“The PQI allows my compaction foremen to quickly and easily monitor the in-place density behind our rollers, much easier and faster than traditional nuclear density gauges, Shawn Hammer, QC Manager at Fisher Sand & Gravel said. “The ease of use, speed, accuracy and smaller footprint makes the user’s job much easier to perform.”
“We’ve tried a variety of density gauges both nuclear and non-nuclear. The PQI is more accurate and has the options for testing and data recording that are most useful to us,” David Hose, Vice President, Materials & Field Quality at Mathy Construction Company said. “We get faster and more reliable results with a PQI than we do nuclear gauges. Even before we have an offset we identify trends and lower-density segments and make faster corrections to our rolling patterns. They are safer, easier, lighter, faster and more accurate than nuclear gauges and allow us to make corrections before the mat is set up.
If your state or federal projects do not require a nuclear gauge you should seriously consider switching to non-nuclear. You will save time, test a larger portion of the mat and spot deficiencies before they become penalties. If you are required to use nuclear gauges I would recommend supplementing with a non-nuclear gauge. The PQI 380 is the best we’ve found.”
|