SHARE:  

Despite WOTUS Uncertainty, Florida Legislature Aims to Expedite Wetland Permitting

As we have recently reported, federal regulation of wetlands under the Clean Water Act ("CWA") is uncertain and quickly evolving. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that would keep the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA's") 2015 rule defining waters of the United States ("WOTUS") on the books. Then, the EPA responded by finalizing a different rule that delays the 2015 rule from taking effect for two more years. Now, the Florida Legislature has passed a bill giving the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") authority to assume the federal permitting program for dredging and filling wetlands under Section 404 of the CWA.

Section 404 requires a permit before dredged or fill material may be discharged into WOTUS, unless the activity is exempt from 404 regulation. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") administers the program with EPA oversight. Florida administers a parallel state-permitting program for dredging and filling in Florida wetlands and other surface waters. Thus, discharging dredged or fill material in WOTUS in Florida often requires permits from the Corps and DEP for the same activity.

However, states can assume administration of the Corps' federal permitting program themselves, and the Florida Legislature is aiming to do just that. This year, the House and Senate have passed House Bill 7043, which gives DEP authority to administer the federal Section 404 permit program for dredging and filling federal wetlands. If Governor Scott signs the bill into law, Florida law would still require two permits before dredging or filling Florida wetlands when they also qualify as federal wetlands. Under the proposed law, however, Florida permit seekers would no longer have to go to the Corps for the federal permit - DEP would be able to issue the state and federal permits alike.

Under the CWA, a state assuming Section 404's permitting program must set criteria for permitting that are at least as stringent as the federal criteria, and must follow the federal permitting procedures. That means two things: (1) DEP could not issue permits to dredge or fill Section 404 wetlands under a more relaxed or inconsistent definition of WOTUS; and (2) federal permitting would still be subject to the notoriously vague and shifting definition of WOTUS. So far, only Michigan and New Jersey have assumed state control over Section 404's permitting program.

The Association of State Wetland Managers has noted state assumption of the Section 404 permitting program has a variety of benefits for state agencies and permit seekers alike, including: 
  • Eliminating a high percentage of duplicative state/tribal federal permitting programs; 
  • Reducing costs for permit applicants; 
  • More effective resource management due to localized expertise;
  • Incorporation of state goals into the overall permit process; and 
  • Improved consistency and stability in the permitting process. 
If Governor Scott signs the bill into law, DEP must still obtain EPA approval before it can administer the Section 404 permit program. DEP must also pass rules sufficient to satisfy the EPA that it will administer the program consistent with federal regulation.

However, DEP's assumption of the Section 404 permitting program is not a complete panacea. First, permit seekers would still need Corps approval whenever they propose to dredge or fill wetlands adjacent to Florida's coastal and tidal waters. Second, state assumption of the program would require additional resources to review, process, and administer the Section 404 permits. However, both the Senate and House Staff Analyses of the bills indicate DEP can absorb the increased permitting authority without an increase in staff or administrative costs. 

Our Land Development, Zoning & Environmental team has extensive experience advising clients on permitting wetland impacts. We will continue to monitor the bills' progress through the Florida Legislature and how the bills will impact ongoing, proposed, or future projects in Florida. For more information, please contact us.
MEET THE AUTHORS


Tallahassee
email
Tampa
Tampa
 
Special thanks to Kaley Witeck and Samuel Walenz, who assisted in the drafting of this update. Kaley is a third-year Juris Doctor Candidate at Stetson University College of Law. Sam is a third-year Juris Doctor Candidate at Florida State University College of Law.
LEGAL UPDATE  
Court Awards Eminent Domain Compensation to Property Owner for Lost Leases and Lost Profits 

The Northern District of Florida was tasked with determining the amount of compensation due to a property owner as a result of an eminent domain proceeding, in which a company's construction affected the property owner's land. The court awarded the property owner compensation for lost leases and lost profits; however, the court refused to award compensation for the value of the property owner's lost trees. View More 
 
Village Ordinance Prohibiting Front Yard Gardens Held Constitutional
 
The Third District Court of Appeal upheld a trial court's finding that a Miami Shores ordinance banning front yard vegetable gardens was constitutional. The court evaluated the ordinance under rational basis review and upheld the ordinance under the "fairly debatable" standard. View More  
 
Court Clarifies Correct Law in Rezoning Application Review
 
After a city council denied a rezoning application, the applicant filed suit alleging the city council evaluated the application under the incorrect section of the Land Development Code. The First District Court of Appeal agreed and held that the city council deprived the applicant of the lawful use of its property.  View More  
 
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Challenge to Government's Dusky Gopher Frog Critical Habitat Designation
 
The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to a property owners' challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's determination that 1,500 acres of private property in Louisiana are protected as a "critical habitat" for the dusky gopher frog under the Endangered Species Act. Depending on the outcome, the case could heavily influence individuals' property rights and how the "critical habitat" section of the ESA will be implemented in the future. View More
 
Supreme Court Ruling on WOTUS Rule Challenges Could Create More Confusion
 
As a result of complicated procedural history, the Supreme Court took up the issue of whether the federal district courts or the federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction to hear WOTUS rule challenges. The Court held that WOTUS rule challenges must originate in the federal district courts and remanded the rule challenge back to the appeals court. View More
 
Federal Court Finds Mortgagee Lacks Standing Under Florida Constitution for Inverse Condemnation Claim but Allows Federal Constitutional Takings Claims to Proceed
 
The Middle District of Florida granted the City of Deltona's motion to dismiss an inverse condemnation claim, concluding that a mortgage-holder had no standing to bring it under the Florida Constitution because it had only a lien interest, not an ownership interest, in the property that the City demolished. The court, however, denied the City's motion to dismiss the mortgagee's federal constitutional claims, holding that the demolition of the mortgaged property could be a taking entitling the mortgagee to compensation and to notice and an opportunity to be heard before the City demolished the property. View More
 
Court Allows Clean Water Act Citizen Suit to Proceed Despite FDEP Action
 
Suncoast Waterkeeper filed a law suit against the City of St. Petersburg alleging that the city violated the CWA. The key question in the court's decision was whether the Florida Department of Environmental Protection had commenced and was diligently prosecuting a comparable action against the City under Florida law, barring the citizen suit. The court held the Plaintiffs' suit was not barred under the CWA because FDEP's enforcement procedures are not sufficiently comparable to the CWA's. View More
 
Jury Awards Landowner over $4 Million after Finding Former County Commissioner Interfered with Project
 
A jury recently awarded a landowner approximately $4.4 million in a case involving a former Martin County commissioner. The jury found that Maggie Hurchalla interfered with an interlocal agreement between Martin County and the South Florida Water Management District. View More
TEAM MEMBER SPOTLIGHT   

 
Abigail Corbett 
Abby's Practice:  In addition to a nationwide litigation practice, Abby advises Florida municipalities and other public entities on constitutional law matters as well as on other governmental affairs issues including efforts to adapt to the anticipated effects of climate change. Abby is a frequent public speaker and writer regarding the policy options, legal implications, and litigation risks associated with efforts by governmental and private actors to adapt to the anticipated effects of climate change.
Notable Experience:  Abby serves as Special Counsel to the City of Coral Gables. In 2016 she was asked by the Coral Gables City Commission to help the City create a comprehensive white paper that would set out the various policy options and corresponding legal considerations associated with a local government's efforts to adapt to climate change and, in particular, sea level rise. The white paper that resulted has guided the City's proactive steps to adapt to climate change, and it is frequently shared and cited as a resource around the country including by organizations such as the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact and the Georgetown Climate Center's Adaptation Clearinghouse. Abby's climate change advisory work has been featured on NPR's All Things Considered, and she has been a contributor to articles relating to climate change in Bloomberg, Bloomberg Markets, Earther, and Time.

Community Involvement: Abby is a member of The Florida Bar's Diversity and Inclusion Committee, serves on the Board of Directors of the Chattahoochee Hills Charter School, and is a long-time supporter and former Board member of South Florida's SAVE Foundation.
EXECUTIVE ORDER PERMIT EXTENSION TRACKER
View our online tool that tracks Executive Orders declaring a state of emergency in Florida so that you can research whether opportunities exist to extend the expiration of those permits.

RECENT NEWS   
Stearns Weaver Miller Adds Coral Gables Office As Convenience for Clients

Opportunities for Permit Extensions Available - But Claiming Them Not Always Straightforward

A New, Narrower Take on the "Incidental Take" of Bird Species under the MBTA


 

MEET THE TEAM   
About Stearns Weaver Miller
  
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson is a full service law firm with offices in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Tallahassee, and Coral Gables, Florida. We offer multidisciplinary solutions with a concentration on Business Restructuring, Corporate & Securities, Labor & Employment, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Real Estate, Land Development, Zoning, Environmental & Governmental Affairs and Tax. For more information, please visit stearnsweaver.com.