The Gooney Birds, named after the giant cargo planes (which looked like the giant albatrosses) that brought the Military Engineers to tiny atolls in the South Pacific to build landing strips for army air force planes to land and refuel, are local clubs for Marines. As a Gooney Bird, Pat also serves as a member of Teaneck's Patriotic Observance Advisory Board.

As for that last job before retirement: Pat Korczak, working on many projects, appeared frequently before the Board of Adjustment, chaired by Anne Senter. When Pat saw an advertisement for clerical help at KOF-K Kosher Supervision, the family firm of Rabbi Harvey and Mrs. Anne Senter, she delivered her resume to their office. Two minutes later, Anne Senter appeared welcoming, “I knew it was you. When can you start?”

Pat says, “I took a crash course in Hebrew and koshering – and organized their files. I love them – but you can’t file everything under P for Paper!”
She continues, “It was the best time I ever had working; it was the most acceptance of being a woman I ever found in a workplace.” She continues, “I learned my organizational skills through the Marine Corps, and really put them to use working for Rabbi Harvey and Mrs. Anne Senter. It was absolutely wonderful!”
Announcements

FINAL WEEK
Click below to be taken to the Teaneck International Film Festival Web Site


An all-access pass for the virtual screenings is only $25:

MATH ADVENTURES AND WORD PLAY
Still Unanswered Questions
Why does the Township Council have 23 subcommittees - none of which have a quorum - about which Teaneck residents are told virtually nothing?
In how many lawsuits is the Township currently involved? How many has it settled in the past year except for the Glenpointe tax appeal? How many has it won?
Why is Stop & Shop suing us?
Did any Town official tell Englewood anything about our Alfred Avenue plans? Englewood says NO!
When will the Planning Board act on the OSRP?
What's really happening with the Holy Name issues?
When will Councilwoman Orgen make available the records from the Marijuana Subcommittee that she in August said she would readily give to Councilwoman Gervonn Rice?
New this week
Why did the Town website have nothing about Thursday's Veteran's Day until Wednesday afternoon?
UPCOMING MUNICIPAL MEETINGS

THIS WEEK IN TEANECK


Teaneck Historical Preservation Commission (THPC) - rescheduled to Tuesday November 30, 2021 at 7:00 pm

Environmental Commission (EC) - Wednesday November 17 at 7:30 pm – zoom access Zoom Link passcode 397511

Senior Citizens Advisory Board – Thursday November 18, 2021 at 1:30 pm - public access by approval of the Chair only - contact Town Clerk.
 
Teaneck International Film Festival (TIFF) continues - November 14 to 21, 2021
 Click Here to see vide0


THIS WEEK AT THE LIBRARY
Click here for this week’s Teaneck Library Events Calendar