Abstract
Background
A method has been developed and validated for selective, accurate and precise determination of total proteinogenic amino acids and taurine from Infant Formula and Adult/Pediatric Nutritional Formulas (powders, ready-to-feed liquids, and liquid concentrates). The method was reviewed by the AOAC INTERNATIONAL SPIFAN Expert Review Panel (ERP) during the 133rd AOAC Annual Meeting & Expo on September 7, 2019 in Denver, CO, USA and was recommended to First Action Official MethodsSM status.
Objective
The method involves protein hydrolysis to amino acids, a simple pre-column derivatisation of amino acids and separation of derivatised amino acids by UHPLC. The quantification of amino acids is performed by multi-point calibration using norvaline as the internal standard. The analytical method is capable of quantitative determination for 22 proteinogenic amino acids, but cannot be used to quantitate tryptophan, which is destroyed during the acid hydrolysis step. Asparagine is determined as aspartic acid and glutamine as glutamic acid. The cystine and cysteine are converted to S-2-carboxyethylthiocysteine (CYSx) and the derivative is separated from the other amino acids. Citrulline which is present in some matrices and it is separated from other amino acids is not included in the method performance evaluation in the single laboratory validation (SLV).
Method
The proposed method met all the performance requirement limits set in standard method performance requirements (SMPR) 2014.013 for total proteinogenic amino acids and taurine. The correlation coefficient of multi-point calibration was not less than 0.999 for any amino acids at any point in the SLV study confirming the validity of linear dynanic range (LDR) and linearity of the method. The individual amino acids in the chromatogram were identified by absolute retention time and relative retention time (RRT) with respect to the internal standard norvaline. There were no significant (S/N Ratio <10) interferences from the reagents or by-products of derivatisation and targeted matrices. The method demonstrated high selectivity.
Result
Accuracy of the method was validated using standard reference materials (NIST SRM 1869 and 1849a) and spike recovery studies. The amino acid results in the SRMs were within the ranges of Reference Mass Fraction Values. The accuracy of the method was corroboratively validated by spike recovery studies. The average spike recovery range between 93 to 107% ensure the accuracy of the method for amino acids and compliance to the AOAC SMPR 2014.013.
Conclusions
Precision data of the method demonstrate that it meets the stakeholder requirements as per the SMPR. The mean RSDr for all the amino acids for 17 matrices selected for the SLV were not more than 4%. The method is very sensitive and the LOQ can go down to approximately ten times lower than the SMPR requirements. The sensitivity of method is a direct reflection of its signal to noise ratio which ensures guaranteed method performance at the lower levels of amino acids in these matrices.
