November 3, 2016

In This Issue
Committee
NTSF
Midwest Plant Closures
Nuclear News
Important Dates
2016

Nov. 3-4: Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force Fall Meeting, Atlantic City, NJ

Nov. 29: Rail/Routing AHWG Meeting (in conjunction with MRMTC meeting), St. Louis, MO:
Register Here

Nov. 30-Dec. 1: MRMTC Fall Meeting, St. Louis, MO:
Register Here

Dec. 7-8: Southern States Energy Board Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee Winter Meeting, Myrtle Beach, SC

Dec. 13-14: Western Interstate Energy Board High-Level Radioactive Waste Committee Fall Meeting, Phoenix, AZ

2017

Jan. 24-26: Tribal Caucus Mid-Year Meeting, Charlotte, NC 

March 5-9: Waste Management Symposium 2017, Phoenix, AZ:
More information

June 6-8: NTSF 2017 Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA
Quick Links
Join Our List
COMMITTEE HAPPENINGSCommittee
Fall Meeting Registration Closes Monday!people meeting
There are just four days left to register for the Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee's fall meeting on November 30-December 1 in St. Louis. Online meeting registration is open at this site and will remain open until November 7. The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites by Hilton St. Louis Downtown. An updated meeting agenda is available here. As a reminder the Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail/Routing Ad Hoc Working Group will be co-locating its meeting with the Committee on November 29 from 9 am to 5 pm. If you have any meeting-related questions, please contact Lisa Janairo.

Another reminder for the Committee: the Midwest will be hosting the 2018 Annual Meeting of the National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) and it is up to members to recommend locations to the NTSF Planning Committee. Thank you to those who have already submitted nominations for the following cities:
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • Indianapolis, IN
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Minneapolis, MN
If you would like to nominate a different city for the 2018 meeting, please send an email to Lisa by next Friday, November 11, with your suggestion and some "selling points" that would make that city a great choice--things like being a hub for a major airline, having nuclear- or transportation-related sites nearby for touring, or having amenities like ballparks or lots of great restaurants within walking distance from major hotels. Remember, the city you nominate does not necessarily have to be in your state, and even though Chicago and Minneapolis have already hosted, those cities can be nominated again. The complete list of nominations and potential dates in 2018 will be discussed at the meeting in St. Louis.
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM NTSF

NTSF News and EventsNTSF The NTSF Planning Committee continues holding monthly conference calls to discuss the 2017 Annual Meeting of the NTSF and plan other activities for the next fiscal year. On the Planning Committee's call in October, members worked on finalizing an agenda structure for 2017. 

Also on the call, the Planning Committee approved the creation of a new ad hoc working group (AHWG) to review communication materials from the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Integrated Waste Management (formerly the Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Project). Leads for the AHWG are Giulia Bisconti (DOE), Ken Niles (Oregon), and Lisa Janairo (CSG Midwest). Invites have gone out to prospective members from each state regional group and the Tribal Caucus. The AHWG leads are hoping to schedule a conference call later this month.

In other Planning Committee news, the following webinar topics have been agreed on and planning will get underway soon:
  • Greater-Than-Class-C Low-Level Radioactive Waste Environmental Impact Statement and Report to Congress
  • DOE: The Year in Preview
  • Section 180(c) Proposed Policy Implementation Exercise: Lessons Learned and Next Steps
  • Consent-Based Siting: Draft Site Selection Process Document
  • Getting to Know the NTSF: An Orientation for Newcomers
Please relay any other webinar topic suggestions to Katelyn Tye, or your organization's representative on the Planning Committee.

Finally, a preliminary agenda for the Rail/Routing AHWG meeting in St. Louis (in conjunction with the Midwest's fall committee meeting) is available online. As was mentioned in the Committee Article, registration for the meeting closes on Monday, November 7.
FOCUS THIS MONTH third

Fort Calhoun Nuclear Generating Station in Nebraska
Another Midwest Plant Shutters; Two Remain in Limbo
Nebraska's Fort Calhoun nuclear station officially closed at the end of October, while the Quad Cities and Clinton plants in Illinois are on the chopping block, pending action from the state legislature this fall.

The plant owners cited economic conditions in their decisions to cease operations - specifically, cheap natural gas and the failure of energy markets to reward nuclear with the same zero-carbon emissions credit given to renewable energy sources.

At a recent forum on nuclear energy organized by the University of Illinois, Illinois Sen. Donne Trotter said that the closure of the Clinton and Quad Cities plants would result in the loss of $21 million in property taxes, $1.2 billion of economic activity, and over 4,000 jobs.

Trotter is the co-sponsor of legislation (SB 1585) that would improve market conditions for nuclear power. The Next Generation Energy Plan would establish a Zero Emissions Standard, which would require the Illinois Power Agency to procure contracts for zero emission credits from nuclear utilities. Crain's Chicago Business reported in late October that a draft version of the bill will use the "social cost of carbon" to calculate the base subsidies for nuclear plants. Additional adjustments would then be made based on market conditions.

As of late October, Trotter was hoping to pass the legislation during the Illinois General Assembly's fall veto session. If the legislation does not pass, Exelon has promised to close the Clinton plant in 2017 and the Quad Cities plant in 2018. With the closures, both communities would lose not only their largest job provider, but also a major tax base.

"When you take that kind of money out of the local economy and schools, it's really going to hurt," says Illinois Rep. Pat Verschoore, who represents the state on the Council of State Governments' Midwestern Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee.

In Nebraska, the recently shuttered Fort Calhoun, which employed about 700 workers, was one of two nuclear plants in the state and produced a quarter of the state's clean electricity.

The Nebraska Emergency Management Agency receives revenue from the state's nuclear plants as reimbursement for developing radiological emergency preparedness plans and conducting training for first responders. With the closure of Fort Calhoun, the fund that is used for preparation and training of emergency management personnel for accidents involving radiological materials will be cut in half.

Fort Calhoun will now undergo a $1 billion decommissioning and decontamination project, a process that could take up to 60 years to complete. As is the case at four other shutdown reactors in the Midwest (Zion, Big Rock Point, La Crosse and Kewaunee), the spent nuclear fuel will remain in storage at Fort Calhoun until a centralized storage facility or a permanent repository for the nation's waste is established.
NUCLEAR NEWS NuclearNews

Dairyland Power Cooperative Wins $73.5 Million Settlement from DOE
Last month, Dairyland Power Cooperative--owner of the LaCrosse Boiling Water Reactor--announced it had won a $73.5 million settlement from DOE in exchange for having to store spent nuclear fuel onsite at the facility.

According to the La Crosse Tribune, the cooperative's board will decide what to do with the settlement money. Half of the last settlement award was returned to its members and the rest was used for rate relief.

As was mentioned in a previous newsletter, Dairyland has since transferred the license for the La Crosse plant to LaCrosse Solutions, LLC for decommissioning, which is estimated to be complete in 2018.

Thank you to Committee Co-Chair Teri Engelhart (Wisconsin) for sharing this news.

Union Pacific Cars Carrying Octene Derail in Wisconsin
Late in the evening on October 24, four Union Pacific cars carrying octene derailed near Highway 35 in the Town of Superior, Wisconsin. Three of the cars rolled on their sides and one leaked the flammable liquid, according to a report from Wisconsin Public RadioThe derailment took place on track owned by BNSF.

At the time of the report, a uthorities were not sure how much octene spilled or what the timeline for the cleanup would be. The exact cause of the derailment was also still under investigation. Luckily, none of the rail crew or members of the public were injured during the incident.

West Valley Melter Shipment Gets Public Attention
Last month, a blogger for the website TruckYeah! posted photos and a narrative about a truck shipment of nuclear waste that was spotted on its way from West Valley Nuclear Services near Buffalo, NY. Included in the blog posted is a one-and-a-half minute video of the shipment and its convoy as it passes through a residential area.

In related news, DOE's Office of Environmental Management has released a fact sheet on the West Valley Melter transport at the end of October. According to the fact sheet, the shipment would take place mostly via rail through New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, and New Mexico, before ending up at Waste Control Specialists in Andrews, Texas.

Thank you to Mike Wangler (DOE-EM) for sharing the shipment fact sheet.
Thank you for reading. Watch for the next edition to come out on December 8, 2016.
Please do not reproduce or create new content from this material without the prior express written permission of CSG Midwest.

This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Numbers DE-NE0000555, DE-EM0002121, and DE-EM00002327.  

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.