Let's seize this opportunity to get AB 857 passed.
Take Action Today!
Legislative Background:
Assembly Members David Chiu (D-17 San Francisco) and Miguel Santiago (D-53 Los Angeles) authored AB 857 and submitted it on Feb. 20, 2019. Assembly Member Mark Stone from Santa Cruz County, member of the Banking and Finance Committee, has signed on as one co-author; so have Assembly Members Phil Ting (D-19 San Francisco/northern San Mateo County, Ash Kalra (D-27 eastern San Jose), and State Senator Scott Wiener (D-11 San Francisco/San Mateo County).
Background on Public Banking:
Assembly Member Stone (D-29, portions of Santa Cruz/Monterey Counties) reported to the Santa Cruz Public Banking group that the California Banking Association not only vigorously lobbying, but incorrectly stating that public banks are detrimental to credit unions and local banks.
The opposite is true. For example, in North Dakota that has had a state public bank for the past hundred years,
"the result of having a public bank has been profound (as of Sept. 2015): With 89 small and mid-sized community banks, and 38 credit unions, North Dakota has six times as many locally owned financial institutions per person as the rest of the nation. And these local banks and credit unions control a resounding 83 percent of the deposits of the state - more than twice the 30 percent market share that small and mid-sized financial institutions have nationally" from the Public Banking website.
Public banks are the opposite of Wall Street banks. Public banks work for the public good -- instead of giving our money to the corporate banks that put oodles of money into the pockets of their CEOs and investors; charge our cities, counties and states high interest for loans; and take hard-earned revenues out of our communities.
Public Banks get the capital they loan out from public money such as taxes or reserve funds. They are run by elected Boards, and by operating as not-for-profit banks can channel the tremendous amount of money spent on fees, interest, and high salaries into needed public projects. We can direct these "public monies" to affordable housing, lower charges on student loans, climate resiliency measures for our cities and counties, and environmental needs.
Public banks are governed by strict adherence to standards of racial, economic and community justice. Their very low-interest loan policies can be tailored to suit any community's ideals of benefits, desirable investments and outcomes.
We consumers generally bank at consumer banks. Public Banks generally do not provide a range of consumer services, so the credit unions and small local banks that we beneficially use would be supported and strengthened by public banks. People wanting their cities to divest from fossil fuels, found that small local banks and credit unions don't have the capacity cities and states need for banking services. So these activists proposed public banks as a place where cities, counties and states can put their money in good conscience.
Presently over 20 states
are at some stage of instituting public banking. Many countries already have public banks: in Germany they helped the country reduce dependence on fossil fuels; and in Japan they helped reduce the national debt.
The reason is clear, there is just too much money being handed over by local and state governments to the Wall Street corporate banking establishment! We need to democratize money and credit. We need money to fund education, transportation, housing, cleaning up the environment, and responding to global warming for the public good.
Here are examples of statements of support.
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors passed a Resolution that states their reasons for supporting AB 857. Here's the summary:
(We vote to)
Adopt the resolution supporting the establishment of a California municipal public banking license and supporting the concept of a state, regional, or network of public banks to provide cost-saving services to public entities and to serve local needs including affordable housing, transportation and education investment adhering to principles of economic, racial and environmental justice, and direct the Clerk of the Board to distribute the resolution as indicated, as recommended by Supervisor Coonerty.
Take Action Today!
Many thanks!
Randa Solick and Nancy Price for WILPF
People for Public Banking and the California Public Banking Alliance