www.Naaleh.com

Newsletter Contents
Printable Version of This Week's Parsha Newsletter
Refua Shleima List
Featured Classes
Student Testimonial
Parshat Matos- Final Acts
Ascending the Level of Holiness
G-d's Love of Israel.
Now when you shop on Amazon you can help support Naaleh Torah Online!

Click here for more info and to start shopping while supporting Torah NOW!!
Protect the Soldiers in Israel!

Sign up at ShmiraProject.com to receive the name of a soldier to daven for and do mitzvahs for their protection.
Thinking of going back to school for your Associates or
Bachelors Degree?

Consider joinging Naaleh College this Fall!
  • Earn Bachelor's Degrees in:
    • Psychology
    • Business Management
    • Computer Information Management
    • Judaic Studies
    & Associate's Degrees in:
    • Computer Information
    • Graphic Design
Apply now for Fall Semester!
 


Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
Refua Shleima List

Esther Leora bas Chava  
Reuven Peretz ben Fayge Chaya

Dovid ben Bracha

Michelle bas Noach  
Avigail Rachel bas Zahava Sarah

Hillel ben Shimon

Rachel bas Simcha

Natanel Menachem Avroham Ben Rochel

Rochel bas Zahava

 

Please send in any names to daven for to contact@naaleh.com 

Student Testimonial 

"Thank you for this wonderful, wonderful site. I can't begin to express how great it is to be able to listen to whatever shiur on whatever topic whenever it works. Amazing."

- Anonymous



Send in your comments to contact@naaleh.com and they might appear it an upcoming newsletter! 

Quick Links...
Dear Naaleh Friend,
 
During the Three Weeks we have time to reflect and especially now, with all that is happening in Israel, we encourage you to take the time to daven and learn in the zechut of the soldiers and citizens of Israel.

This week we have featured a class from our newest Naaleh.com series called Mourning and Forgiveness.  In this series we learn about Tisha B'Av, the themes of loss and redemption in the haftarot of the months of Av and Elul, and an analysis of the obligations we have to each other during the month of Elul. 
The first class, entitled Reality of Redemption is by Mrs. Shira Smiles and in this class Mrs. Smiles discusses the underlying message of the 3 weeks.

You can view the featured shiur by clicking on the image below:


Be sure to check out this week's Torat Imecha below and view the printable version here.

As always, visit our website Naaleh.com to learn more and watch thousands of FREE classes on various Torah and Jewish topics.

Shabbat Shalom and may we only share good news, 

Ashley Klapper and the Naaleh Crew
Dedicated in memory of Rachel Leah bat R' Chaim Tzvi
Torat Imecha- Women's Torah

Parsha Journeys: Parshat Matos-Masei 

Based on a Naaleh.com class by Rabbi Hanoch Teller 

The tribe of Levi did not inherit a portion in the land of Israel. Instead they were given cities scattered throughout the land which also served as cities of refuge for unintentional murderers. In a good environment among the Leviim who were scholars and educators, they could be influenced to repent and become righteous people.

 

The Torah tells us that there were signposts throughout the land pointing to the cities of refuge, while there were no such markers leading to Jerusalem. Rav Dessler explains that one is meant to feel revulsion when speaking to a murderer. But if one is exposed to such people numerous times, one becomes inured. Therefore to maintain the Jews' sensitivity there were signs posted throughout the land so that there would be minimal interaction. In contrast, going up to Jerusalem is a mitzvah. Hashem wanted as many people as possible to come to the beit hamikdash. Therefore he made it difficult for people to find the way so that they would ask others how to get there. In this way more Jews would be influenced and inspired to ascend to the holy city.


 

 

 

Writing on Shabbat

Based on a Naaleh.com class by Rabbi Michael Taubes 

 

The Gemara says the 39 melachot (activities forbidden on Shabbat) correspond to the creative activity that was done in the mishkan. One only transgresses Shabbat on a d'orayta level (Torah mandated level) by doing work that was done in the mishkan. There are a number of sources that detail how writing was used in the mishkan. Each of the kerashim (boards) that made up the tabernacle had to be marked to know where to reposition it after traveling. Moshe made an exact reckoning of everything that was collected for the mishkan. The jewels on the breastplate of the kohen gadol had the name of each tribe carved on it.

 

The Gemara notes that one is allowed to write up the deed of a sale of land in Israel on Shabbat because of the prime importance of the mitzvah of settling Eretz Yisrael. Rashi says this means that if a non-Jew wants to sell land immediately and the buyer is afraid the opportunity will be lost, he may ask a non -Jew to write up the contract on Shabbat. The Rambam and Shulchun Aruch accept this Gemara as it is written. However, the Rema says this is only permitted if the non-Jew writes up the document in his own language. He quotes the Ohr Zeruah that writing in Hebrew is an issur d'orayta and a non-Jew can only do an issur d'rabanun (Rabbinical prohibition) for a Jew. In this case it would be a shvus d'shvus, a double d'rabanun. The first d'rabanun would be asking the non-Jew to do work. The second d'rabanun would be writing in a foreign language. The view of the Ohr Zeruah is based on a Yerushalmi which says that the letters written on the planks of the mishkan were in Hebrew.

 

The Gemara in Eiruvin raises another question. The Torah allows a brit (circumcision) to be performed on Shabbat but the preparatory mitzvot related to it must be done beforehand. In the times of the Gemara, if hot water wasn't available for a brit, the mitzvah was not performed that day. It happened once at a brit on Shabbat that someone mistakenly spilled the hot water that had been prepared. Rabbah said, "Bring a pot of hot water from my house." His nephew Abaye countered, "How can we do this? There's no eruv and we can't carry?" Rabbah answered, "Ask a non-Jew to get the pot." It seems the Gemara permitted a non -Jew to do an issur d'orayta for a brit. However later, the Gemara brings another story. Again, there was no hot water for a brit. Rava said, "Ask the mother if she needs hot water. Since she's considered a cholah sheyesh bo sakana (an ill person in danger), one would be allowed to heat water for her and then use the extra water for the baby. This Gemara seems strange. Rabbah allowed a non-Jew to do melacha for a brit. Why was the mother needed? Tosfot points out that in fact one is not allowed to tell a non-Jew to do an issur d'oryata. In the first Gemara it was a shvus d'shvus, asking the non-Jew to carrying in a place that was only Rabbinically prohibited. However the Bahag disagrees and says one can ask a non-Jew to do a melacha d'orayta for a brit. In that case the mother was needed as there were no non-Jews around and a Jew was forced to heat the water.

 

The Rema rules like the Ohr Zeruah and Tosfot that writing in Hebrew is an issur d'orayta. Writing in all other languages is an issur d'rabanun. One can never allow a non-Jew to do something on a d'oryata level. One needs a shvus d'shvus even for the mitzvah of settling Eretz Yisrael. The Magen Avraham asks, how can the Ohr Zarua and the Rema permit a non-Jew to write on Shabbat when the Mishna says writing in any language is an issur d'orayta. The Noda B'Yehuda notes that the Ohr Zarua's opinion is a minority view. Most authorities rule that all writing is prohibited m'dorayta. However Tosfos says that the Gemara made one exception and permitted writing for the sake of the mitzvah of settling Eretz Yisrael.

 

The Torah says, "Zacher et yom ha'Shabbat ." The Gemara explains, "Zachreyhu al hayayin." We learn that there are three aspects to the mitzvah of kiddush. 1. One must express kedushat Shabbat (the holiness of the day) 2. It should be done on a cup of wine 3. The wine must be drunk. Most Rishonim maintain that kiddush is a mitzvah d'orayta. However there is a major disagreement among the Rishonim whether all three aspects are on the d'orayta level. According to the Meforosh all three aspects of kiddush are d'orayta. According to Tosfos in Pesachim the bracha on kiddush and reciting it on a cup is d'orayta and the drinking is d'rabanun. According to Tosfos in Nazir, the bracha is d'orayta, while saying it on a cup and drinking the wine is d'rabanun. The Rambam writes that reciting the words of kiddush and havdala is d'orayta. Saying it over wine is d'rabanun.

 

The Gemara asks, if one can't afford both candles for Chanukah and Shabbat which one gets priority? Rava answers one should buy Shabbat candles because of shalom bayit. If it is Shabbat Chanukah and one only has enough money for wine or Chanukah candles, Chanukah candles wins out because of pirsumei nisa (the mitzvah to publicize the miracle). The Ran, in keeping with the opinion of Rashi, writes that although the best way to fulfill the mitzvah is to make kiddush on wine, it can be said on bread too. So the Gemara debates what overrides.

 

Are we exempt from kiddush on Yom Kippur? If the halacha is like Rashi that the mitzvah dorayta is to sanctify the day on a cup of wine, then one is exempt. But according to the dominant view of the Rambam and Tosfos, one can have intention when one recites the kedushat hayom in Maariv and satisfy one's obligation of kiddush.

 

On Friday night we say two blessings in kiddush, Borei pri hagafen and Mekadesh Ha'Shabbat. There's a disagreement which blessing comes first. Beit Hillel says Borei pri hagefen takes priority because wine brings about the obligation for kiddush. In addition, our sages say, "Tadir v'sheino tadir tadir kodem." (That which is frequent is put before that which is less frequent.) The Nodeh B'Yehuda asks, we assume that the blessing of Mekadesh Ha'Shabbat is d'orayta and Borei pri hagafen is d'rabanun. Certainly a blessing that is d'orayta takes precedence over a d'rabanun. Why then is hagefen first? He answers that we rule like the Tosfos and the Rambam. Since we already sanctified the Shabbat during Maariv, kiddush at home is only d'rabanun. We can then debate which of the two Rabbinic brachot come first. He then asks, what if one didn't daven Maariv? Should Mekadesh Ha'Shabbat then precede hagefen? In addition, women generally don't daven Maariv. If she makes Kiddush for herself, should she first say Mekadesh Ha'Shabbat? The Shaagas Aryeh explains that when a few mitzvot are performed in a series and one is dorayta and the other d'rabanun, the dorayta doesn't necessarily have to come first. Perhaps Chazal wanted a context of dorayta and the d'rabanun could come first. So we keep the order as it is.

 

The Shulchan Aruch states that a woman could technically exempt a man with Kiddush as she is obligated in the mitzvoth of Shabbat just as men are. However the Mishna Berura notes that if there are other men outside the family present, she should not do so for reasons of modesty. The Noda B'Yehuda asks, can a man who has fulfilled his d'orayta obligation of Kiddush in Maariv exempt a women with kiddush if she hasn't prayed?

 

The Rosh brings two contradictory Gemaras in Brachot. Are women obligated in bentching on a d'orayta or d'rabanun level? There are some parts of the text that don't apply to women such as, "Al britcha shechasmta..." and "Al haretz shehinchalta..." So assuming a women is only obligated m'darabanun can she exempt a man who has a d'orayta obligation? The second Gemara tells the story of King Yannai who was eating a meal with his wife. When they finished they realized they had no one to bentch for them. His wife suggested they call Rav Shimon ben Shetach who said, "I didn't eat with you, how can I bentch on your behalf?" He then ate a kezayit of bread and bentched for them. The Gemara points out that eating a kezayit only obligates a person to bentch m'drabanun. Yet Rav Shimon exempted King Yannai and his wife who had eaten a full meal and were obligated d'orayata. So we learn that one who is obligated d'rabanun can exempt someone who is obligated m'dorayta. The Rosh explains that a man maintains his arvut in all situations while women aren't in the category of arvut at all. Rav Akiva Eiger suggests that when a woman says Good Shabbat to her husband Friday night she has satisfied her d'orayta obligation.