|
Dear
Naaleh Friend,
This week we feature a class from the Naaleh Torah series
Parsha for Our Lives 5770 by Mrs. Shira Smiles. In this class,
Parshat Balak Pilgrimage Power,
Mrs. Shira Smiles examines the use of the words "shalosh regalim," when the donkey spoke to Bilam.
To view the class click on the image below.
This week's edition of Torah Imecha on
Parshat Balak is available on our
Newsletter page.
Click here
for the printer friendly version, to share at your Shabbat table! Be sure to visit the homepage as well, for many more inspiring Torah classes!
Shabbat Shalom!
-Ashley Klapper and the Naaleh Crew
|
For Tehillim list please click here to view our Refuah Shleima page
|
|
|
Ludicrous Licentiousness: Parshat Balak
Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Mrs. Shira Smiles
Summary by Channie Koplowitz Stein
Parshat Balak recounts the sin of the Jewish people with
Baal Peor
. Rabbi C. Shmulevitz asks two questions. What is the connection between sinning with the Moabite women and worshipping
Baal Peor
, and how could
Bnei Yisroel
have fallen to such a depraved level. The
Mikdash Halevi
points out that
Bnei
Yisroel
were just completing their forty year sojourn in the wilderness and were about to enter
Eretz Yisroel
. It is at this moment of victory and completion that one has a tendency to let one's guard down, and
Satan
took advantage. In addition, adds the
Leket Sichot Mussar
the voice of Balaam blessing the Jews had been carried throughout the Israelite camp, adding to their arrogance and sense of invincibility.
Bnei Yisroel
became complacent, they settled in,
vayeshev
rather than merely camped,
vayachanu
. When Hashem sees us as too complacent, we are courting tragedy.
Bnei Yisroel
were camped in
Shitim
.
Letitcha Elyon
cites the definition of Rabbi Yehoshua that the root word of Shitim is
shtut
, senselessness, while Rabbi Eliezer sees the root as
loshut
, to wander about aimlessly. The
Sefer Haparshiot
also notes two meanings, wandering aimlessly and the exact opposite, a straight line, like the tall and straight
atzei shitim
tree. This represents the attribute of justice says Rabbi Rivlin, while the circuitous route represents kindness.
Bnei Yisroel
, as does each of us, contained within themselves both of these attributes, the ability to remain on the straight and narrow in awe and fear of judgment, and the ability to explore the world.
Baal Peor
is the furthest point of no restriction, where anything and everything goes. Even when we start going off the
derech
, the aspect of
din
and the straight path must lead us back.
Balaam was looking for that one moment of judgment to make Hashem angry at
Bnei Yisroel
, but could find none, for
Bnei Yisroel
and the world was filled with Hashem's love and
chessed
at that time. But loving kindness unrestrained becomes perverted, even leading to incestuous relationships. At this moment, there was no counterbalancing restraint of judgment to keep
Bnei Yisroel
in check, says the
Drash Mordechai
.
Bnei Yisroel
had internalized the
Avinu
, our loving Father, but had forgotten the judgmental
Malkeinu
, our King aspect of Hashem. The
Oznaim LaTorah
cites
Gemara Sanhedrin
that the
Satan
knows he cannot succeed if he wrenches us harshly away from our path. He therefore seduces his prey with seemingly insignificant steps. Here in Shitim the men went out merely to see the wares in the market. This first thin thread of desire slowly pulled them in with ever thickening strands until they sinned completely
Rabbi I. Schwartz notes that most of the time we are running toward something we desire external to ourselves. Both run,
ratz
, and desire,
ratzon
,
share the same Hebrew root, One must find a place of quiet serenity and disconnect ourselves from the outside world at least for a few minutes. There our vision will turn inward to our true essence, and we will connect to the essence of Godliness within ourselves.
The Netivot Shalom explains that the blood of
emunah
, faith, is part of our DNA but it must be guarded through the discipline over our desires, represented by the blood of circumcision. Balaam understood that if he could break through the bounds of discipline and entrap
Bnei Yisroel
with physical desire, he would then easily be able to break the bond of faith, and
Bnei Yisroel
would worship an alien god. Therefore Pinchas attacked the source of the downfall Zimri and Kozbi rather than those worshipping
Baal Peor
.
What was the allure of
Baal Peor
? Rav C. Shmulevitz explains that this god represented permissiveness without restraint. Even the Torah recognizes that as human beings we have desires and passions. But it places restrictions that will bring us back even when we fall into temptation. Balaam knew that if the Israelite men would succumb to licentiousness with the Moabite women, they would eventually succumb to the allure of
Baal Peor
, and anger their God.
Baal Peor
proclaims our godliness in that we are limitless and without restraint.
Yiddishkeit
says we need to build fences around ourselves to preserve that Godly image. We believe the greatness of man comes precisely from his ability to control himself, thereby giving him the opportunity to soar beyond physical limitations.
|
|
|
The
yetzer hara's
purpose is to draw a person after him so that he too becomes evil and gets consumed by his feeling of lack and emptiness. Imagine a girl living alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn. She has a job but it's unfulfilling and pays very little. She views life as unbearable and tells herself she has no future. All of these thoughts resonate as true because there is a certain level of lack in this girl's life. The
yetzer hara
is too involved in the situation for her to see objectively. However if she was to compare herself to a young girl in 1945 forced to hide in a basement, bereft of human contact, she could see that her life is really full of possibilities. She could say blessings over food joyously, she could engage with people, she could change the world and herself. At the moment, she's in the clutches of the
yetzer hara
because she sees her life through the prism of expectation as opposed to the prism of reality. This is the
yetzer hara's
job- to keep us out of reality
The Maharal quotes a Gemara- Rav says the
yetzer hara
is compared to a fly that sits at the two openings of the heart. Like a fly, the
yetzer hara
is despicable and transient. One of the ways to bond with Hashem is to enjoy the physical world but that does not mean we must get emotionally engaged in it. Imagine how ridiculous we will appear in the next world when we will look back at our lives and see how much emotional effort we invested in going after desires that really didn't get us anywhere and never really gave us all that much pleasure.
There are two views of the
yetzer hara
expressed in the Gemara. One view says opposites attracts. Another view says what people want is to become more complete. It isn't that we're drawn to the opposite because we like it. We like ourselves and therefore we seek greater completion. Rav says the
yetzer hara
is despicable and evil and will find itself in something despicable and evil. Another view says we are drawn to the
yetzer hara
which is opposite because we like excitement. So are we attracted to the
yetzer hara
because it resonates with the part of us that is despicable and we are drawn to something that affirms that? Or are we drawn to it because we are aware of our own inner purity and want to try something different? The Maharal tells us there's a part of us that's lacking, no matter how pure we think we are. Hashem is infinite. A person can go higher and higher and never have a moment of boredom or emptiness. The part of the person that says I want to try something else is the part that's lacking. The
yetzer hara
goes after
Bnei Yisrael
more than any other nation and goes after Torah scholars more than other people. This is because if you're almost perfect the little black spot that decreases one's perfection is felt more acutely. According to the opinion of Shmuel, the more a person wants perfection and the closer he is to it, the more empowered evil becomes. According to Rav, the lack that the person feels so acutely at the moment is within their essential self. When a person feels despicable, it's very easy for him to fall. His
tzura,
his sense of essential identity is injured. So he just gives up on himself and says, "I'll do what I'll want."
We should be very careful never to insult someone's
tzurah.
Never suggest that a person's essential self is anything less than beautiful.
|
|
|
Part II
Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Rabbi Shimon Isaacson
There seems to be a contradiction in the Gemara. A number of opinions tell us to give rebuke even if it won't be heeded. But the Gemara in Yevamos and Beitza tell us to refrain. The Ritva in Masechet Gittin suggests that the Gemara in Yevamos refers to a group. If a group is sinning and they will not listen to rebuke, one should be silent. However for an individual, perhaps there is merit in giving rebuke even many times. Another Ritva in Masechet Beitza tells us that when the sin is unintentional one should not give rebuke. However if it's intentional one should give rebuke even if the sinner won't listen.
There's a fundamental disagreement how we view the mitzvah of rebuke. The Sefer Hachinuch seems to say, if you won't accomplish anything by rebuking the sinner cease and desist. If there's a chance he'll listen, go up to the point where he is ready to cause you bodily damage. The Sefer Yereim makes a distinction between intentional and unintentional sins. If it's unintentional and you know the sinner won't listen don't give rebuke. If it's intentional, rebuke him although he will not listen. The Rambam seems to follow the Sefer Hachinuch's interpretation. In line with Rashi, he emphasizes the idea of rebuke as a form of helping the sinner. If it will not accomplish anything perhaps there is no obligation. The Yereim says there's two elements to the mitzvah - the first is to help out the sinner and the second is for the one who is obligated to rebuke. One may not be apathetic to sin. However if it is unintentional and rebuking the sinner will make the sin intentional that overrides the issue of apathy. If the sin is intentional and is an open act of rebellion against Hashem, the Torah mandates that one must take a stand although the sinner may not listen.
There's a disagreement in the Gemara up to what point one must go to rebuke a sinner. The Avnei Nezer suggests, if you want to help your friend, push until the point that he's ready to hit you. If you are rebuking so as not to remain apathetic, then go up until the point that he's ready to scorn you. Another differentiation can be learned from Masechet Brachot which recounts how Eli rebuked Chana for praying silently, thinking she was drunk. Rav Elazar learns from this that if you see someone doing something improper you have to give rebuke. Tosfot asks, don't we learn the mitzvah from a verse in Chumash? It answers that although a particular act may not be a Torah prohibition, it might only be improper behavior, one must still give rebuke. However if the idea is to offer rebuke as a form of
chesed
, then even if it's not a prohibition but just improper behavior one should rebuke. If it's a matter of defending the honor of Hashem then rebuke would only apply to an actual sin not improper
middot
. If you have knowledge of a person's improper behavior but you have not seen it, perhaps one can suggest based on the Gemara in Erchin, that if it's a matter of helping a friend, you must give him rebuke. However if it's a matter of not being apathetic to sin perhaps one must only take a stand if the sin was done in one's presence.
|
|
Discovering Our Inherent Goodness Rebbetzin Tziporah Heller |
|
|
Tosefet Shabbat
Rabbi Shimon Isaacson
|
|
|
Parshat Balak
Bringing Spirituality into the Mundane
Rabbi Hershel Reichman
|
|
Naaleh College combines quality
convenience and affordability!
We accept Yeshiva/Seminary credits! Courses affordable when qualifying for the Dean's Scholarship
Check out our degree programs:
|
Please visit our
Refua Shleima Page for a current list of Cholim.
E-mail Ashley@naaleh.com to add a name to our Tehillim list.
|
|
|
|
|
|