Mirick O'Connell Header
L ABOR, E MPLOYMENT  AND E MPLOYEE B ENEFITS L AW  UPDATE
Follow our Blog
"Off the Clock"
 
SPOTLIGHT ATTORNEY:

  


 Amanda Baer


 

Bob Kilroy

Join Our Mailing List 
July 27, 2017
Massachusetts Enacts
Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
On July 27, 2017, Governor Charlie Baker signed the Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act ("PWFA").  Historically, courts have struggled with the issue of whether pregnancy is a "disability" that must be accommodated under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA") as well as under Massachusetts law.  The PWFA resolves that issue and conclusively establishes that pregnancy, and any related conditions, must be accommodated and that discrimination against pregnant workers is prohibited. 
 
The PWFA goes into effect April 1, 2018 and amends Chapter 151B to:
  • Add "pregnancy or a condition related to said pregnancy, including, but not limited to, lactation, or the need to express breast milk for a nursing child" as a protected classification;
  • Require employers to provide a reasonable accommodation (see below) for an employee's pregnancy, or any condition related to the pregnancy, unless the employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship;
  • Prohibit employers from retaliating against an employee for requesting an accommodation;
  • Provide that employers must reinstate the employee to her original employment status or equivalent position with equivalent pay and accumulated seniority when the need for reasonable accommodations ceases; and
  • Prohibit employers from imposing accommodations, including leaves of absence, upon pregnant employees.
With respect to the requirement that employers provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant employees, the PWFA specifically enumerates several reasonable accommodations, including: (1) more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks; (2) paid or unpaid time off to recover from childbirth; (3) acquisition or modification of equipment or providing seating; (4) temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position; (5) job restructuring; (6) light duty; (7) private non-bathroom space for expressing milk; (8) assistance with manual labor; and (9) modified work schedules.  Under the ADA, employers can require employees to submit documentation to support their need for a reasonable accommodation.  The PWFA, however, prohibits employers from requiring documentation to support three reasonable accommodations: more frequent restroom, food, and water breaks; seating; and limits on lifting over 20 pounds.
 
Employers must provide notice of the protections and rights created by the PWFA to their employees in a Handbook or other means to all new employees at the commencement of employment and existing employees on or before January 1, 2018 and an employee who notifies the employer of a pregnancy or related condition within 10 days of such notification.  Employers should act now to create policies to satisfy this provision.
 
Please contact a member of our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Group if you have any questions about your organization's obligations under the PWFA, including the drafting and implementation of policies.


Worcester Office
Mercantile Center 
100 Front Street
Worcester, MA  01608
t 508.791.8500
f 508.791.8502
Westborough Office
1800 West Park Drive
Suite 400
Westborough, MA  01581
t 508.898.1501
f 508.898.1502
Boston Office
175 Federal Street
Suite 1220
Boston, MA 02110


Mirick O'Connell is a full-service law firm with offices in Worcester, Westborough and Boston, Massachusetts.  The Firm's principal practice groups include Business;
Construction Law; Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy and Reorganization; Elder Law; Family Law and Divorce; Health Law; Intellectual Property; Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits; Land Use and Environmental Law; Litigation; Personal Injury; Public and Municipal Law; and Trusts and Estates.
This client alert is intended to inform you of developments in the law and to provide information of general interest.  It is not intended to constitute legal advice regarding a client's specific legal issues and should not be relied upon as such.  This client alert may be considered advertising under the rules of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.