|
|
|
Parshas Vayeitzei 5776
Candle Lighting Time: 4:23 pm
Nov 20, 2015
Volume 12 Issue 6
|
|
|
Printer Friendly Version
|
|
For a printer friendly version of Menucha Vesimcha and weekly update click here: Menucha Vesimcha |
|
Dvar Torah |
|
IN STONE
By Rabbi Yosef Prupas
There are verses in the Torah where a slight nuance in the wording can be explained in a way that would work with the simple understanding of the verse. Or, one can take the approach that any variance in a verse's wording alludes to something beneath the surface, waiting to be revealed. This week's parsha, Parshas Vayetzei, is one such example. We are told of how Yaakov, upon arriving at Har Hamoria, prepared for sleep by placing stones in a semi circle around his head to protect him from wild animals. Rashi points out that when Yaakov wakes up, the verse states that he took "the stone," and not "the stones," from under his head. Rashi explains that it is written in singular form to allude to a dispute between the stones that occurred that night. Each stone desired the merit of having the righteous Yaakov rest his head upon it. The end result of their argument was that they all merged into one. The Maharal laments, that unfortunately, since such an event is hard to believe, there are those who prefer to explain the use of the singular form in a way that wouldn't conflict with the simple understanding of the verse. Therefore, since one cannot ignore the words of the Medrash, how is this phenomenon to be explained? After all, it is well known that stones aren't capable of speech, nor can they transform into one entity.
One may prefer to avoid the hidden and mysterious elements of the Torah, but because it is all truth one must attempt to extrapolate that which can be understood and apply appropriately. The Maharal reveals that the soul of Yaakov was a lofty one. Yaakov had worked upon himself until he eventually rose to a high level of holiness and was by definition removed from all that was physical. The spiritual plane that Yakov was on demanded that all that related to him be in a unified form. While in the physical world there is diversity, in the spiritual world there is only unity. We find the children of Yaakov, in responding to his concern of the possibility of sin amongst them, saying, "just as in your heart there is only 'one' so too in our heart there is only one." (Pesachim 56a) There are other additional to this concept.
With this in mind we can now understand how stones can argue. They don't argue verbally, rather there was conflict that arose as a result of the need to unify in their connection with Yaakov. Because Yaakov's spiritual nature demanded that the stones somehow combine, the stones therefore morphed into one entity. It is for this reason all Jews are unified under one name - Klal "Yisrael," the name of Yaakov. "Yisrael" signifies the spiritual accomplishment of Yaakov. We are only "Klal Yisrael" when we are "K'ish echad b'lev echad," one body and one heart.
We can now understand why the holiday of Succos represents Yaakov. The Sukah is referred to as "Sukas Shalom," the Sukah of Peace. R' Eliyahu Dessler explains this is because the transitory nature of the Sukah reminds us that all in life is temporary. If one contemplates and internalizes this lesson, one will learn to focus on what is truly important in life: Torah and service of Hashem. If we live that way there will be no reason to fight, because our priorities and goals will be the same. As a result there will only be peace and unity, which is the attribute of Yaakov. May we merit true unity through the guidance of Torah, thereby meriting the coming of Moshiach speedily in our day.
|
|
Dvar Halacha
|
|
By
Rabbi Yochanan Eskenaz
i
The
brachos
are recited before lighting the
menorah
(Rama 676:6). Each night two
brachos
[1)
Lehadlik ner shel Chanukah
and 2)
She'asah neisim
]
are recited (Shulchan Aruch 676:2). On the first night one lights
,
a third
brachah
[
Shehecheeyanu
] is recited
. If one forgot
Shehecheeyanu
on the first night he lit
, he may recite it on the first night he remembers (Shulchan Aruch 676:1).
One should light immediately [within
toch k'dai dibbur
(a few seconds
)] of reciting the
brachos
.
The
minimum
mitzvas hadlakah
is to light one candle on each night.
It is preferable that the one who starts a
mitzvah
completes it.
Therefore, the one who recited the
brachos
should light all the candles himself.
If one did not, as long as he lit at least one candle it is not a
brachah l'vatalah
(Mishneh Berurah 671:48-49).
After lighting the first candle the
minhag
is to say
Ha'neiros hallalu
(Mishneh Berurah 676:8 & Aruch Hashulchan 676:8).
Others say it only after all the candles have been lit (Mishneh Berurah 676:8).
It is important to note, that if one talked before lighting at least one candle, this is considered an
interruption and he would be required to recite the
brachah
again before lighting.
Therefore, one has to be
very careful
not to start saying
Ha'neiros hallalu
until at least one candle was lit (Koveitz Halachos [
Piskei Harav Shmuel Kamenetsky, shlit"a
] 6:6).
If a person, after reciting his own
brachah,
but before he lit one candle answered
amen
to someone else's
brachah
on the
menorah,
it is
not
considered an interruption, and therefore he is not required to recite another
brachah
(Koveitz Halachos 6:9).
When lighting, it is proper to have in mind that he is lighting to give thanks and praise to
Hashem
on the miracle of the war [of the
Chashmonaiyim
] (Halichos Shlomo Moadim 1:16:9).
There are different opinions as to which direction one should light the
neiros
.
Whichever way one lights he has fulfilled the
mitzvah;
the difference of opinions is only which way is the most preferable (Mishneh Berurah 676:9 & Beur Halacha 676:5 s.v. k'day).
There is a
halachah, ain maveirin al ha
mitzvos
(we do not "pass over"
mitzvos
) (Gemara Pesachim 64b).
Therefore, if one is lighting starting from the left, one should stand towards the left side, as not to pass over candles on the right side (Mishneh Berurah 676:11).
A lefty should light with his left hand (Koveitz Halachos 5:4).
It is
prohibited
to use any of the
neiros Chanukah
for personal use (Shulchan Aruch 673:1) in order that it should be recognizable that these are
ner
mitzvah
(Mishneh Berurah 673:8).
Another reason suggested is that the
neiros
are lit as a
remembrance
to the
miracle
that was done with the
menorah
of the
Bais Hamikdash
which was
prohibited
to use for personal use (Mishneh Berurah 673:8).
In order to avoid using the light, the common custom is to light a
shamash
, so that if one accidentally does use the light we consider it as if he is using the light of the
shamash
and not of the
mitzvah
candles (Shulchan Aruch 673:1).
It is preferable that the
shamash
be higher than the other candles (Rama 673:1).
Nevertheless, even when one lit a
shamash,
one should
preferably
not use the
shamash
when it is together with the other candles, since it appears as if he is using the
mitzvah
candles (Mishneh Berurah 673:15).
It is prohibited to use the
neiros
starting from the time that they are lit through the time of the
mitzvas
hadlakah
[
ad shetichleh
regel min hashuk
] (Mishneh Berurah 673:21).
It is also
prohibited
to light other things from the
neiros Chanukah
(Shulchan Aruch 674:1), including lighting other
neiros shel mitzvah
[e.g.
Shabbos
candles] (Mishneh Berurah 674:9).
It is permitted to light other
Chanukah
candles from the
shamash
, because since it is the same
mitzvah
it is not considered a "disgrace" for the
mitzvah
(Shulchan Aruch 674:1).
|
|
|
About Us |
|
If you would like to receive Menucha Vesimcha by weekly email or to sponsor an issue of Menucha Vesimcha in someone's honor / memory, please contact the editor at: [email protected]
Philadelphia Community Kollel
364 Montgomery Avenue
Merion Station, Pennsylvania 19066
Philadelphia Community Kollel
610-668-9557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|