CFEC Crane Logo 2012
September 8, 2015
In This Issue
School Bond PLA Threat Update
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
City of Pinole Wastewater Treatment Plant
City of Alameda
Fort Ord Reuse Development
Imperial County
Quick Links
Join Our List
School Bond PLA Threat Update:
With more than $25 billion worth of school construction bonds out there to be worked on (from just 2012 and 2014 bonds alone!)   CFEC continues to monitor all of them for PLA activity. Here is a current update:
 
Sacramento City Unified School District: On September 4th CFEC's Eric Christen was joined by other merit shop associations and contractors in addressing the District's Facilities Committee about their plan to lower their PLA threshold from $1 million to $500,000. Apparently too much work is getting away from union bosses. Stay tuned.

Vacaville Unified School District: CFEC and our allies have attended the last two board meetings to monitor that District's PLA discussions with local big labor special interests, of which there have now been two. We will continue to watch these "negotiations." $194 million is at stake here.

Fremont Unified School District:
CFEC's Eric Christen addressed the Board of Trustees two weeks ago (you can read about his appearance in this news article) explaining why the PLA they were discussing was a bad idea. Six pro-PLA speakers spoke ahead of Eric. This issue comes back for discussion tomorrow ( September 9th) and we need contractors to attend the meeting to speak out against the PLA. The meeting begins at 6:30pm. Please contact CFEC today if you can join us. $650 million is at stake! 
 
San Mateo Community College District: Despite having placed PLAs on previous bond work the new board majority at this college appears to actually have the best interests of taxpayers and students at heart, vs big labor special interests. This is quite fascinating to watch and we will continue to monitor and be involved where we can. $388 million is at stake here.

Santa Clara Unified School District: Due to the chief PLA proponent on this District's Board of Trustees being insane we have reason to hope that we can kill a PLA here. Stay tuned! $419 million is at stake.

Salinas Union High School District:
Despite the Board already voting 4-1 for PLA negotiations to begin with local unions, staff at the District is running into all kinds of trouble. It appears unions have no desire to compromise on any language in the PLA, and why would they? CFEC and our allies are working aggressively behind the scenes to keep this PLA from ever taking effect. Stay tuned. $95 million is at stake.

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District: We have learned that unions are making a move on the bond approved by voters in 2012. We are currently helping to create a strategy that ranges from educational to recalling any board member who votes for a PLA. Stay tuned for this important fight! $398 million is at stake. 
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
As we have been reporting SMUD is being pressured by local big labor special interests to have a PLA placed on its headquarters renovation. CFEC and our allies have been working to see that this does not happen, or, at the very least, that it is an agreement that is fair for everyone. A Five Party Advisory Group has been created that includes the merit shop perspective. This group will help determine what is in the PLA that covers this project. If this is a project you would consider bidding and you are interested in helping to keep it open to all, please contact CFEC today.
City of Pinole Wastewater Treatment Plant
This $43 million project has been the center of contention since it was first considered over a year ago. The Pinole City Council has moved ahead with the PLA despite a clear conflict of interest with regards to the Mayor being employed by a union construction firm and the fact that its partner in this project, the City of Hercules, has voted to oppose the PLA. Last week the Pinole City Council voted to approve the "negotiated" PLA with local unions.
City of Alameda
For three years there has been discussion in this city about having a PLA placed on all city construction work. Last week the issue was scheduled to be discussed again but at 1:30am the council decided to delay the item despite CFEC's Eric Christen and ABC NorCal's Nicole Goehring being in the audience. Thankfully they were each allowed to speak to the council for three minutes each to express their thoughts on the issue.  It will now be brought back up for consideration on September 9.
Fort Ord Reuse Development
For years local big labor special interests have been trying to have all work here done under both prevailing wage and a PLA. The latest attempt comes compliments of the Mayor of the City of Marina (Bruce Delgado). He would like to explore the use of a PLA on the next Fort Ord project, a university dormitory complex. The City could insist on a PLA in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) needed with the project developer for the project to happen.

Here are questions he would like discussed, if needed, so City could be best informed on pros and cons of PLA at Promontory II:
 
1) The definition of local (e.g. tri-county, Monterey county, Monterey Bay cities)
2) Pros and cons to labor groups (local and non-local, union and non-union)
3) Pros and cons to AMCAL
4) Understanding of how a PLA may affect the number of bids and the submitted bid amounts
5) Estimate based on recent completed university dormitory of how many construction jobs in each trade there will be at proposed dormitory project
6) Estimate from local building trades of percent of estimated construction jobs could be supplied by local union or non-union contractors
7) Preferred number of apprentice slots based on #5 above
8) How a PLA may affect the quality of workmanship or the work completion schedule
9) Estimate of cost or cost savings to AMCAL of PLA
10) Estimate of economic value to the local area of a PLA (e.g. multiplier effect)
 
We will continue to monitor this issue and fight any imposition of a PLA.
Imperial County
CFEC's Eric Christen and other stakeholders who have been opposing a PLA on the County's $33 million jail expansion project will be meeting with County Supervisors today (Tuesday, September 8) to specifically ask how their proposed PLA does anything other than exclude contractors and increase costs.
 
The County has included a sample PLA in the projects RFP. It can be found here. It is a typical PLA with all the discriminatory provisions.