For decades, animal research opponents have penned op-eds and letters to the editor as part of their campaigns to end crucial health studies. This is why both proactive and reactive articles (such as the one featured above) are so critically important. Here’s some advice for constructing an effective argument.
Focus on the Research First
Opinion articles on animal studies should always focus on the science first and foremost. No organization advocates for animal studies themselves. Instead, our shared objective is expanding knowledge and developing new and better treatments. We must remember this whenever we communicate publicly. In addition, we should never dismiss the opportunity to highlight the critical role of animals when writing about a research advancement where they played a significant role.
Do More Than Simply Respond
When reacting to animal rights claims or opinions, it's easy to focus on their inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Instead, most of your time should be spent making your own points supported by evidence. Debunking activist claims can be helpful, but it shouldn't be the only goal.
Connect the Dots for Readers
Whenever possible, explain how animal studies played a key role in a research finding or medical advancement. Highlight why animals were necessary and why there were no other alternatives. One major goal should always be to help readers think more deeply about the role of animals in research. This will help them better identify when they are being mislead by research opponents.
Partner With Others
At times, it is helpful when a third-party gets involved. The above example from the Cascade AIDS Project is a good example. Sometimes organizations can partner with others to author and effective op-ed. Other times, it is beneficial when an independent organization such as a nonprofit disease advocacy group takes up the case by themselves.
