This week's Parsha newsletter and more on Naaleh.com!

www.Naaleh.com
Connect with Us:
Naaleh College combines quality
convenience and affordability!
We accept Yeshiva/Seminary credits!
Courses affordable when qualifying for the Dean's Scholarship 
Check out our degree programs:
For more information: NaalehCollege.com
(305) 944-0035 
[email protected]
Dear  Naaleh Friend, 

In this week's featured Torah class on Parshat Vayigash, Mrs. Chana Prero discusses why the blessings to Yaakov invoke Hashem as G-d of Yitzchak and not as G-d of Avraham.  The class is called  Parshat Vayigash: Father's Merit from the Naaleh series  Parsha Study Group.  

 To watch this class now and to learn more please click on the image below: 
 
parsha study group

This week's edition of our Torat Imecha Newsletter on Parshat Vayigash is available on our  Newsletter pageClick here  for the printer friendly version, to share at your Shabbat table! Be sure to visit the homepage as well, for many more inspiring Torah classes! 

Shabbat Shalom!

-Ashley Klapper and the Naaleh Crew
For Tehillim list please click here to view our Refuah Shleima page
Chariots Consideration: Parshat Vayigash
Based on a Naaleh.com shiur by Mrs. Shira Smiles
Summary by Channie Koplowitz Stein
After Yosef revealed himself to his brothers, it was time for Yaakov and the whole family to reunite and come to Egypt. To this purpose, Paro told Yosef to load up the brother's animals and send wagons back to Canaan to transport the entire family to Egypt. When the brothers return, they told Yaakov the amazing news about Yosef. When Yaakov saw the wagons, he believed his sons and his spirit revived.
 
The commentators focus on the significance of the wagons and how they revived Yaakov's spirit. The most widely accepted answer is a play on the Hebrew word for wagon(s),  eglah / agalot . By sending these wagons, Yosef alluded to the last Torah topic he had studied with his father, eglah arufah , the calf that would be killed as atonement after finding a murdered man between two cities. By sending the wagons, Yosef was telling his father that Torah was still important to him, even after all these years in Egypt.
 
Rabbi Z. Leff asks, if Paro commanded Yosef to send wagons how could they serve as an allusion?  The  Netivot Chaim explains that while the wagons were indeed authorized by Paro, Yosef packed the animals full of provisions for the journey, but the wagons remained empty. If one understands that the  eglah  that would atone for the murder victim was one that had never born a burden, one can understand why Yosef sent the wagons empty and put the loads on the donkeys instead.
 
The laws of  eglah arufah  are meant to teach important ideas. Both Rabbi Belsky and Rabbi Frand teach that escorting a traveler and providing food for the journey gives him the self-confidence and dignity to fend off his attackers (or make him seem a less easy target). Yosef is thus telling his father that he survived and maintained his Jewish identity by remembering his relationship with his father.  Rabbi M. Ezrachi points out that the crux of the  eglah arufah  ritual is the declaration by the elders that they did not spill the blood of this man.  But there is a second responsibility they may not have met. They should have also have noticed the people at risk who may already have been on a criminal path. They should have stepped in and, with sensitivity and caring, brought them back from a violent lifestyle.   Each of us serves as a role model to others at one time. We must always act responsibly, for a careless action on our part may be the catalyst for someone else's first step away from the Torah.    
 
Rabbi Leff points out that Paro sent empty wagons to express his hope that Yaakov would leave not only his physical possessions behind, but also his spiritual identity. But Yosef sent additional wagons so that Bnei Yisroel were able to bring down their belongings and by extension their unique culture. Yaakov understood that Yosef himself had maintained his spiritual connection to  Am Yisroel . In fact, according to the Medrash, Yehudah destroyed Paro's wagons because they were decorated with idolatrous images. Rabbi Leff sees here the inherent message that wherever we find ourselves, we can carry the sanctity of the community with us and not succumb to the lures of other cultures. In connecting this to eglah arufah , Rabbi Leff posits that by escorting a traveler, one arms him with the spiritual protection of the community.
 
The  Shvilei Pinchas  discusses the symbolism of the wheels, the  g a lg a l im  of the  a g a l ot , the wagons. When we pronounce the four letter name of Hashem, we think that it refers to all times, h a y a h /past,  h o v e h /present, and  y i h i y e h /future. Numerically, the all temporal God is the Master of the  g a lg a l , the turning wheels of time. Yosef encouraged his father to go down to Egypt, for although Bnei Yisroel would be enslaved there, the wheels would keep turning, and their enslavement in Egypt would be a necessary step in the purification process to bring Bnei Yisroel to receive the Torah at Sinai.



The Men of the Great Assembly taught three very important principles. " Hevu metunim ba'din ," the beit din should not be hasty when they pass judgement. " V'ha'amidu talmidim harbeh ," and have many students. They will ask questions of their teachers and thereby sharpen their minds and make the halacha clearer.  ' V'asu seyag l'Torah ." Seyagim are fences, added restrictions that protect us from violating the mitzvot. Every person should be careful about this.
 
The Midrash tells us that Hashem, Moshe Rabbeinu, and the Torah itself made a seyag . The Mishna tells us that Hashem said to Moshe, "In the future when the Jewish people will be exiled from their land they will ask, 'Why did Hashem do this?'  And Hashem tells Moshe that the answer is written right in the Torah, ' Asher azvu et briti Hashem v'avdu Elohim acheirim . They worshipped idols of other nations.' "  It does not mean they actually bowed to statues. It means they thought that their daily lives depended on a power other than Hashem. Galut happens because we do not keep the Torah and mitzvot. We need to create seyagim to help us do so and to make Hashem the unifying force in our life.
 
We find that Adam Harishon also made a seyag . He told Chava that she could not eat from the Tree of Knowledge , and she could not touch it either. Chava violated the seyag and brought death to the world. Had she observed it, the whole history of the world would have been different.  
 
We see that seyagim are good for beit din , and for Hashem. Why do individuals have to make a seyag ? What right does a person have to add on new restrictions?  
 
The power of a seyag is to help us control ourselves. " Mi ke'amcha Yisrael goy echad b'aretz ..."   Echad does not mean one, but unique. We are a special nation. If it's a law in the Shulchan Aruch, it's enough for us to keep it.  We don't need any other ways or means of stopping our desires.  It's not something impossible or above us, or only for the elite among us. We can accept the halacha and fulfilling it. Klal Yisrael are the descendants of Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov. Our ancestors said, " Naaseh v'nishma , We will do and then hear," and we should strive to continue to embody that commitment.



The poskim address the question of including a boy younger than bar mitzvah in a minyan, when there are only nine men available. The basis of this practice is a discussion in Masechas Berachos. The Talmud teaches that ten men are required for a minyan , but nine men plus the aron kodesh doesn't count, since an aron kodesh is not a human being. Rabbeinu Tam refers to the practice of counting a boy under bar mitzvah - even if he is holding a chumash - as a minhag shtus (foolish custom). Just as the aron kodesh doesn't count, a chumash or a Sefer Torah wouldn't count, even if you have someone holding it.
However, there are some prominent authorities such as the Magen Avraham who disagree and maintain that it would be acceptable. Others suggest that even according to early authorities who permitted it, they did not mean a printed chumash, but a real Sefer Torah . This is why those who still do this today will have the boy stand near the aron kodesh with the Sefer Torah so he's holding not just a chumash but a Sefer Torah as well. Although one may not make fun of this custom, we avoid it when possible, in keeping with the view of the Rabbeinu Tam and other primary medieval authorities.  
The Kitzur notes that one should pay attention to the recital of the kaddish and to answer amen with concentration , and especially amen yehei shemei rabbah . The sages taught that one who recites Amen yehei shemei rabbah with all his physical strength and mental concentration receives forgiveness for his sins. Even if there was a negative decree issued against him it will be annulled when he proclaims this amen yehei shemei rabbah . One should ideally answer Amen yehei shemei rabbah out loud. However, the Kitzur warns not to yell too loud as it may make people laugh and cause them to sin. They shouldn't laugh, but you shouldn't put yourself in a position where people would do that.     
The Kitzur writes further that we answer Amen yehei shemei rabbah yisbarach .  Then the chazzan repeats yisbarach and we answer Amen. This is not the general custom. The Mishne Berura refers to various practices regarding how far one should answer. Is yisbarach the end of yehei shemei rabbah or is it the beginning of the next sentence? There are different customs. Some answer Amen yehei shemei rabbah and then begin yisbarach as the new sentence. Others follow the practice noted in the Kitzur, answering yisbarach with the yehei shemei rabbah . There is a third practice maintained by chassidim and sefardim to go even further until d'amerin b'alma .  
How should one conduct oneself? For public responses and declarations, one has to follow the custom of the shul one is davening in. Failing to do so may be a Torah violation of, " Lo titgodedu ." The Gemara in Yevamot interprets this to mean, " Lo tei'asu agudot ," don't create a situation in which everyone is doing their own thing.  A community should follow a uniform practice. There are two distinct interpretations among medieval commentators as to what this means. Is it primarily in order to not give the impression that there are two different codes of law?  Others say if forcing everyone to keep the same custom will cause fighting, then it's probably better to leave it alone.  
The Chofetz Chaim though did not hold this way.  The Mishne Berurah says each shu l should have one uniform custom. If a community has a very strong minhag that everyone answers Amein yehei shemei rabbah without yisbarach , then that's what one should do. If it's not clear, some are saying yisbarach and some are saying until l'almeh olmayah, then one could follow one's own custom.



Featured Classes
Parshat Vayigash
Rabbi Hershel Reichman
Destruction of Unity - The Three Weeks Rebbetzin Tziporah Heller
Parshat Vayigash Confrontation of Kings Rabbi Hanoch Teller
Please visit our Refua Shleima Page for a current list of Cholim.
E-mail [email protected] to add a name to our Tehillim list.