August 3, 2022 | Volume 2 | Issue 9 | As of Week 30
Welcome to the Florida Disease Activity Update from the desk of Dr. Jonathan Day.
It continues to be Clarke’s privilege to share Dr. Day's weekly analysis of arbovirus disease activity in Florida with mosquito control professionals across the state. Our shared goal with Dr. Day is to provide timely and actionable information that mosquito control programs can use to make operational decisions and protect public health from vector-borne diseases.

An archive of all past newsletter issues remains available on the Clarke website.
A QUESTION FROM OUR READERS

Carol from Sanford, FL has a two-part question. The first part will be answered this week: “What is the difference between mechanical and biological disease transmission by blood-feeding arthropods?”

A. Blood-feeding arthropods (biting flies, mosquitoes, ticks, fleas, tsetse flies and kissing bugs to name a few) have a variety of methods to obtain the blood they need to develop eggs.

For example, horse flies, deer flies and black flies have mouthparts that work like scissors and a sponge. The scissors make a cut in the skin and the tongue laps up the blood. Mosquito mouthparts act like a scalpel and a straw; the cutting parts make a small incision in the skin through which a hollow tube is inserted. A pump in the mosquito’s neck creates a negative pressure and blood is drawn into the mosquito’s midgut. Mosquitos are “clean feeders” that leave no blood on their exterior mouthparts. In contrast, horse, deer, and black flies are “dirty feeders” that contaminate their entire head with blood during feeding. Because of this contamination, dirty feeders are able to transmit viruses directly from one host to another in a process known as mechanical transmission. Disease transmission by contaminated hypodermic needles is a form of mechanical transmission. Equine infections anemia is a retrovirus that is mechanically transmitted from horse to horse by biting flies.

Diseases transmitted by mosquitoes include malaria (a protozoan), dog heartworm (a nematode) and West Nile (a virus). The pathogens that cause these diseases must complete a reproductive cycle inside the mosquito before they can be transmitted to additional hosts. This is referred to as biological transmission. Pathogen reproductive cycles in the mosquito are temperature-dependent; the higher the environmental temperature, the faster the mosquito becomes infected and is able to transmit the pathogen to a new host. For example, it takes a mosquito approximately two weeks to become infected after taking a blood meal containing West Nile virus.
THE CURRENT OUTLOOK FOR ARBOVIRAL TRANSMISSION IN FLORIDA DURING 2022

Transmission of locally-acquired dengue in Miami-Dade County continues to ramp up and may present a problem during the coming weeks (please see below).
 
Transmission of EEEV seems to have leveled off in Florida. The 40 sentinel chicken seroconversions reported in Florida so far in 2022 are well below the 18-year average (2004-2021) of 133 per year. Likewise, the eight equine EEE infections reported so far this year are also well below the 18-year average of 45 per year. Equine infections peak in June and July (Figure 1) and it is unlikely that we will see a surge of EEEV transmission in the coming months.
Figure 1. EEE-positive equines reported in Florida by month of infection: 1982-2022.
Transmission of WNV in Florida during 2022 has had difficulty getting started. The 16 sentinel chicken seroconversions reported so far this year are well below the 21-year average (2001-2021) of 413 seroconversions per year. There have been no WN-positive equines reported so far in 2022 compared with a 21 year average of 60 positive equines per year. It is unlikely that we will see a significant widespread outbreak of WN in 2022.
 
There were 28 travel-related dengue introductions into Florida last week, 14 of which were in Miami-Dade County (Figure 2). A second locally-acquired dengue case was reported in Miami-Dade County last week. It is evident that local mosquitoes (probably Aedes aegypti) have been infected with DENV and are transmitting the virus to susceptible individuals in South Florida. The full extent of this outbreak remains to be determined. 
Figure 2. Travel-related dengue introductions in Florida during 2022. Counties in blue indicate introductions during 2022. Counties in red indicate the total number of dengue introductions in 2022 and recent introductions during Week 30.
Year to Date Summary of Mosquito-Borne Disease Transmission

As of Week 30, 2022, the following mosquito-borne disease transmission events and pathogen introductions have been reported in Florida:
Table 1. Summary of mosquito-borne disease transmission and introductions in Florida as of August 3, 2022 
The number of travel-related dengue cases introduced into Florida continues to increase.

The 12-year average (2010-2021) for travel-related dengue introductions into Florida is 105 per year. The 12-year average for locally-acquired dengue cases in Florida is 16 per year. During the past six weeks, there has been an average of 12 dengue introductions per week. It is likely that we will surpass the 12-year average of 105 Florida dengue introductions in the next couple of days. Most of these introductions continue to originate in Cuba and all four dengue serotypes have been introduced into Florida from Cuba during 2022. The continued increase in travel-related dengue introductions into South Florida and the report of locally-acquired dengue cases in Miami-Dade County suggests the possibility of a significant outbreak of dengue in South Florida during the coming weeks. Historically, most of the locally-acquired dengue cases reported in Florida have had onset in August (Figure 3).
Figure 3. The month of onset for locally-acquired dengue infections in Florida: 2009 to 2021.
OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES TO CONSIDER
Vector and arboviral surveillance remain some of the most important tools that vector control agencies currently have at their disposal. Arboviral transmission indices (sentinel chickens, positive equines, positive exotics such as emus), positive humans, and positive mosquito pools provide indicators of local virus transmission, although sometimes not in a timely manner. Monitoring mosquito populations and their age structure gives additional information about potential transmission risks. Supplemental vector control efforts in and around sites where virus transmission is known or suspected of recently occurring provide another mechanism to mitigate viral transmission.
 
Specific operational strategies will be discussed during the 2022 arboviral transmission season depending on where and when vector-borne disease transmission becomes obvious in Florida.
 
There is currently a low risk of EEEV transmission in Florida. 
 
There is currently a low risk of WNV transmission in Florida. Arboviral surveillance and reporting during the next weeks will help to determine the current situation relative to the transmission of EEE and WN viruses throughout the state.
 
There is currently a moderate to high risk of local dengue transmission in South Florida (Figures 2 and 3). The appearance of two locally-acquired dengue cases in Miami-Dade County in June and July and the continued influx of travel-related dengue cases into South Florida increase the risk of a local outbreak. As of now, Miami-Dade County is the most likely spot for such an outbreak. Increased Aedes aegypti control in areas surrounding locally-acquired and travel-related dengue cases will help to reduce potentially infected vector mosquitoes. Source reduction, the emptying, and where possible the destruction, of all water-holding containers remains the most productive control method against the likely dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. Cryptic Ae. aegypti breeding habitats remain a huge problem in places where this species is abundant. The location of these cryptic habitats remains one of the primary challenges for vector control agencies dealing with dengue outbreaks. 
ABOUT DR. JONATHAN DAY
Jonathan Day, Professor Emeritus of Medical Entomology from the University of Florida, is a national expert on mosquitoes and other blood-feeding arthropods that transmit diseases to humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. In collaboration with other researchers, Dr. Day has developed an effective system for monitoring and predicting epidemics of mosquito-borne diseases.
Acknowledgments: This analysis would not be possible without the tireless efforts of multiple agencies across Florida. At least 27 Florida agencies collect serum samples from sentinel chickens each week and mail them to the Florida Department of Health Tampa Branch Laboratory for analysis, compilation and reporting. Data are summarized by researchers at the Florida Department of Health in Tallahassee and reported weekly as the Florida Arbovirus Surveillance Report.

Contributors to this summary and full report include: Andrea Morrison, PhD, MSPH, Rebecca Zimler, PhD, MPH, and Danielle Stanek, DVM, Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology; Lea Heberlein-Larson, DrPH; Alexis LaCrue, PhD, MS; Maribel Castaneda, and Valerie Mock, BS, Florida Department of Health Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, and Carina Blackmore, DVM, PhD, FDOH Division of Disease Control and Health Protection. And, Dr. Rachel Lacey, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory in Kissimmee, FL.

Daily updates of the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) are produced by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Forest Service.

All of the graphics used in issues of this Newsletter are designed and developed by Gregory Ross.
Presented by
Clarke has been helping make communities more livable, safe and comfortable since 1946.
Learn more about our work in protecting public health on clarke.com.