Worrisome Implications for US Democracy

                                            Are You Worried?

1) In 2016, all presidential campaigns were OPAQUE to American voters. An 
    ordinary citizen would not have been able to find a phone or fax number, 
    or an  email address,  or a website to make a suggestion to a campaign. 
    Even  donors and volunteers for future events could not find a way to make 
    a  suggestion.   In 2008, citizen voices were still eagerly sought.  Why the
    drastic change?  Implications?

2) The near unanimity of the media endorsements plus the recommendation 
    of the top political leaders of BOTH  parties, failed to elect Hillary Clinton
    Is there any  institution that the  American voters still respect?  

     On the other hand,  one could see a silver lining from the above -- America
      is still a young nation capable of changing its course dramatically.

3)  Although the election is over, the partisan fever has risen higher among
      some Democratic voters.  Everyone hates the political gridlock in D.C. 
      However, are we aware that the ULTIMATE reason for the political 
      grid lock in D.C. is the partisan fever of voters like you and me?

      Defects that have always existed in Our Presidential Elections

a) Requiring way too much $$$$$.  The combined campaign cost was $(1.4
    + 0.9) billion.  Implications?

b)  Candidates either expected us to be too sophisticated to believe in their
     campaign rhetoric, or too dumb to know that we're being fooled, or too 
     cynical to care. [Note: Some of us might take on all 3 of the above 
     characteristics when it came to defending our favorite candidate.]

                  - - - - This "2016 election" series ENDS.- - - -

                                   Continued Good News

      Andrew Lam, the author of NY Time's Op Ed,
emailed me:

    "Dear Dr. Woo, 
          . . . . I just wanted to introduce myself and ask you to put me 
       back on  your newsletter email list. I respect everything you've 
       done to advance the cause of Asian Americans.     Andrew"

    Andrew is a summa cum laude graduate of Yale, an M.D. who is a distinguished retinal surgeon, and the  author of two books:
     "Saving Sight",  an Amazon.com best seller, and
     "Two Sons of China", which is based on a true story in China during WWII.
                It won the Best Book Award from the Chinese American Librarians                     Association a couple years ago and some other awards.  I bought 
                a copy.  :-)
     
     He just joined 80-20's petition.   Won't YOU join the petition too?
   
                           The Petition is Actually Failing!
  
      Although the petition presents a thoughtful, unique, middle-of-the-road  solution to college admissions, it is failing.  Click here to see that it
has only about 2,000 petitioners thus far, including that of Andres Lam.  It 
must get 50 times more signers in 1.5 years  or fail.  Why is it failing?   Because many of us don't care enough  about our own rights and those of our children. 

       Won't YOU join the petition?  Your $10 donation  will be returned to you, 
if the petition fails to reach 100,000 petitioners in another 1.5 years.


S. B. Woo 
President and a volunteer for the past 18 years
80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc, a 501 C-3 organization,
http://www.80-20educationalfoundation.org/index.php


To know more about 80-20, view these videos :
https://youtu.be/dB3eGVqG-wA  ( I gnore the last 35 secs. The election is over. )