Employee Rights Briefing
February 2017
What We're Reading
The Institute News


Employee Rights In The News news
In The News
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is seeking public input on its Proposed Enforcement Guidance on Harassment. The deadline for submitting comments has been extended to March 21, 2017.



Workers' rights advocates seeking inspiration as we enter the Trump Administration should review outgoing Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez's cabinet exit memo, Department of Labor: Memorandum to the American People, issued on January 5, 2017.



In a January 6, 2017 editorial, A Resurrected House Rule Lets Congress Go Open Season On Civil Servants, The Washington Post Editorial Board derided House Republicans for reinstating the Holman Rule, last used over a century ago, which allows members of Congress to offer amendments to bills that would target individual government workers by slashing their annual salary to $1.






Now that they have full control of the federal government, Republicans are moving forward with a bill to implement right-to-work legislation on the federal level. So-called "right-to-work" laws provide that workers can refuse to pay union dues even though they receive all the benefits and protections provided by the union (what critics call the free-rider problem). For more on the effects of right-to-work legislation on employees, see John Nichols' article in The Nation, " Why Workers Everywhere Should be Scared By Kentucky's Assault on Unions."



ProPublica is investigating the effects that the recent blocking of the DOL Overtime Rule is having on workers and is seeking input from workers who make between $450 and $920 per week.



On January 23, 2017, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) launched the Perkins Project on Worker Rights and Wages to track the Trump Administration's wage, labor, and employment policies, and hold them accountable for their record. According to EPI's press release, the project will be "[l]ed by former Department of Labor Chief Economist Heidi Shierholz... [and] will document and fight any attempts to dismantle the laws and regulations that protect and defend American workers."



Workers' Rights By The Numbers:

4
The number of times Secretary of Labor nominee Andrew Puzder's committee hearing has been rescheduled .
( CNN )

$8.90
The average minimum wage per hour among the 29 states that have adopted a standard higher than the federal minimum wage .
( Economic Policy Institute )

27
The number of  states that have so-called "right-to-work" laws on the books, now that Gov. Mark Bevin has signed legislation enacting the policy in Kentucky.
 
30
The number of minutes that the Department of Labor's report on LGBT rights in the workplace remained on its website
after Donald Trump's inauguration .
( CBS News )
 
36
The number of cents a Native American woman earns for every dollar earned by a white man in the food-supply industry.
Employee Rights In The Courtscourts
In The Courts
On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and consolidated a trio of forced arbitration cases. In Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, Ernst & Young, LLP v. Morris, and National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., the parties seek to determine whether forced arbitration clauses containing class and collective action waivers conflict with the employees' right to engage in "concerted activities" for the purpose of "mutual aid or protection," as provided by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Norris-LaGuardia Act (NLGA), rendering those waivers unenforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Elizabeth Colman, The Institute's Paul H. Tobias (PHT) Fellow, synthesized the arguments in the cases in her blog post, Horton Comes to a Head: U.S. Supreme Court Poised To Resolve Conflict Regarding Workers' Rights to Act Collectively.



On January 12, 2017, in Dittman v. UPMC dba The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a divided Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that a university medical center did not owe a duty to its employees' to protect confidential information about them that was stored on the medical center's computer system.



On January 25, 2017, in Salinas v. Commercial Interiors, the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed its two-part test and added a new 6-factor analysis to determine whether two persons or entities constitute a joint employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In so finding, the court refocused the analysis on the relationship between the two employing entities and rejected the application of common law control tests normally utilized in determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor.
The Institute News
inst1Workers Beware: Forced Arbitration Can Happen To You
The use of forced arbitration clauses in the workplace is becoming more and more pervasive. Yet, because the proceedings often are confidential, it is impossible to know how many employees are affected. To expose companies that try to shield themselves from public accountability, The Institute has recently launched its Workers Beware project, which enables employees to discover whether an employer is known to force its workers to forego their rights in exchange for a paycheck. Now workers and allies can use our new reporting tool to help expand this list by identifying companies that attempt to hide their bad behavior behind the closed doors of forced arbitration proceedings.



inst2The Faces Of Forced Arbitration
The Institute would like to invite you to be a part of a new project it is developing: The Faces Of Forced Arbitration. Too often, discussions of forced arbitration involve a lot of legal and technical jargon, while the human impact is lost. The Faces Of Forced Arbitration will serve as a platform for workers to tell their personal stories and share the real harm they endure when they lose their right to go to court. In order for this project to be successful, we need employees who have suffered under the weight of a forced arbitration clause to come forward. Please share information about this project with your networks, and encourage the people you know who have been harmed by forced arbitration to speak up. If you know of any employees who would like to participate in this groundbreaking effort, please have them contact PHT Fellow Elizabeth Colman at [email protected].



inst3Taking "Forced" Out Of Arbitration
The Institute is sharing far and wide its recently published Taking "Forced" Out Of Arbitration: How Forced Arbitration Harms America's Workers to educate the public about forced arbitration of workplace disputes and why it jeopardizes workers' rights and their access to the courts. Taking "Forced" Out Of Arbitration includes a plain language description of forced arbitration; an explanation of why forced arbitration harms employees and results in poor outcomes; and employee stories that provide real world examples of the negative impact of forced arbitration on workers. The publication is available in English, Spanish, and Chinese. To obtain a free hard copy, contact Maria Rapier at (415) 296-7629 or [email protected].
The Employee Rights Briefing is a monthly newsletter designed to help keep you up-to-date on breaking news and emerging trends impacting America's workers. From the growth of forced arbitration of employment disputes, to employee misclassification, to stories of wage theft and workplace discrimination, the Employee Rights Briefing will report on employment law and policy developments from the federal government to state legislatures to the courtroom and everywhere in between. Our goal is to provide you with a digestible snapshot of the events shaping employment law and policy, so that you can be kept abreast of the most important issues facing today's workers.

We welcome your feedback! If you have any questions, or are aware of any stories or issues you think should be included in the Employee Rights Briefing, please contact us. If you would prefer not to receive the Briefing in the future please unsubscribe below.