PRESERVATION ACTION LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
|
|
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
VOLUME 23, NUMBER 09
|
|
|
|
Preservation Action Submits Testimony to House Appropriations Committee in Support of Historic Preservation Priorities
|
President Announces Support for the Restore Our Parks and Full LWCF Funding. Legislation Introduced in the Senate
Last week, President Trump announced his support for the Restore Our Parks Act, which would address the deferred maintenance backlog at the National Park Service, and his support for full funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) at $900 million annually. Following the news, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell promised to bring legislation to the Senate floor.
The administration had previously expressed their support for addressing the deferred maintenance backlog at the National Park Service, but the announcement of full funding for the LWCF came as a surprise. President Trump's most recent FY21 budget request, called for a 97% cut to the LWCF.
A bipartisan group of Senators including Sen. Cory Garder (R-CO), Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) and 56 other bipartisan cosponsors introduced the Great American Outdoors Act (S. 3422) which combines the provisions of the Restore Our Parks Act and the legislation to fully fund for the LWCF. The bill would fully fund the LWCF at $900 million and provides $6.5 billion over five years to address the National Parks Service's deferred maintenance backlog, which estimated be nearly $12 billion, 43% of which is attributed to historic assets.
Urge your Senators to cosponsor S. 3422 today and to vote YES on this important legislation.
|
Preservation Action Submits Comments on the Proposed Changes to the National Environmental Protection Act
This week Preservation Action submitted comments to the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) responding to proposed revisions to the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). As stated in our comments, the proposed changes would have a dramatic impact on historic and cultural resources. NEPA regulations require federal agencies to consider a projects impact on the human environment, which includes historic and cultural resources. Like Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, NEPA requires public engagement and for federal agencies to consider alternatives before proceeding with a project that could impact historic resources, but does not mandate a particular outcome.
The proposed changes would make it easier for a federal agency to move forward with a project without public engagement by expanding the use of categorical exclusions and disregarding non-technical public comments. These changes would limit the ability of the public to express concerns about a federal project. Additionally, the proposed changes would remove or reduce the requirements of federal agencies to consider "cumulative" and "indirect" impacts of a project, and instead focus on effects that have a "close causal relationship". Limiting the consideration of indirect impacts, like changes to a setting, tourism and traffic would have a huge impact on historic resources.
|
Thanks for Another Successful Preservation Advocacy Week
|
|
National Park Service Acting Director David Vela speaking at Advocacy Week 2020 |
|
Preservation Action along with our partners at the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers just concluded another great National Historic Preservation Advocacy Week in Washington, DC this week. Despite contending with a unique set of circumstances as concern over Covid-19 rises, we were joined by more than 150 participants, representing 41 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. Thank you to everyone that helped make Advocacy Week 2020 a huge success.
The gathered group of preservation advocates were fortunate to hear from national preservation leaders and policy experts on the current legislative landscape and insight on conducting successful congressional visits. We were also honored to be joined by Acting Director of the National Park Service, David Vela
, Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee,
Rep. Raul Grijalva
(D-AZ) and Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY), who shared their unique perspectives on why historic preservation is important and how we could all be better preservation advocates.
The next day advocates from across the country took to the Hill and met with their members of congress in support of historic preservation priorities. In the evening, Preservation Action hosted the Champions of Historic Preservation Congressional Reception, where we thanked select members of Congress for their strong support and leadership on historic preservation.
Hill Report Forms/Follow Up
A
s preservationists return to the their home states as Hill veterans, remember to follow-up from your congressional visits. Send a personalized thank you note and invite members and staff to tour a historic tax credit project in-district.
|
National News
Stories From the States
|
|
|
|
|