Informal Institute for National Security Thinkers and Practitioners


Quotes of the Day:


"The way to get things done is not to mind who gets the credit of doing them." 
- Benjamin Jowett

"Imagination is more important than knowledge." 
- Albert Einstein

“When war breaks out, people say; ‘it won't last, it's too stupid.’ And war is certainly too stupid, but that doesn't prevent it from lasting.” 
 - Albert Camus






1. The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?

2. Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded

3. Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism

4. What books are US Army, congressmen reading?

5. Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos

6. Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election

7. Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan

8. US, Ukraine Officials Privately Say Counteroffensive Against Russia Has ‘Failed’ (Exclusive)

9. The CIA Sure Looks Busy

10. US Deals with Allies Signal Concerns Over China's Disinformation Campaign

11. Army employee charged with stealing $100 million from fund for military children

12. The NYT is wrong about Israeli intelligence

13. A Chinese Pearl Harbor-style attack could end America’s days as a superpower

14. Funding on ‘fumes:’ The Pentagon is nearly out of money to replace weapons sent to Ukraine

15. Congress Tells Army to Set Higher Fitness Standards for Combat Arms Soldiers

16. Large-Scale Combat Operations Will Bring New Medical Ethics Challenges

17. The Army-Navy Game example: A bitter rivalry and a common cause

18. Petraeus says Israel should try U.S.-style counterinsurgency in Gaza

19. The new world disorder by Robert D. Kaplan

20. Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power (book review)





1. The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?




The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?

BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Updated 9:52 PM EST, December 7, 2023

AP · December 8, 2023

It’s called “Article 99.” And it hasn’t been used for decades. Until this week.

With an intensifying Israeli offensive and escalating civilian casualties, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres invoked a rarely exercised power this week to warn the Security Council of an impending “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. He urged members to demand an immediate humanitarian cease-fire.

Guterres invoked Article 99 of the U.N. Charter — last used over half a century ago — which says the secretary-general may inform the council of matters he believes threaten international peace and security.

Here, Edith M. Lederer, longtime chief U.N. correspondent for The Associated Press, breaks down what this could mean.

WHAT IS ARTICLE 99 AND WHY IS GUTERRES INVOKING IT?

It’s a provision of the United Nations Charter, the U.N. constitution. It states that the secretary-general — the U.N.'s top diplomat — may bring to the attention of the Security Council “any matter which, in his opinion, may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.”


This gives an important additional power to the secretary-general, since the real power at the U.N. is held by its 193 member nations and especially the 15 countries that serve on the Security Council.

Article 99 is extremely rarely used. The last time it was invoked was during fighting in 1971 that led to the creation of Bangladesh and its separation from Pakistan.

Guterres invoked Article 99 because he sees the situation in Gaza at risk of a “complete collapse” of the territory’s humanitarian system and civil order. It was something he felt needed to be done.

HOW LIKELY IS THIS TO HAVE AN EFFECT, GIVEN THE U.S. VETO POWER?

Arab and Islamic nations followed up on Guterres’s letter immediately.

The United Arab Emirates, the Arab representative on the Security Council, circulated a short resolution to Security Council members late Wednesday calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. They plan to put that resolution to a vote at a Security Council meeting on Friday morning.

The United States, which is Israel’s closest ally and has veto power on resolutions, has not supported a cease-fire. On Tuesday, U.S. Deputy Ambassador Robert Wood said that the role of the Security Council in the Israel-Gaza war is not to get in the way of important diplomacy that’s taking place. And he said the Security Council resolution at this time “would not be useful.”

This could signal a likely veto, but the U.S. has not said either way.

IN THAT CASE, WHY INVOKE IT?

Because Guterres believes that the humanitarian system and the humanitarian operations in Gaza are collapsing.

He also warns in his letter that in the current situation, “amid constant bombardment by the Israeli Defense Forces and without shelter or essentials to survive, I expect public order to completely break down soon due to the desperate conditions, rendering even limited humanitarian assistance impossible.”

Guterres said the situation could get even worse, pointing to possible epidemics and the mass displacement of Palestinians into neighboring countries. He sees a looming disaster.

Previous secretaries-general have brought threats that they saw to international peace and security to the Security Council without mentioning Article 99. This includes Congo in 1960, the U.S. hostage crisis in Iran that began in November 1979, the Iran-Iraq war in 1980 and more recently Myanmar in 2017.

We don’t know why they didn’t invoke Article 99, and several of the previous secretaries-general are now dead. Guterres has been very outspoken on both the Hamas attacks on Israel and the very high death toll of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

AP · December 8, 2023



2. Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded


Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded

militarytimes.com · by Tara Copp · December 7, 2023

When the U.S. military took the extraordinary step of grounding its entire fleet of V-22 Ospreys this week, it wasn’t reacting just to the recent deadly crash of the aircraft off the coast of Japan. The aircraft has had a long list of problems in its short history.

The Osprey takes off and lands like a helicopter but can tilt its propellers horizontally to fly like an airplane. That unique and complex design has allowed the Osprey to speed troops to the battlefield. The U.S. Marine Corps, which operates the vast majority of the hundreds of Ospreys in service, calls it a “game-changing assault support platform.”

But on Wednesday, the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps grounded all Ospreys after a preliminary investigation of last week’s crash indicated that a materiel failure — that something went wrong with the aircraft — led to the deaths of all eight Air Force Special Operations Command airmen on board.

And it’s not the first time. There have been persistent questions about a mechanical problem with the clutch that has troubled the program for more than a decade. There also have been questions as to whether all parts of the Osprey have been manufactured according to safety specifications and, as those parts age, whether they remain strong enough to withstand the significant forces created by the Osprey’s unique structure and dynamics of tiltrotor flight.

The government of Japan, which is the only international partner flying the Osprey, had already grounded its aircraft after the Nov. 29 crash.

“It’s good they grounded the fleet,” said Rex Rivolo, a retired Air Force pilot who analyzed the Osprey for the Pentagon’s test and evaluation office from 1992 to 2007 as an analyst at the Institute for Defense Analyses, and who previously warned military officials that the aircraft wasn’t safe. “At this point, they had no choice.”

The Osprey has become a workhorse for the Marine Corps and Air Force Special Operations Command and was in the process of being adopted by the Navy to replace its C-2 Greyhound propeller planes, which transport personnel on and off at-sea aircraft carriers.

Marine Corps Ospreys also have been used to transport White House staff, press and security personnel accompanying the president. White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said they also are subject to the standdown.

While the Ospreys are grounded, Air Force Special Operations Command said it will work to mitigate the impact to operations, training and readiness. The command will continue to fly other aircraft and Osprey crews will continue to train on simulators, spokeswoman Lt. Col. Becky Heyse said.

It was not immediately clear how the other services will adapt their missions.

Questions about the clutch

The first Ospreys only became operational in 2007 after decades of testing. But more than 50 troops have died either flight testing the Osprey or conducting training flights over the program’s lifespan, including 20 deaths in four crashes over the past 20 months.

In July, the Marine Corps for the first time blamed one of the fatal Osprey crashes on a fleet-wide problem that has been known for years but for which there’s still no good fix. It’s known as hard clutch engagement, or HCE.

The Osprey’s two engines are linked by an interconnected drive shaft that runs inside the length of the wings. On each tip, by the engines, a component called a sprag clutch transfers torque, or power, from one proprotor to the other to make sure both rotors are spinning at the same speed. That keeps the Osprey’s flight in balance. If one of the two engines fails, the sprag clutch is also a safety feature: It will transfer power from the working side to the failing engine’s side to keep both rotors going.

But sprag clutches have also become a worrying element. As the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps began looking at HCE events following incidents in 2022, they determined that the clutches may be wearing out faster than anticipated.

Since 2010, Osprey clutches have slipped at least 15 times. As the system re-engages, hard clutch engagement occurs. In just fractions of a second, an HCE event creates a power spike that surges power to the other engine, which can throw the Osprey into an uncontrolled roll or slide. A power spike can also destroy a sprag clutch, essentially severing the interconnected drive shaft. That could result in the complete loss of aircraft control with little or no time for the pilots to react and save their Osprey or crew, Rivolo said.

In the 2022 crash of a Marine Corps MV-22 in California that killed five Marines, hard clutch engagement created an “unrecoverable, catastrophic mechanical failure,” the investigation found. The fire was so intense it destroyed the Osprey’s flight data recorder — another issue the Marines have pushed to fix, by requiring new flight data recorders to be better able to survive a crash.

Ospreys have been grounded before

After Air Force Special Operations Command experienced two hard clutch engagement incidents within six weeks in 2022, the commander, Lt. Gen. James Slife, grounded all of its Ospreys for two weeks. An undisclosed number of Ospreys across the military were grounded again in February 2023 as work began on clutch replacements.

But getting replacements to all the aircraft at the time depended on their availability, Slife said in 2022.

And even that replacement may not be the fix. Neither the services nor defense contractors Bell Textron or Boeing, which jointly produce the Osprey, have found a root cause. The clutch “may be the manifestation of the problem,” but not the root cause, Slife said.

In last week’s crash, Japanese media outlet NHK reported that an eyewitness saw the Osprey inverted with an engine on fire before it went down in the sea. If eyewitness accounts are correct, Rivolo said, clutch failure and a catastrophic failure of the interconnected drive shaft should be investigated as a potential cause.

After its investigation of the 2022 crash, the Marine Corps made several recommendations, including designing a new quill assembly, which is a component that mitigates clutch slippage and hard clutch engagement, and requiring that all drivetrain component materiel be strengthened.

That work is ongoing, according to the V-22 Joint Program Office, which is responsible for the development and production of the aircraft. A new quill assembly design is being finalized and testing of a prototype should begin early next year, it said.

When asked what inspections the JPO will conduct on the fleet while they are grounded, the office told Military Times that’s still unknown.

“The mishap investigation will ensure a thorough look into the casual factors, which will help identify recommendations to address any issues uncovered,” Marcia Hart, a spokesperson for Naval Air Systems Command, said Thursday.

Whistleblower questions

Materiel strength was the subject of a whistleblower lawsuit that Boeing settled with the Justice Department in September for $8.1 million. Two former Boeing V-22 composites fabricators had come forward with allegations that Boeing was falsifying records certifying that it had performed the testing necessary to ensure it maintained uniform temperatures required to ensure the Osprey’s composite parts were strengthened according to DOD specifications.

A certain temperature was needed for uniform molecular bonding of the composite surface. Without that bond, “the components will contain resin voids, linear porosity, and other defects that are not visible to the eye; which compromise the strength and other characteristics of the material, and which can cause catastrophic structural failures,” the lawsuit alleged.

In its settlement, the Justice Department contended Boeing did not meet the Pentagon’s manufacturing standards from 2007 to 2018; the whistleblowers contended in their lawsuit that this affected more than 80 Ospreys that were delivered in that time frame.

In a statement to The Associated Press, Boeing said it entered into the settlement agreement with the Justice Department and Navy “to resolve certain False Claims Act allegations, without admission of liability.”

Boeing said while composites are used throughout the V-22, the parts that were questioned in the lawsuit were “all non-critical parts that do not implicate flight safety.”

“Boeing is in compliance with its curing processes for composite parts,” the company said. “Additionally, we would stress that the cause of the accident in Japan is currently unknown. We are standing by to provide any requested support.”

Ongoing fixes

The V-22 Joint Program Office said that since the 2022 incidents, significant progress has been made toward identifying the cause of the hard clutch engagement.

“While the definitive root cause has not yet been determined, the joint government and industry team has narrowed down the scope of the investigation to a leading theory,” it said in a statement to the AP. “The leading theory involves a partial engagement of some clutches which have been installed for a lengthy period of time. This has not yet been definitively proven, but the data acquired thus far support this theory.”

Bell assembles the Osprey in a partnership with Boeing in its facilities in Amarillo, Texas. Bell would not comment on last week’s crash, but said it works with the services when an accident occurs. “The level of support is determined by the service branch safety center in charge of the investigation,” Bell spokesman Jay Hernandez said.

In its report on the fatal 2022 crash, the Marine Corps forewarned that more accidents were possible because neither the military nor manufacturers have been able to isolate a root cause. It said future incidents were “impossible to prevent without improvements to flight control system software, drivetrain component material strength, and robust inspection requirements.”

Air Force Times Editor Rachel S. Cohen contributed to this story.

About Tara Copp, AP

Tara Copp is a Pentagon correspondent for the Associated Press. She was previously Pentagon bureau chief for Sightline Media Group.


3. Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism


Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism

AP · by COLLIN BINKLEY · December 7, 2023


WASHINGTON (AP) — Facing heavy criticism, the University of Pennsylvania’s president walked back some of her remarks given earlier this week at a congressional hearing on campus antisemitism, saying she should have gone further to condemn hate against Jewish students.

Penn President Liz Magill was grilled during a five-hour hearing Tuesday, along with Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth, on how their institutions had responded to instances of antisemitism on campuses. Their carefully worded responses faced swift backlash from Republican and some Democratic lawmakers as well as the White House.

Much of the blowback centered on a heated line of questioning from Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., who repeatedly asked whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” would violate each university’s code of conduct.

Magill said that whether hate speech crossed the line into violating Penn’s policies depended on context.

“If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment,” Magill said.


Gay responded to the question in a similar manner, saying that when “speech crosses into conduct, that violates our policies.” Kornbluth responded that she had not heard calling for the genocide of Jews on MIT’s campus, and that speech “targeted at individuals, not making public statements,” would be considered harassment.

Magill expanded on her answer on Wednesday, saying a call for the genocide of Jewish people would be considered harassment or intimidation.

“I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate,” Magill said in a video statement released by the university. “It’s evil, plain and simple.”

Magill called for a review of Penn’s policies, which she said have long been guided by the U.S. Constitution but need to be “clarified and evaluated” as hate spreads across campus and around the world “in a way not seen in years.”

In a statement posted Wednesday by Harvard on X, formerly Twitter, Gay condemned calls for violence against Jewish students.

“Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account,” Gay wrote Wednesday.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates issued a statement Wednesday criticizing Gay, Magill and Kornbluth’s responses for not going far enough to condemn antisemitism on campuses.

“It’s unbelievable that this needs to be said: calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country,” he said. “Any statements that advocate for the systematic murder of Jews are dangerous and revolting — and we should all stand firmly against them, on the side of human dignity and the most basic values that unite us as Americans.”

The Republican-led House Education and Workforce Committee said Thursday that it will take “additional action” to hold Harvard, MIT and Penn accountable. The panel said it will review the schools’ policies and disciplinary records and examine “their seemingly deplorable record.”

Free speech experts say the college presidents’ answers, while uncomfortable, did follow current interpretations of the First Amendment. Any call for genocide would deserve condemnation but “is not speech that could be banned or punished by the state,” according to the nonprofit PEN America.

“The First Amendment’s protections for speech extend even to deeply hateful speech, unless it constitutes a true threat, incitement to imminent violence, or harassment, which is legally defined as requiring severity and pervasiveness,” said Suzanne Nossel, the group’s CEO.

Even prior to the hearing Tuesday before the House committee, Stefanik has called for Gay’s resignation in response to events that have occurred on campus since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. On Wednesday, she told Fox News that all three presidents needed to be removed from their leadership positions, calling their answers “pathetic.”

“They don’t deserve the dignity of resigning,” she said. “They need to be fired.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, told reporters on Wednesday that Magill’s response was “an unacceptable statement.”

“I’ve said many times, leaders have a responsibility to speak and act with moral clarity. And Liz Magill failed to meet that simple test,” he said. “I think whether you’re talking about genocide against Jews, genocide against people of color, genocide against LGBTQ folks, it’s all in the wrong. And it needs to be called out. And it shouldn’t be hard. And there should be no nuance to that. She needed to give a one-word answer. ”

Shapiro also said it was time for the university’s board to make a “serious decision” about Magill’s leadership at the school.

___

The Associated Press education team receives support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


COLLIN BINKLEY

Collin is a national education reporter

twittermailto

AP · by COLLIN BINKLEY · December 7, 2023


4. What books are US Army, congressmen reading?



What books are US Army, congressmen reading?

Defense News · by Staff · December 7, 2023


(Courtesy of Advantage Media Group)

Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said he is reading “Vectors: Heroes, Villains, & Heartbreak on the Bridge of the U.S. Navy.” The book, by former acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly, offers insight into “idiosyncrasies that happened within the Pentagon and within the service branch,” Wittman said.


(Courtesy of Macmillan Publishers)

Doug Bush, assistant secretary of the U.S. Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, said he is reading “How Ike Led: The Principles Behind Eisenhower’s Biggest Decisions” by Susan Eisenhower. The granddaughter of the former president doesn’t just write about his decision-making process, but why he took certain actions in office.


(Courtesy of Oxford University Press)

Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., chairman of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said he is reading Rush Dosie’s “The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order.” It examines what China wants, whether Beijing can achieve its goals, and how the U.S. could respond.


(Courtesy of Potomac Books)

He had also recently reread “This Kind of War: The Classic Korean War History,” written by T.R. Fehrenbachfor and touted as an account of the conflict written from the perspective of those who fought it.


(Courtesy of Scribner)

Gabe Camarillo, undersecretary of the U.S. Army, said he is reading “Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams,” by Matthew Walker. The New York Times called it “a book on a mission,” adding that “Walker is in love with sleep and wants us to fall in love with sleep, too. And it is urgent.” Camarillo also said he is reading “Showtime: Magic, Kareem, Riley, and the Los Angeles Lakers Dynasty of the 1980s,” by Jeff Pearlman. Real-life characters include basketball players Earvin “Magic” Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar; basketball coach Pat Riley; and team owner Jerry Buss.


5. Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos


Excerpts:

In one video recorded by Wood, known for playing Frodo Baggins in Lord of the Rings, the actor says: "I hope you get the help that you need. Lots of love, Vladimir, take care."
The Cameo videos were then modified to include emojis and logos of media outlets, and were then circulated on social media, sometimes through Russian government-owned or backed media outlets.
In one instance, the videos were reportedly discussed on a Russian prime-time political talk show.
Microsoft said it has spotted seven such videos since July 2023, featuring celebrities like Priscilla Presley, Breaking Bad actor Dean Norris, The US Office actress Kate Flannery and Scrubs star John C McGinley.
Cameo said that it will not publicly comment on any of its ongoing Trust and Safety investigations, but added that the use of its videos in Russian propaganda would be a violation of its community guidelines.

Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos

BBC

By Nadine YousifBBC News

Getty Images

Lord of the Rings star Elijah Wood is one of the actors named in the report

Russia has tricked several US actors on the video message platform Cameo into spreading falsehoods about Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky.

The latest propaganda push was outlined in a Thursday report by Microsoft's Threat Analysis Center.

In the videos, celebrities like actor Elijah Wood appear to be sending a personal message to Mr Zelensky asking him to get help with substance use.

Cameo said those videos may violate its guidelines.

The platform, which gained massive popularity during the Covid-19 pandemic, allows users to request recorded messages from celebrities and other public figures in exchange for a fee.

Microsoft's report stated that the celebrities in the videos were likely asked by a Cameo user to send a message to someone named "Vladimir", pleading for him to seek help with alcoholism and drug use, unaware that their videos would be used in Russian propaganda.

Russia has long falsely claimed that Mr Zelensky and other Ukrainian leaders are struggling with substance use, in a bid to win support for their ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

In one video recorded by Wood, known for playing Frodo Baggins in Lord of the Rings, the actor says: "I hope you get the help that you need. Lots of love, Vladimir, take care."

The Cameo videos were then modified to include emojis and logos of media outlets, and were then circulated on social media, sometimes through Russian government-owned or backed media outlets.

In one instance, the videos were reportedly discussed on a Russian prime-time political talk show.

Microsoft said it has spotted seven such videos since July 2023, featuring celebrities like Priscilla Presley, Breaking Bad actor Dean Norris, The US Office actress Kate Flannery and Scrubs star John C McGinley.

Cameo said that it will not publicly comment on any of its ongoing Trust and Safety investigations, but added that the use of its videos in Russian propaganda would be a violation of its community guidelines.

"In cases where such violations are substantiated Cameo will typically take steps to remove the problematic content and suspend the purchaser's account to help prevent further issues," a Cameo spokesperson said in a statement.

A spokesperson for Wood told media outlets that the actor was only answering a request through Cameo, and the video "was in no way intended to be addressed to Zelensky or have anything at all to do with Russia or Ukraine or the war".

Russia has been increasingly using different methods to spread falsehoods about the war in Ukraine on social media.

Most recently, a report by American technology magazine Wired found that images of celebrities like Taylor Swift and Kim Kardashian were put side-by-side with anti-Ukraine quotes, making it appear as though they said those things.

That disinformation campaign reached at least 7.6 million people on Facebook alone, Wired reported. Researchers have linked it to a Russian influence operation with previous ties to the Kremlin.






6. Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election


I wonder about the analysis behind these actions by the Chinese. How do they think they will influence the outcome of the election? What effects do the Chinese seek to achieve with these actions? And among which target audience(s)? Has China correctly assessed the target audience(s)?


Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election

Reuters · by Ben Blanchard

TAIPEI, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Taiwan said on Friday that 12 Chinese fighter jets and a suspected weather balloon had crossed the Taiwan Strait's sensitive median line, in a ratcheting up of tensions about a month before the island's presidential election.

Democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, has complained for the past four years of regular Chinese military patrols and drills near the island.

Taiwan holds presidential and parliamentary polls on Jan. 13 and campaigning has kicked into high gear with how the next government handles relations with China a major point of contention.

Taiwan's defence ministry, offering details of Chinese missions on Thursday night, said 12 fighter jets had crossed the median line, that once served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides but which Chinese planes now regularly fly over.

In an unusual addition to its statement, the ministry said that around midday on Thursday it had also detected a Chinese balloon 101 nautical miles (187 km) southwest of the northern Taiwanese city of Keelung, which travelled eastward for about an hour, crossing the strait before disappearing.

Taiwan Defence Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng told reporters at parliament that their "initial understanding" was it was probably a weather balloon, but felt the ministry had an obligation to report this to be public.

"Otherwise, if after other units or other countries have reported it, everyone will wonder why (we) did not report it. The defence ministry requires all our subordinate units to have a grasp of the enemy situation," he added.

China's defence ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

The potential for China to use of balloons for spying became a global issue in February when the United States shot down what it said was a Chinese surveillance balloon but which China said was a civilian craft that accidentally drifted astray.

Taiwan is on high alert for Chinese activities, both military and political, ahead of its election, especially what Taipei views as Beijing's efforts to interfere in the ballot to get electors to vote for candidates China may prefer.

Vice President Lai Ching-te and running mate Hsiao Bi-khim from the ruling Democratic Progressive Party are leading in the polls. China views then as separatists and has rebuffed Lai's offers of talks.

Taiwan Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said on Friday that China's Taiwan Affairs Office was being "blatant" in its interference. It has called Lai and Hsiao an "independence double act".

"They are commenting in very negative language about Vice President Lai or the vice presidential candidate Bi-khim Hsiao. Those kinds of statements have already told the Taiwanese people that they want to interfere in Taiwan's election and they want to shape the results of the election," Wu said.

"They are doing all sorts of things to interfere in our election and we can expect more leading up to our polling date.

China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment on Friday about Taiwan's interference accusations. Previously it has said only that it respects Taiwan's "social systems".

It has, however, framed the election as a vote between war and peace, and urged Taiwan's people to carefully consider their choices.

Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Additional reporting by Faith Hung and Sarah Wu; Editing by Christopher Cushing and William Mallard

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Acquire Licensing Rights, opens new tab

Reuters · by Ben Blanchard


7. Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan


Seems like anything that includes Hamas would be a non-starter for Israel. (and should be a non-starter for the US).



Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan

  • Shtayyeh says in interview Hamas could join as junior partner
  • US-brokered proposals likely to be fiercely opposed by Israel
  • By Ethan Bronner and Fadwa Hodali
  • December 7, 2023 at 11:00 PM EST
  • Corrected December 8, 2023 at 7:06 AM EST

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-08/palestinian-authority-working-with-us-on-postwar-plan-for-gaza?cmpid=BBD120823_OUS&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=231208&utm_campaign=openamericas


The Palestinian Authority is working with US officials on a plan to run Gaza after the ongoing war is over, with one of its top leaders arguing that Israel’s aim to fully defeat Hamas is unrealistic and the militant group should instead join it under a new governing structure.

Speaking to Bloomberg in his West Bank office on Thursday, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said his preferred outcome of the conflict that started Oct. 7 would be for Hamas to become a junior partner under the broader Palestine Liberation Organization, helping to build a new independent state that includes the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

The Authority, which once ran Palestinian affairs in both the West Bank and Gaza, has been limited to the West Bank since 2007 when Hamas pushed it out. Hamas was formed in the late 1980s as a radical Islamist competitor to the PLO which was coming to terms with Israel’s existence. Hamas rejects Israel entirely, but Shtayyeh suggested that could change.

“Hamas before Oct. 7 is one thing and after is another thing,” said Shtayyeh, a 65-year-old economist who’s been running the Palestinian Authority under President Mahmoud Abbas since 2019. “If they are ready to come to an agreement and accept the political platform of the PLO, then there will be room for talk. Palestinians should not be divided.”

The Palestinian Leadership in the West Bank Offers Plan for Post-War Gaza

The proposal contradicts what Israel says it sees as the future for the impoverished enclave

Source: Bloomberg

Yet that proposal contradicts what Israel says it sees as the future of Gaza, an impoverished coastal strip of 2.2 million. The country’s military launched an air and ground campaign to destroy Hamas in the enclave after the group’s attack on Oct. 7, when some 1,200 people were killed and 240 taken hostage.

Read More: How West Bank, Settlements Fit Into Israel-Hamas War: QuickTake

Israel says it won’t stop its campaign until Hamas is eradicated. It says no group based in Gaza should be able to threaten it again — and that means patrolling the territory for the foreseeable future.

US officials visited Abbas earlier this week to discuss a plan for the day after the war in Gaza, the Palestinian official said. Both sides agreed that Israel shouldn’t reoccupy Gaza, reduce its land for a buffer zone or drive Palestinians out. That suggests plenty of friction ahead.

Read More: Israel’s Mission to Wipe Out Hamas Tunnels Will Take Months

“We’re not going to go there on an Israeli military plan,” Shtayyeh said. “Our people are there. We need to put together a mechanism, something we’re working on with the international community. There will be huge needs in terms of relief and reconstruction to remedy the wounds.”

Shtayyeh will fly to Qatar this weekend to ask Doha to switch its substantial financial support for Hamas of recent years over to the Palestinian Authority, giving it more resources to achieve postwar aims.

Gaza Destruction

Israel’s campaign to dismantle Hamas’s military and political structures both above ground and in a complex tunnel network has killed more than 16,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, and large areas have been reduced to rubble. It’s now Israel’s longest war since 1948.


An Israeli strike in southern Gaza on Dec. 4.Photographer: John Macdougall/AFP/Getty Images


An explosion in Khan Yunis as battles between Israel and Hamas militants continue, on Dec. 5.Photographer: Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images

Under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel not only wants to destroy Hamas — considered a terrorist organization by the US and European Union — but doesn’t trust the Palestinian Authority to pursue peaceful coexistence. It opposes a two-state solution and is hoping to cultivate a new technocratic leadership within Gaza as an alternative to Shtayyeh and Abbas.

Read More: Understanding the Roots of the Israel-Hamas War: QuickTake

Shtayyeh’s idea that Hamas might join together with the Authority seems optimistic, not only because Hamas pushed the party out of Gaza following a 2007 civil war, but because four subsequent agreements between the sides haven’t been implemented.

Asked why Israel can’t eliminate Hamas, Shtayyeh said: “Hamas is in Lebanon, everybody knows Hamas leadership is in Qatar and they are here in the West Bank.”


Palestinians flee the north on the southern outskirts of Gaza City in November.Photographer: Mahmud Hams/AFP/Getty Images

Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders have expressed anger that top Palestinians like Shtayyeh haven’t condemned the slaughter of Oct. 7. Asked to do so in the interview, Shtayyeh demurred, saying the conflict didn’t begin on that date and Israeli officials have refused to condemn things done by their citizens to Palestinians.

“What Israel is doing in Gaza is an act of revenge,” he said. “This is not going to take them anywhere.” At least half a million Gazans are likely to be homeless after the war, he added.

Shtayyeh, who’s worked in the Palestinian Authority for years after teaching economics and being a university administrator, said both Palestinian and Israeli youths are growing more militant and the chance for a peaceful agreement between the two sides is fading fast.


Mohammad Shtayyeh in Ramallah, on Dec. 7.Photographer: Stringer/Bloomberg

He said ministers in his government have repeatedly reached out to Israeli counterparts but have been rebuffed.

“Unfortunately, there is no partner on the other side,” he said, an echo of what Israelis say about Palestinians. “Look at what Netanyahu has been saying — no return to the Palestin

...


[Message clipped]  View entire message


Recipients






De Oppresso Liber,

David Maxwell

Vice President, Center for Asia Pacific Strategy

Senior Fellow, Global Peace Foundation

Editor, Small Wars Journal

Twitter: @davidmaxwell161

Phone: 202-573-8647

email: david.maxwell161@gmail.com



---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: David Maxwell <david.maxwell161@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM

Subject: 12/8/23 National Security News and Commentary

To:



Quotes of the Day:


"The way to get things done is not to mind who gets the credit of doing them." 
- Benjamin Jowett

"Imagination is more important than knowledge." 
- Albert Einstein

“When war breaks out, people say; ‘it won't last, it's too stupid.’ And war is certainly too stupid, but that doesn't prevent it from lasting.” 
 - Albert Camus




1. The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?

2. Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded

3. Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism

4. What books are US Army, congressmen reading?

5. Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos

6. Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election

7. Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan

8. US, Ukraine Officials Privately Say Counteroffensive Against Russia Has ‘Failed’ (Exclusive)

9. The CIA Sure Looks Busy

10. US Deals with Allies Signal Concerns Over China's Disinformation Campaign

11. Army employee charged with stealing $100 million from fund for military children

12. The NYT is wrong about Israeli intelligence

13. A Chinese Pearl Harbor-style attack could end America’s days as a superpower

14. Funding on ‘fumes:’ The Pentagon is nearly out of money to replace weapons sent to Ukraine

15. Congress Tells Army to Set Higher Fitness Standards for Combat Arms Soldiers

16. Large-Scale Combat Operations Will Bring New Medical Ethics Challenges

17. The Army-Navy Game example: A bitter rivalry and a common cause

18. Petraeus says Israel should try U.S.-style counterinsurgency in Gaza

19. The new world disorder by Robert D. Kaplan

20. Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power (book review)





1. The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?




The UN secretary-general invoked 'Article 99' to push for a Gaza cease-fire. What exactly is it?

BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Updated 9:52 PM EST, December 7, 2023

AP · December 8, 2023

It’s called “Article 99.” And it hasn’t been used for decades. Until this week.

With an intensifying Israeli offensive and escalating civilian casualties, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres invoked a rarely exercised power this week to warn the Security Council of an impending “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. He urged members to demand an immediate humanitarian cease-fire.

Guterres invoked Article 99 of the U.N. Charter — last used over half a century ago — which says the secretary-general may inform the council of matters he believes threaten international peace and security.

Here, Edith M. Lederer, longtime chief U.N. correspondent for The Associated Press, breaks down what this could mean.

WHAT IS ARTICLE 99 AND WHY IS GUTERRES INVOKING IT?

It’s a provision of the United Nations Charter, the U.N. constitution. It states that the secretary-general — the U.N.'s top diplomat — may bring to the attention of the Security Council “any matter which, in his opinion, may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.”


This gives an important additional power to the secretary-general, since the real power at the U.N. is held by its 193 member nations and especially the 15 countries that serve on the Security Council.

Article 99 is extremely rarely used. The last time it was invoked was during fighting in 1971 that led to the creation of Bangladesh and its separation from Pakistan.

Guterres invoked Article 99 because he sees the situation in Gaza at risk of a “complete collapse” of the territory’s humanitarian system and civil order. It was something he felt needed to be done.

HOW LIKELY IS THIS TO HAVE AN EFFECT, GIVEN THE U.S. VETO POWER?

Arab and Islamic nations followed up on Guterres’s letter immediately.

The United Arab Emirates, the Arab representative on the Security Council, circulated a short resolution to Security Council members late Wednesday calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. They plan to put that resolution to a vote at a Security Council meeting on Friday morning.

The United States, which is Israel’s closest ally and has veto power on resolutions, has not supported a cease-fire. On Tuesday, U.S. Deputy Ambassador Robert Wood said that the role of the Security Council in the Israel-Gaza war is not to get in the way of important diplomacy that’s taking place. And he said the Security Council resolution at this time “would not be useful.”

This could signal a likely veto, but the U.S. has not said either way.

IN THAT CASE, WHY INVOKE IT?

Because Guterres believes that the humanitarian system and the humanitarian operations in Gaza are collapsing.

He also warns in his letter that in the current situation, “amid constant bombardment by the Israeli Defense Forces and without shelter or essentials to survive, I expect public order to completely break down soon due to the desperate conditions, rendering even limited humanitarian assistance impossible.”

Guterres said the situation could get even worse, pointing to possible epidemics and the mass displacement of Palestinians into neighboring countries. He sees a looming disaster.

Previous secretaries-general have brought threats that they saw to international peace and security to the Security Council without mentioning Article 99. This includes Congo in 1960, the U.S. hostage crisis in Iran that began in November 1979, the Iran-Iraq war in 1980 and more recently Myanmar in 2017.

We don’t know why they didn’t invoke Article 99, and several of the previous secretaries-general are now dead. Guterres has been very outspoken on both the Hamas attacks on Israel and the very high death toll of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

AP · December 8, 2023



2. Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded


Ospreys had history of safety issues long before they were grounded

militarytimes.com · by Tara Copp · December 7, 2023

When the U.S. military took the extraordinary step of grounding its entire fleet of V-22 Ospreys this week, it wasn’t reacting just to the recent deadly crash of the aircraft off the coast of Japan. The aircraft has had a long list of problems in its short history.

The Osprey takes off and lands like a helicopter but can tilt its propellers horizontally to fly like an airplane. That unique and complex design has allowed the Osprey to speed troops to the battlefield. The U.S. Marine Corps, which operates the vast majority of the hundreds of Ospreys in service, calls it a “game-changing assault support platform.”

But on Wednesday, the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps grounded all Ospreys after a preliminary investigation of last week’s crash indicated that a materiel failure — that something went wrong with the aircraft — led to the deaths of all eight Air Force Special Operations Command airmen on board.

And it’s not the first time. There have been persistent questions about a mechanical problem with the clutch that has troubled the program for more than a decade. There also have been questions as to whether all parts of the Osprey have been manufactured according to safety specifications and, as those parts age, whether they remain strong enough to withstand the significant forces created by the Osprey’s unique structure and dynamics of tiltrotor flight.

The government of Japan, which is the only international partner flying the Osprey, had already grounded its aircraft after the Nov. 29 crash.

“It’s good they grounded the fleet,” said Rex Rivolo, a retired Air Force pilot who analyzed the Osprey for the Pentagon’s test and evaluation office from 1992 to 2007 as an analyst at the Institute for Defense Analyses, and who previously warned military officials that the aircraft wasn’t safe. “At this point, they had no choice.”

The Osprey has become a workhorse for the Marine Corps and Air Force Special Operations Command and was in the process of being adopted by the Navy to replace its C-2 Greyhound propeller planes, which transport personnel on and off at-sea aircraft carriers.

Marine Corps Ospreys also have been used to transport White House staff, press and security personnel accompanying the president. White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said they also are subject to the standdown.

While the Ospreys are grounded, Air Force Special Operations Command said it will work to mitigate the impact to operations, training and readiness. The command will continue to fly other aircraft and Osprey crews will continue to train on simulators, spokeswoman Lt. Col. Becky Heyse said.

It was not immediately clear how the other services will adapt their missions.

Questions about the clutch

The first Ospreys only became operational in 2007 after decades of testing. But more than 50 troops have died either flight testing the Osprey or conducting training flights over the program’s lifespan, including 20 deaths in four crashes over the past 20 months.

In July, the Marine Corps for the first time blamed one of the fatal Osprey crashes on a fleet-wide problem that has been known for years but for which there’s still no good fix. It’s known as hard clutch engagement, or HCE.

The Osprey’s two engines are linked by an interconnected drive shaft that runs inside the length of the wings. On each tip, by the engines, a component called a sprag clutch transfers torque, or power, from one proprotor to the other to make sure both rotors are spinning at the same speed. That keeps the Osprey’s flight in balance. If one of the two engines fails, the sprag clutch is also a safety feature: It will transfer power from the working side to the failing engine’s side to keep both rotors going.

But sprag clutches have also become a worrying element. As the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps began looking at HCE events following incidents in 2022, they determined that the clutches may be wearing out faster than anticipated.

Since 2010, Osprey clutches have slipped at least 15 times. As the system re-engages, hard clutch engagement occurs. In just fractions of a second, an HCE event creates a power spike that surges power to the other engine, which can throw the Osprey into an uncontrolled roll or slide. A power spike can also destroy a sprag clutch, essentially severing the interconnected drive shaft. That could result in the complete loss of aircraft control with little or no time for the pilots to react and save their Osprey or crew, Rivolo said.

In the 2022 crash of a Marine Corps MV-22 in California that killed five Marines, hard clutch engagement created an “unrecoverable, catastrophic mechanical failure,” the investigation found. The fire was so intense it destroyed the Osprey’s flight data recorder — another issue the Marines have pushed to fix, by requiring new flight data recorders to be better able to survive a crash.

Ospreys have been grounded before

After Air Force Special Operations Command experienced two hard clutch engagement incidents within six weeks in 2022, the commander, Lt. Gen. James Slife, grounded all of its Ospreys for two weeks. An undisclosed number of Ospreys across the military were grounded again in February 2023 as work began on clutch replacements.

But getting replacements to all the aircraft at the time depended on their availability, Slife said in 2022.

And even that replacement may not be the fix. Neither the services nor defense contractors Bell Textron or Boeing, which jointly produce the Osprey, have found a root cause. The clutch “may be the manifestation of the problem,” but not the root cause, Slife said.

In last week’s crash, Japanese media outlet NHK reported that an eyewitness saw the Osprey inverted with an engine on fire before it went down in the sea. If eyewitness accounts are correct, Rivolo said, clutch failure and a catastrophic failure of the interconnected drive shaft should be investigated as a potential cause.

After its investigation of the 2022 crash, the Marine Corps made several recommendations, including designing a new quill assembly, which is a component that mitigates clutch slippage and hard clutch engagement, and requiring that all drivetrain component materiel be strengthened.

That work is ongoing, according to the V-22 Joint Program Office, which is responsible for the development and production of the aircraft. A new quill assembly design is being finalized and testing of a prototype should begin early next year, it said.

When asked what inspections the JPO will conduct on the fleet while they are grounded, the office told Military Times that’s still unknown.

“The mishap investigation will ensure a thorough look into the casual factors, which will help identify recommendations to address any issues uncovered,” Marcia Hart, a spokesperson for Naval Air Systems Command, said Thursday.

Whistleblower questions

Materiel strength was the subject of a whistleblower lawsuit that Boeing settled with the Justice Department in September for $8.1 million. Two former Boeing V-22 composites fabricators had come forward with allegations that Boeing was falsifying records certifying that it had performed the testing necessary to ensure it maintained uniform temperatures required to ensure the Osprey’s composite parts were strengthened according to DOD specifications.

A certain temperature was needed for uniform molecular bonding of the composite surface. Without that bond, “the components will contain resin voids, linear porosity, and other defects that are not visible to the eye; which compromise the strength and other characteristics of the material, and which can cause catastrophic structural failures,” the lawsuit alleged.

In its settlement, the Justice Department contended Boeing did not meet the Pentagon’s manufacturing standards from 2007 to 2018; the whistleblowers contended in their lawsuit that this affected more than 80 Ospreys that were delivered in that time frame.

In a statement to The Associated Press, Boeing said it entered into the settlement agreement with the Justice Department and Navy “to resolve certain False Claims Act allegations, without admission of liability.”

Boeing said while composites are used throughout the V-22, the parts that were questioned in the lawsuit were “all non-critical parts that do not implicate flight safety.”

“Boeing is in compliance with its curing processes for composite parts,” the company said. “Additionally, we would stress that the cause of the accident in Japan is currently unknown. We are standing by to provide any requested support.”

Ongoing fixes

The V-22 Joint Program Office said that since the 2022 incidents, significant progress has been made toward identifying the cause of the hard clutch engagement.

“While the definitive root cause has not yet been determined, the joint government and industry team has narrowed down the scope of the investigation to a leading theory,” it said in a statement to the AP. “The leading theory involves a partial engagement of some clutches which have been installed for a lengthy period of time. This has not yet been definitively proven, but the data acquired thus far support this theory.”

Bell assembles the Osprey in a partnership with Boeing in its facilities in Amarillo, Texas. Bell would not comment on last week’s crash, but said it works with the services when an accident occurs. “The level of support is determined by the service branch safety center in charge of the investigation,” Bell spokesman Jay Hernandez said.

In its report on the fatal 2022 crash, the Marine Corps forewarned that more accidents were possible because neither the military nor manufacturers have been able to isolate a root cause. It said future incidents were “impossible to prevent without improvements to flight control system software, drivetrain component material strength, and robust inspection requirements.”

Air Force Times Editor Rachel S. Cohen contributed to this story.

About Tara Copp, AP

Tara Copp is a Pentagon correspondent for the Associated Press. She was previously Pentagon bureau chief for Sightline Media Group.


3. Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism


Ivy League presidents reckon with swift backlash to remarks on campus antisemitism

AP · by COLLIN BINKLEY · December 7, 2023


WASHINGTON (AP) — Facing heavy criticism, the University of Pennsylvania’s president walked back some of her remarks given earlier this week at a congressional hearing on campus antisemitism, saying she should have gone further to condemn hate against Jewish students.

Penn President Liz Magill was grilled during a five-hour hearing Tuesday, along with Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth, on how their institutions had responded to instances of antisemitism on campuses. Their carefully worded responses faced swift backlash from Republican and some Democratic lawmakers as well as the White House.

Much of the blowback centered on a heated line of questioning from Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., who repeatedly asked whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” would violate each university’s code of conduct.

Magill said that whether hate speech crossed the line into violating Penn’s policies depended on context.

“If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment,” Magill said.


Gay responded to the question in a similar manner, saying that when “speech crosses into conduct, that violates our policies.” Kornbluth responded that she had not heard calling for the genocide of Jews on MIT’s campus, and that speech “targeted at individuals, not making public statements,” would be considered harassment.

Magill expanded on her answer on Wednesday, saying a call for the genocide of Jewish people would be considered harassment or intimidation.

“I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate,” Magill said in a video statement released by the university. “It’s evil, plain and simple.”

Magill called for a review of Penn’s policies, which she said have long been guided by the U.S. Constitution but need to be “clarified and evaluated” as hate spreads across campus and around the world “in a way not seen in years.”

In a statement posted Wednesday by Harvard on X, formerly Twitter, Gay condemned calls for violence against Jewish students.

“Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account,” Gay wrote Wednesday.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates issued a statement Wednesday criticizing Gay, Magill and Kornbluth’s responses for not going far enough to condemn antisemitism on campuses.

“It’s unbelievable that this needs to be said: calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country,” he said. “Any statements that advocate for the systematic murder of Jews are dangerous and revolting — and we should all stand firmly against them, on the side of human dignity and the most basic values that unite us as Americans.”

The Republican-led House Education and Workforce Committee said Thursday that it will take “additional action” to hold Harvard, MIT and Penn accountable. The panel said it will review the schools’ policies and disciplinary records and examine “their seemingly deplorable record.”

Free speech experts say the college presidents’ answers, while uncomfortable, did follow current interpretations of the First Amendment. Any call for genocide would deserve condemnation but “is not speech that could be banned or punished by the state,” according to the nonprofit PEN America.

“The First Amendment’s protections for speech extend even to deeply hateful speech, unless it constitutes a true threat, incitement to imminent violence, or harassment, which is legally defined as requiring severity and pervasiveness,” said Suzanne Nossel, the group’s CEO.

Even prior to the hearing Tuesday before the House committee, Stefanik has called for Gay’s resignation in response to events that have occurred on campus since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. On Wednesday, she told Fox News that all three presidents needed to be removed from their leadership positions, calling their answers “pathetic.”

“They don’t deserve the dignity of resigning,” she said. “They need to be fired.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, told reporters on Wednesday that Magill’s response was “an unacceptable statement.”

“I’ve said many times, leaders have a responsibility to speak and act with moral clarity. And Liz Magill failed to meet that simple test,” he said. “I think whether you’re talking about genocide against Jews, genocide against people of color, genocide against LGBTQ folks, it’s all in the wrong. And it needs to be called out. And it shouldn’t be hard. And there should be no nuance to that. She needed to give a one-word answer. ”

Shapiro also said it was time for the university’s board to make a “serious decision” about Magill’s leadership at the school.

___

The Associated Press education team receives support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


COLLIN BINKLEY

Collin is a national education reporter

twittermailto

AP · by COLLIN BINKLEY · December 7, 2023


4. What books are US Army, congressmen reading?



What books are US Army, congressmen reading?

Defense News · by Staff · December 7, 2023


(Courtesy of Advantage Media Group)

Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said he is reading “Vectors: Heroes, Villains, & Heartbreak on the Bridge of the U.S. Navy.” The book, by former acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly, offers insight into “idiosyncrasies that happened within the Pentagon and within the service branch,” Wittman said.


(Courtesy of Macmillan Publishers)

Doug Bush, assistant secretary of the U.S. Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, said he is reading “How Ike Led: The Principles Behind Eisenhower’s Biggest Decisions” by Susan Eisenhower. The granddaughter of the former president doesn’t just write about his decision-making process, but why he took certain actions in office.


(Courtesy of Oxford University Press)

Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., chairman of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said he is reading Rush Dosie’s “The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order.” It examines what China wants, whether Beijing can achieve its goals, and how the U.S. could respond.


(Courtesy of Potomac Books)

He had also recently reread “This Kind of War: The Classic Korean War History,” written by T.R. Fehrenbachfor and touted as an account of the conflict written from the perspective of those who fought it.


(Courtesy of Scribner)

Gabe Camarillo, undersecretary of the U.S. Army, said he is reading “Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams,” by Matthew Walker. The New York Times called it “a book on a mission,” adding that “Walker is in love with sleep and wants us to fall in love with sleep, too. And it is urgent.” Camarillo also said he is reading “Showtime: Magic, Kareem, Riley, and the Los Angeles Lakers Dynasty of the 1980s,” by Jeff Pearlman. Real-life characters include basketball players Earvin “Magic” Johnson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar; basketball coach Pat Riley; and team owner Jerry Buss.


5. Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos


Excerpts:

In one video recorded by Wood, known for playing Frodo Baggins in Lord of the Rings, the actor says: "I hope you get the help that you need. Lots of love, Vladimir, take care."
The Cameo videos were then modified to include emojis and logos of media outlets, and were then circulated on social media, sometimes through Russian government-owned or backed media outlets.
In one instance, the videos were reportedly discussed on a Russian prime-time political talk show.
Microsoft said it has spotted seven such videos since July 2023, featuring celebrities like Priscilla Presley, Breaking Bad actor Dean Norris, The US Office actress Kate Flannery and Scrubs star John C McGinley.
Cameo said that it will not publicly comment on any of its ongoing Trust and Safety investigations, but added that the use of its videos in Russian propaganda would be a violation of its community guidelines.

Russia tricks US actors into appearing in propaganda videos

BBC

By Nadine YousifBBC News

Getty Images

Lord of the Rings star Elijah Wood is one of the actors named in the report

Russia has tricked several US actors on the video message platform Cameo into spreading falsehoods about Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky.

The latest propaganda push was outlined in a Thursday report by Microsoft's Threat Analysis Center.

In the videos, celebrities like actor Elijah Wood appear to be sending a personal message to Mr Zelensky asking him to get help with substance use.

Cameo said those videos may violate its guidelines.

The platform, which gained massive popularity during the Covid-19 pandemic, allows users to request recorded messages from celebrities and other public figures in exchange for a fee.

Microsoft's report stated that the celebrities in the videos were likely asked by a Cameo user to send a message to someone named "Vladimir", pleading for him to seek help with alcoholism and drug use, unaware that their videos would be used in Russian propaganda.

Russia has long falsely claimed that Mr Zelensky and other Ukrainian leaders are struggling with substance use, in a bid to win support for their ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

In one video recorded by Wood, known for playing Frodo Baggins in Lord of the Rings, the actor says: "I hope you get the help that you need. Lots of love, Vladimir, take care."

The Cameo videos were then modified to include emojis and logos of media outlets, and were then circulated on social media, sometimes through Russian government-owned or backed media outlets.

In one instance, the videos were reportedly discussed on a Russian prime-time political talk show.

Microsoft said it has spotted seven such videos since July 2023, featuring celebrities like Priscilla Presley, Breaking Bad actor Dean Norris, The US Office actress Kate Flannery and Scrubs star John C McGinley.

Cameo said that it will not publicly comment on any of its ongoing Trust and Safety investigations, but added that the use of its videos in Russian propaganda would be a violation of its community guidelines.

"In cases where such violations are substantiated Cameo will typically take steps to remove the problematic content and suspend the purchaser's account to help prevent further issues," a Cameo spokesperson said in a statement.

A spokesperson for Wood told media outlets that the actor was only answering a request through Cameo, and the video "was in no way intended to be addressed to Zelensky or have anything at all to do with Russia or Ukraine or the war".

Russia has been increasingly using different methods to spread falsehoods about the war in Ukraine on social media.

Most recently, a report by American technology magazine Wired found that images of celebrities like Taylor Swift and Kim Kardashian were put side-by-side with anti-Ukraine quotes, making it appear as though they said those things.

That disinformation campaign reached at least 7.6 million people on Facebook alone, Wired reported. Researchers have linked it to a Russian influence operation with previous ties to the Kremlin.






6. Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election


I wonder about the analysis behind these actions by the Chinese. How do they think they will influence the outcome of the election? What effects do the Chinese seek to achieve with these actions? And among which target audience(s)? Has China correctly assessed the target audience(s)?


Chinese fighters, balloon cross Taiwan Strait a month before election

Reuters · by Ben Blanchard

TAIPEI, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Taiwan said on Friday that 12 Chinese fighter jets and a suspected weather balloon had crossed the Taiwan Strait's sensitive median line, in a ratcheting up of tensions about a month before the island's presidential election.

Democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, has complained for the past four years of regular Chinese military patrols and drills near the island.

Taiwan holds presidential and parliamentary polls on Jan. 13 and campaigning has kicked into high gear with how the next government handles relations with China a major point of contention.

Taiwan's defence ministry, offering details of Chinese missions on Thursday night, said 12 fighter jets had crossed the median line, that once served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides but which Chinese planes now regularly fly over.

In an unusual addition to its statement, the ministry said that around midday on Thursday it had also detected a Chinese balloon 101 nautical miles (187 km) southwest of the northern Taiwanese city of Keelung, which travelled eastward for about an hour, crossing the strait before disappearing.

Taiwan Defence Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng told reporters at parliament that their "initial understanding" was it was probably a weather balloon, but felt the ministry had an obligation to report this to be public.

"Otherwise, if after other units or other countries have reported it, everyone will wonder why (we) did not report it. The defence ministry requires all our subordinate units to have a grasp of the enemy situation," he added.

China's defence ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

The potential for China to use of balloons for spying became a global issue in February when the United States shot down what it said was a Chinese surveillance balloon but which China said was a civilian craft that accidentally drifted astray.

Taiwan is on high alert for Chinese activities, both military and political, ahead of its election, especially what Taipei views as Beijing's efforts to interfere in the ballot to get electors to vote for candidates China may prefer.

Vice President Lai Ching-te and running mate Hsiao Bi-khim from the ruling Democratic Progressive Party are leading in the polls. China views then as separatists and has rebuffed Lai's offers of talks.

Taiwan Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said on Friday that China's Taiwan Affairs Office was being "blatant" in its interference. It has called Lai and Hsiao an "independence double act".

"They are commenting in very negative language about Vice President Lai or the vice presidential candidate Bi-khim Hsiao. Those kinds of statements have already told the Taiwanese people that they want to interfere in Taiwan's election and they want to shape the results of the election," Wu said.

"They are doing all sorts of things to interfere in our election and we can expect more leading up to our polling date.

China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment on Friday about Taiwan's interference accusations. Previously it has said only that it respects Taiwan's "social systems".

It has, however, framed the election as a vote between war and peace, and urged Taiwan's people to carefully consider their choices.

Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Additional reporting by Faith Hung and Sarah Wu; Editing by Christopher Cushing and William Mallard

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Acquire Licensing Rights, opens new tab

Reuters · by Ben Blanchard


7. Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan


Seems like anything that includes Hamas would be a non-starter for Israel. (and should be a non-starter for the US).



Palestinian Authority Working With US on Gaza Plan

  • Shtayyeh says in interview Hamas could join as junior partner
  • US-brokered proposals likely to be fiercely opposed by Israel
  • By Ethan Bronner and Fadwa Hodali
  • December 7, 2023 at 11:00 PM EST
  • Corrected December 8, 2023 at 7:06 AM EST

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-08/palestinian-authority-working-with-us-on-postwar-plan-for-gaza?cmpid=BBD120823_OUS&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=231208&utm_campaign=openamericas


The Palestinian Authority is working with US officials on a plan to run Gaza after the ongoing war is over, with one of its top leaders arguing that Israel’s aim to fully defeat Hamas is unrealistic and the militant group should instead join it under a new governing structure.

Speaking to Bloomberg in his West Bank office on Thursday, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said his preferred outcome of the conflict that started Oct. 7 would be for Hamas to become a junior partner under the broader Palestine Liberation Organization, helping to build a new independent state that includes the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

The Authority, which once ran Palestinian affairs in both the West Bank and Gaza, has been limited to the West Bank since 2007 when Hamas pushed it out. Hamas was formed in the late 1980s as a radical Islamist competitor to the PLO which was coming to terms with Israel’s existence. Hamas rejects Israel entirely, but Shtayyeh suggested that could change.

“Hamas before Oct. 7 is one thing and after is another thing,” said Shtayyeh, a 65-year-old economist who’s been running the Palestinian Authority under President Mahmoud Abbas since 2019. “If they are ready to come to an agreement and accept the political platform of the PLO, then there will be room for talk. Palestinians should not be divided.”

The Palestinian Leadership in the West Bank Offers Plan for Post-War Gaza

The proposal contradicts what Israel says it sees as the future for the impoverished enclave

Source: Bloomberg

Yet that proposal contradicts what Israel says it sees as the future of Gaza, an impoverished coastal strip of 2.2 million. The country’s military launched an air and ground campaign to destroy Hamas in the enclave after the group’s attack on Oct. 7, when some 1,200 people were killed and 240 taken hostage.

Read More: How West Bank, Settlements Fit Into Israel-Hamas War: QuickTake

Israel says it won’t stop its campaign until Hamas is eradicated. It says no group based in Gaza should be able to threaten it again — and that means patrolling the territory for the foreseeable future.

US officials visited Abbas earlier this week to discuss a plan for the day after the war in Gaza, the Palestinian official said. Both sides agreed that Israel shouldn’t reoccupy Gaza, reduce its land for a buffer zone or drive Palestinians out. That suggests plenty of friction ahead.

Read More: Israel’s Mission to Wipe Out Hamas Tunnels Will Take Months

“We’re not going to go there on an Israeli military plan,” Shtayyeh said. “Our people are there. We need to put together a mechanism, something we’re working on with the international community. There will be huge needs in terms of relief and reconstruction to remedy the wounds.”

Shtayyeh will fly to Qatar this weekend to ask Doha to switch its substantial financial support for Hamas of recent years over to the Palestinian Authority, giving it more resources to achieve postwar aims.

Gaza Destruction

Israel’s campaign to dismantle Hamas’s military and political structures both above ground and in a complex tunnel network has killed more than 16,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, and large areas have been reduced to rubble. It’s now Israel’s longest war since 1948.


An Israeli strike in southern Gaza on Dec. 4.Photographer: John Macdougall/AFP/Getty Images


An explosion in Khan Yunis as battles between Israel and Hamas militants continue, on Dec. 5.Photographer: Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images

Under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel not only wants to destroy Hamas — considered a terrorist organization by the US and European Union — but doesn’t trust the Palestinian Authority to pursue peaceful coexistence. It opposes a two-state solution and is hoping to cultivate a new technocratic leadership within Gaza as an alternative to Shtayyeh and Abbas.

Read More: Understanding the Roots of the Israel-Hamas War: QuickTake

Shtayyeh’s idea that Hamas might join together with the Authority seems optimistic, not only because Hamas pushed the party out of Gaza following a 2007 civil war, but because four subsequent agreements between the sides haven’t been implemented.

Asked why Israel can’t eliminate Hamas, Shtayyeh said: “Hamas is in Lebanon, everybody knows Hamas leadership is in Qatar and they are here in the West Bank.”


Palestinians flee the north on the southern outskirts of Gaza City in November.Photographer: Mahmud Hams/AFP/Getty Images

Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders have expressed anger that top Palestinians like Shtayyeh haven’t condemned the slaughter of Oct. 7. Asked to do so in the interview, Shtayyeh demurred, saying the conflict didn’t begin on that date and Israeli officials have refused to condemn things done by their citizens to Palestinians.

“What Israel is doing in Gaza is an act of revenge,” he said. “This is not going to take them anywhere.” At least half a million Gazans are likely to be homeless after the war, he added.

Shtayyeh, who’s worked in the Palestinian Authority for years after teaching economics and being a university administrator, said both Palestinian and Israeli youths are growing more militant and the chance for a peaceful agreement between the two sides is fading fast.


Mohammad Shtayyeh in Ramallah, on Dec. 7.Photographer: Stringer/Bloomberg

He said ministers in his government have repeatedly reached out to Israeli counterparts but have been rebuffed.

“Unfortunately, there is no partner on the other side,” he said, an echo of what Israelis say about Palestinians. “Look at what Netanyahu has been saying — no return to the Palestinian Authority, no two-state solution. What does this mean? Netanyahu wants a continuation of a military occupation of the Palestinian territory. This is not acceptable.”

A positive step would be for the United Nations Security Council to admit the state of Palestine as a full member rather than an observer, Shtayyeh said. A team could then be put together to work out borders and other issues, he said.

— With assistance from Julius Domoney

(Corrects to show US officials met with Palestinian Authority president in seventh paragraph.)

8. US, Ukraine Officials Privately Say Counteroffensive Against Russia Has ‘Failed’ (Exclusive)


Are there echos of Monte saying the mission was a 90% success, it was just that it was a bridge too far?


Of course the Russians have failed to significantly advance either.


Excerpts;


In a phone call with The Messenger, Pentagon spokesman Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder said that such criticism ignored the scale of U.S. and European assistance since the first days of the war.


“Let’s take a step back, when Russia first invaded,” Ryder said. “The estimates of Ukraine’s survival were about a week and not only did they survive a massive Russian invasion, they pushed back and in a year and a half have regained more than 54 percent of captured territory.”


On Wednesday, White House national security spokesman John Kirby said “We would agree that (the Ukrainians) didn't go as far, as fast, as they, themselves, wanted to go. And again, as winter sets in, I don't think we should expect any more than we did last winter that the fighting is just going to stop.”



US, Ukraine Officials Privately Say Counteroffensive Against Russia Has ‘Failed’ (Exclusive)

themessenger.com · December 7, 2023

A series of meetings over the last month between U.S. officials and representatives of Ukraine’s presidential office and defense ministry concluded that the months-long counteroffensive against Russian forces has failed to meet its objectives and reached a stalemate, The Messenger has learned.

Amid the backdrop of a high-stakes debate in the U.S. Congress over continuing American military and financial support for Ukraine, multiple U.S. defense and intelligence officials told The Messenger that the meetings held in November and December surfaced a range of political and military issues which could undercut Ukraine’s war efforts. The American officials spoke under condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national security matters.

Beyond the slow pace of the counteroffensive, those issues included a growing rift over the course of the war between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his top military commander, setbacks in troop mobilizations and desperately low stocks of artillery ammunition.

The U.S. officials said that participants in the meetings agreed that key objectives of the Ukrainian counteroffensive, which began in June, have not been met and that there was little chance that they would be, particularly if American aid was suspended. Those objectives included driving Russian forces from land taken in the eastern Donbas region and reaching the Sea of Azov to cut the land bridge between the Crimean Peninsula–which Russia annexed and seized from Ukraine in 2014–and the Russian mainland.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion nearly two years ago, Ukraine has recaptured more than 54 percent of its territory from Russian forces, but the recent counteroffensive has resulted in only marginal territorial gains. Russian forces have fortified their defenses by expanding their use of minefields and trench networks which have been supported by artillery, close-air support and mechanized vehicles.

American participants in the meeting went so far as to suggest that given the limited gains, a longstanding U.S. policy of letting Ukraine define the terms of victory in the war be reconsidered.

On Thursday a U.S. official told The Messenger that U.S. policy "will continue to be that it is up to Ukraine to define victory and that it should remain up to Ukraine to decide how this war ends."

Zelenskyy and his commander

The U.S. defense and intelligence officials told The Messenger that the meetings raised questions about the fraying relationship between Zelenskyy and several Ukrainian generals, including his top military commander Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, and how these tensions may be impacting the war. The U.S. officials noted that such political-military tensions were not unusual in wartime and that the rifts in Ukraine had not yet reached a crisis point.

Multiple reports have described friction between Zelenskyy and Zaluzhny, some of which spilled into public view last month when Zaluzhny gave an interview to The Economist in which he doubted that either side could win the war.

Gen. Zaluzhny said that “there will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough,” and that the conflict risked becoming “an attritional trench war” that could drag on for years.

Zelenskyy’s office chided Zaluzhny for the comments. A top aide said Zaluzhny’s interview “eases the work of the aggressor” and that his remarks had stirred “panic” among Ukraine’s Western allies.

Zelenskyy himself disputed the general’s characterization of the fighting.

“Time has passed, people are tired, regardless of their status, and this is understandable,” the president said. “But this is not a stalemate.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst told The Messenger that tensions between Zaluzhny and Zelenskyy have been evident since the early days of the war, and had grown in recent months.

“We're hearing about it again and even more loudly, which is not surprising because we are at the most dangerous moments of the war,” Herbst said. “And the reason why this moment is so dangerous is because at this point, the unreliability of American support for Ukraine.”

This week Ukraine's defense minister dismissed the reports of tension between the president and his top general. "There is no conflict. This is a fictional construct," Rustem Umerov told The Kyiv Post.


Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, and then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, who retired in September, attend a wreath laying ceremony at the Pentagon 9/11 Memorial by the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the First Lady of Ukraine, Olena Zelenska, Sept. 21, 2023.Sgt. David Resnick/U.S. Army

Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill…

The bleak assessments come at a particularly volatile time for Ukraine. The Biden Administration is pressing Congress to authorize more than $60 billion in additional funding for Ukraine, arguing that cutting off weapons and equipment would “kneecap Ukraine on the battlefield.”

"This cannot wait,” President Joe Biden said Wednesday from the White House. “It's as simple as that."

But Republicans and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., blocked the Senate from beginning consideration of the emergency spending package on Wednesday. Republicans have said they won’t vote to authorize more funds unless the package includes policy changes to halt migration at the U.S. border, and they have called on the White House and other supporters of aid to Ukraine to articulate a path to victory.

The private U.S.-Ukraine meetings over the past month suggest that path is more difficult now than at any point since the early stages of the war.

A blame game?

Herbst, the former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, disputed the suggestion that the counteroffensive had failed and blamed the White House and Congress for a slower-than-needed delivery of military support.

The Ukrainians have achieved “modest gains” on land, Herbst said, and given the equipment they had, it was “foolish” to think they could have recaptured thousands of kilometers of occupied territory. He said more American tanks, long-range ATACMS missile systems and anti-mining equipment would have made a difference.

“So to suggest that their counteroffensive was a failure, especially coming from the American officials who did not give Ukraine what it needed, is kind of laughable,” he said. “To have expected a breakthrough, given the way we armed them, was not sound strategic thinking.”

In a phone call with The Messenger, Pentagon spokesman Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder said that such criticism ignored the scale of U.S. and European assistance since the first days of the war.

“Let’s take a step back, when Russia first invaded,” Ryder said. “The estimates of Ukraine’s survival were about a week and not only did they survive a massive Russian invasion, they pushed back and in a year and a half have regained more than 54 percent of captured territory.”

On Wednesday, White House national security spokesman John Kirby said “We would agree that (the Ukrainians) didn't go as far, as fast, as they, themselves, wanted to go. And again, as winter sets in, I don't think we should expect any more than we did last winter that the fighting is just going to stop.”

themessenger.com · December 7, 2023


9 The CIA Sure Looks Busy

.

Fascinating graphic at the lnk: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/cia-sure-looks-busy


Is the ground zero target for all our adversaries now Northern Virginia and the two counties in particular? Certainly from a cyber targeting perspective it must be.



The CIA Sure Looks Busy | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge

The rise of generative AI applications like ChatGPT, Midjourney or Bard already leads to increased demand in the world's data center network due to its sometimes hefty requirements for the underlying large language models.

This computing demand will only increase in the upcoming years, necessitating the building of new data centers and expanding the capacities of existing ones.

As Statista's Florian Zandt shows in the following chart, based on 2022 data collected by commercial real estate company Cushman & Wakefield, the race between the global superpowers China and the United States also extends to data centers.


You will find more infographics at Statista

The highest concentration of data center power capacity in the world can be found in Northern Virginia, particularly the counties of Loudoun and Prince William.

According to an interview with the vice chairman of real estate service provider CBRE, Rob Faktorow, with radio broadcaster WTOP in 2022, the main reasons are tax incentives, superior connectivity and infrastructure well suited to the resource needs of big server farms.

“It is true Northern Virginia is the data center capital of the world, the largest market in the world, by three times,” said Faktorow.
“It encompasses almost 50% of the data centers in the United States.”

We couldn't help but notice that both those Northern Virginia counties border The CIA's 'Langley' HQ in Fairfax County...


Coming in second is Beijing with a capacity of 1,800 megawatts, followed by London (1,000 megawatts) and Singapore (876 megawatts).

While the Greater Tokyo area only ranks fifth for current capacity, the island nation is on an accelerationist path in terms of future projects, especially compared to its competitors in the Asia-Pacific region. According to Cushman & Wakefield, Beijing's capacity will likely increase by around 300 megawatts in the next three to five years, owed partly to investors shifting funds due to rising U.S.-China tensions. The traditionally Western-aligned Japan might see its data power capacity double to almost 2,000 megawatts in the same period, in part due to pledges by big players like TSMC and Nvidia to build chip fabrication plants and establish a network of, as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang put it, "AI factories" across the country.

Another relevant aspect in evaluating the growth potential of data centers in a specific region is their vacancy rate.

As CBRE notes, capacity vacancy in Singapore stood at less than one percent in Q1 of 2023. Northern Virginia had a vacancy rate of about two percent, and Tokyo stood at 11.2 percent.

ZeroHedge



10. US Deals with Allies Signal Concerns Over China's Disinformation Campaign


Dennis Wilder and I are of like mind.


Excerpts:


The agreements the U.S. made with its allies are "a deliberate acknowledgment of the threats posed by China," said David Maxwell, vice president of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy.
"Disinformation is part of a deliberate long-term political warfare campaign by China to subvert the democracies of the U.S., the ROK and Japan as well as to undermine the alliance relationships to prevent unified action against China," Maxwell said, using the acronym for South Korea's official name, Republic of Korea.
China is seemingly accelerating its social media operation aimed at influencing the U.S. election in 2024.
Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, announced on Nov. 30 that it took down 4,789 Facebook accounts based in China that were impersonating Americans, including politicians, and posting messages about U.S. politics and U.S.-China relations.
In the report on adversarial threats, Meta said China is the third-most-common source of foreign disinformation after Russia and Iran.
Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow for the Initiative for U.S.-China Dialogue on Global Issues at Georgetown University, said, "The Chinese, Russians, and others seek to disrupt the normal give and take of our political discourse."


US Deals with Allies Signal Concerns Over China's Disinformation Campaign

December 08, 2023 2:48 AM

voanews.com · December 8, 2023

Washington —

Western foreign policy experts are welcoming recent U.S. agreements to jointly tackle foreign disinformation with Seoul and Tokyo, saying they are needed to counter Chinese efforts to undermine liberal democracies through the spread of fake news.

The U.S. signed a Memorandum of Cooperation with Japan in Tokyo on Wednesday "to identify and counter foreign information manipulation," according to a State Department statement.

The agreement follows a Memorandum of Understanding signed with South Korea in Seoul on Friday to cooperate in their efforts to tackle foreign disinformation. The agreements, the first designed to fight disinformation, were made during an Asia trip by Liz Allen, the U.S. undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs.

They are designed to "demonstrate the seriousness with which the United States is working with its partners to defend the information space," according to the State Department's Wednesday statement, which did not specify any nations as threats.

In response, Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, told VOA on Tuesday that he wants to stress that "China always opposes the creation and spread of disinformation."

He said, "What I have seen is that there is a lot of disinformation about China on social media in the U.S. Some U.S. officials, lawmakers, media and organizations have produced and spread a large amount of false information against China without any evidence, ignoring basic facts."

The agreements the U.S. made with its allies are "a deliberate acknowledgment of the threats posed by China," said David Maxwell, vice president of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy.


U.S. President Joe Biden, right, greets China's President Xi Jinping at the Filoli Estate in Woodside, California, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders' week, Nov. 15, 2023. (Doug Mills/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

"Disinformation is part of a deliberate long-term political warfare campaign by China to subvert the democracies of the U.S., the ROK and Japan as well as to undermine the alliance relationships to prevent unified action against China," Maxwell said, using the acronym for South Korea's official name, Republic of Korea.

China is seemingly accelerating its social media operation aimed at influencing the U.S. election in 2024.

Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, announced on Nov. 30 that it took down 4,789 Facebook accounts based in China that were impersonating Americans, including politicians, and posting messages about U.S. politics and U.S.-China relations.

In the report on adversarial threats, Meta said China is the third-most-common source of foreign disinformation after Russia and Iran.

Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow for the Initiative for U.S.-China Dialogue on Global Issues at Georgetown University, said, "The Chinese, Russians, and others seek to disrupt the normal give and take of our political discourse."

Wilder, formerly National Security Council director for China in 2004-05 during the George W. Bush administration, continued to say the agreements Washington made with Seoul and Tokyo are "a significant step forward" as "democracies must work together" to offset "disinformation designed to influence electorate and sow overall dissent within our open political systems."

Beijing appears to be spreading anti-U.S. and pro-China messages in South Korea as well.

South Korea's National Intelligence Service (NIS) announced Nov. 13 it had identified and taken down 38 fake Korean-language news sites operated by two Chinese public relations firms, Haimai and Haixun.

South Korea's National Cyber Security Center, which is overseen by NIS, released a report on the same day describing the kind of propaganda that the firms disseminated through the fake news sites by posing as members of the Korean Digital News Association. The organization oversees the copyrights of news articles posted by its members.

Using news site names such as Seoul Press with the corresponding domain name as seoulpr.com and Busan Online with busanonline.com, Haimai has been disseminating disinformation and operating the sites from China, according to the report. Busan is South Korea's second-largest city.

An article on Daegu Journal, another illicit site Haimai was running, stated in June that nuclear wastewater released from Japan would affect the South Korean food supply chain.

The National Cyber Security Center report also noted that U.S.-based cybersecurity firm Mandiant, owned by Google, released a report in July accusing Haimai of operating 72 fraudulent websites to spread anti-U.S. messages.

Cho Han-Bum, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute for National Unification, told VOA's Korean Service on Tuesday that "China and North Korea have been attempting in various ways to influence South Korea's public opinion."

He said the influence campaign could affect South Korean politics and therefore Seoul's relations with Beijing or its stance on Pyongyang.

Kim Hyungjin in Seoul contributed to this report.

voanews.com · December 8, 2023


11. Army employee charged with stealing $100 million from fund for military children



When I read stories like these I feel there is no punishment strong enough for criminals like this. 140 years is not enough. They make me think bad thoughts.


Army employee charged with stealing $100 million from fund for military children

Stars and Stripes · by J.P. Lawrence · December 7, 2023

Army

ByJ.P. Lawrence


Stars and Stripes •

Janet Yamanaka Mello was indicted on 10 criminal counts including mail fraud, engaging in a monetary transaction using criminal proceeds and aggravated identify theft. Prosecutors say she stole more than $100 million from a fund meant to help military children. (File)


An Army civilian employee in Texas is accused in a federal indictment of stealing more than $100 million from a fund meant to help military children.

Janet Yamanaka Mello, 57, was indicted Wednesday in a San Antonio district court on 10 total criminal counts including mail fraud, engaging in a monetary transaction using criminal proceeds and aggravated identity theft.

Federal prosecutors say Mello used her position as a financial program manager for Child, Youth and School services at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio to steer 4-H Military Partnership Grant program funds into a shell company she controlled.

The grant program helps military children participate in projects with 4-H, which is a traditionally farming-focused network of youth organizations administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Mello founded Child Health and Youth Lifelong Development in 2016 in order to take grant money from the program, the indictment alleged.

Prosecutors said her business didn’t provide services to military members and their families, as Mello said it would.

The $100 million in grant funds awarded to the business over the past six years instead went toward high-end jewelry, clothing, vehicles and real estate, prosecutors said.

Mello also is accused of repeatedly falsifying the digital signature of one of her supervisors, the indictment said.

Each of the five fraud charges carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, with the four spending charges carrying a maximum sentence of 10 years each, and the aggravated identity theft charge mandating at least two years.

Mello is scheduled for an initial court appearance Dec. 14.

Crime and courts

J.P. Lawrence

J.P. Lawrence

J.P. Lawrence reports on the U.S. military in Afghanistan and the Middle East. He served in the U.S. Army from 2008 to 2017. He graduated from Columbia Journalism School and Bard College and is a first-generation immigrant from the Philippines.



Stars and Stripes · by J.P. Lawrence · December 7, 2023


12. The NYT is wrong about Israeli intelligence


Certainly an interesting thesis that I am sure many will not accept because emotion will trump logic.


Can you explain this to the families of the victims?


Conclusion:


In the half century between the intelligence failures of October 1973 and October 2023, the system worked so well that Israel could win its wars while still allowing Israelis to get on with their lives and build their country. That is how Israel, which started off in 1949 with a per capita income far below the European average, is now 13th in the world. Once in 50 years, the system fails — but the alternative, of mobilising in response to every possible threat, would be far worse.


The NYT is wrong about Israeli intelligence

The IDF knew of Hamas's plan — and made the logical call

BY EDWARD LUTTWAK

unherd.com · by Edward Luttwak · December 8, 2023

The bad-faith reporting of Israeli news in The New York Times can overcome even the simplest arithmetic. Last month, there was a day-long rally for Israel in Washington that filled its Mall, with police attendance estimates ranging between 250,000 and 300,000. In the pages of the NYT, however, this became a gathering of “tens of thousands”.

As for Hamas’s recent attack, the NYT has already reported that Netanyahu’s policies focused on the West Bank and neglected Hamas. Indeed, it seems that the NYT keeps one Ronen Bergman as its Staff Writer for in-depth “bad-Israel” stories, and he works hard to deliver the goods. Having actually served in the Military Police, the lowest-prestige Corps of the armed forces, Bergman claimed an intelligence background to write about intelligence operations. (He once wrote that my much-missed friend Meir Dagan, the later Mossad chief, would personally strangle captured terrorists in an elbow lock when serving in military intelligence — a physical impossibility for short-armed Dagan.)

The latest is a carefully contrived misrepresentation of the reason that Israel was caught by surprise on October 7. Headlined “Israel Knew Hamas’s Attack Plan More Than a Year Ago”, it was based on a fundamental misconception — that the Israeli army is an active-duty force, as most armies indeed are. But the Israel Defence Forces is radically different: it is a reserves-centered force, one of only three in the world, along with the Finnish and Swiss armies.

Instead of consisting of active-duty forces that are up and running around the clock, the IDF mostly consists of reserve units. When mobilised for refresher training or to fight a war, the reservists go to their specific depots scattered around the country to collect their uniforms, kit and weapons — everything from pistols to battle tanks — before moving out as combat units ready for action.

That is how a country of some 7 million has more than 635,000 soldiers, airmen and sailors when fully mobilised, compared with the 2 million in all US armed forces, out of a population of some 330 million: that is, a ratio that is more than tenfold. Invented in 1948, the reserve system is the key to Israel’s military strength. Aside from allowing Israelis to work and raise their families while still being ready to fight, it also allows the Israeli troops who are on duty to train properly in unit exercises and larger manoeuvres, instead of being tied down to watch frontiers and hold outposts.

But there is a major catch: advance warning is needed to mobilise the reserves in time, and even with the best possible intelligence analysts, and all the best satellites, sensors and computers, the problem is not just hard… it is impossible. Had Israeli intelligence analysis, or the arrival of a complete war plan sold by an enterprising operative revealed Hamas’s plan for an attack on October 7, the Israelis would have sent much stronger forces to guard the Gaza perimeter. Instead of the lone Merkava tank whose capture by dozens of Hamas fighters was shown again and again in news videos, there would have been a company of 10 tanks in that position, which would have massacred the attackers with their machine-gun fire. As for the single mechanised infantry company with fewer than 100 solders that guarded a critical hinge position, there would have been a battalion or even two that would have crushed the attackers.

But then, of course, Hamas spotters would have seen Israeli troops ready to defeat them — and they would have called off the attack altogether. There is worse: once an attack warning is received and reinforcements are deployed so that the enemy calls off its planned attack, the intelligence indicators that got it right will be discredited as false alarms, while the intelligence officers who failed to heed the signs will be the ones everyone listens to the next time around.

That is how, almost exactly 50 years before Hamas’s recent invasion, President Anwar Sadat’s offensive across the Suez Canal caught the Israelis with only 411 soldiers holding the frontline forts. On the first day of the Yom Kippur War, they were attacked by a first wave of 20,000 Egyptian troops, with 10 ten times as many following behind them. Why were the Israelis surprised? Because they had got it right several months earlier, and had recalled reservists from their jobs and their families to take up their weapons and go to the front, which persuaded the Egyptians to call off their initial attack.

This is why, when a complete Hamas war plan was captured more than a year ago, identifying each target that would in fact be attacked on October 7 (the “rave” was a last-minute addition), there was no alarm and no mobilisation. The plan was one of many — Hamas was always fantasising about mass attacks, but would then limit itself to the launch of its rockets that Israel could reliably intercept.

In the half century between the intelligence failures of October 1973 and October 2023, the system worked so well that Israel could win its wars while still allowing Israelis to get on with their lives and build their country. That is how Israel, which started off in 1949 with a per capita income far below the European average, is now 13th in the world. Once in 50 years, the system fails — but the alternative, of mobilising in response to every possible threat, would be far worse.

unherd.com · by Edward Luttwak · December 8, 2023


13. A Chinese Pearl Harbor-style attack could end America’s days as a superpower




A Chinese Pearl Harbor-style attack could end America’s days as a superpower

New York Post · by  Harry J. Kazianis V · December 7, 2023

More On: china

This is the case feds should have brought against Hunter Biden in the first place

Florida family stunned after man accused of poisoning them was sent back to China

Stop foreign adversaries like China from corrupting American schools

Joe Biden offers bald-faced lies to all of America about his family affairs

As Americans pause to reflect on Imperial Japan’s brutal attack on Pearl Harbor — 82 years ago Thursday — the US military faces an even bigger threat coming from Asia once again.

There’s ample evidence that if China were to go to war against America, it would use the same strategy as Japan to try to achieve a quick and dirty victory — but with a modern twist: a massive “bolt-from-the-blue attack” that could, in not even a day, wipe out most of our military assets in the Indo-Pacific region and perhaps forever mark the end of the United States as a superpower.

And the saddest part of this scenario is that the Biden administration is well aware of it and has done almost nothing to reverse the threat.

First, a bit of history.

Back in the 1990s, China became obsessed with trying to neutralize US military power in Asia.

The Biden administration is doing nothing to prepare for a potential attack from China, according to Post columnist Harry J. Kazianis. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Beijing realized it had no ability to target, attack or destroy US military bases in Asia or the powerful warships that protected vital sea lanes and commerce all over the Pacific.

That problem became more acute when America and China faced off in multiple crises over Taiwan in the mid-1990s.

China’s leaders would find they could not even target US aircraft carriers near Taiwan for a simple reason: They didn’t have the technological means to locate them.

see also


Xi Jinping has one goal: ensure China can win a war with America

US bases would also be hard to target.

America would dominate the battlefield in a war.

China would, in time, and after spending billions of dollars over several decades, come up with a solution.

Beijing needed an asymmetric weapon it could build cheaply and on a large scale to counter US military dominance.

That meant building thousands of ever-more-advanced cruise and ballistic missiles.

There seems to be just one reason to build such a massive arsenal of deadly weapons: If the moment came and Xi Jinping’s Chinese Communist Party gave the order, Beijing could launch a massive surprise strike that could cripple the US military in any scenario over Taiwan, the South China Sea and beyond.

China has enough advanced missiles to not only destroy nearly every US military base in Asia quickly but also target and attack most US Navy warships in the region.

Indeed, Beijing has one-of-a-kind missile platforms designed to destroy US Navy aircraft carriers.

Some experts have even declared such weapons make our mighty supercarriers — the pride and symbol of American military might — as obsolete as the old battleships of the 20th century.

But China wouldn’t target just military assets; it would attempt to blind our armed forces, ensuring a counterattack would not be easy.

see also


beijing

Lawmakers warn struggling defense industry needs to get on ‘war footing’ for growing China threat

Beijing has specialized satellite-killer missiles created to go into space and knock out military satellites, as well as commercial satellites that provide GPS data.

In fact, China’s missile buildup in the Indo-Pacific is so massive that even if the US military moved every single missile-defense asset it has globally to Asia, it would be unable to stop much of China’s own version of Pearl Harbor.

So what is the Biden administration doing about it?

The sad reality is the US defense community has widely discussed this style of attack, and Team Biden does not seem worried in the slightest.

Despite talking a good game, American defense officials continue to call China a “pacing threat,” a problem that can be managed as if the threat has not arrived.

Yet China continues to this day to develop ever more advanced weapons that make its missiles look tame by comparison.

Beijing is building a fleet of aircraft carriers, hypersonic missiles and more stealth fighters based on stolen US designs, as well as dramatically expanding its nuclear arsenal.

The good news is, not all is lost.

There is bipartisan consensus that China must be confronted, and America’s allies are already building up their military capabilities in the region.

We must do the same and fully fund new weapons like the B-21 Raider stealth bomber — building 200 or more — to ensure we can attack from range, negating Beijing’s missile capabilities in many respects.

Now is the time for the Biden administration to take the China military threat seriously and come up with a plan to mitigate it beyond phony rhetoric and buzzwords.

If not, and if China smells weakness like Imperial Japan did, war in Asia could once again be a part of our future.

Harry J. Kazianis is a senior director for national security affairs at the Center for the National Interest (founded by President Richard Nixon) and executive editor of its publishing arm, the National Interest.

New York Post · by Social Links for Harry J. Kazianis View Author Archive Get author RSS feed · December 7, 2023


14. Funding on ‘fumes:’ The Pentagon is nearly out of money to replace weapons sent to Ukraine




Funding on ‘fumes:’ The Pentagon is nearly out of money to replace weapons sent to Ukraine

DOD preps a last request after Republican lawmakers reject the White House’s $61.4 billion aid bill.

defenseone.com · by Marcus Weisgerber

The Pentagon is preparing to ask Congress to approve spending $1 billion to replace weapons sent to Ukraine, a request that will essentially exhaust the “drawdown account” of funds available to replenish U.S. stockpiles.

“I don't believe the final $1 billion request has quite gone over yet, but it's, I believe, very close to going over,” Doug Bush, the Army’s assistant secretary for acquisition, logistics, and technology, said Thursday at the Defense One Acquisition Summit.

Congress will have 15 days to approve or reject the request. Lawmakers have not rejected any of the administration’s drawdown requests to date, Bush said.

“Right now, [there’s] just under a billion. However, we're working on using the remainder of that pending Congressional approval,” he said. “Pretty soon it'll be zero.”

President Biden has asked Congress to approve $61.4 billion in new aid to Ukraine. Republicans have said they would approve the expenditure if it comes with new border security measures to reduce the flow of migrants across the U.S. border with Mexico. Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked a bill that would provide aid to Ukraine and Israel because it did not include enough border measures.

Bill LaPlante, the Pentagon undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, said there’s “fumes” left in the Ukraine drawdown account.

“There's already about four or five things that people want to spend it on,” LaPlante said Saturday at the Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California. “Consider it gone, basically.”

Bush said the U.S. supply of weapons to Israel, including 155-millimeter artillery, in recent months has not affected the flow of weapons to Ukraine.

“That 155 provided to Israel was not going to Ukraine,” he said. “That came out of our stocks.”

Bush said the transfer of weapons to Israel has been done through a rapid foreign military sales package that allows the munitions to be transferred directly from U.S. military arsenals.

Weapons to Ukraine have been sent using a different mechanism called presidential drawdown authority.

“So far, there's not been a lot of overlap” between Ukraine and Israel, Bush said. “We've done munitions of many types—everything from helicopters to artillery, some night vision—but nothing where it was so far, at least, a direct competition with what was already planning to go to Ukraine.”

He acknowledges that as the wars drag on, that might cease to be the case.

defenseone.com · by Marcus Weisgerber


15. Congress Tells Army to Set Higher Fitness Standards for Combat Arms Soldiers



Excerpts:

The final NDAA dropped a controversial plan from Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., which would have directed the service to revert back to the old fitness test, the Army Physical Fitness Test, or APFT.
The APFT was in use from 1980 to 2020 and is seen by all of the Army's senior leadership and among much of the force as a poor assessment of physical fitness, only measuring push-ups, sit-ups and a two-mile run.


Congress Tells Army to Set Higher Fitness Standards for Combat Arms Soldiers

military.com · by Steve Beynon · December 7, 2023

Congress is set to direct the Army to boost fitness standards for most combat-arms jobs through a compromise defense policy bill unveiled Wednesday.

The must-pass National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, which sets funding and policy priorities for the Pentagon, directs the service to increase the baseline standards in the Army Combat Fitness Test, or ACFT, for ground troops including infantry, cavalry scouts and Special Forces within 18 months of the bill being signed into law by the president.

The direction is the latest in a yearslong slog Army planners have dealt with in finalizing the ACFT with lawmakers from both sides of the aisle being skeptical, turning the test into a political lightning rod. Soldiers started being graded on the ACFT in Oct. 2022.

The NDAA does not prescribe the new standards to be gender neutral, an about-face from what a draft version of the House version of the bill called for and what some Army planners were mulling behind the scenes.

That means men and women will likely be scored on different standards as they are now, something that has caught the ire of some Republicans on Capitol Hill in recent years. There is nothing preventing the Army from doing so, though.

The bill comes after months of negotiations between the House and Senate. It's expected to easily pass through Congress before the end of the year and will then head to President Joe Biden's desk to be signed into law.

Democratic Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut put a pause on the test's implementation in 2021, amid early test data showing half of the service's women were failing the test during its beta period.

Army planners have eyed tweaks to the fitness test, including upping the standards for combat arms roles and potentially making them gender neutral, but lawmakers' frequent debate and proposals have put any plans into a holding pattern.

The final NDAA dropped a controversial plan from Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., which would have directed the service to revert back to the old fitness test, the Army Physical Fitness Test, or APFT.

The APFT was in use from 1980 to 2020 and is seen by all of the Army's senior leadership and among much of the force as a poor assessment of physical fitness, only measuring push-ups, sit-ups and a two-mile run.

Cotton's proposal caught immediate backlash from senior Army leaders, including Michael Grinston, who served as the top enlisted leader at the time, telling reporters that move would create "chaos." In an interview with Military.com in October, Army Secretary Christine Wormuth said any move from Congress to scrap the ACFT would be "pretty problematic."

Cotton has long blasted the ACFT standards, including calling them "pathetic" in a Senate hearing a year ago.

The new test is broadly seen in the force as easy to pass but difficult to get top scores, with the diversity of events demanding soldiers have diverse workout routines and be well-rounded athletes. The new test includes deadlifts, hand-release push-ups; a plank; a timed two-mile run; an event in which soldiers yeet a 10-pound ball as far as they can; and another event that involves sprints, carrying two 40-pound kettlebells and dragging a 90-pound sled.

"I'm a fan of the ACFT ... I think we'll be able to continue using [it] to change the culture of fitness," Sergeant Major of the Army Michael Weimer told Military.com in an October interview.

Here are the Army occupations that would see increased fitness standards: 11A, 11B, 11C, 11Z, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13F, 18A, 18B, 18C, 18D, 18E, 18F, 18Z, 19A, 19C, 19D, 19K and 19Z.

The bill specifies "close combat" troops, not listing the physically demanding enlisted artillery role, otherwise known as a 13B, but artillery officers would see new standards. It wasn't immediately clear if that was an oversight.

military.com · by Steve Beynon · December 7, 2023


16. Large-Scale Combat Operations Will Bring New Medical Ethics Challenges


There will be more "golden hour."


Conclusion:


Large-scale combat operations will require a significant paradigm shift from past conflicts. Commanders should anticipate higher casualty rates and prepare accordingly. What will not change, however, is the medical maxim of doing the greatest good with limited supplies, so that others may live.


Large-Scale Combat Operations Will Bring New Medical Ethics Challenges - War on the Rocks

warontherocks.com · by Michael Wissemann · December 8, 2023

As the U.S. military prepares for an era of large-scale combat operations, the “golden hour” as medics know it is dead. So long as near-peer adversaries can create anti-access/area denial zones that threaten ground and rotary wing medevac units, they will not be able to get servicemembers to Role 2 surgical care within an hour after the injury.

The result will be more casualties. With initial estimates from warfighter exercises suggesting casualty rates as high as 55 percent in future conflicts, the current military medical system, regardless of service, will quickly become overwhelmed. The Center for Army Lessons Learned reached the same conclusion based on the experience of a brigade rotation at the National Training Center. During the last 20 years of conflict, the statistical category “died of wounds,” which measures those who were killed after reaching a medical treatment facility, has rarely even been discussed due to high survival rates. In Ukraine, however, this category has returned.

Large-scale combat operations will bring new ethical dilemmas to combat casualty care. The real potential exists for medical logistical needs to outpace the availability. Contested air environments will deny freedom of movement, and dedicated medevac units will need to say no to requests for evacuation. Finally, the pure volume of casualties will require difficult decisions be to made. There will be a shift from years past when we treated all casualties to deciding who is treated and who does not receive limited resources.

Become a Member

The way of warfare will fundamentally change from irregular warfare with infinite resources to high-intensity conflict with limited capabilities. Creative solutions will be necessary to ensure timely logistical support. Evacuation will shift to platforms of convenience, potentially supplemented with autonomous vehicles. Low-tech solutions can be taken from 1943 North Africa, such as loading casualties in trucks and continuing forward while treating soldiers on the move. Finally, training on the concept of “reverse triage” — treating those who might not be the most severely wounded but rather those that can most quickly be returned to the front — should be socialized and introduced to training plans.

Movement, Evacuation, and Logistics

Even in conflicts against non-peer adversaries, U.S. logistics and movement have been subject to interdiction. The Viet Cong cut supply lines across South Vietnam during the Tet Offensive. Somali fighters restricted the movement of convoys of Rangers and soldiers by blocking roads with burning tires. A near-peer adversary will have access to far more complicated means to restrict movement, from tactical nuclear weapons that could make certain areas of the battlefield inaccessible, to concentric and overlapping fields of antiaircraft or theater ballistic missile systems. Drones and real-time intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance will put actions such as movement, resupply and the evacuation of casualties at risk.

When bogged down with hundreds of casualties, the ability to move treatment units (such as battalion aid stations, treatment companies, or fleet hospitals) along main supply routes with the forward line of troops may well become impossible, further complicating care. Many NATO Role 3 medical units (those with hold capability) lack the organic transportation assets to move 100 percent of their units. For instance, per the 2023 Army Health System Doctrine Smart Book, a current 240-bed hospital center requires 46 C-17s to enter theater. To get a 32-bed early entry hospital on the ground requires 13 C-17s. For transport by ground, the full hospital needs 50 rail cars or more than 100 commercial trucks. The U.S. Air Force theater hospital’s 58 beds, in turn, require 104 pallets and six C-17s to get into theater, still a significant lift when competing with a combatant commander’s need for rockets and food. Further complications will arise when Role 1 facilities need to follow the forward line of troops. What happens when the battalion aid station needs to jump to the forward line of troops and casualties are taken while they are under way, especially if communications are degraded against a near-peer adversary?

Lack of air superiority coupled with anti-access/area denial will foster a dependence on ground-based evacuation systems, both manned and autonomous. However, these too will be degraded. A 19-year-old Fleet Marine Force corpsman, faced with a potential of 50 percent casualties, may have to decide which casualties are loaded and which will die. Main supply routes clogged with casualties flowing back and supplies flowing forward will limit the effectiveness of autonomous systems such as the Squad Multi Equipment Transport casualty evacuation platform employed by the Army and Marine Corps. Those same clogged roads will also present a robust targeting opportunity for a near-peer adversary.

Another example of potential difficult decisions arising from medical logistic shortfalls comes from the 1991 Gulf War. A General Accounting Office report on the topic discusses shortfalls in medical supplies that occurred during the conflict. All 10 hospitals reviewed for the study experienced medical supply shortfalls. This included oxygen, morphine, antibiotics, plasma, reagents necessary for laboratory tests, flu vaccines, and antibiotics. Pharmaceuticals and reagents are notoriously expensive and frequently expire before use in field units. Additionally, they can lose efficacy if not kept in environmentally controlled conditions.

While some might relegate the lessons of Desert Shield to a bygone era, medical logistics remains a significant issue today. Even civilians often wind up short of medical logistics. When adversarial forces seize family medicines, ambulances, supplies, and facilities, the civilian populace is left with few options. In the early years of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, locals seeking medical aid at front gates was a common occurrence. Failure to provide medical resources that are perceived to be plentiful but that are in actuality limited can help fuel insurgency. Even Ukraine, which is currently the beneficiary of a worldwide effort led by the World Health Organization, has seen shortages of medical supplies.

Ethical Implications

Within the U.S. military, there is growing concern about the ethical challenges of future conflicts. Surgeons, fleet corpsmen, medics, pararescuemen, and nurses have grown accustomed to saving lives, not losing them. Large-scale combat operations will put medical professionals in a very uncomfortable space, deciding who lives and dies. A nonpermissive environment that limits medical resupply will lead to rationing of treatment and use of medical supplies and drugs.

As I saw personally during the initial push into Iraq in 2003, the forward elements of the 86th Combat Support Hospital faced a number of difficult decisions. With limited medical supplies and only a 32-bed slice of the hospital, the small team quickly became overwhelmed with U.S. and Iraqi (civilian and enemy) casualties. Those who were shot or wounded with shrapnel required a tetanus shot, and the leadership and team had to decide which servicemembers and civilians received the very limited doses available. In the end, Iraqis were given tetanus shots, as a well-established evacuation chain ensured U.S. casualties could receive the necessary tetanus vaccination while being evacuated or upon reaching a stateside facility, while the Iraqis had no such support. This example of unpopular but ethical decision-making hints at what medics and others may face in the future, with life-and-death implications.

Returning soldiers to the fight as quickly as possible will be critical to winning the next battle. Of the over 10,000 documented cases in the Joint Trauma Registry from January 2007 to mid-March 2020, 37 percent returned to duty within 72 hours without evacuation from theater. Similarly, it may become necessary at times to have a patient with a low acuity injury who is already being evacuated carry the litter of a more severely wounded patient. The U.S. military should consider assigning servicemembers who are wounded to replacement companies, as was often the case during World War II.

Triage is derived from the French word “to sort” and has been a mainstay of military medicine in perpetuity. The process helps determine which casualties are treated first during mass casualty scenarios to save the most lives. It is founded on the ethical principle of benevolence, doing the most good for the most people. According to the Army Emergency War Surgery manual, “immediates” — those with a condition that is salvageable if they are treated expeditiously — are traditionally treated first. They normally comprise 10 percent of the wounded, and might include someone with an improvised explosive device blast wound that requires immediate surgical intervention or a gunshot wound to the torso. Such procedures could take significant medical materials as well as multiple hours of surgeons’ finite time.

Following immediates are “delayed,” those who, if not treated in a timely manner (24 to 48 hours), could progress and become “immediates.” “Delayed” require less surgical time and normally comprise 30 percent of casualties. “Minimal,” those who need scarce resources, comprise the bulk of casualties, roughly 50 percent. These people may be able to go days without significant treatment or might even be returned to battle. Traditionally, “expectants,” those who are not anticipated to be able to survive wounds, constitute less than 10 percent of casualties and receive no treatment, just comfort measures.

The most unorthodox process being quietly discussed is that of “reverse triage.” If faced with several hundred casualties from a hypersonic missile strike, should immediate patients be left to expire so medical personnel can save the larger percentage of “delayed” before running out of medical supplies? While a foreign concept over the past two decades, “delayed “casualties (often referred to as walking wounded) might be treated and immediately returned to the front lines. The first rule of tactical combat casualty care is to return fire, take cover, and establish fire superiority. The same should be considered at an operational and strategic level. These are questions the medical community is currently struggling to come to terms with.

Potential Solutions

The first step toward addressing these challenges is establishing clear expectations about future casualty rates with leaders from the squad level to the military corporate level. Company commanders from Iraq and Afghanistan are now battalion and brigade commanders accustomed to survival rates north of 90 percent. The author had the privilege of speaking with the U.S. Army First Corps’ surgeon following Talisman Sabre 23, a joint service, multinational exercise that predicted 8,500 casualties over 18 days or 1,000 casualties over 3 days among 30,000 servicemembers. That is a projected casualty rate of roughly 30 percent.

Army Techniques Publication 4-02.2, Medical Evacuation, establishes the evacuation categories of “urgent/urgent surgical,” “priority,” and “routine.” These roughly correspond to the common triage terms of “immediate,” “delayed,” and “minimal,” respectively. Lessons from Talisman Sabre 23 indicated the need to focus on saving the 30 percent delayed casualties as opposed to the time-, surgical bed–, and material-intensive 10 percent immediate casualties. In theory, this allows the medical force to save three times as many patients. Urgent (immediate) are defined as “emergency cases that should be evacuated as soon as possible and within a maximum of one hour in order to save life, limb, or eyesight.” Most urgent casualties will perish before reaching surgical care in the prolonged evacuation timelines and relatively scarce medical resources of the large-scale combat operations battlefield. Burying our heads in the ground and hoping for the best is not a method, it’s a recipe for disaster. The concept of reverse triage should be socialized and introduced to training plans.

On a more tactical level, this will require a shift in training frontline medics and caregivers on who they treat first. Given the anti-access/area denial threat and the inability to clear casualties from the battlefield to surgical facilities, prolonged field care move from a concept to a necessity. Since line medics are often limited to whatever supplies they could carry on their back, is it time to consider having each servicemember include one liter of intravenous fluids and the supplies to start a line to their ruck? This would allow for rehydration in the days following injury during prolonged field care. It would be similar to the past practice of designating soldiers to be responsible for carrying drugs to treat the medical effects of nuclear, biological, or chemical attacks, commonly known as the “Mark 1” kit. For those providers accustomed to running fluids wide open (fast), or keeping veins open (slow), longer evacuation chains make the ability to calculate fluid rates more important in order not to bust clots open and prevent hypotension and hypothermia.

Walking blood banks and the Ranger O Low Titer programs were developed as a solution to the need for frontline blood during low-intensity and counter-insurgency operations. These operations involve having support individuals not engaged on the battlefield available to transfuse others. In contrast, large-scale combat operations will need a new solution set, as donors will not have days to recover, and everywhere from the forward line to corps support areas may be held at risk. As a case in point, during her online Army Medical Corps officer professional development session on Aug. 15, 2023 titled “Ukraine Lessons Learned from a Front-Line Physician,” Dr. Kasia Hampton referred to the walking blood bank as a “walking blood bath.” Walking blood banks have their utility, especially in an irregular warfare, forward operating base construct. But this doesn’t mean they will be able to play a role in future wars, as high-intensity conflict will require nearly all servicemembers be involved in the fight.

Logistics and timely resupply will also be important, raising a number of questions policymakers should begin to think about now. Modern aircraft have significantly more range than those of World War II. If fighting a near-peer adversary in the Pacific, where anti-access/area denial may be common, is the airdrop of medical supplies a viable option, as rehearsed in Mobility Guardian? Can medical logistics be delivered by unmanned medevac drones that are sent in to extract casualties? How could over-the-shore logistics reach the front line in large-scale combat operations? Finally, in order to bring higher numbers of casualties home, would a medical draft, in conjunction with the activation of the National Disaster Medical System, be necessary?

Large-scale combat operations will require a significant paradigm shift from past conflicts. Commanders should anticipate higher casualty rates and prepare accordingly. What will not change, however, is the medical maxim of doing the greatest good with limited supplies, so that others may live.

Become a Member

Michael Wissemann has been in the Army for 25 years and has served in a plethora of positions from the bedside to the field to the command suite. Many of the scenarios or examples provided in the text are the author’s firsthand experience from crossing the berm in Operation Iraqi Freedom 1. He currently serves as the deputy commander for nursing and chief nursing officer of U.S. Army Medical Activity–Bavaria. The views expressed are the author’s alone and are not representative of Army Medicine, the Army, or the Department of Defense.

The author would like to thank Col. Jay Baker, U.S. Army First Corps surgeon, for his contributions.

Commentary

warontherocks.com · by Michael Wissemann · December 8, 2023


17. The Army-Navy Game example: A bitter rivalry and a common cause


The Army-Navy Game example: A bitter rivalry and a common cause

Stars and Stripes · by Reps. John James and Mikie Sherrill · December 7, 2023

Army running back Markel Johnson runs past the Navy defense for a touchdown during the 2022 edition of the service academies’ rivalry game in Philadelphia. (Carlos Bongioanni/Stars and Stripes)


Before the invention of the forward pass, the first ever Army-Navy football game was played in 1890. Over the 133 years that have passed, it has become a rivalry ingrained in the American psyche and forever embodied by the phrases “Go Army. Beat Navy” and “Go Navy. Beat Army.” These battle cries are deeply woven into the identities of West Point and the Naval Academy. They are the first things cadets and midshipmen learn upon their arrival on campus in West Point and Annapolis. Students open and end meetings with those storied slogans, they wear them on their clothes (on those rare occasions they’re not in uniform), and they even yell them after games with other teams.

While the football trash talk is dished out year-round, it is actualized only one day a year: game day. And yet upon graduation, these men and women, these midshipmen and cadets, will take on the same duties and responsibilities: to risk their lives for the preservation and promotion of this great nation. The people they play on the football field and tease in the stands become the people they fight alongside on the battlefield.

There’s a lot to learn from the example of these cadets and midshipmen: that while we may compete, we must put aside our differences to realize a shared purpose as collective parts of the American experiment. Deeper than any rivalry or any competition, is mutual respect. Respect for the shared mission and shared motivation.

As a West Point graduate and a Naval Academy graduate ourselves, we are proud to serve together as members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Not believing our service to the American people ended when we left the military, we came to Capitol Hill during highly polarized times when veteran representation in Congress was at near-historic lows. When we arrived, we were met with legislative stagnation incited by the infighting and divisiveness along party lines. The feeling here is often tribal: The people across the aisle are our enemies; our parties are our teams.

We reject this premise. While we belong to different parties, we agree that our political affiliations mirror our allegiance to our alma maters. They’re a part of our identity. But so too is our dedication to this country. In the most challenging of times, we must prioritize our American identity and duty over our political affiliations. We must be brought together by our common goal to work on behalf of the American people. We know that while we may disagree on the specifics of how to get there, we both want the same thing: what is best for this nation and the American people. It is so much harder to alienate one another when we recognize we are both working toward the same goals.

As veterans serving in Congress, we’ve seen how the lessons we’ve learned from our time in the military can be applied to our service today. Serving in both contexts, we’ve seen the importance of being able to work under pressure and with people of different backgrounds. Both now and in uniform, we spent time away from family and put the interests of this country before our own. We don’t back down from a challenge and we must always persevere, both for the people we were elected to represent and those we’re serving alongside.

The quickly approaching Army-Navy Game has a lesson to teach, one we’d like to share with our colleagues and our fellow Americans. It’s the perfect example of adversaries becoming partners. The leadup to the game is campaign season. Game day is Election Day. And everything after is our time in office — focused on working together with a shared mission. We must learn, as the cadets and midshipmen exemplify, that our differences can be put aside to do our jobs with respect for one another.

As a nation, we face a host of difficult challenges from conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East to domestic political disagreements here at home. In these moments of conflict, we ask our colleagues to join us in common cause. We are more alike than we are different.

We’ll see you on the field. “Go Army. Beat Navy.” “Go Navy. Beat Army.”

John James, a Republican representing Michigan’s 10th Congressional District, is a West Point graduate who served in the U.S. Army for eight years. Mikie Sherrill, a Democrat representing New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, is a Naval Academy graduate who served in the U.S. Navy for nearly 10 years. Both members belong to the bipartisan For Country Caucus, a group of 30 military veterans serving in Congress who work across party lines to pass thoughtful legislation on national security, veterans affairs and military quality of life.

Stars and Stripes · by Reps. John James and Mikie Sherrill · December 7, 2023



18. Petraeus says Israel should try U.S.-style counterinsurgency in Gaza


Debate and discuss this.


Petraeus says Israel should try U.S.-style counterinsurgency in Gaza

armytimes.com · by Todd South · December 7, 2023

CARLISLE, Pa. – Retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, who led a surge of U.S. troops and shifted Iraqi militia alliances to help turn the tide of the Iraq War, now says a similar, counterinsurgency-based approach could work for the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The former CIA director, who was later tasked with stabilizing the Afghanistan War, spoke on Nov. 30 at the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center near the home of the Army War College at Carlisle Barracks, following the October release of the book “Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Ukraine,” which he co-authored with military historian Andrew Roberts.

The book centers on political-military strategy following the end of World War II and how those changes resonate in current and future conflicts.

Part military history, part memoir, the general draws on his experiences in Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanistan for some of the more recent parallels. Petraeus also dissects the failures of the Vietnam War, a conflict he analyzed for his doctoral dissertation as a young Army officer in the 1980s.

The retired general largely champions the counterinsurgency, or COIN, approach in conflicts such as Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, but also notes how difficult it can be, how precarious its gains are and how quickly those successes can disintegrate without sustained support.

His thesis, both in the book and at his recent discussion, centers around the vital nature of strategic leadership and getting “big ideas” right from the outset, something he said the U.S. failed to do both in Vietnam and for the first nine years of the Afghanistan War.

Shifting his attention to the current Israel-Hamas War, Petraeus said the “big idea” Israel has landed on is destroying Hamas. But how that happens and what comes next remain unresolved.

Petraeus, who said he has ongoing discussions with interlocutors in the Middle East, claimed that Israel has determined Hamas is the equivalent of the Islamic State, meaning it is an irreconcilable, extremist organization.


Former director of the CIA Gen. David Petraeus participates in a panel discussion at the Warsaw Security Forum in Warsaw, Poland, Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2022. (Michal Dyjuk/AP)

“You have to, therefore, destroy them,” Petraeus said. Israel cannot allow Hamas to reconstitute as a militant group and it also must dismantle the group’s political wing, he argued, adding that military force alone won’t accomplish that goal.

“But there are some big ideas missing,” Petraeus said. “You can’t kill or capture your way out of an industrial strength insurgency.” The Hamas challenge echoes what U.S. forces faced in Iraq and Israel should take a similar approach, he said.

“The campaign should be a counterinsurgency campaign,” Petraeus said. “Don’t clear and go on. Clear, hold and build.”

The U.S. pitch at the time of the Iraq surge was that the United States wanted the Sunni groups’ help or at least for those groups not to impede their work as they went after other insurgent groups such as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. With that approach, he said, many of the formerly opposing Sunni groups began helping the Americans.

But even if early surge efforts in Iraq — and later in Afghanistan — saw success, short-term and long-term failures led the respective insurgencies to claw back U.S. gains.

The surge drove the fledgling Islamic State, which had been established in 2006, out of Baghdad and into Diyala, Salahideen and Mosul, Iraq. By 2008 an estimated 2,400 members remained out of a previous high of 15,000, according to analysis by The Wilson Center.

Following the 2011 end of the Iraq War, ISIS began a series of bombings, attacks and prison breaks in Syria, launching successful attacks that captured territory in Syria and then both Fallujah and parts of Ramadi by 2013. The following year, ISIS took over Mosul and Tikrit. It wasn’t until late 2017 that U.S. and Iraqi forces could dismantle the majority of ISIS’ infrastructure and reclaim territory once controlled by the extremist group.


Retired Army Gen. David Petraeus signs a copy of his new book, "Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Ukraine" a the U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center, Carlisle, Pa. on Nov. 20, 2023. (Todd South/Staff)

Jason Dempsey, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Military Times, “the only lesson on COIN that we as Americans have to offer or should be offering, is that one, we didn’t do it very well.”

Dempsey saw this first hand on two Afghanistan tours, one in 2009 when he served with the Army’s 10th Mountain Division and later led Task Force Spartan coordinating COIN operations in Wardak and Logar provinces. He returned to Afghanistan from 2012-13 with the 101st Airborne Division as a combat advisor to the Afghan Border Police.

During his recent book talk, Petraeus himself acknowledged the challenges of sustaining counterinsurgency gains in Iraq.

“We learned the hard way with the Islamic State that if folks take their eye off them, don’t be surprised if a few years later there’s a caliphate,” Petraeus said.

Shortly after shifting to counterinsurgency and surging troops into Iraq, Petraeus was tasked with stabilizing the declining security situation in Afghanistan. Arriving in 2010, nearly a decade into the war, the four-star applied a similar approach as in Iraq — an increase of forces that pushed into Taliban-controlled areas, working with local populations to gain support in countering the Taliban.

“In every case, Afghanistan was much, much harder,” Petraeus said.

One such place that served as a key test for the counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan was the city of Marjah in 2010. The U.S.-led coalition pushed thousands of troops into the area to clear out the Taliban insurgency. But by 2015, the Taliban had regained their hold on the region. It was not until 2019 that the coalition controlled Marjah again. Following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, the entire nation was under Taliban control.

Though the U.S. military spent two decades in Afghanistan, the nation’s longest war, Petraeus pointed to the final leg of the conflict in which an estimated 3,500 U.S. troops, aided by persistent drone cover, were able to hold the Taliban at bay and not suffer a single U.S. fatality in more than 18 months. He saw that level of troops and support operations as sustainable and should have continued.

But taking out militants in Gaza won’t produce lasting results without a political solution, he said. “There needs to be a vision for who’s going to oversee Gaza.”

While Israel may not want that job, it might need to do it, at least temporarily, he said. That would require Israelis winning over Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank to support that effort as a transitional Palestinian government takes shape.

That approach, Dempsey said, ignores major differences in Gaza as compared to U.S. efforts in recent wars.

“It’s not an internal fight,” he said. “These are two states that happen to be fighting.”

What can be learned from past U.S. COIN efforts, is how to avoid the allure of black-and-white narratives, Dempsey said. For years, U.S. leaders defined any Taliban association with Al Qaeda as meaning the Taliban, and anyone who worked with them was as much of an existential threat as Al Qaeda. That view prevented U.S. leaders from seeing ways to work with various groups to gain support.

“It’s COIN 101, treat civilians like an enemy and they’ll become an enemy, even if they’re not,” Dempsey said.

And the dynamic between Israelis and Palestinians is even more complicated.

“The narratives are so hardened, there’s just almost no way that Israel could walk in there and Israeli forces in any way shape or form be seen as anything other than occupiers,” Dempsey said.

Petraeus called the current combat campaign the “most fiendishly difficult and challenging urban operation since 1945.” But that operation could conclude in weeks or months. The longer, even more precarious effort, to gain Palestinian support through a counterinsurgency campaign, would take longer.

“And if you go in with that mindset, the way we did in Ramadi, Fallujah and the other Sunni areas, very sequentially and progressively, I think that the results will be better over time,” he said.

That kind of thinking ignores generations of conflict between Israel and Gaza, Dempsey said.

“In what universe does building a school compensate, ameliorate these generational struggles?” he said.

Any chance of success, Dempsey argued, would require an international coalition effort with a nation other than Israel or the United States in the lead.

About Todd South and Meghann Myers

Todd South has written about crime, courts, government and the military for multiple publications since 2004 and was named a 2014 Pulitzer finalist for a co-written project on witness intimidation. Todd is a Marine veteran of the Iraq War.

Meghann Myers is the Pentagon bureau chief at Military Times. She covers operations, policy, personnel, leadership and other issues affecting service members.



19. The new world disorder by Robert D. Kaplan


Excerpts:

We are now in a world where one crisis prompts a chain reaction with another, and leads eventually to dynamic change in geopolitics. This is sometimes called a “polycrisis”. But that term doesn’t quite suggest the rumbling military instability that is starting to take place. Of course, this has periodically been the case in history, but now – because of communications technology in all of its manifestations – the pace of events has accelerated.
The Second World War actually began in 1931 with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, though it didn’t begin in earnest until the German attack on Poland in 1939. It was a process that eventually lasted 14 years. War is not a continuous battle. It can start and stop, and then start again. The Israel-Gaza war will end with a Middle East transformed, which will then have subsequent, often violent repercussions. As for Russia, battlefield stalemates do come to an end, and when that happens Russia will find itself weaker in the Caucasus, Central Asia and points further east than it has been in decades.
Looming behind all of this is the US-China conflict over Taiwan, which if it ever becomes violent could unravel financial markets and supply chains all at once, to say nothing of its specific high-end military effects. Russia and Iran are in terminal decline, even as China’s economic waning can lead to more disruptive nationalism. The United States has its own domestic problems. Only in the sense of the great powers being in decline, albeit at different rates, can we talk of a fundamentally unstable, multipolar world that has nothing to do with the deceptive order implied by the United Nations, the G20 or the Global South. For the foreseeable future, geopolitics will essentially be bipolar, and frighteningly so.


The new world disorder

A new binary of opposing powers has emerged, with the forces of chaos, expansion and anti-Semitism ranged against a West committed to the status quo.

NewStatesman · by Robert D Kaplan · December 7, 2023


Forget multipolarity. A worldwide, ­bipolar military conflict has begun. It will unfold in stages, feature hot war in certain places for extended periods of time, and cold war in other places and times. It will be the organising principle of geopolitics for years to come. It is not a “clash of civilisations” as the late Harvard professor Samuel P Huntington put it in the early 1990s, but it is a clash: a clash of broad value systems that, while emerging out of national cultures and age-old traditions, are essentially modern and postmodern in their origins.

It is a bipolar struggle that combines the global war on terrorism with great-power conflict. Rather than the latter supplanting the former – as the conventional wisdom had observed – following the end of America’s post-9/11 Middle East wars and Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the two dramas now run together. One side of this bipolar world features gangster states such as Russia and North Korea; totalitarian states such as China and, again, North Korea; a revolutionary and ­terrorist state such as clerical Iran, with all of its proxies in the Middle East; and a movement that is at once age-old, industrial and post-industrial: anti-Semitism. These enemies of the West are more formidable and nihilistic than the old Soviet Union or Mao Zedong’s China.

The Soviet leaders, who, because they had survived both Stalin’s purges and then the Second World War, were generally risk-averse in their actions. When they weren’t, they paid a price. Nikita Khrushchev deployed nuclear missiles in Cuba in late 1962, leading to a crisis with Washington in which he ultimately had to back down, and was ousted from the Soviet leadership two years later. Leonid Brezhnev’s 1979 invasion of Afghanistan accelerated the collapse of the Soviet system altogether.


As for Mao, with all of his atrocities against his own people in the 1950s through to the early 1970s, he could be a rational actor in foreign affairs. The current crop of villains constitute a more unstable human element than what the West faced during the Cold War, when the rigid Marxist-Leninist ideology of our adversaries often made their thinking more predictable.

Brothers in arms: a placard protesting deliveries of Iranian drones to Russia shows Vladimir Putin and Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei, Kyiv, 2022. Photo by Oleksii Chumachenko/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

These new villains are all interlocked. Russia, through its Wagner mercenary group, threatens to send an air-defence system to help Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy, fight Israel on the Israel-Lebanese border. Russia’s new military alliance with Iran, established in recent months, which garners materiel and drones for Moscow in its war against Ukraine, makes President Vladimir Putin a de facto ally of Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, against Israel. North Korea is also sending arms to Moscow, which it uses in its war on Ukraine, even as China backs Russia and benefits from the distraction of Hamas’s attack on Israel. This is how the Ukraine and Gaza wars are connected.

In all of this, we in the West should be careful how we label our own side. It is not the world of democracies, not only because something such as anti-Semitism has, as it has always done, rooted itself inside democracies, but because our own side also includes conservative and reactionary autocracies in the Arabian Gulf, Jordan, Egypt and elsewhere – all of which stand for the regional status quo and oppose regime changes throughout the region.

In fact, this is a bipolar struggle between status quo powers and movements who want to topple the existing post-Cold War order, whether by territorial acquisition such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, or like China’s possible attempt in the future to integrate Taiwan, or by the eradication of an entire people – the goal of Iran’s coalition regarding Israel. Order versus disorder. That is what this still-emerging world conflict is finally about.

During the Second World War, the Nazis and Japanese fascists attempted to replace a relatively orderly world, one mostly defined by the post-First World War peace treaties, with revolutionary mass murder, military conquest and extremism. The West’s Cold War adversaries were cautious by comparison. We are, therefore, in a new geopolitical age which, its great differences notwithstanding – contrasting with industrial slaughter on battlefields, the Holocaust and collapsing empires – is somewhat more reminiscent of the violent upheaval between 1939 and 1945 than the relatively pacific interregnum that followed.

In geopolitical terms, the struggle is also between the Eurasian Heartland powers of Russia, China, North Korea and Iran, and the Rimland powers that are essentially maritime, with some variations, such as the US, Europe, the Indo-Pacific, Israel and the conservative Sunni Arab powers from the Gulf to the Red Sea and Mediterranean. These are geographical distinctions about which I wrote in my book, The Revenge of Geography (2012).

Yet, given how technology has compressed geography, creating through digital media a global platform for performance politics, the new bipolar confrontation is better understood as a war of ideas with geopolitical and military ramifications.

The Heartland and Rimland divisions are just too abstract to capture the ways in which global order is becoming disordered. Anti-Semitism does capture it, since in its latest iteration it has been ignited by the war between Israel and Hamas and has since spiked throughout the West, as well as in the Russian empire and China. Witness the pogrom-like riot in the Russian republic of Dagestan in late October in response to the arrival of a flight from Israel, and the attacks on Jews on Chinese social media helped by Beijing’s pro-Palestine position.

Anti-Semitism has deep historical associations. The term evokes hatred of Jews in medieval Europe, pogroms against Jews in Russia’s Pale of Settlement before and around the turn of the 20th century, and culminates in the Nazi Holocaust. The Holocaust, in particular, has given anti-Semitism an industrial-age aura, with converging railway tracks as a signature of both the industrial age and of trains transporting Jews to death camps.

But anti-Semitism can be post-industrial, too, with new associations and forms of communication, even when wrapped around an old territorial dispute between Israelis and Palestinians, as when Hamas terrorists used GoPro cameras to record their slaughter of Jewish men, women, children and the elderly on 7 October. That was nihilism, violent Jew hatred, postmodern performance politics and Iranian grand strategy all at once.

Israel stands at the heart of this global geopolitical war. That is because Israel, it seems, won’t waver. Israel is not the Biden administration giving the Ukrainians just enough aid and weaponry to wear down the Russians, but not enough to win outright. It is not China’s President Xi Jinping, biding his time about if and when to make a dramatic move to undermine Taiwan’s de facto independence. It is not even Iran that probably seeks all the benefits of being a threshold nuclear power without actually using a bomb.

Israel, however much its national-unity government may be divided behind the scenes, and however much its population may be divided about the fate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is absolutely united about the need to eventually destroy Hamas.

The destruction of Hamas, which probably lies many weeks and months in the future, will have unpredictable aftershocks. The ferocity of the air and ground war in a crowded, urban environment, over an extended period of time, will anger populations in the streets of Cairo, Baghdad, Amman, and other places. This will have second-order effects on conservative Arab regimes that privately hope for Hamas’s destruction, but must proclaim the opposite in public. The visit of Iran’s president to Saudi Arabia on 11 November manifests a surface, momentary unity only.

If given enough weeks of intense warfare in Gaza, with Hamas’s destruction a possibility, Iran may feel it has no choice but to unleash Hezbollah in the north of Israel. Ultimately, the shadow war between Israel and Iran – which includes Israel’s industrial sabotage of Iranian nuclear materiel and its suspected assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists – may ignite into a full-scale conflict.

[See also: The new authoritarian personality]

I advance this theory mainly because the very intimacy and horror of 7 October, in which 1,200 Israelis were killed in such gruesome circumstances, may have shifted Israeli calculations about Iran in a more decisive direction towards eventual military action.

Over time, as Israel comes close to defeating Hamas, as the Middle East rocks as a consequence, as the Iranian regime becomes more desperate and the war in Ukraine continues to weaken the Russian empire as a whole, our momentary darkness may dissipate. For our enemies are in perilous condition.

For example, the Ukraine war may just be a curtain-raiser for ugly unrest elsewhere across Russia, where Siberian republics such as Buryatia and Tuva have provided troops for Ukraine, and have died in proportionally much greater numbers than ethnic Russians from places such as Moscow. The Russian empire, as this stalemate in Ukraine grinds on, may sooner or later start to crumble.

As for Iran, clerical rule there rests on a narrow base of support. Iran has been likened to a country of 88 million South Koreans ruled by a clique of North Koreans. Last year there were significant anti-government demonstrations, calling for the downfall of the ayatollahs. Yet they were not the first: 2009, 2017, 2018 and 2019 saw large anti-regime uprisings.

There is a long way from protests to true political upheaval. But it was nationwide demonstrations that toppled the Shah’s regime in 1979. We have to be able to imagine a post-revolutionary system in Iran, or at least the kind of instability that starts to immobilise the existing power structure. An event from outside, such as a successful Israeli or Israeli-American attack on Iranian nuclear and missile facilities, may help do just that.

We are now in a world where one crisis prompts a chain reaction with another, and leads eventually to dynamic change in geopolitics. This is sometimes called a “polycrisis”. But that term doesn’t quite suggest the rumbling military instability that is starting to take place. Of course, this has periodically been the case in history, but now – because of communications technology in all of its manifestations – the pace of events has accelerated.

The Second World War actually began in 1931 with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, though it didn’t begin in earnest until the German attack on Poland in 1939. It was a process that eventually lasted 14 years. War is not a continuous battle. It can start and stop, and then start again. The Israel-Gaza war will end with a Middle East transformed, which will then have subsequent, often violent repercussions. As for Russia, battlefield stalemates do come to an end, and when that happens Russia will find itself weaker in the Caucasus, Central Asia and points further east than it has been in decades.

Looming behind all of this is the US-China conflict over Taiwan, which if it ever becomes violent could unravel financial markets and supply chains all at once, to say nothing of its specific high-end military effects. Russia and Iran are in terminal decline, even as China’s economic waning can lead to more disruptive nationalism. The United States has its own domestic problems. Only in the sense of the great powers being in decline, albeit at different rates, can we talk of a fundamentally unstable, multipolar world that has nothing to do with the deceptive order implied by the United Nations, the G20 or the Global South. For the foreseeable future, geopolitics will essentially be bipolar, and frighteningly so.

Robert D Kaplan is an author and foreign correspondent. His latest book is “The Loom of Time: Between Empire and Anarchy, from the Mediterranean to China” (Random House)

[See also: When is an empire not an empire?]

Topics in this article : Hamas Israel Magazine Russia The West War

NewStatesman · by Robert D Kaplan · December 7, 2023



20. Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power (book review)




An ideological war with battles fought in the human domain (battlefield of the mind). I just ordered this (Kindle) and will read it on the flight to Manila tomorrow.




Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power

A new collection of hard-hitting essays reveals how autocrats undermine democracies from within.

americanpurpose.com · by Ellen Bork · December 6, 2023

Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power

by William J. Dobson, Tarek Masoud, and Christopher Walker, eds. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 226 pp., $34.95)

Approving comments about Osama bin Laden’s 2022 antisemitic “Letter to America” posted on TikTok after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel have rightly renewed attention to the social media platform and its operation under Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government dictates. “Beijing’s carefully censored domestic information space has permitted a torrent of antisemitic content, while the Beijing-controlled algorithms and censors of TikTok have promoted pro-Hamas and anti-Israel content,” according to Matt Pottinger, David Feith, and Ben Noon, “apparently, with major influence on the views of American TikTok users, who increasingly rely on the platform for news.”

The promotion of antisemitic, pro-Hamas views is just one element in what Edward Lucas notes is China’s “bid for outright dominance of the world’s information systems.” The Chinese government and its “favored private companies”—including TikTok and the message app WeChat, which the government censors and monitors—“are seeking to become the ‘gatekeepers’ of news and information in other countries via influence and control over key content dissemination platforms and infrastructure.”

Lucas’ essay appears in Defending Democracy in an Age of Sharp Power, edited by William Dobson, Tarek Masoud, and Christopher Walker. Although Russia receives some attention, the authors’ main focus is China, and deservedly so considering the scope and ambition of China’s efforts.

Walker and Jessica Ludwig coined the term sharp power in 2017. Writing in Foreign Affairs, they distinguished it from soft power, which has become “a political science catch-all for forms of influence that are not ‘hard’ in the sense of military force.” Sharp power likewise does not include force or violence, but, in contrast to soft power, it “centers on distraction and manipulation.” Its purpose is to “pierce, penetrate or perforate the political and information environments in the targeted countries,” using the openness of democratic society “to cut into the fabric of a society, stoking and amplifying existing divisions.”

Appreciation of sharp power has been central to mounting a response to the authoritarian resurgence after the end of the Cold War. Leaders had imagined an “end of history” in which democracies were in a commanding position to oversee the demise of the remaining authoritarian regimes that would inevitably fall under the influence of investment and the free flow of ideas. Instead, a China-led assault on liberal democratic norms has challenged the United States and its allies around the world.

Indeed, as Dobson and Masoud write in their introduction to the volume, autocrats perceive democracies as “an existential threat.” Rather than being “content to shore up their own rule, they are now reaching across borders to prevent democracy where it does not yet exist, and to undermine it where it does.”

Recognizing China’s sharp-power efforts also helped transform U.S. China policy from the earlier “engagement” approach that imagined the CCP leadership willingly deferring to American leadership not only in Asia, but around the world. At the same time, the legacy of earlier policies that minimized the Leninist character of the Chinese regime makes it more difficult to neutralize China’s sharp power.

What is China trying do with the influence and control it is acquiring? China, Nadège Rolland explains, seeks “discourse power,” that is,

what Chinese elites define . . . as the ability to voice ideas, concepts, propositions and claims that are respected and recognized by others, and in the process to change, without violence or coercion, how others think and behave.

To put it another way, “getting others to do the CCP’s will through the use not of force, but of words.”

Much of what China does in its sharp-power efforts is overt. For example, through a tactic known as “borrowing the boat,” it takes advantage of foreign media outlets to publish state media content, often through paid inserts or published opinion pieces by Chinese officials. As they become familiar to readers, they normalize Beijing’s presence in American media as a respectable actor, even as China refuses reciprocal access to American media and diplomats. This content helps Beijing convey that there is another side to the story about China that is told by editorials and journalistic investigations in the same outlets. Why otherwise would they have access to these platforms?

In the knowledge sector, which includes, for example, institutions of higher education and book publishing, writes Glenn Tiffert, China uses financial and other leverage to circumscribe speech and advance its narrative on certain issues—whether it’s Taiwan or Tibet—while simultaneously eroding principles of freedom of expression.

The picture presented by these essays is not all doom and gloom. Accounts of resistance in several countries are especially cheering and show how vital individuals and civic society have been to turning back Chinese sharp power.

After Beijing meddled in Taiwan’s 2018 local elections, grassroots and civil society groups pushed back against psychological warfare by the People’s Liberation Army, microblogging and content farms spreading disinformation, and even efforts to coopt local farming and fishing societies. Ketty Chen describes an extraordinary response led by NGOs that included training in media literacy and dissemination of trustworthy information. By the 2020 national election, writes Chen, “Beijing’s political warfare was not only falling flat but backfiring.” President Tsai Ing-wen, who had staunchly resists Chinese pressure, won reelection in a landslide.

Australia’s experience is particularly relevant to the United States because both have federal political systems and both have citizens of Chinese descent who are prime targets of Beijing’s influence efforts. In Australia, John Fitzgerald writes, civil society, not the government, led the exposure of the PRC’s surveillance and political interference. These were driven not by “geopolitics and international rivalries, but rather with a concern for freedom, rights, and equal treatment for all Australian citizens.”

In Eastern and Central Europe, Martin Hála writes, the experience of Leninist regimes should have made countries skeptical about China’s sharp power tactics. Instead, a combination of factors, including the 2008 economic crisis and U.S. and UK engagement policies, worked in Beijing’s favor.

Beijing uses “strategic corruption” in its investment and infrastructure projects to capture elites in countries with weak institutions. Nonetheless, many of Beijing’s projects are now in bad odor at least in part because “in free societies there are always people talking back.” Hála notes that, tellingly, “it is now only those members with authoritarian tendencies (such as Hungary and Serbia) that still maintain the façade of ‘friendly cooperation’ with the PRC.”

When China has suffered setbacks to its sharp-power agenda in the past, it has redoubled its efforts. In a conclusion to the volume, Walker warns that most countries are not prepared to confront sharp power effectively. He offers a set of achievable recommendations that play to the democracies’ strengths: rebuffing the secrecy and opacity that autocrats favor, unleashing the power of individuals and NGOs, and answering autocrats’ media narratives. Above all, “policymakers and citizens in free societies must be clear eyed about what is at stake,” and resist becoming “inured to autocrats extraordinary depredations” through “the neutralizing and conditioning effects of present-day disinformation and propaganda.”

The essays in this book show the extent of the challenge, and the strengths that democracies must summon to meet it.

Ellen Bork, a contributing editor of American Purpose, is a fellow at the George W. Bush Institute.

Image: A smartphone with the TikTok logo and a background with the flag of the People's Republic of China. (Unsplash: Solen Feyissa)

americanpurpose.com · by Ellen Bork · December 6, 2023




De Oppresso Liber,

David Maxwell

Vice President, Center for Asia Pacific Strategy

Senior Fellow, Global Peace Foundation

Editor, Small Wars Journal

Twitter: @davidmaxwell161

Phone: 202-573-8647

email: david.maxwell161@gmail.com


Sans Serif





De Oppresso Liber,

David Maxwell

Vice President, Center for Asia Pacific Strategy

Senior Fellow, Global Peace Foundation

Editor, Small Wars Journal

Twitter: @davidmaxwell161

email: david.maxwell161@gmail.com



If you do not read anything else in the 2017 National Security Strategy read this on page 14:


"A democracy is only as resilient as its people. An informed and engaged citizenry is the fundamental requirement for a free and resilient nation. For generations, our society has protected free press, free speech, and free thought. Today, actors such as Russia are using information tools in an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of democracies. Adversaries target media, political processes, financial networks, and personal data. The American public and private sectors must recognize this and work together to defend our way of life. No external threat can be allowed to shake our shared commitment to our values, undermine our system of government, or divide our Nation."

Access NSS HERE

Company Name | Website
Facebook  Twitter  Pinterest  
basicImage