The Monthly Recharge - November 2018, I was unsure about _________ until _________
Leadership+Design


"We design experiences for the people who create the future of teaching and learning."

 

In our work, we build capacity, create conversations, and make connections.

 

Follow us on:  Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook

Plan your professional learning adventures with L+D in 2019. 


Design Studio
March 20-21, 2019
Washington, DC

Designing for Student Civic Engagement


null
Design Studio
April 19, 2019
Tacoma, WA

Equity and Inclusion Action Lab




Wonder Women
June 24-27, 2019
Oakland, CA 

Uncovering your Superpowers and Leadership Presence


L+D Board of Directors

Ryan Baum
VP of Strategy
Jump Associates, CA

Matt Glendinning  (Secretary)
Head of School
Moses Brown School,  RI

Trudy Hall (Board Chair)
Director of Strategic Initiatives
Forest Ridge School, WA
 
Brett Jacobsen (Vice Chair)
Head of School
Mount Vernon Presbyterian , GA
 
Barbara Kraus-Blackney (Treasurer)
Executive Director
Association of Delaware Valley Independent Schools (ADVIS), PA 

Brenda Leaks
Head of School
Seattle Girls School, WA

Karan Merry
Retired Head of School
Brooklyn, NY

Jeanette Moore
CFO
The San Francisco School, CA

Natalie Nixon
Founder
Figure 8 Consulting, PA

Kaleb Rashad
Principal
High Tech High School, CA
 
Carla Robbins Silver (ex-officio)
Executive Director
Leadership+Design, CA

Matthew Stuart
Head of School
Caedmon School, NY

Brad Weaver
Head of School
Sonoma Country Day School, CA

L+D Fellows
2018-19

Paul Chung
RIPL Designer
McGillis School, UT

Michael Ecker
Principal
Calaveras, Middle School, CA

Kristen Erickson
History Department Chair and Art Gallery Director
Greenwich Academy, CT

Jon Freer
Director of Technology and Innovative Teaching
Solebury School, PA

Rhonda Hewer
Learning Services Consultant
Waterloo Region District School Board, Ontario, Canada

Louise Lindsay
Innovation Coach
Knoxville Jewish Day School, TN

Sonja McKay
Teacher
Exploris School, NC

Stephanie Mendrala
Director of Professional Development
STEM School Highlands Ranch, CO

Ingrid Moore
Director of Lower School
The Steward School, VA

Brian Mull
Innovation and Learning Design Coordinator
Trinity Episcopal School, NOLA

Hannah Nelson
Science Teacher and Academic Dean
Watershed School, CO

Gwenyth Nicholson
8th Grade Humanities Teacher
Saco Middle School, ME

Bobby Pollicino
Upper School Principal
Bullis School, MD

Sara Slogesky
K-12 Social Studies Curriculum Specialist
Capital Region Education Council Magnet Schools, CT


I'm 65% Sure That You Are Reading This Article.  
Carla Silver, Head L+Doer
Leadership+Design

This month we've challenged our November writers to respond to the following prompt: "I was unsure about _____________ until ______________."  In sitting down to write my article, I immediately took issue with the prompt - one that I may have actually suggested in the first place. (Typical.) To say that I was unsure about something, suggests that I am sure now.  I'm a little unsure how I feel about that.

Certainty is a funny concept. There are very few things about which I feel certain, and the more I learn, the less certain I am - about almost everything.  My friend Christian Long first introduced me to the phrase, "be more curious than certain" and  we have adopted it as a core principle and norm of Leadership+Design.  My email signature contains a favorite quotation from Rumi that states, "Sell your cleverness and buy bewilderment" which reminds me of my own uncertainty each time I send an email and suggests that a posture of curiosity and wonder is a good position to take. I have found that certainty feels synonymous for "being right" and creates a barrier to seeing and hearing other perspectives.

So, I'm 99% sure, that certainty is uncertain at best.  (Or maybe it's more like 87%).

What is the actual probability that your or I are certain - ever, about anything?  Annie Duke, one of the world's greatest poker players, has become an expert and consultant on decision making.  I reviewed her book Thinking in Bets for our June Summer Read edition.  Duke writes about how we can use probability in our thinking to help us move from a goal of "being right" to instead on of "being accurate." The difference between the two has a lot to do with giving up our own certainty, opening ourselves up to different perspectives and possibilities that may enhance our own learning and ultimately our ability to make better decisions more frequently.  

The idea of thinking in probabilities (or bets), and assigning a probability to any hypothesis or belief serves three purposes.  1) It allows us to pause and reflect how certain we think we are about an idea or belief.  Am I 45% sure?  Am I 60% sure?  80%? 2) It allows us to consider why we have assigned that level of probability to our belief or idea. Is it because of our past experience our expertise another mental model or "just because"?  3) Once we make the probability assessment, we can ask ourselves "How might we explore the area of uncertainty in order to be more accurate in our decision making?"  If we are at 60%, what can we learn to get closer to75 or 80%? What information might we be missing?  Who can we learn from? Who might hold a different opinion than we do?  What data can we gather? 

In poker this kind of thinking happens in almost every hand, but it might be un unexplored tool when it comes to our work in schools.  Whether we are contemplating a new hire or position,  adding a new program, determining a strategic direction, or deciding to maintain the status quo, assessing our own uncertainty and the probability that we are accurate, can help us have outcomes that are more consistently successful.  Duke, however, warns her readers not to assume that just because the outcome of a decision has turned out well, that the decision process or the decision itself was a a good one. Sometimes we all get lucky - in poker or in life.  Making an over-tight correlation between the results and decision make is something that Duke calls "resulting" and it can be dangerous and misleading and cause us to be less intentional and more intuitive when we might need to be more thoughtful. Sometimes a really good decision can blow up, but decision itself was a skilled one.  Sometimes we all get unlucky - in poker or in life.  Duke argues that the more we do this kind of probability analysis we will hone our skills as decision makers and increase our accuracy in the long run, even if we lose a few hands in the process.

Annie Duke has a website and a weekly newsletter worth checking out.  And she also started a nonprofit that is dedicated to help k-12 students make better decisions on everything from friendships, to healthy habits, to high school choices, so check it out at www.howidecide.org.

So what are our other writers so sure (or unsure) of?  I'm sure you can't wait to find out.  Thanks to this month's contributors - Ilsa Dohmen, Hillbrook School, Juna McDaid, Sonoma Country Day School, and Liam Gallagher, Upland Country Day School (L+D Fellow 2017-18) for stepping up with some really powerful articles from the field.

L+D had an amazing four days in Santa Fe this year with a group of school leaders who were ready to do some work.  We'll be opening up registration for next year in January, so if you missed it this year, consider joining next year's cohort.  Still coming up this year are three design studios (Designing for Equity and Inclusion, Designing for Civic Engagement, and Human Centered Design for Admissions Professionals West Coast Edition (with AISAP), and of course, Wonder Women.  Registration is live for all of these events.  

Wishing you all a Happy Thanksgiving that will bring you many opportunities for gratitude and joyful eating and connecting with those you love!

Warmly,

Carla
 
I was unsure about my job title until I discovered design thinking.
Liam Gallagher, Director of Making & Doing @ IDEA Center, Upland Country Day School
I'm often asked - 'what do you teach?'  A simple enough question at its surface, but as the Director of Making & Doing at the IDEA Center in Upland Country Day School, it's become a rather complicated response.  It took me awhile to recognize that I'm not teaching a straight forward subject like my previous position as a middle school science teacher.  Biology, chemistry, physics and geology - neat categories of information, scientific methods and earthly rules that determine the fate of species, molecules and planets.  Therefore, my answer often resembles - 'kids, I teach kids.'  

I've found that the growth and development of 'kids' rarely adheres to a single academic discipline. How does one measure grit, perseverance, passion and joy?  Because my ultimate objective is to teach kids how to work through frustration, pursue a goal and make their world a better place. The march towards this goal distills down to the cultivation of curiosity and practiced ability to transform your ideas into a reality.  Thus enter, the IDEA Center (Innovation, Design, Engineering and the Arts) and the greatest moniker a teacher could hope for; the Director of Making & Doing.  However, I was unsure about my job title until I discovered design thinking.

During my entire teaching tenure, I've been fortunate enough to imagine, design and implement my own curriculum.  As I transitioned into my current position, I was searching for a new framework to use while creating curriculum, and my research led me to 'design thinking.'  At its core, design thinking is a process for creative problem solving. I immediately latched on to its human centered approach which focuses on building empathy, empowering changemakers and encouraging action.  

As I initially began using the process to determine what and how I'd teach in the IDEA Center, I soon realized that design thinking is the educational process I'd been looking for all these years. Creative problem solving, and all that it entails, is precisely what we should be teaching our students.  Giving students the tools they need to navigate and collaborate in an uncertain future is paramount especially in a maker space such as the IDEA Center. My desire to transform students into people who could shape their own future and improve their communities is built into the design thinking process. To put it eloquently, I want my students to feel empowered to make stuff and do stuff that will improve the world around them. 
 
As my quest to gain a better understanding of my job title, I was fortunate enough to come across the folks at Leadership + Design, attending a workshop on design thinking in Philadelphia. After being surrounded by a slew of changemakers, I was energized and convinced of the power that design thinking has to transform education.  From an individual classroom to institutional structures, design thinking can inspire a seismic shift in how educators teach, administrators lead, parents mentor and students learn.  Personally, it has strengthened and added useful verbage to my project based habits to include the likes of 'prototyping,' 'iteration,' and 'ideation.' It has also provided greater depth to the meanings of student ownership and empowerment as my students embark on real world projects that impact their communities.  

Designing a safe path through a forest fire for our Optibots to follow, imagining how sensors and robots can help firefighters.


However, the true gem of design thinking that has shaped my current teaching is the incorporation of empathy at every step. As I began to have kids make and do stuff, I quickly realized that the mechanics of how to build something is far less important than the reason why you're building something. How will your idea impact those around you?  If I truly want my students to become changemakers, I'll need to help them realize why it's important to make changes. 

I'm certainly fortunate to find myself amongst some wonderful tools in the IDEA Center - a woodshop, sewing machines, laser cutter and the near mandatory 3D printer - but, as a colleague has told me several times, the magic of this space comes with my design thinking approach and that I'd be just as effective teaching in closet.  That exaggeration aside and with a human centered approach in mind, I've spent a considerable amount of time cultivating relationships with community organizations in an effort to give student projects greater meaning and a real world context. Students feel a greater impact on their own learning when they see their projects in the community, witnessing people interact with their work that once started as an idea.

Now when I'm asked what I teach, the answer has become a lot clearer since I've discovered design thinking - I help kids make stuff and do stuff that creates an impact on their lives, their community and our future.

Twitter - Upland_IDEA
Developing Passion for the Art of Teaching
Juna Kim McDaid, Middle School Division Head, Sonoma Country Day School 
I was recently at a luncheon for independent school administrators in the San Francisco Bay Area where the topic was "Retaining Excellent Faculty." I attended with high hopes that I would hear about a magic formula (spoiler: there isn't one). The teachers on the panel shared story after story of feeling seen, valued, and supported, reinforcing what I already knew. Relationships matter, so how can schools ensure relationship-building and encourage growth mindsets for all teachers?

Early in my teaching career, my then division head Ken Aldridge gave me a copy of Zander and Zander's The Art of Possibility , and he and this book shaped the way I view leadership. The authors use the analogy of the orchestra to show that it is not about one person making success happen but rather about each musician working as leaders from where they sit to make beautiful music together. I was not yet an administrator, but I found that I could help make change right from where I was as an 8th grade teacher of English. Like Benjamin Zander, I started asking myself how I was helping others shine. It gave me a sense of purpose and satisfaction that I hope to pass forward.

Then administration became a part of my professional path, and I had the opportunity to create a system that would support teacher development. What should it entail? I was at first unsure about revamping faculty evaluation to be more about professional growth until I talked to some sage mentors who convinced me that all teachers deserve to feel the excitement of taking control of their own professional path and designing it according to their needs. Prioritizing professional growth honors the complexities of teaching and the unique gifts each individual brings to the classroom to make learning possible. The priorities for any growth plan should be time for conversations, observations, relationship-building, and empathetic feedback. In a school culture that encourages a growth mindset, everyone invests in each others' development.

Brené Brown in Dare to Lead writes, "The data made clear that care and connection are irreducible requirements for wholehearted, productive relationships between leaders and team members". I have learned that it is in the day to day that I forge my relationships with others, and I schedule my time so that I can be available, walk through classes, have conversations with all teachers, and ask questions out of curiosity. Brown's research also shows that "...trust is in fact earned in the smallest of moments. It is earned not through heroic deed, or even highly visible actions, but through paying attention, listening, and gestures of genuine care and connection". I mostly write this as a reminder to myself that there is nothing more important than taking care of my team.

Teachers tend to be so busy focusing on their students, they rarely take time for themselves. I recently saw a meme on social media that said, "If speaking kindly to plants helps them grow, imagine what speaking kindly to humans can do" (no source provided). Teachers are emptying their proverbial buckets by trying to meet the needs of all of their students, so how are they refilling their buckets? How are administrators helping to refill buckets? As an administrator responsible for the well-being of faculty members, these were the questions that led me to research and whole-heartedly jump on the bandwagon of the professional growth model as a system to ensure that we in education are never depleted because the lives of our students are too important, and educator burnout is all too real.

If you care about others and enter relationships with curiosity, I hope you will embrace your inner leader and support someone else in developing their potential. You'll find that you are improved for it as well.
Containers for Childhood
By Ilsa Dohmen, Director of Teaching & Learning, Hillbrook School, @HillbrookCTE
In September of 2015, a former student of mine died. He had been a freshman in high school. He was crossing the street after practice when he was hit by a car. He died a few days later. He was a sweet kid (though not always), a devoted older brother, had a sharp wit, was a deep thinker and a tremendous athlete. And I believe he had been misunderstood in many moments during his middle school years by our faculty, myself included. This was one of those crushing reckonings-that sometimes we do not fully know or honor the children we serve-that came afterwards, ushered in and sharpened by the loss. But this is not the place to tell his story. This is a story about what happened at school in the days surrounding his death.

In those days, his classmates started to show up on our campus-before, during and after school. They wandered mostly to one area and sat. Students in our older grades who knew him left classes and sat too, and some older alumni who had played on teams with him, also returned. Many of them came back onto campus for hours, late into the afternoon and evening, multiple days in a row. They watched music videos, they cried, they consoled, they sat silently, they shared stories, they walked around the parts of campus you would expect recent ninth graders to remember as belonging to them. And while it took me a few months to put my finger on why, this behavior was the one possibly heartening thing about that time period for me.

Perhaps you've had this other kind of experience as an educator: In 2014-15, I had had a fabulous teaching year. I'd rewritten much of the sixth grade science curriculum, designed new projects, really hit a stride. My students had given me great feedback and, I believe, had learned a lot of high-quality science mindsets and skills. And then, there we were sitting in the science lab on the last day of school, waxing nostalgic, and a student spontaneously exclaimed that she had loved science class this year. Some peers nodded. I thanked her. She went on to explain that the very best part of science class was that one day I let her climb our back campus fence, into neighboring property, to retrieve a drone she'd accidentally lost at recess that belonged to her brother. I was floored, perhaps even humiliated. I knew what she meant. I knew she also had enjoyed all the great things we'd learned in what I thought of as the class. I also knew she was telling me the truth: that in that moment when we broke school together, and entered a space of genuine problem-solving and blurred authority, that was the best part of "my" science class for her. When she told me this, publicly, I could have thought she was the wrong kind of student, or I was a bad teacher, or I could embrace that my impact on her had been one I could not have predicted. Her experience wove around and through the parts of class that I had consciously designed.

Returning to that September: In the months following my former student's death, there was a popular song on the radio by Twenty One Pilots. A portion of the lyrics went:
Sometimes a certain smell will take me back to when I was young
How come I'm never able to identify where it's coming from
I'd make a candle out of it if I ever found it
Try to sell it, never sell out of it, I'd probably only sell one
It'd be to my brother, 'cause we have the same nose
Same clothes homegrown a stone's throw from a creek we used to roam
Struck by these lyrics, in the aftermath of the loss, it occurred to me that that's what these young people were doing gathered on-campus: burning the candle of their shared childhood. The one that we could watch and relate to somewhat, but could not ourselves smell.

Educators often conceive of schools as places where we practically operate on children. We spend tremendous heart and energy and time reshaping our procedures, collaborating to improve them, drafting and re-drafting the questions, the goals, the policies. But we fool ourselves; children are delightfully slippery and out of sync with our adult world. The experience they have at school is the one they make. We are merely a presence, a feature of the landscape that they weave around as they form their own secrets, their knowings, their pacts, their understandings of the world and one another. We matter. But the ways in which we matter are hardly the ones we spend the most time, energy or heart designing.

Our schools are not places that instruct children. Our schools are containers for childhood; ones we shape and maintain, but that merely create an outline of space for them to fill. We get to decide if the containers will be rough or polished, if they will look out into the world or invite it in, if they will be places of curiosities or certainties, what values they will practice. But children in our schools make their own way. When my former students gathered in that one part of campus after the accident, along that creek, they may have shared the physical location with us, but not the psychic location. 

I was unsure about the purpose of school until after he died. And now, though I forget sometimes, I feel more sure.




               

PO Box 33153
Los Gatos, CA 95031 

408.348.8617

www.leadershipanddesign.org

 

Follow us on:  Follow us on TwitterLike us on Facebook