Kindergarten readiness typically focuses on individual children. Do the children have the foundational math and language skills to be ready academically? Do they have the social and emotional skills to play well with others, express their feelings, pay attention, and complete simple tasks? Are they physically and mentally healthy?
In Alameda County, California—which includes the city of Oakland—early childhood leaders assess those traditional measures of readiness, but they center their assessment on the readiness of the community to help young children thrive.
“We are focusing on the conditions necessary for kids to be successful and intentionally moving away from labeling kids as being ready or not ready,” explains Laura Schroeder, senior administrator of data and evaluation at First 5 Alameda.
Lisa Forti, First 5 Alameda’s director of policy, planning, and evaluation, refers to it as “moving from portrait to landscape.”
“You’re not just looking at children, or even families, in isolation, but you’re looking at people within the context of the communities, structures, systems, policies, and conditions that would support children’s success.”
First 5 Alameda issues a Kindergarten Readiness Assessment (KRA) every two years. The report lays out policy changes that would help communities, schools, and families ensure children are ready to thrive in kindergarten and beyond. There are approximately 25 policy recommendations covering a broad range of issues, including:
- Expand access to quality affordable housing and utility assistance,
- Invest in community-driven equitable economic development,
- Invest in family resource centers and provide access to community resources and navigation support, and
- Increase access to affordable, quality mental health and self-care resources for ECE professionals and educators.
Alameda County’s KRA has historically relied on the Kindergarten Observation Form (KOF), a research instrument used in many states and communities. Over the last several years, First 5 Alameda has incorporated more participatory and equity-based practices in the data collection, such as focus groups and surveys. In consultation with schools and other partners, the decision was made to not use the KOF at all for the most recent report, in part because of disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead, the data is from a survey of more than 3,000 local parents and caregivers, early care and education providers, and kindergarten teachers – the people with firsthand knowledge of children’s readiness, the obstacles they face, and the best opportunities to help all children thrive.
Forti says the responses show that “readiness really took a hit from Covid,” with only 34 percent saying children are ready for school, a drop from 44 percent in the last report.
“Some of it is academic, but a lot of it is social emotional from the impact of the isolation,” Forti points out. “Families’ access to community resources declined during Covid, including those things that are really important to children’s health, development, wellbeing, and socialization, and that are a financial support to families.”
A Research Advisory Group—made up of a diverse and representative group of parents, educators, and other stakeholders—guided all phases of the process.
“From the design of the research questions to our approach, the sampling, selecting the survey tools, interpreting the data when it is was crunched, and helping us think through recommendations and policy priorities, it was really important to have an advisory group that is reflective of the community,” Schroeder says.
Those involved with the KRA hope it is used a policy tool that guides the allocation of public resources.
“The ways that we, as a society, are setting people up are not supportive of kindergarten readiness. We think about structural racism, the impacts of poverty, and how all that stuff was exacerbated in Covid,” Forti says. “Now is a moment to double down on investments in those structural conditions and policies that are supportive of families, like universal basic income, supporting access to other basic needs, good housing policies, parks and playgrounds, living wages for ECE providers.”