CFEC Crane Logo 2012
August 12, 2015
In This Issue
Educational PLA Threats
Greenmail Exposed Three Times in One Week!
PLAs Approved
Monterey County Water Tunnel PLA Negotiations Not Going Well for Big Labor
Quick Links
Join Our List
Educational PLA Threats 
Of the 90 school bonds passed in November of 2014 alone, 17 have already been targeted for PLAs. Review these HERE and help us monitor the school board agendas of the others that are in your area. The more eyes the better!
 
This week alone the following school districts are considering the PLA issue:
 
Alameda Unified School District : $179,500 million bond under PLA threat. School district has had a presentation from PLA proponents and we have requested equal time. 
 

Fremont Unified School District : $295,000 million bond under PLA threat. The school board is having a presentation made tonight by staff on the PLA issue. We are working to educate the board about what one would mean for them.

We need you to do two things -  attend the meeting and contact the board!
 
When: TONIGHT , August 12, 2015 6:00pm
Where: Education Center Board Room
4210 Technology Drive
Fremont, CA 94538
 

View the board's contact info HERE.



Santa Clara Unified School District:  $419,000 million school bond under threat of a PLA. Tomorrow night (Thursday, August 13) the board will have presentations made to it by pro and anti PLA groups
 
We need you to do two things -  attend the meeting and contact the board!
 
When: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:30PM 
Where: Santa Clara Unified School District Board Room
1889 Lawrence Rd. Santa Clara

View the board's contact info HERE

View the agenda HERE.

Greenmail Exposed Three Times in One Week!
The infamous tactic of big labor special interests using environmental extortion to hold up construction projects until owners "agree" to place a PLA on them is well documented. Just this past week the issue was in the public eye once again:
 
 This Union Watch article by Kevin Dayton highlights exactly what is going on here. It's an excellent read that you should pass along to as many others as you can. 
 
Because of this article the San Diego Union Tribune penned this editorial blasting the use of greenmail by big labor special interests. This led to both Kevin Dayton and CFEC's Eric Christen being interviewed on AM 600 KOGO in San Diego!

PLAs Approved
The Port of Long Beach has approved negotiations with unions for a Port-wide PLA. CFEC has been fighting such an idea for more than 10 years during which time numerous projects have gone out to bid PLA-free. We are continuing to fight this issue and if you would like to be part of this effort contact us today.
 
The City of San Leandro city council has approved a Community Workforce Agreement  (PLA for those too embarrassed to use the term) with the Alameda County Building and Construction Trades Council for city construction projects valued above $1,000,000.00.

Monterey County Water Tunnel PLA Negotiations Not Going Well for Big Labor
As reported by Labor Issues Solutions' Kevin Dayton:
 
INTERLAKE TUNNEL PROJECT
 
HERE is a link to a June 15, 2015 letter from the Monterey/Santa Cruz Counties Building and Construction Trades Council expressing a lack of confidence in the Monterey County Water Resources Agency. Obviously this is pressure on the agency to move forward with implementation of a Project Labor Agreement.

As this June 16, 2015 Monterey County Herald article points out...

Meanwhile, a regional building and construction labor union sent a letter to the county on Monday criticizing water agency administration, including Chardavoyne, the second such letter from a prominent area organization on the subject.
 
The letter from the Castroville-based Monterey/Santa Cruz Counties Building & Construction Trades Council to the supervisors and agency board indicated council leadership had voted "no confidence" in the current agency administration, urging county officials to "look into this matter and take any and all actions to resolve this issue and put the (agency) on a firm and energetic foundation and road to progress."
 
Signed by council CEO Ron Chesshire and other council members, the letter questioned whether agency staff was "up to the challenge" of dealing with issues ranging from state-mandated groundwater basin monitoring and the Salinas River diversion permit to challenges involving the tunnel project and the Salinas Valley Water Project, along with budgetary difficulties.
 
"In our opinion, the Leadership (GM) has not made a full commitment to our community and seems distracted or unwilling to take on the issues as needed," the letter read. "Efforts need to be made to work with our Legislators as much as possible to solve problems. The current course we are on is vague. We need leadership, commitment, and a new energy to bring solutions to our County."
 
Chardavoyne said the trades council letter contained "misstatements of what the true facts are," and defended the agency's actions on several fronts. He suggested the letter's true motivation was a disagreement over the timing of negotiations on a project labor agreement for the tunnel project.