Parents purchased a property in La Quinta, California, for their son and wife to live in while they worked as professors at a nearby college. The son and his wife lived in the home for years but moved when they were offered higher paying positions in San Diego County.
The parents decided to retain ownership of the home and offer it on an online site as a short-term rental. They were lucky to have great tenants (such as traveling nurses during COVID), until they were not.
In October 2022, an offer to rent the property came in from a husband and wife for short term housing, "while they looked to purchase a home." The property owners explained they already had the home reserved beginning in January 2023, but they could rent it for the next 60 days.
The potential renters had just joined the online rental site, so there were no reviews on them. The owners of the property were not concerned since the online rental site claimed to "vet" members when setting up an account — or so they thought!
Immediately upon moving in, neighbors reported loud noises, lights on at all hours and lots of arguing. Police were called to the property on three separate occasions for disturbing the peace, drunk and disorderly conduct, and domestic violence.
After living in the home for 31 days, the owner sent the police to evict them for violations of their short-term rental agreement. The police, however, were not able to evict them after the renters presented the police with a short-term agreement showing they had prepaid and had rights to the property until December 29, 2022. The owner could not remove them from the property without a court order since they had been there for more than 30 days.
Due to a backlog in the courts, the property owners were advised the eviction could take about six months. The property is in Riverside County. The property owners received the water and electricity bills which were astronomically higher than they had previously been.
Fearing a water leak, the property owners sent a 24 hours' notice to the occupants letting them know a plumber would be sent to the property. Upon the plumber's arrival, he was denied access by the renters claiming no notice was ever given to them.
The property owners then had the Sheriff meet them at the property. The property owners showed the notice to the Sheriff but...
To continue reading this article, click the link below:
https://fraudinsights.fnf.com/vol18iss04/article1.htm
|