Are You Worried?
1)
In 2016, all presidential campaigns were
OPAQUE to American voters. An
ordinary citizen would not have been able to find a phone or fax number,
or an
email address,
or a website to make a suggestion to a campaign.
Even
donors and volunteers for future events could not find a way to make
a
suggestion.
In 2008, citizen voices were still eagerly sought. Why the
drastic change? Implications?
2) The near unanimity of the media endorsements plus the recommendation
of the top political leaders of BOTH
parties, failed to elect Hillary Clinton
.
Is there any
institution that the
American voters still respect?
On the other hand,
one could see a silver lining from the above -- America
is still a young nation capable of changing its course dramatically.
3) Although the election is over, the partisan fever has risen higher among
some Democratic voters. Everyone hates the political gridlock in D.C.
However, are we aware that the ULTIMATE reason for the political
grid
lock in D.C. is the partisan fever of voters like you and me?
Defects that have always existed in Our Presidential Elections
a) Requiring way too much $$$$$. The combined campaign cost was $(1.4
+ 0.9) billion. Implications?
b) Candidates either expected us to be too sophisticated to believe in their
campaign rhetoric, or too dumb to know that we're being fooled, or too
cynical to care. [Note: Some of us might take on all 3 of the above
characteristics when it came to defending our favorite candidate.]
- - - - This "2016 election" series ENDS.- - - -
Continued Good News
Andrew Lam, the author of NY Time's Op Ed,
emailed me:
"Dear Dr. Woo,
. . . . I just wanted to introduce myself and ask you to put me
back on
your newsletter email list. I respect everything you've
done to advance the cause of Asian Americans. Andrew"
Andrew is a summa cum laude graduate of Yale, an M.D. who is a distinguished retinal surgeon, and the
author of two books:
It won the Best Book Award from the Chinese American Librarians Association a couple years ago and some other awards. I bought
a copy. :-)
The Petition is Actually Failing!
Although the petition presents a thoughtful, unique, middle-of-the-road
solution to college admissions, it is failing. Click here to see that it
has only about 2,000 petitioners thus far, including that of Andres Lam. It
must get 50 times more signers in 1.5 years
or fail. Why is it failing?
Because many of us
don't care
enough
about our own rights and those of our children.
if the petition fails to reach 100,000 petitioners in another 1.5 years.
S. B. Woo
President and a volunteer for the past 18 years
80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc, a 501 C-3 organization,
http://www.80-20educationalfoundation.org/index.php
To know more about 80-20, view these videos :
|