As thousands of Americans gathered in Washington D.C. for the 2024 March for Life, the House passed two pieces of pro-life legislation.  With the theme of the March this year being “With Every Woman, For Every Child,” the two votes could not have been more appropriate. 

On Thursday, January 18, 2024, the U.S. House of Representatives passed two bills designed to help women and their families as well as pregnant and parenting students.  In a post-Roe America, it is more important now than ever that pregnancy centers are able to effectively support mothers and their babies.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has put off a decision to admit a radical pro-abortion organization into official relations and launch a three-year collaboration.

The proposed partnership with the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) drew sharp criticism from a coalition of pro-life groups led by C-Fam (publisher of the Friday Fax) that called upon the WHO Director-General to reconsider the alliance.

The letter pointed out that partnering with the abortion litigation group would compromise the UN’s health organization’s integrity and expose it to increased risk of the withdrawal of U.S. funding under a future pro-life administration.

Each time we read a story about late [or "later"] abortions--often without an explanation of what that means--it is presented as a rare condition undertaken in only the gravest of circumstances. Since numerically they are “rare,” that is supposed to persuade us that because late-term abortions make up such a small percentage of the total number, we should accept on faith that they are undertaken only for the most serious of reasons.



But if you want proof positive that this is not the truth, read the interview the King of Late-term abortions Warren Hern gave to The Atlantic’s Elaine Godfrey. He told her that in at least half of the late term abortions he performed, the babies these women were carrying did not have devastating diagnoses.