News and information to help journalists serve the public and stay safe.
August 3, 2020
What’s next after this 100th newsletter?
Thank you for reading this, the 100th edition of the Covering Coronavirus newsletter. Thanks to everyone who has been reading since March 12, when we emailed the first edition. Thank you to everyone who joined more recently. And thank you to Beth Francesco, Holly Butcher Grant, and Jim Kuhnhenn on their tremendous work producing this newsletter with creativity and excellence on deadline.

The newsletter has evolved as the pandemic spread, protests grew against systemic racism, the presidential election reshaped itself. And it will continue to evolve. We’re committed to providing you with news and practical tips and tools to help you cover today, tomorrow and whatever’s next. 

Since that’s not limited to Covering Coronavirus, we hope you’ll help us pick an updated name for this newsletter that reflects its expanded scope and its focus on actionable information. 
You can tell us if your favorite name is one of these, or you can suggest your own:
News now
On the Record
Behind the headlines
Developing stories
Covering ... (email us to fill in the blank)
Don't have a favorite from above? Send us your suggestions. If you propose a name we choose, we’ll let you know first, then we’ll announce it here and send you a thank-you gift. 

We welcome any other feedback you’d like to provide about how this newsletter is most (or least) helpful and what we can do to make it more valuable to you. Please stay in touch, and we’ll see you again tomorrow. 

Executive Director, National Press Club Journalism Institute
TOP STORIES
Government records belong to the public, but journalists often face delays and redactions that make it difficult to get the information they need to inform the public about significant issues. Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s more important than ever for journalists to be strategic when they are seeking government records.

Panelists Miranda Spivack, journalism fellow at the Brechner Center for Freedom of Information at the University of Florida, and Mark Walker, FOIA coordinator in The New York Times’ Washington Bureau, will cover strategies and approaches to requesting and obtaining public records using the Freedom of Information Act and state open records laws. 

Registration is open for the program, which will take place on Wednesday, August 5.
As newsrooms continue to grapple with racial inequities, we emailed journalism schools to determine how academia is addressing the same issues, and what lessons journalists can learn from them. 
 
News organizations cannot wait for people to come to them, said Tracy Everbach, Ph.D., professor at University of North Texas' Mayborn School of Journalism. They “need to be out there identifying talent” while journalists are still in school.
 
“This talent has to be nurtured and recruited,” said Everbach, whose research focuses on gender and race in the media. “Too often hiring managers are seeking people who remind them of themselves, and that perpetuates the same hiring patterns.”

How can journalism schools help reshape the industry to become more inclusive?
 
Everbach: We as faculty need to support our students of color, women, LGBTQ students, students with disabilities to let them know they have our backing. We need to encourage them and recommend them for internships and jobs. We need to teach them about the history of this country and the treatment of people of color, women, LGBTQ people, people with disabilities so that they understand why these groups have been oppressed and discuss how they can improve coverage and make it more equitable and inclusive. They are the upcoming industry leaders and we need to prepare them for an even more diverse world. 
 
Another initiative is to teach them to diversify their sources by keeping track of who they are reporting on and what kinds of stories they are producing about different types of people. For example, keep track of how many women, men, non-white people, etc. you are featuring in your stories and how you are portraying them. This can go a long way in learning how to end stereotyping and give voice to the voiceless.

How do you think COVID-19 will affect diversity in newsrooms?

Everbach: I am afraid it will have a negative effect. Often those hired last are the first to be laid off, and people of color often are the journalists hired most recently. In addition, without much new hiring, news organizations will not have the chance to recruit and hire more diverse staff. And while they are preoccupied with COVID-19 coverage and trying to stay healthy, they will have fewer opportunities to find and recruit new people.
 
As news organizations and the nation have responded to the coronavirus pandemic and the protests following the murder by police of George Floyd, journalists have increasingly confronted the need for newsroom equity and a truer relationship with the communities they serve.

The National Press Club Journalism Institute and PEN America will co-host a program on “Equity and community in local news: Lessons learned in 2020” to identify and share takeaways from pandemic and protest coverage and to look ahead toward election coverage. 

Registration is open for the program on August 12, which will be moderated by Jim Friedlich, executive director and CEO of the Lenfest Institute of Journalism, and will feature Denise Rolark Barnes, publisher of The Washington Informer; Cassie Haynes, co-executive director at Resolve Philadelphia; Darryl Holliday, co-founder and News Lab director at City Bureau in Chicago; and Tasneem Raja, editor-in-chief of The Oaklandside.

Advice from Jill Geisler,
Bill Plante Chair in Leadership & Media Integrity, Loyola University Chicago
Freedom Forum Fellow in Women’s Leadership

It seems ages ago that journalists moved their work stations from newsrooms to living rooms. Organizations moved quickly to protect their teams during the pandemic and resilient employees adapted.

They made it work. 

Good managers keep tabs on their staff’s well-being and the effectiveness of the workflow, so it’s important to keep asking, “Can it work better?”

Here are a few things to check on.

Meetings: Is our meeting schedule efficient? Are our meetings focused? If they’re not routine meetings, do people know what’s on the agenda so they can think ahead? In general, are people getting what they need from our gatherings?

Information sharing: Do we have a centralized place where people can see what’s going on today and what others are up to? Are we doing an effective job of handing off information from shift to shift or show to show?

Planning: How well are we looking ahead — and are all the right people in the loop?

Organizational communication: Are people being kept informed about big picture items like equity initiatives, business updates, new partnerships or re-organizations? Are they hearing directly about new hires, job openings, or key performance analytics related to their work?

Feedback: Are people getting sufficient, helpful one-on-one communication about their work from their managers? Is it personalized and specific? 

Work-life harmony: Do your team members feel they must be “always on”? Have you made expectations clear and created backup support so people can unplug without jeopardizing your coverage — or their careers or wellbeing? Do they feel you know and care about the many personal and professional stresses the pandemic has inflicted on employees?

Onboarding: Are we doing a good job of welcoming people into our world? Are we giving them the information, training and personal connections they would have had much more easily if we were under the same roof?

Let me leave you with the most important check of all — on your culture.

If it was flawed in the traditional workplace, it didn’t heal itself when people dispersed to their homes. If harassment, discrimination or incivilty existed, they didn’t go away. If power and opportunity were unequally distributed, the imbalance remains. Your job is to assess and improve your culture.

If it was healthy before your transition to remote work and people felt respected, engaged and connected, with opportunities to grow and do darn good work, your job is to confirm that the culture remains alive and well, celebrate it — and grow it.
Do you qualify as an ally? Join Jill for the next Freedom Forum Institute Power Shift Project program on August 20 at 1 p.m. EDT. Registration is now open.
Feeling stressed? Try wandering through an outdoor labyrinth. 

Labyrinths have been around since the Neolithic Age as a form of meditation or spiritual journey. Unlike a maze, labyrinths only have one entrance and exit, so without the worry of getting lost, it’s a great way to practice mindfulness and relax.

So it’s no surprise that labyrinths are gaining popularity this summer. Even without a big budget to spend on commissioning a backyard labyrinth, there are still three ways you can enjoy their benefits during the pandemic:


Read on for more self-care tips, or share your own.
This newsletter is written & edited by the National Press Club Journalism Institute staff: Beth Francesco, Holly Butcher Grant, Jim Kuhnhenn, and Julie Moos. Send us your questions and suggestions for topics to cover.

Get this from a friend? Subscribe, and view the archives.