Something very unusual happened on the floor of the House today.

Earlier this Session, HB 892 - State Prescription Drug Benefits - Retirees was introduced by Delegate Joe Boteler and cosigned by a bipartisan list of delegates (including me). The same bill was cross-filed in the Senate, also cosigned by members of both parties. This bill would reinstate the original state prescription drug plan to the retirees who had been promised the benefit when they began work with the state.

I reported that, unfortunately, neither was given a vote in committee and thus the bills died. This is still true.

Today, either the Dems decided to do the right thing, or they maneuvered a way to keep from having a recorded vote on the issue. I'll lay odds on the latter.

Today, SB 402 - State Employee and Retiree Health and Welfare Benefits - Reemployment Earnings Limitation – COVID–19 Exemption was brought before the House for a final vote. This two-page bill did not deal with Retiree Prescription Drug Benefits ("RPDB"), but the topic of the bill was close enough for an amendment related to RPDB. [House Bills are restricted to a one-subject rule.]

Delegate Johnnie Mautz introduced such an amendment that imported the entirety of HB 892 into SB 402. After Delegate Mautz introduced his amendment and spoke eloquently for adopting it, Delegate Joe Boteler was recognized. He spoke passionately about the amendment focusing on three arguments:
  • First, he emphasized the importance of honoring commitments the state makes to employees when they are hired; promises employees count on to compensate for a lower state salary.
  • Delegate Boteler noted that the primary reason the original prescription drug plan was repealed and replaced by the three alternate plans currently in place was money. And at that time, it was a reasonable action for the financial health of the state. Today, however, the State has a $7 BILLION SURPLUS! Revisiting that earlier decision is the honorable thing to do.
  • Finally, Delegate Boteler spoke about the members of the Democrat party that came and asked to co-sponsor his original bill (HB 892) and expressed his hope that each of them would be supporting the amendment.