Our Website Forums
|
|
Greetings!
Can a SAR catch a RAT?
In its just released review of Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) trends, tips, and issues, FinCEN included a brief, but illustrative statement about how a SAR filing eventually led to an indictment obtained in a "Cash Back" Mortgage Fraud Scheme.
It is interesting to take note of this example of how proper application of FinCEN's Anti-Money Laundering requirements for residential mortgage lenders and originators may lead to reducing mortgage fraud.
Let's look at some good compliance and investigative work and find out how the SAR caught a RAT.
Regards,
Jonathan Foxx
President & Managing Director
|
Smelling a RAT
|
The case had its origins in a review of SARs conducted by a specialized mortgage fraud task force. The task force then launched an investigation that led to charges against two individuals.
The defendants were charged with engaging in a scheme to defraud mortgage lenders in connection with residential real property purchases.
Not only was the SAR a critical component of uncovering the perpetrators, but also a would-be filed Currency Transaction Report (CTR) on one of the individuals further caused concern, triggering yet another SAR filing, because in addition to the SAR that initiated the case, the second SAR reported how the defendant became "very upset" when he learned that a CTR would be filed because of a series of transactions.
|
The Scheme
|
Here's how the scheme worked:
(1) One of the defendants acted as the recruiter, finding various individuals, including straw and nominal purchasers, to purchase more than 15 residential real estate properties.
(2) The recruiter orchestrated the purchase transactions while the second defendant, a mortgage broker, brokered the mortgage loans through his mortgage company.
(3) Although the buyers provided the mortgage broker with legitimate personal information, this defendant made false representations on the loan applications in regard to income, employment, and intent to occupy the residences
|
The Mark
|
But there's more.
The criminal complaint described in detail the defendants' efforts to defraud lenders through the straw buyers, including controlling all aspects of the purchases and the accounts.
The indictment in the case charged that fraudulent or false representations were made in obtaining 100% mortgage financing, including misstatements about the purchasers' monthly income, intent to occupy the property, and existing liabilities.
In each transaction, the purchase price was above (!) the true market price of the property.
An amount approximately equal to the difference between the purchase price and the true market price was then diverted as "cash back" at the close of each escrow to a bank account for a corporation.
|
SARs to the Rescue
|
As part of the scheme, these credits, which ranged from almost $42,000 to more than $137,000, were concealed from the mortgage lenders by the mortgage broker.
The mortgage broker, through his control over the corporation's bank account, used the fraudulently obtained funds for various purposes, including extensive cash withdrawals.
The SARs uncovered the perpetrators, as follows:
(1) A SAR review team identified a SAR filed on an associate of one of the defendants.
(2) Because the SAR listed mortgage loan fraud as the suspected violation type, the team referred the SAR to a mortgage fraud task force. The filer noted that the associate apparently misrepresented information on loan applications that were not performing. Also noted was the fact that the second defendant had acted as the loan agent and broker of record on the loans.
(3) Through research, the institution found that the associate had purchased several additional properties, with mortgage loans that totaled at least $450,000 for each purchase. The same title company closed all sales involved in the fraud.
(4) Eventually investigators found several additional SARs, including one with a nine page narrative describing activity on more than 17 individuals and businesses associated with the scheme.
(5) Investigators included many of the details described in the SARs in a criminal complaint and in the indictment charging both defendants with fraud.
|
Bilking a Bank
|
The losses caused by the defendants' conduct exceeded $2,500,000.
The defendants pleaded guilty to mail fraud and structuring currency transactions with a financial institution to evade the filing of CTRs.
|
Professional Assistance
|
Library
|
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
SAR Activity Review Trends, Tips & Issues (Issue 21)
May 9, 2012
|
Suite of Services
|
|
LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the United States specializing exclusively in outsourced mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of services in residential mortgage banking for banks and non-banks.
Pioneers in outsourcing solutions for mortgage compliance. Professional guidance and support to financial institutions!
Mortgage Compliance CFPB Examination Preparation Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Legal and Regulatory Compliance State Banking Examinations HUD/FHA Examinations Loan Originator Compensation Licensing Compliance HMDA/CRA and Fair Lending Information Technology & Security Training and Education Quality Control Prefunding Fannie LQI Audits Platform Development Retail and Wholesale Compliance Correspondent Compliance Servicer Compliance Affiliates Compliance (RESPA) Business Development Advertising Compliance Loss Mitigation Strategies Forensic Mortgage Services Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance (Part 404) Audit and Due Diligence Reviews Regulatory and Sales Training Portfolio Risk Management Credit Risk Management Loan Analytics Audits Compliance Audits Policies and Procedures Due Diligence Reviews Portfolio Purchase Audits GSE Applications Ginnie Mae Applications
This communication is sent to our valued clients and colleagues, who regularly receive our Mortgage Compliance Updates, Compliance Alerts, Commentaries, and related publications.
These publications are free to subscribers. Information contained herein is not intended to be and is not a source of legal advice.
� 2006-2012 Lenders Compliance Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|