This week was generally focused around debate. We saw some movement on our priorities and some additional movement on a new bill, HF 867, that includes a $100 million appropriation for broadband grants.
THE GOVERNOR'S RENEWABLE FUEL BILL: HF 859/SF 549- MONITORING(House version passed out of Ways and Means Committee with 5 NO votes: Eisenhart, Jones, McConkey, Osmundson and Wheeler)
Please reach out to your local legislators to tell them how this would impact your company
APPROPRIATIONS (BROADBAND GRANT FUNDS):HF 867- SUPPORT
Among other things, appropriates $100 million from state funds to broadband grant programs
BROADBAND GRANT PROGRAM: HF 848- SUPPORT (Passed out of the Senate unanimously without any additional amendments, sent to the Governor to sign)
The Governor's broadband bill provides a tiered approach to grant funding based on current broadband access/capabilities and has speed requirements
Tier 1: areas with less than 25/3 mbps speed available
Minimum 20% of grant funds must go to this tier to serve difficult areas
100/100 buildout is eligible for a 75% match
100/20 buildout is eligible for a 50% match
Tier 2: areas with 25/3 to 50 down with no upload target
100/100 buildout is eligible for a 50% match
Tier 3: areas with 50 to 80 mpbs (no upload target)
100/100 buildout is eligible for a 50% match
OVERWEIGHT FLUID MILK PERMITS FOR INTERSTATE TRAVEL: HF 790/SF 550- SUPPORT (Passed out of House Ways Subcommittee unanimously this week, now will have to go through full House Ways & Means Committee)
Fluid milk has been deemed an indivisible load by the Federal Government and thus eligible to haul overweight on interstates
We're working with the Iowa State Dairy Association and Iowa DOT to create an annual permit for interstate travel up to 96,000 lbs.
CENTRAL FILING: SF 486- OPPOSE (No recent movement)
Introduced by the Iowa Bankers Assn and Wells Fargo
This bill would create a central filing system that all buyers (local sale barns, meat processors, lockers, grain buyers, grocers, etc.) would have to check before issuing payment to each farmer
It shifts the burden to buyers, increases the number of two-party checks and is not an improvement on our current system
Bank lobbyists say they want to move a paper system to electronic but have disregarded solutions that would allow for electronic/e-mail notifications through direct notice
Current bill registrations (all ag groups against, bankers support) HERE