If images are not visible, click on Webpage version at top of newsletter

The NAHLN Update |2015| 
Volume 6, No. 2

 

THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH LABORATORY NETWORK (NAHLN)
A STATE AND FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP TO SAFEGUARD ANIMAL HEALTH

Founding Principles and Features of the NAHLN 

 

  • Quality management standards
  • Competency of laboratory personnel
  • Standardized diagnostic techniques
  • Reference materials and equipment
  • Secure communications and reporting system
  • Adequate facilities to ensure biosafety/biosecurity levels
  • Assessment of preparedness through scenario testing
     

 

Quick Links

 NVSL
 

 

For quick viewing, click below on the articles that interest you!

 

In This Issue
Message from NAHLN Leadership
Highlights from the 2015 AAVLD/USAHA Annual Meeting
NAHLN EDWG Preparedness Workshop
NAHLN Updates reported to various AAVLD/USAHA Committees
NAHLN Laboratory Director Feature
Getting to Know Us
VS Surveillance Update
NAHLN Facts
Acronym Key

 Events in 2015 

 

December 6-8

2015 Conference of Research Workers in Animal Disease (CRWAD) Annual Meeting

Chicago, IL


 

Message from NAHLN Leadership  
 
For many of us, 2015 has been a very busy year. The U.S. animal health community faced an unprecedented outbreak of high pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). We have also experienced outbreaks of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) in a number of western States, on-going Swine Enteric Coronavirus Diseases (SECD), and increased incidence of Seneca Valley Virus (SVV) emerging in swine. In addition to these outbreak events, we all continued to complete our daily missions and responsibilities for safeguarding U.S. animal health. These challenges provided our network the opportunity to illustrate the breath of cooperation, collaboration, dedication and value NAHLN provides for animal health.
In this edition of the NAHLN Newsletter, you will read about the cooperation of NAHLN labs demonstrated when the network activated to respond to HPAI by strategically shifting samples among labs and sending trained personnel to assist other labs with higher demand.
You will learn about the collaboration among labs to discuss lessons learned and specifics for improving for the next outbreak during the Exercises and Drills Preparedness Workshop.
The finalization of the details for implementing the restructure of the network demonstrates the incredible dedication by the NAHLN Coordinating Council, the NAHLN Program Staff and our partners at NIFA for developing a very thorough and transparent process.
Finally, we hope you will see the value of NAHLN reflected in numerous ways, including: new initiatives such as anti-microbial resistance (AMR) activities,  significant advances in number of labs electronic messaging test results, and activities that NAHLN continues to support as fundamental to the network- quality management system trainings is just one example. Whatever your role is as a NAHLN stakeholder, we hope you can take a few moments to read about the year's activities and appreciate all we've accomplished across the network!
2016 promises to be busy for the NAHLN program staff as well.  Our priorities include:
  • implementing of the new NAHLN structure;
  • continueing to progress toward codification in 9CFR;
  • continuing to improve electronic result messaging;
  • implementing the laboratory aspect of the National List of Reportable Animal Diseases and emerging diseases;
  • exploring AMR methods standardization and data collection mechanisms; and
  • implementing business process improvement projects to improve program management efficiency.

Luckily, we have a fantastic team-- including our new Associate Coordinator, Dr. Beth Harris (welcome!) and great collaborators- so we can successfully accomplish our goals!

 
 

Input Welcome!

   
We appreciate hearing from you!   Are there other topics that you would like to hear about? 
 
Please e-mail your comments to us at

Current Number of Subscribers:

  

1616 

   

  

  

 

Highlights from the 2015 AAVLD/USAHA Annual Meeting  

 

NAHLN Exercises and Drills Working Group (EDWG) Preparedness Workshop
  • The first NAHLN EDWG official meeting at the annual AAVLD/USAHA meeting was a success! The NAHLN EDWG- sponsored Preparedness Workshop provided a forum for NAHLN laboratories hit hardest by the HPAI outbreak to describe the effects of the outbreak on their labs. The labs provided a brief overview of the impact HPAI had on their laboratory as well as 2-3 examples of what went well and 2-3 examples of what did not go well and why.  Representatives from Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, South Dakota's Animal Disease Research & Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Guelph Animal Health Lab and British Columbia Animal Health Center shared their experiences. Some of the highlights to report include:
    • The exercises and drills provided to the laboratories by NAHLN have helped identify and address gaps.
    • Being able to incorporate emergency response into normal business routine and expand functionality vs changing functionality is essential. 
    • Labs in states where premises IDs were readily available and where field staff could pool samples before they reached the lab were ahead of the game.  
    • Capacity of individual laboratories was never maxed out.  However, sample delivery at odd times and in low numbers stressed the efficiency of some labs. 
    • Accessioning was a limiting factor due to: samples submitted with incomplete information, namely the premises ID; samples submitted by owners instead of regulatory field staff or veterinarians; excessive packaging and Virkon; and the need to reformat tubes for further processing.
    • Dealing with glass tubes in BSL-3 facilities and local requirements, such as needing a respirator for work with undiagnosed high risk samples, were challenges.
    • A potential shortage of testing kits caused concern, especially given the urgency placed on decreasing turn-around-time, "same day wasn't good enough". 
    • The responsiveness of NVSL and NAHLN in handling requests associated with proficiency testing, IT issues, and protocol questions was appreciated.
    Almost 80 people participated in the discussion, including many representatives from labs preparing for the reappearance of HPAI. The group further emphasized that consideration must be given to packaging material disinfection from sample delivery; setting delivery times and expectations for clients; and assigning personnel that can handle communication with clients. Hopefully the information and interaction will help all labs as they prepare for the potential return of HPAI.
     
    Dr. Mia Torchetti briefed the group about the overall response plan and how NVSL helped states with their individual responses. She also discussed specifics of the testing protocol, describing them as adequate in identifying the H5 infection. However, NVSL also approved planned deviation to protocols along the way to quickly address an evolving situation.
     
    Dr. Deep Tewari presented on Mobile lab use during an outbreak situation. Discussion followed that helped identify what options exist and where mobile lab capabilities are located. In order to consider the addition of a mobile lab for use during an outbreak, the NAHLN has developed criteria to follow in order to make sure mobile labs will meet the minimum quality standards of the network. NAHLN labs can operate a mobile lab in the area of the outbreaks after approval, as long as need is demonstrated and quality and safety issues can be addressed. Use of such labs will depend on specific situations.
    Article submitted by Christina M. Loiacono, DVM, PhD, DACVP, Associate Coordinator, NAHLN Program Office,  USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Ames, IA.
  • NAHLN Updates reported to various AAVLD/USAHA Committees
    NAHLN Restructure
    APHIS and NIFA worked in conjunction with NAHLN Coordinating Council on details, transition and implementation of NAHLN restructure, based on 2013 NAHLN Concept Paper. The overall process for determining needs and lab distribution involved 4 steps over the last year:
    The group used a decision matrix to assess each laboratory before recommending laboratory distribution. The decision matrix is an objective and justifiable tool that is reflective of the main criteria of concept paper, self-assessment and key NAHLN mission factors. A combination of minimum criteria and percentage of total matrix points were used to determine each lab's level.
    The available APHIS and NIFA funding for lab infrastructure funds will be distributed among Level 1, 2 and 3 laboratories based on combined percentage of testing capacity that each level provides.
    The group developed a plan to reassess both lab classification and funding. On an annual basis, funding distribution based on available funds and number of labs per level. A full network assessment will occur every three years to update capacity and evaluate the use of the matrix. The new structure will be implemented in 2016; funding adjustments will be made with 2016 funding cycles - March 2016 (APHIS) and June 2016 (NIFA).

     
    HPAI Response and Fall Preparedness Efforts
    A total of 17 NAHLN laboratories were involved in the 2015 outbreak response to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). As of October 30, 2015, these laboratories ran approximately 95,000 PCR assays and conducted 1300 virus isolations. The network was activated which included: the direction of samples to other NAHLN labs and deployment of personnel from one NAHLN lab to another to increase local capacity. The NAHLN program continues to prepare for the reappearance of HPAI by finalizing a funding mechanism for deployed NAHLN lab staff, finalizing mobile laboratory activation criteria, and working with commercial companies regarding reagent availability.
    VSV Response
    In response to the ongoing Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) outbreak, NVSL-DVL validated a VSV PCR test in spring 2015. In May, the NAHLN program office deployed the test to those NAHLN laboratories previously approved for VSV testing. Once NVSL confirmed the first case of VSV in the state, the NAHLN laboratory was eligible for activation. This allowed the laboratory to use the PCR and Compliment Fixation assays for testing cases from clinically ill equine species with VSV compatible clinical signs located within the State. Since May, five laboratories have been activated for VSV testing.
    NVSL continues to provide confirmation testing for new states, ruminants and any inconclusive results.
    Quality Management Systems Training
    The original Quality Management System (QMS) course in 2010 was developed to assist the NAHLN laboratories in implementing and continually improving quality management systems; it has since expanded to assist other laboratory networks and international colleagues. In 2015, the NAHLN program office and AAVLD trainers provided QMS training to 50 participants from the Plant Protection and Quarantine's Center for Plant Health that included participants from the Science and Technology Laboratory in Beltsville, MD, National Plant Board and the National Clean Plant Network. In August 2015, the NAHLN program office, International Services (IS), Veterinary Services' Professional Development Staff (PDS), and AAVLD trainers offered the annual QMS training course in Ames, IA. Forty-five participants from NAHLN laboratories and 21 participants representing 14 countries participated in the training. The three-and-a-half day training provided an interactive class environment that included topics such as: quality management system requirements, document control, internal auditing, corrective actions, root cause analysis, and a mock audit. Additionally, the development and expanded use of the on-line QMS training-- a collaboration between AAVLD, Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory and NAHLN--continued in 2015 and will be on-going in 2016.
    Laboratory Messaging
    The network continues to make advancements in laboratory messaging. Veterinary Services can now receive electronic messages, using the Health Level 7 (HL7) standards, for 9 diseases, up from 5 last year. There are currently 20 NAHLN laboratories actively messaging, with 10 additional laboratories actively working to build their capability. The integration of laboratory data into VS' Emergency Management Response System (EMRS 2.0), which was successfully demonstrated with the SECD outbreak in 2014 has proven essential for the HPAI response. Additionally, the NVSL is now routinely messaging confirmatory results for several diseases. In 2016, we plan to: expand the number of labs messaging and the diseases for which VS can receive HL7 messages; integrate with other internal  systems to automatically move lab/testing data; and explore collaboration and integration of lab data to support other initiatives.
    NAHLN Portal
    We made several improvements to the NAHLN Portal in 2015. These improvements include the continued integration with the Laboratory Capacity Estimation Model (LCEM).  This, eliminates the need for double entry of some information fields related to laboratory capacity - they now automatically move into LCEM from the Portal. Additionally, we implemented a new method for managing security roles, providing NAHLN laboratories more flexibility for accessing, updating and editing their information within the Portal. We continue to work with NVSL personnel to expand the proficiency testing module by adding non-NAHLN laboratories and personnel for APHIS-approved testing. This includes mechanisms for both NAHLN labs and non-NAHLN labs to receive invitations to participate in upcoming proficiency tests (PTs), register participants, and enter PT test results through the Portal. Laboratory personnel can also acknowledge receipt and download current standard operating procedures released to their labs, provide electronic copies of accreditation documents and enter assay performance monitoring data.
    To help showcase these improvements, the NAHLN program office is developing a series of training webinars for NAHLN laboratories on Portal functions for 2016. We anticipate hosting the initial training on proficiency testing in January, with other training modules to follow approximately once a quarter. The training will cover equipment management, assay monitoring and managing cooperative agreements/blanket purchase agreements through the Portal.
     
    NAHLN Methods Technical Working Group
    The NAHLN Methods Technical Working Group (MTWG) met in March 2015. Topics included updating the charter to restructure the group and expand membership opportunities. Under the new structure, there will be general and core members. All NAHLN laboratories will be encouraged to name a representative to the general membership. Bi-monthly conference calls will be held with the general membership to share information, provide opportunities for feedback and offer a platform to request volunteers in specific areas where expertise is needed. The core committee will consist of federal employees and state partners, identified by expertise, and lab level representatives who serve on a rotational schedule. These members will lead sub-groups that address specific topics based on identified needs and projects by the general membership.
    With the 2015 HPAI outbreak, the MTWG evaluated several requests for changes in instrumentation or procedures to increase efficiency during surge testing. These requests led to multiple methods and instrument comparisons that the group conducted and/or reviewed. The MTWG continues to evaluate these and other requests for the most efficient use of NAHLN laboratory resources. Additionally, the group finalized the dossiers for real time RT-PCR for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) virus in bulk tank milk, the FMD pen-side antigen assay and FMD serological negative cohort studies in 2015. The dossier for real time RT-PCR for African swine fever was presented and reviewed. Upcoming dossiers for review include methods comparison study was conducted to compare 3 different master mixes for use to test HPAI samples. Finally, the group continued their routine review and providing input on a number of NVSL Standard Operating Procedures for NAHLN assays.
     
    NAHLN Exercises and Drills Working Group
    The NAHLN Exercises and Drills Working Group (EDWG) completed a hands-on receiving/accessioning exercise in 2015. Fourteen NAHLN laboratories participated in this FMD table-top exercise.  They received increments of increasing numbers of mock-samples in their laboratories to process through the receiving and accessioning sections over a three day period. Feedback from the laboratories was very helpful in identifying gaps that can be addressed, including support from the NAHLN program office. Responses were very positive and lessons learned should provide labs with useful information to help them improve their emergency response plans. Additionally, the EDWG is working towards an exercise program that includes regular drills, exercises targeting specific areas and processes in labs, and utilization of virtual tools such as LCEM and the NAHLN Portal to train and overall enhance preparedness in laboratories. In 2015, the NAHLN program office conducted four drills were including capability and capacity information related to CSF and FMD testing.
    Engagement in Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
     
    VS has been charged with implementing a number of activities related to Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). NAHLN program staff and NVSL's Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory (DBL) engaged AAVLD and FDA to form a joint working group.  The working group will design an implementation plan for collecting and analyzing AMR data generated in US veterinary diagnostic laboratories. As part of this overarching goal, the working group finalized a survey that AAVLD administered to veterinary diagnostic laboratories in September, with preliminary results being presented at this year's AAVLD Bacteriology Committee. Next, the committee will focus on defining standard testing methodology, data collection, needs and gaps that may impact implementation of a national surveillance plan.
     
    National List of Reportable Animal Diseases and Emerging Disease Implementation Planning
      
    A joint working group consisting of members of the National Animal Health Reporting System (NAHRS) Steering Committee and the National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) Coordinating Council was formed to develop a draft implementation plan for the National List of Reportable Animal Diseases (NLRAD), including emerging diseases, which will be shared with stakeholders for comment. Topics addressed in the plan include triggers, timeline, confidentiality/proprietary issues and case definition for reporting of emerging diseases, including case definition, and other NLRAD listed diseases.
    Aquaculture
    The first phase of integration of aquaculture testing into the NAHLN is successful; NAHLN labs approved for Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia virus (VHSV) and Infectious Salmon Anemia virus (ISAV) completed the first round of proficiency tests. Eleven NAHLN labs will be testing for VHSV and six NAHLN labs will be testing for ISAV. The proposed Phase 2 of the process is to invite other Federal and State non-NAHLN laboratories (e.g., U.S. FWS Fish Health Laboratories) and private aquatic animal health testing laboratories to consider applying for NAHLN approval and test for the approved aquatic diseases using standardized requirements. This phase can occur once the NAHLN restructure is completed, which will allow for the possibility of including private laboratories into the NAHLN. Preparation for Phase 3 will occur concurrently with VS aquaculture staff holding discussions with stakeholders to identify additional diseases  to be added to the aquatic animal pathogen group within the NAHLN scope.
    Resolutions from USAHA/AAVLD Annual meeting
    There were a number of resolutions put forward from various committees that may be of interest to NAHLN stakeholders. The resolutions can be found at http://www.usaha.org/Reference/USAHAResolutions/2015USAHAResolutions.aspx .

    Article submitted by Christina M. Loiacono, DVM, PhD, DACVP, Associate Coordinator, NAHLN Program Office,  USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Ames, IA;  Beth Harris, M.S., PhD., Associate Coordinator, NAHLN Program Office, USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Ames, IA; and Sarah M. Tomlinson, DVM, NAHLN Coordinator, USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Fort Collins, CO.

    NAHLN Laboratory Director Feature
     
    Featured NAHLN Laboratory Director:   
    Debbie Reed DVM, MPH

     
    Academic/Laboratory Background:               
    Dr. Debbie Reed 
    Laboratory Director
    Breathitt Veterinary Center  

    Dr. Debbie Reed received her Bachelor of Science  and Masters of Science Degrees at Western Kentucky University, in Bowling Green KY.  She received her DVM at Auburn University in Auburn, Alabama and her Masters of Public Health from Western Kentucky University.  She was the owner of a mixed private practice for 18 years before accepting the position of Case Coordinator for Breathitt Veterinary Center (BVC) in 2006.  Dr. Reed became the BVC Interim Director in 2014 and was name the Director of the lab in 2015.

     
     
      Is there anything unique in your career that you'd like to share?
    "I have discovered that my practice background is a bit of an anomaly.  While many NAHLN lab directors are pathologists or academicians, my time in practice has made me better appreciate the assistance that a NAHLN lab can give to the general practitioner.  Not only can I give advice on tests available and correct samples, as a former practitioner, I understand the difficulties of obtaining samples and keeping paperwork free from contaminants!"
     
    How long have you been Director?
    Dr. Reed  became Interim Director July 1, 2014 and was named Director on January 31, 2015.
     
    What brought you to a NAHLN Laboratory?
    "I accepted the position as Case Coordinator in 2006 and became heavily involved in helping our referring veterinarians understand how the lab works and how to get the best results from our lab.  Not all practicing veterinarians understand how samples move through the lab; the more insight they have about the mechanics of the lab and the science behind the tests, the better choices they make in selecting samples and tests.  The NAHLN component of diagnostic lab work is a great addition to the services we can offer and the assistance that can be offered to veterinary diagnostic labs."
     
    Do you have any hobbies that you'd like to share with us?
    "I do yard work and gardening, scrapbook and other crafty pursuits, and do a little part time livestock farming."
     
    Lastly, why is NAHLN important to you?
    "As a laboratory director, I know that NAHLN is an important backup to our lab activities.  NAHLN is so important in keeping all the labs and the NVSL in communication as well as providing training for staff, and helping us prepare for those "what-ifs" that we hope never arrive.  The coordination effort that NAHLN has provided between federal and state laboratories gives opportunities that would not have occurred without NAHLN.  The BVC is very proud to be a member of the NAHLN network, and will continue to work within the framework to advance diagnostics, animal health and human health."
     
    Welcome to the NAHLN, Dr. Debbie Reed!
     
    Article submitted by Traci Imlau, Program Assistant, NAHLN Program Office, USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Ames, IA.
    Getting to Know Us - Beth Harris

    Beth Harris M.S. Ph.D.,

    Associate Coordinator,

    National Animal Health Laboratory Network

    USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL

    Beth Harris joined the NAHLN program staff as an Associate Coordinator in March 2015. Beth received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln and a Master of Science from University of Maryland, College Park. After graduating from University of Maryland, she briefly worked at the University of Missouri, Columbia in the Animal Science department before moving to Nebraska. There, Beth was at the University of Nebraska Veterinary Diagnostic Center for several years before going back to school for her doctorate degree. After graduating with her PhD in 2001, she started with National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) as an APHIS Science Fellow, working on Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in the Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory's Mycobacteria and Brucella (MB) Section. Beth worked in the MB section as a Microbiologist, then as the Section Head until 2011. Beth transferred to the NVSL Director's Office as Chief of Staff and was in that position prior to joining the NAHLN Program Office.
     
    In her current position, Beth will be taking on some of the new initiatives that NAHLN is involved in, such as antimicrobial resistance. She'll also be working with the Methods Technical Working Group in various capacities and overseeing some of the projects involving sequencing, such as whole genome sequencing for Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD).
     
    Beth is married to Brad Coates, who is a research geneticist for the Insect and Crop Genetics Research Unit at USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS). They have one son, TJ, and one soon to be daughter-in-law, Millei Ishikawa. Some may remember that Millei worked for the NAHLN Program Office while attending college at Iowa State University. In her free time, Beth states she is addicted to gardening, cooking and genealogy.
     
    We are excited to welcome Beth as a member of the NAHLN team!
      Article submitted by Traci Imlau, Program Assistant, NAHLN Program Office, USDA APHIS VS STAS NVSL, Ames, IA.
    NAHLN Surveillance Update
     
    The NAHLN continues to collaborate with other groups in APHIS, such as the NVSL reference laboratories; Wildlife Services; Surveillance; Design and Analysis Unit; and the Surveillance Response and Preparedness Services Unit to design and implement surveillance programs in domestic and feral species. In fiscal year 2015, NAHLN laboratories participated in APHIS surveillance programs for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), classical swine fever (CSF), scrapie , influenza A virus in swine
    (IAV-S), and pseudorabies virus (PRV).
     
    NAHLN laboratories play a critical role in VS surveillance programs by providing rapid standardized testing and results reporting for the above-mentioned diseases that are targeted in national animal disease surveillance initiatives.
    Testing data provided in The NAHLN Update are based on results data that are available at the time of release of the newsletter. Testing numbers may change in future reports as new information is received and testing data are updated (for reference, see article in Volume 3, No. 2 edition titled, "Data dynamics within the SIV Surveillance Program, Why do the reports change?").

    BSEBovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance

    The USDA has conducted surveillance for BSE since 1990. In 2004, following the December 2003 detection of BSE in an imported cow, USDA implemented an enhanced BSE surveillance program to more accurately determine the prevalence of the disease in the U.S. cattle population.
     
    USDA concluded that the prevalence of BSE in the United States is extremely low (less than 1 case per million adult cattle), and in 2006, transitioned to an ongoing BSE surveillance program that tests at a level more commensurate with this extremely low level of risk. Ongoing BSE surveillance exceeds guidelines set forth by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), providing testing at a level 10 times that which is recommended by OIE.
     
    On May 29, 2013, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack released a statement regarding notification received from the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) upgrading the United States' risk classification for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) to negligible risk. This was a significant achievement and it demonstrates OIE's belief that both our surveillance for, and safeguards against, BSE are strong.
     
    The NAHLN laboratories have provided BSE surveillance testing since 2004.
    During FY 2015, six NAHLN laboratories were approved to conduct diagnostic testing for the BSE surveillance program. These laboratories conducted testing to detect BSE at the very low level of less than 1 case per million adult cattle, assess any change in the BSE status of U.S. cattle, and identify any rise in BSE prevalence in this country. The NVSL Pathobiology Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, serves as the national reference laboratory and performs surveillance and confirmatory testing on all samples identified as suspect (potential positive) for BSE by the NAHLN laboratories.
     
    The chart below shows sample testing performed, by quarter, for BSE by NAHLN laboratories (not including NVSL) in Federal fiscal years (FY) 2014 and 2015. The total number of animals tested for BSE by NAHLN laboratories in FY 2014 (October 2013 through September 2014) was 38,936. In FY 2015, 39,455 animals were tested.
     

     

     

     
    CSFClassical Swine Fever Surveillance  

     
    The CSF surveillance program was initiated in 2006 to rapidly detect CSF virus and monitor the risk of introduction of the virus in the U.S. swine herd. The CSF national surveillance program currently includes data obtained through six data sources or populations:
     
    • Diagnostic laboratory samples that meet CSF testing criteria
    • High-risk slaughter swine
    • Feral swine samples
    • Samples from high-risk on-farm swine
    • Samples from high-risk slaughter plants in Florida and Texas
    • Samples from high-risk populations in Puerto Rico


    NAHLN laboratories conduct CSF surveillance testing and NVSL's Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL) is the CSF reference and confirmatory laboratory. In FY 2015, 24 NAHLN laboratories were approved to conduct diagnostic testing for the CSF surveillance program.


    The table below shows the number of animals tested for CSF by NAHLN laboratories in two target surveillance populations in FY 2014 and the first three quarters of FY 2015. Feral swine test counts are not included here and waste feeder/high probability for exposure data are not available at this time.

     
            

     
    SCRAPIEScrapie Surveillance
    USDA initiated the National Accelerated Scrapie Eradication Program in 2001 with the goal of eradicating scrapie from the U.S. sheep and goat populations. Since 2003, surveillance for the program has been conducted primarily through the Regulatory Scrapie Slaughter Surveillance (RSSS) program, which targets sheep and goat populations that have been recognized as having higher than average scrapie prevalence.


    Other scrapie surveillance also targets scrapie-exposed and potentially exposed sheep and goats found through investigations of infected animals; clinical-suspect animals and other mature sheep and goats submitted to veterinary diagnostic laboratories; rabies-suspect animals that test negative for rabies; and voluntary on-farm testing of flocks with risk factors for scrapie or as part of the Scrapie Flock Certification Program.


    In FY 2015, 17 NAHLN laboratories were approved to conduct diagnostic testing for scrapie surveillance. The NVSL Pathobiology Laboratory in Ames, Iowa serves as the national reference laboratory and performs surveillance and confirmatory testing on all samples identified as suspect (potential positive) by the NAHLN laboratories.


    The charts below show the number of animals, by quarter, tested for scrapie by the NAHLN laboratories in FY 2014 and FY 2015 (not including NVSL). In FY 2014, 45,670 animals were tested, and in FY 2015, 37,974 animals were tested.


     

     

     

     
    SIVInfluenza A Virus in Swine Surveillance
    The IAV-S surveillance program was initiated in May 2009 with a focus on monitoring the pandemic H1N1 2009 [pH1N1 (2009)] virus in swine. As the human health threat of pH1N1 (2009) declined in 2010, IAV-S surveillance efforts were re-focused on monitoring all current circulating IAV-Ss. Also in 2010, an anonymous submission protocol was adopted to encourage more industry participation and increase the number of samples available for monitoring IAV-S in the U.S. swine population.


    The goals of the IAV-S surveillance program are (1) to monitor the genetic evolution of endemic swine influenza A virus to better understand endemic and emerging influenza virus ecology, (2) make IAV-S isolates and associated epidemiologic data available for research and analysis, and (3) select proper isolates for the development of relevant diagnostic reagents, updating diagnostic assays, and vaccine seed stock products.


    IAV-S surveillance efforts are targeted towards three swine populations:
     
    • Case-compatible sick pig submissions to VDLs;
    • Swine exhibiting influenza-like illness at first points of concentration or commingling events such as auctions, markets, fairs, or other swine exhibition events;
    • Swine populations that have been epidemiologically linked to a confirmed isolation of swine influenza virus in a human.


    In FY 2015, 38 NAHLN laboratories were approved to conduct IAV-S surveillance testing. The NVSL Diagnostic Virology Laboratory in Ames, Iowa serves as the IAV-S reference laboratory.


    The table below shows the number of accessions tested, number of influenza-positive accessions, and number of accessions with virus subtyping results reported in FY 2014 and the first three quarters of FY 2015.


      *Influenza-positive accessions are those with samples with positive matrix assay results.
      
     
    PRV Pseudorabies Virus Surveillance
    The PRV surveillance program was initiated in 2009 as an extension of USDA's successful PRV eradication efforts. The program gathers surveillance data to support three specific objectives: (1) rapidly detect PRV entry and infection in U.S. commercial swine, (2) demonstrate freedom from PRV in commercial herds, and (3) monitor domestic sources of PRV.
     
    The overall PRV surveillance plan targets 8 specific swine population segments to meet these objectives (surveillance streams):
     
    • Swine cases reported to State and Federal officials as suspicious for PRV*;
    • Sick pig submissions to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs)*;
    • Routine serology and herd profiling*;
    • Swine with high probability of feral swine exposure*;
    • Swine with known feral swine exposure*;
    • Cull sow/boars at slaughter;
    • Market swine at slaughter;
    • Feral swine.


    PRV-approved NAHLN laboratories conduct testing in support of 5 of those surveillance streams, as indicated by the * above.  Additionally, NAHLN laboratories also conduct PRV testing for domestic swine samples that are submitted as part of epidemiologic trace back investigations.
     
    In FY 2015, 14 NAHLN laboratories were approved to conduct PRV surveillance testing. The NVSL Diagnostic Virology Laboratory serves as the national reference laboratory and performs confirmatory testing for suspect and positive submissions for PRV.


    In FY 2014, NAHLN laboratories tested 276,652 swine under the PRV surveillance program in the following streams: diagnostic laboratory serologic submissions, sow-boar slaughter, and market slaughter. In the first 3 quarters of FY 2015, 187,937 swine were tested. This includes 32,426 swine for the PRV diagnostic laboratory stream in FY 2014 and 18,665 swine in the first three quarters of FY 2015.

      
     
    The surveillance information in this article has been provided by the responsible USDA APHIS offices.
     
    Charts in this article are based on information and test results available at the time of report generation.  Numbers are subject to change due to later reporting of test results and updates in the database(s).
     
    NAHLN Facts
      
    Archived issues of  The NAHLN Update.

    The following links show a map and laboratory list of the laboratories that have been approved as part of the NAHLN testing network (including NVSL):

    AI Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    ASF Testing Laboratories: Map and Laboratory List
    BSE Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    CWD/Scrapie IHC Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    CWD ELISA Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    CSF Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    FMD Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    IAV-S Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    ISA Testing Laboratories: Map and Laboratory List
    NDV Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    PRV Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    VHS Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    VSV Testing Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List 
    Original 12 NAHLN Laboratories:  Map and Laboratory List
    For more information on the NAHLN, visit the NAHLN Homepage

    Acronym Key


    Click Here for Volume 6, No. 2 Acronym Key 

     

    Join Our Mailing List!

    If images are not visible, click on Webpage version at top of newsletter